2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Looks like Trump won the Latino vote and Biden won the Latinx vote."

You mean Biden won the "Delusional" vote? I guess so...

For the record both here in Spain and at the other side of the pond, calling Latinos (or Latinas) "Latinx" will get you weird looks. Only a very small minority of crazy ass hardcore commies uses "x", and as I mentioned in the past, at least some years ago when there was a movement by feminists to use in writing a "neutral term" they used "@" (pronounced "at") which got less backlash mostly because it was fucking hilarious pronouncing words that way, but faded away for obvious reasons. So not only is the "x" hated by most people because it's an insult to our language, but it's even hated by those who would be ok with the "@", because it's just a bad copy of the "@" that can't be pronounced, doesn't actually seem like an A within an O, and looks like an eyesore.

Oh and also btw currently Spanish radical feminists are actually eating each other because there's a group that claims we need to make neutral terms (they use the "e" now, which at least has some grammatical sense... still sounds retarded and won't fly under my watch though) while the second wants even neutral terms to have A and O versions and the A and O to be used all the time, like "latinos and latinas", because they say if you don't do that you're "minusvalorating" women. So yeah... even the radicals by en large hate the fucking X just because it's a third contender to an already very stupid and heated fight. Seriously as some of you already know I was a commie when I was a teen and still know multiple contacts from back then that haven't gotten out of it, and even they hate it. Latinx is a fucking Anglican term, its linguistic colonialism.

So please if you're gonna push for bullshit changes to our language. At least use "@". That way people will hate you less because they'll get a chuckle, and laughing is always welcome.

Off-topic, but -

Esperanto-speaking troons are pushing for gender-neutral pronouns too, even though they already exist. Li and ŝi are he and she, and there is also ĝi (like the English it, but without the negative connotation and it's used for babies, inanimate objects and sometimes as a gender-neutral alternative to li and ŝi) and oni (which can mean "one", as in "one thinks that..." or the impersonal "they", as in "they say that...") And if that wasn't enough, there are a seperate set of words - kies (whose), ĉies (everyone's), ties (that person's), ies (someone's), and nenies (no-one's). No problem, right? Lots to choose from? Wrong! THEY'RE ALL TROONPHOBIC!

Naturally the pasty failures wearing mummy's blouse want special treatment, so they are pushing the use of "ri" as super-special troon pronoun. Oriental esperantists have a hard time pronouncing it as well, which I expect will cause some amusing meltdowns!
 
1604830481748.png


1604830472342.png
 
How widely used is Wikipedia nowadays? It's become so blatantly corrupt and biased it's not even funny.
it's mostly used by college students for sparknotes history lessons on politics. I actually use it for quick refreshers on mythological, anthropological and geographical subjects while ignoring any of the pozzed additions. There's still some useful bits and pieces here and there but you have to already know about the subject the article is on before you go looking at the article.
 
How widely used is Wikipedia nowadays? It's become so blatantly corrupt and biased it's not even funny.
Still is heavily used. Academically it's a good point to jump off and find other sources, or get a brief general rundown.

This is no different than Mirriam Webster changing the definition of "preference" to be a slur because that stupid cunt Mazie Hirono said so.
 
Retards dancing in the street during a pandemic that has allegedly killed 200k plus people (which they are apparently so mad about) to celebrate a result that isn't even close to being finalized may be the most 2020 thing to happen. Especially if there's a sudden spike in cases and Trump is eventually declared the winner. I don't ask for much but give me this.
 
Retards dancing in the street during a pandemic that has allegedly killed 200k plus people (which they are apparently so mad about) to celebrate a result that isn't even close to being finalized may be the most 2020 thing to happen. Especially if there's a sudden spike in cases and Trump is eventually declared the winner. I don't ask for much but give me this.
I fully expect in 2 weeks to see lots of "I have the coof, fml" posts.
 
"You would think the candidates who campaigned on covid, would tell the people hosting street parades to knock that shit off"
-My old man who is as apolitical as it gets

They really don't care how blatant it all is and how mad you get. This is merely a taste to come.
And you can't vote them out either. The DNC has seen to that.
Godspeed, White kiwis. By the time they're done you will be guests in a Mexican/Muslim nation.
 
