2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Gehenna]

Yeah, I’m calling fraud on that. Why all mail in and absentee? Aren’t in person votes usually the last to be tallied since they happen the latest? Seriously, GA needs to be called for Trump, these last minute ballots are probably all fakes, which is why they are stalling so much.

Actually, no. Military ballots can take up to a week to get to the polls after election day. While they get priority IN the states, they do not get so outside of them.

So they move at the speed of European mail.

 

[draggs]

The real action isnt muh dead people voting and muh literally fake ballots

The real action is theyre counting real ballots that are illegitimate because they weren't filled out right or it cant be proven that the signature is legit (which by itself doesnt mean the ballot was made up) and stuff like that

These states are completely ignoring their own laws to put ballots that SHOULD be tossed in the trash according to the law into Biden's total

That's why they dont want any Republicans watching and challenging ballots

Good chance the Supreme Court does invalidate lots of those ballots

Both sides will get something, Trump will win, commies will be able to cry that the SC stole it for Trump

 

[Gehenna]

The real action isnt muh dead people voting and muh literally fake ballots

The real action is theyre counting real ballots that are illegitimate because they weren't filled out right or it cant be proven that the signature is legit (which by itself doesnt mean the ballot was made up) and stuff like that

These states are completely ignoring their own laws to put ballots that SHOULD be tossed in the trash according to the law into Biden's total

Good chance the Supreme Court does invalidate lots of those ballots

Both sides will get something, Trump will win, commies will be able to cry that the SC stole it for Trump

This is why I think a normal recount may actually swing a significant, though perhaps not sufficient, number of votes.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

Not statistically impossible; just statistically crystal clear that you can reject the null hypothesis that this year is drawn from the same distribution as previous ones (being sloppy with my phrasing but whatever). That could be fraud, the ease of mail order ballots, TDS, or anything else. The statistics tell you something changed but not why nor whether it's legitimate or fraud. Maybe the dems finally found a solution to their turnout problem by making voting easy.

Like how 1353 doesn't tell you whether joggers commit more crime or are just more likely to be held accountable for it due to systematic racism (which is why it's so hilarious they censor that statistic so hard instead of just blaming white supremacy like they do for everything else) or the pay gap bullshit or whatever.

I think SCOTUS won't "favor Trump" so much as they'll follow the law. That's a big improvement on "critical justice" or whatever where they just rule against whitie, but it's not just the same thing on the other side. Winning in SCOTUS is going to depend on having a solid legal argument, presenting it well, and evidence to back it up. Given that his lawyers are Jewish and how widespread the irregularities were this year (IMO the fix was a rush job/plan B and they were smoking their own polling), there's a decent chance of that, but SCOTUS will and should reject an argument that boils down to correlation alone.

Couldn't irregularities be used to say that there needs to be a closer look into these results?

The real action isnt muh dead people voting and muh literally fake ballots

The real action is theyre counting real ballots that are illegitimate because they weren't filled out right or it cant be proven that the signature is legit (which by itself doesnt mean the ballot was made up) and stuff like that

These states are completely ignoring their own laws to put ballots that SHOULD be tossed in the trash according to the law into Biden's total

Good chance the Supreme Court does invalidate lots of those ballots

Both sides will get something, Trump will win, commies will be able to cry that the SC stole it for Trump

Could they also throw out ballots that arrived after election day?

This is why I think a normal recount may actually swing a significant, though perhaps not sufficient, number of votes.

Dems demanded that Jill Stein retract her recount suit in Wisconsin and Michigan in 2016 when Trump started pulling even more ahead. I wonder if they were worried about it revealing some deep rot.

 

[Tomboy Respecter]

Not statistically impossible; just statistically crystal clear that you can reject the null hypothesis that this year is drawn from the same distribution as previous ones (being sloppy with my phrasing but whatever). That could be fraud, the ease of mail order ballots, TDS, or anything else. The statistics tell you something changed but not why nor whether it's legitimate or fraud. Maybe the dems finally found a solution to their turnout problem by making voting easy.