Retards dancing in the street during a pandemic that has allegedly killed 200k plus people (which they are apparently so mad about) to celebrate a result that isn't even close to being finalized may be the most 2020 thing to happen. Especially if there's a sudden spike in cases and Trump is eventually declared the winner. I don't ask for much but give me this.

but did they shout "Black Lives Matter"?
 
I was naturalized like 2-3 years ago and this was my first time voting-feelsverybadman

Wow. You finally got a vote and it was at the election that votes ceased to have any meaning.

Yeah, Trump winning election via the Supreme Court - which will require overturning the current (((results))) of multiple states - will unleash so much salt I unironically think we'd be in the Troubles territory. Low level civil war for the foreseeable future.

I'm not sure Republicans will all lie down and accept that Biden is President after this blatant fraud. Most Democrats never accepted Bush or Trump was really elected. Now most Republicans feel the same way about Biden if he stays in office.

while MI/GA would send it to a contingent election. The state assemblies are also taking a look into this in Wisconsin and Michigan, maybe others.

President whose motto is MAGA wins because of a situation involving MI/GA? Either it's rhyming like poetry or the simulation is glitchy.

Tucker really should just leave FOX altogether when this is done and take his ratings elsewhere. If there’s anyone that will make FOX lose revenue, it’s him.

The right needs to cut the old media and big tech companies loose and build their own alternatives. Especially after this election where old media and Big Tech have effectively couped their guy out of office.


From the man himself.
"As far as I'm concerned, this is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks."

I don't think he'd be forgetting that anytime soon.

Holy shit. Thomas has a poker face but you can see from the way his head is rocking slightly he fucking loathes Biden. I'm sure he'll take great pleasure in telling him he's not President.
 
To those that doubt fraud: You are telling me that Joe Biden, JOE BIDEN, is the most POPULAR PRESIDENT in the ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE REPUBLIC? Are you fucking high? How is Trump so hated, yet his voting base grew? How did Biden win but Democrats got massacred everywhere else? How is it that the bell-wheter states, which have all been in the 90th percentile for predicting a winner of an election, fell to 20 PERCENT? That hundreds of thousands of ballots were for Biden only, no third party candidates, no Trump, fuck, not even president not filled out and senate ticked, just filled in for Biden? Why were they boarding up polling places to hide the ballot counting? Why did they lie to people to get election monitors to leave? Why did they suddenly stop counting just after the election and then resumed it at 4 AM where Biden flipped, in some cases, 36 points? Why were sharpies being handed out in Arizona where poll workers knew it would invalidate ballots? Why did PA defy an order by the Supreme Court?

You're looking at ALL of this, and telling me this was perfectly legitimate? You're telling me all of this shit is just a one in a billion coincidence? Yeah, ok. You're out of your fucking mind. All of those things are observed and provable.

Knowing and proving are two different things of course. It's like this. There's this one unsolved case where a girl goes missing. When the girl was 13, she witnessed her mother kill her stepfather. She went to the stepfather's family and taped a confession. She later recanted. Her sister threatened to go to the cops with what she knew about her mother. She got a drive out in the dark and a shotgun pointed at her face to shut her up. The girl, older, has a boy. The mother has only had girls. The mother wants this boy. So naturally, the girl who confessed and has a child the mother wants conveniently disappears. No evidence of foul play. Girl would never leave her son behind. We know the mother already committed murder once and almost killed another one of her daughters. Mother gets the boy. She has the three principles of a committing a crime: She has the motive. She wants the boy and wants to silence her daughter. She has the means. Her new husband owns two huge plots of farmland and she has guns. She has opportunity. The daughter comes and visits alone sometimes. We KNOW the mother killed her daughter. We just can't PROVE it.

Same with this election. Motive: Eject Trump. Means: Democratic controlled boards of election and states with weak protections for mail in ballots. Opportunity: Ejecting poll workers to count in secret in the early hours of the morning. This fraud has all three still. It at least warrants looking into.

I can't believe I have to explain this shit like I'm talking to a five year old, Jesus Christ.

You want your guy in more than you want to clean up our shitty election system. And that is really, honestly fucked. I don't care that Trump lost. I seriously don't. I get to laugh at leftists eating each other, the crying when he gives the entire country to the neo-liberals and neo-cons not doing a single fucking progressive thing and the media scrambling to talk about something, anything, for four years. Its fine. I'm the one that predicted a Biden win anyway.