Like how 1353 doesn't tell you whether joggers commit more crime or are just more likely to be held accountable for it due to systematic racism (which is why it's so hilarious they censor that statistic so hard instead of just blaming white supremacy like they do for everything else) or the pay gap bullshit or whatever.

I think SCOTUS won't "favor Trump" so much as they'll follow the law. That's a big improvement on "critical justice" or whatever where they just rule against whitie, but it's not just the same thing on the other side. Winning in SCOTUS is going to depend on having a solid legal argument, presenting it well, and evidence to back it up. Given that his lawyers are Jewish and how widespread the irregularities were this year (IMO the fix was a rush job/plan B and they were smoking their own polling), there's a decent chance of that, but SCOTUS will and should reject an argument that boils down to correlation alone.

That's fair. All I'm saying is that they should present the data and give an argument as to why they have a good reason to believe there is fraud. Not just the statistical anomalies, but the refusal to have pollsters do their job in their precincts and the current refusal to have the vote counters supervised by a representative of the Trump campaign.

 

[Ponderous Pillock]

Is this how we get the no shit fascist in 2024?

No, but a few rounds of ineffective, useless Congresses and Presidents will likely see someone do that.

 

[Thebag$$$]

Fox News is controlled opposition.

Then this nation is truly dead.

how does that connect to my question mate.

 

[Gehenna]

That's fair. All I'm saying is that they should present the data and give an argument as to why they have a good reason to believe there is fraud. Not just the statistical anomalies, but the refusal to have pollsters do their job in their precincts and the current refusal to have the vote counters supervised by a representative of the Trump campaign.

The case for fraud to the supreme court needs to be based on multiple things. Any one can be explained away. When you have five, though, those explanations start looking like lies. A single instance is an explainable mishap, several is a pattern.

how does that connect to my question mate.

It kinda does, Fox is in bed with the Democrats and called it early like dumbasses.

 

[The Pink Panther]

It's not fraud, we're simply in the transitioning phase from the United States of America to the Banana Republic.

The clothing brand?

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

how does that connect to my question mate.

That has everything to do with your question. Fox News has had refused to call states like Florida and Texas with 99.9% reporting, even when it was obvious Trump would win, while they called Arizona for Biden with something like less than half in.

 

[JambledUpWords]

Both sides will get something, Trump will win, commies will be able to cry that the SC stole it for Trump

They also would get so much more mileage out of it too compared to declaring Biden the winner. These people thrive off of being self victimized and this can just play into it more. Honestly, I’m hoping Trump wins just so I can see all the tears from these people claiming to be the underdogs.

 

[General Disarray]

Hell, I would be happy with just having the requirement to show any photo ID at this point.

It is absolutely ridiculous that I have never had to show a document to prove that I am me before voting. Just say my name, birthday, and address, and I'm good to go! What's to stop literally anyone from saying my name and address to take my vote from me? Nothing!

Wisconsin has voter ID, since mid Spring 2015. Absentee ballots are still prone to fraud as seen in the Governor election. How can we make that method more secure?

Small typo, you put 'jailed for life' in your post and I believe you meant "hung by the neck until dead" right there fam.

Why the hell do you think Kamala was pushing so hard to make lynching ~specifically~ illegal? They planned this out for a long time.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Did anyone post this? I may have missed it going through highlights. Office of the Inspector General contacted Project Veritas about their Michigan whistleblower.

Yeah, that's nice, but if those back-dated votes were already mixed in with the main count, they can't be traced back to be invalidated.

This whole fight against fraud is happening two weeks too late. It needed to happen like that PA SCOTUS case, where they ordered suspicious ballots to be segregated out so they can consider the issues later and remedy it. Republicans should have got court rulings in place ahead of time in every swing state saying late or day-of ballots would be segregated out for inspection. Before election day I said the postmark stamps needed to be seized at close of business 11/3 and swapped out for visibly different stamps; this is why.

Winning a court case saying "they shouldn't have done that" doesn't matter if you can't fix the thing that was done.