But to be apathetic about obvious fucking fraud, shouting "PROVE IT PROVE IT PROVE IT" and plugging your ears is retarded. Also, THAT IS WHAT AN INVESTIGATION IS FOR. Do you not understand how crime and investigation work? Like what a suspicion is and you know, you look into it? Christ on a fucking cross.

If Biden won legitimately, then all you have to do is sit back, crack a beer and watch the show. Not race to shut everything down. I'd be saying the exact same thing if it happened for Trump. To not want to solve this problem means its just going to happen to you eventually. And it shouldn't happen to fucking anyone. That being said...

Do I think Trump will win in court? No. Absolutely not. Even though the election is fraudulent, there is so much power behind him, he's like a rat trying to kill a giant. His only shot is the bubonic plague.

Here's why I don't think he will win in court:

1) Perception is reality. Realistically, the tech companies don't even have to censor anything. Trump supporters already believe it was stolen. However, what they're doing is creating a consensus. This consensus or gestalt, creates this massive amount of social and political pressure. If we were dealing with just the law, emotionless, cold and calculating, I think Trump would stand a chance of winning. But judges are flesh and blood people. When they feel this massive wave, produced by the media, world leaders, politicians, the five people that actually voted for Joe Biden, its going to influence them. And that is a LOT of pressure. They might just kick it up to SCOTUS, which leads me to.....

2) SCOTUS. They don't like being the Kingmakers. Largely, SCOTUS is immune to Gestalt/Consensus, because they go against it every single day sometimes. Their entire job is to invalidate laws with a lot of pressure behind them. So they're not subject to pressures of consensus. That being said, they don't want to be Kingmakers. Everyone remembers Bush v. Gore (Also NOTORIOUS RBG was part of the court that got Bush elected, for all these retards spouting it). They might not want a repeat and might favor a stable transition, rather than throwing everything into chaos. But, for argument's sake lets say Alito and the court is super fucking pissed PA disregarded their order. that goes to...

3) When you're committing any crime, the more time you have, the less likely you're going to get caught. We're what, four, five days later? Plenty of time to mix the ballots up, forge records and do whatever needs to be done. Democratic bagmen and operatives will wipe everything clean. This is not a conspiracy theory. If you think they don't exist, you never worked local politics or knew people in local politics. Shit like this happens ALL the time on a local level. A national level is a lot rarer. 1960 is the closest analogue. Anyway, I knew Democratic bagmen and operatives for one of the biggest Democratic machines on the Easter Seaboard. She'd use blackmail, veiled threats, withholding campaign funds, promise certain measures getting passed if they were on board....pretty much anything short of outright violence (she did tell me of one politician who got their arm broke in a mugging and it was rumored that it was retaliation against the party, but that's just talk. There really wasn't evidence to back it up. But just thinking something like that could be in the realm of possibility shows how dangerous these machines are) and blatant law breaking. That's the type of people you're going up against. Each county has its own and they're all unconnected, so good luck. Only way you'll ever get them is to RICO these political machines and fucking lol if you ever think that's fucking happening. Maybe if you take a lethal amount of LSD and psilocybin you'll see it before your brain melts like butter and runs out your ears. These guys are typically paid in cash, not even registered to the party (my friend was a registered Republican) and leave little to no paper trail. So we've got the crime scene already being cleaned up. It wouldn't matter if you had people that cared but that leads me to....

4) Democrats are generally low information voters. Sorry, but its true. Most see things in black and white, will drool and pull the lever for Democrat and just walk out of the booth. Its how these strongholds don't shift. So you have this disinterested populace which has eaten up every bullshit story fed to them by journos. They don't even want to think about Trump getting a second term, or consider it for a second. So, they're content to just let sleeping dogs lie. They don't want their Brave New World interrupted. They want their hits of dopamine and virtue signaling, like the narcissistic drug addicts they are. Trump is so racist he got a large portion of minorities to vote for him. Yeah, ok. In any event, this creates the consensus that Biden is the true winner, which align with neo-liberal, neo-conservatives both in and out of the Republican party and the corporatists. So that in turn goes back to 1.