 

[Thebag$$$]

That has everything to do with your question. Fox News has had refused to call states like Florida and Texas with 99.9% reporting, even when it was obvious Trump would win, while they called Arizona for Biden with something like less than half in.

yeah but i was wondering why is arizona declared with 88% of votes counted.

 

[The Great Autismo]

The case for fraud to the supreme court needs to be based on multiple things. Any one can be explained away. When you have five, though, those explanations start looking like lies. A single instance is an explainable mishap, several is a pattern.

1. Lots of "typos" and errors all benefitting Biden
2. The refusal to allow Trump representatives into polling places
3. These constant pauses when Trump's shown to be leading
4. Pennsylvania Democrats' comments about how Trump won't win seem a bit suspicious to say the least
5. Sharpiegate

I don't know if it's strictly illegal or fraudulent, but the media companies clearly worked together to give Biden states early and refused to report Trump victories until hours later. Why would they all do that? To make a case for Biden miraculously winning by a hair after they find some miracle votes, which would mean this was all planned out from the beginning.

 

[verissimus]

How did they think they could get away with it? Maybe they thought the American public thinks like in twitter where everyone treats Harry Potter like it's a history book.

"I know we broke several Hogwarts laws but it was necessary to defeat Voldemort!"

"Bravo! 100 extra points for being stunning and brave!"

Repeat after me : Russian

You : Russian

Me: Collusion

You : ....

 

[Gehenna]

yeah but i was wondering why is arizona declared with 88% of votes counted.

The simple answer is "There is no good answer", it was wrong on the face of it and even CNN had the damn thing as a tossup. You are asking to explain someones stupidity, but you can't explain it beyond "They are stupid"

 

[JohnDoe]

Why the hell do you think Kamala was pushing so hard to make lynching ~specifically~ illegal? They planned this out for a long time.

It's not a lynching if you have a guilty verdict.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

The idea of a legislature in a purple state flipping the electors is a pipe dream.

The Republicans control the upper and lower houses of the Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania state legislatures. Given there's evidence of fraud and censorship and things are going to get much, much worse for Republicans if the Democrats get away with it, why not give it a try? It's not like any possible outcome of that can be worse than allowing the Democrats and their media buddies to take over.

Let’s be real here, a Biden “win” will just pacify AntiFa until they start to realize that Biden just sees them as the useful idiots they are. Also, lol at (some of) AntiFa even being in support of Biden when his VP is a prosecutor known for arresting people on the pettiest of crimes.

I must admit I'd get a certain amount of grim satisfaction to see the Democrat regime, having purged the right, purge AntiFa too. This is not out of the question - both Biden and Harris are long-term law and order hawks and one of the few times Biden seemed to show any life apart from defending Hunter was when he condemned riots. Sure he'd be told to do it, but I reckon happy memories of his announcement of the 1992 crime where he bragged it does everything but hang people for jaywalking flooded back into his Alzheimer's addled brain, much as normal people with Alzheimer's can still remember happy parts of their childhood. It's like he was salivating about another speech where he could be tough on criminals.

BLM and AntiFa are in for a rude awakening once the new regime has dealt with the GOP. It'll be like what happened to the SA once the Nazis took power and they were more of a liability than an asset.

Sorry if late, but:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1324386685858287616

https://archive.md/jFoul

View attachment 1709959

What was then was just the calm.

Get ready for the storm.

If you're a Republican in power now, it's fucking do or die time. If you let the Democrats steal this election you'll never be in power again. And you'll never be able to talk to the public again - the old media and the tech company trust will see to that. And everything you care about - the first and second amendments and the notion of a republic where politicians have checks and balances on them will disappear. At best your country will be as fucked as the UK and at worst it will be like some 20th Century dictatorship.

At this point, you might as well go down swinging. And for all Trump's faults, he's definitely someone who'll do that. Same as all the slightly crazy people like Bannon, Giuliani, and Gorka around him actually.

I hope Jack is proud of himself for censoring the president like this. If Trump wins at the end of all of this, he has plenty of proof to declare Twitter a publisher, especially with things surrounding the election. Also, Trump should consider a different platform after this and make Twitter lose revenue big time for it.

Yeah, if he survives he needs to nail Dorsey to the fucking cross.

I wonder if there'll be sites going down this evening.

Senate GOP finally stands up:
View attachment 1709999
Rate me , but I think there's now senate seats in GA and MI at risk, which is driving them to action.

Losing GA in January allows the Dems to control all three wings of government.

Well here's another thing. It's not just the Trump worshippers who see this as a threat. Any Republican with any power at all needs to realize that this time the Democrats stole the Presidency but they didn't manage to steal the down-ballot races. If Biden is President, you can bet those are next in line because the Democrat agenda of amnestying illegals, packing the Supreme Court, and adding states to get permanent power will require them to get control of all three wings of government. This means even the most RINO of Republicans needs to realize that they're next in line.

I know this all sounds apocalyptic but am I wrong? Does anyone see the Democrats as saying 'Well we got Biden over the line with fraud but that was a one-off. We'll leave the Republicans in the Congress and the state legislatures alone'

Not least because most Democrats are going to defend whatever happens to get rid of Trump as absolutely legal and above board.

Is John James suing for transparency? Maybe a black man fighting for fair voting will make someone take note of the fraud.

Yeah, just like the Democrats listen to Clarence Thomas because he's not white. Oh, wait, constantly call him an Uncle Tom and a rapist. I mean I'm no fan of political correctness but it's genuinely irritating to see how the Democrats treat ethnic minorities and women as soon as they step off the plantation.

The fuckery happening in Georgia right now is telling me one thing:

AZ and PA don't look good for Biden, so they're going with plan C.

I'm not sure it's as coordinated as that. I think every Democrat working in a polling station is doing absolutely everything they can to steal the election in all states that haven't been called by the media yet. Luckily this means a lot of what they're doing is going to be blatantly fraudulent and some of it will be detectably so. If it goes to court I could see Trump winning.

And, as I say, what's the alternative? Give up and accept the US is a one-party state? I think a lot of people would literally give their lives to stop that happening. And I'm not suggesting that, I'm just suggesting lots of autists nitpick the process until it comes apart enough for a good lawyer to convince ACB and co that it's fatally flawed.

Apart from a couple of months I've spent my life outside the US and trust me, you don't want to end up like anywhere but the US. There's no alternative system that offers an acceptable level of freedom. And if you let the Democrats steal the presidency and then silence anyone who complains the US is over.

View attachment 1710075
I don't have any words.

Kathy Boockvar is the one who unilaterally decided that mail-in ballots received for three days after the election could still be counted. Opposed by the Republican legislature, upheld by the state Supreme Court and the SCOTUS declined to hear the PA Republican's appeal.

I think it's safe to say that she's going to declare Biden the winner and that the result will be fake.

All this shit needs to go to court and every lost case needs to be appealed to the SCOTUS where the Republicans will win.

Also, there's the nuclear option that states with Republican legislatures of Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania just send Republican electors to the Electoral College regardless of how many boxes of fake ballots turn up at the counting stations, though I don't think we're at that point yet.

Because I'm unprincipled limey swine with no understanding of Liberty though, I'll defend the GOP if it comes to that. It will be a challenge, even for me, but I think I'll be able to rise to the occasion.

 

[draggs]

Yeah, that's nice, but if those back-dated votes were already mixed in with the main count, they can't be traced back to be invalidated.

This whole fight against fraud is happening two weeks too late. It needed to happen like that PA SCOTUS case, where they ordered suspicious ballots to be segregated out so they can consider the issues later and remedy it. Republicans should have got court rulings in place ahead of time in every swing state saying late or day-of ballots would be segregated out for inspection. Before election day I said the postmark stamps needed to be seized at close of business 11/3 and swapped out for visibly different stamps; this is why.

Winning a court case saying "they shouldn't have done that" doesn't matter if you can't fix the thing that was done.

Yes

SC might go this is unresolvable because now we cant separate shit so have the legislatures select the slate of electors