And that's why I don't think Trump has a chance in court.

I wonder if people will ask for Clarence Thomas to recuse himself based on his history with Biden? And of course they will want ACB off the case.
These niggers will want the entire court to recuse themselves, then dig up the corpse of Ruth Bader Ginsberg, screaming "NOTORIOUS RBG" and use her corpse to put Trump on trial.
(((jpost)))... relax niggers, you spent 4 years calling em all fake news, don't start believing them now.
He only went to talk to him about conceding. Which means we don't know what the conversation was about. Was it conceding now? Is it when to give up when the court cases fail? Is it about the process of conceding and transitioning? Are they talking about the worst case scenario? Did Trump ask for his advice about conceding and when to do it? See, these are all questions that don't lead to Trump conceding now. They only have a single line: "US President Donald Trump was approached by his son-in-law and adviser, Jared Kushner, about conceding the election" That's it. That is the entirety of what they have. It could be Kushner going to him and saying "FUCK THESE NIGGERS, NEVER CONCEDE". That would still count as Kushner talking to Trump about conceding. So please, until he actually does it, ignore these faggots.

Why the fuck are you even listening to these retarded idiots anyway? Journos aren't even worth pissing on if they're burning. It is one line of unsubstantiated text with absolutely no context behind it. If Kushner wanted him to concede, why is he doing lawsuits? Why would Kushner say that when election commissions are investigating their own elections, without Trump's hand? There's absolutely no reason to concede right now, it doesn't make sense.

Is it possible he asked him to concede to spare the family? Sure. But we have no idea because there is no context to that single line. So please, don't run around like the sky is falling. But it is.
 
Last edited:
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


BIDEN OUT OF RECOUNT TERRITORY IN PENNSYLVANIA

ELECTION DESKS ARE CALLING IT FOR HIM. IT'S FUCKING OVER

TRUMP LOST TO A SENILE OLD MAN WHO LOVES ICE CREAM AND SAYING MALARKEY

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
There is still an uneaten hat with your name on it.
How did Biden win but Democrats got massacred everywhere else?
I think this is pretty simple actually. People don't like Trump. As popular as he is, with the people he's unpopular with, they hate his guts. But they also don't think the Democrats deserve a mandate after months of these shitbags literally letting terrorist communists burn down their businesses and homes and destroy their lives. I agree with both sentiments. I am glad Trump is gone but the Democrats do not deserve a mandate whatsoever.
2) SCOTUS. They don't like being the Kingmakers. Largely, SCOTUS is immune to Gestalt/Consensus, because they go against it every single day sometimes.
I think they might do it if it involves flipping a single state. I do not think they will step in and overturn something like 3 states though. That would be so obviously rigged it would be ridiculous. People are also discounting the possibility of state supreme courts (PA/GA/NV would do it) overturning the results. At least some counted votes, probably mostly mail-ins, are going to turn out questionable. That literally always happens, literally every time recounting is even an issue. Also just because margins might not allow an automatic recount doesn't mean parties can't do that, and Trump can certainly afford it if he thinks he has a chance.

So yeah "prove it" is an entirely reasonable thing to say. If it's there you can prove it if you have literally unlimited money to do it. If you can't, fuck you, go away, you just fucking lost.
 
Last edited:
Wow. You finally got a vote and it was at the election that votes ceased to have any meaning.



I'm not sure Republicans will all lie down and accept that Biden is President after this blatant fraud. Most Democrats never accepted Bush or Trump was really elected. Now most Republicans feel the same way about Biden if he stays in office.



President whose motto is MAGA wins because of a situation involving MI/GA? Either it's rhyming like poetry or the simulation is glitchy.



The right needs to cut the old media and big tech companies loose and build their own alternatives. Especially after this election where old media and Big Tech have effectively couped their guy out of office.



Holy shit. Thomas has a poker face but you can see from the way his head is rocking slightly he fucking loathes Biden. I'm sure he'll take great pleasure in telling him he's not President.
I always felt bad for the way he was treated. I burst out laughing when she claimed he sprinkled pubes on a soda can, I mean wtf, that's her ace in the hole? Also bitch is still gettng paid for her Long Dong Silver grift.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back