Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
College kids protesting in the United States didn't fight in the Spanish Civil War, dude.
Uh-huh. And if any college kids ran around calling themselves the arditi, or the freikorps, you'd be shitting a brick.

Or maybe you really are that ignorant of history to think 'defund the police' is a shiny new talking point that the 'youths' came up with.
They're just average people who want to stand up and push back against the injustices they see...
Nah. If you know enough to adopt a commie label and talking points , your intentions are not benign.
I can't think of anything more important to a liberal society than that.
Is that from lack of ability? Or lack of effort?
 
"Self-admitted" means that you admit that you, yourself, are guilty of something. Biden never admitted that he was a pedophile.

You are seriously mentally retarded or something. Or trolling. I am starting to think "trolling" because it might be impossible to be as cringy and retarded as you are
I know he doesn't say directly the words "I am a pedophile" but this more than implies it, that statement counts as an admission and it was provided by himself, therefore that makes him a self-admitted pedophile, oh and one more thing, YOU WILL BOW TO ME, YOU WILL KISS THE RING. KEEP COPING.
 
Literally every news story about this calls the allegations "baseless" and "meritless", even right-wing news. There was no election fraud, your boy just lost. Even the majority of Republicans agree there was no voter fraud, because they're not insane conspiracy theorists.
I think there was fraud, however I do not believe that this fraud can be proven since this is the same government who did nothing during 2016 when looking into Clinton's corruption. Trump is part of a script to justify censorship of the internet by associating those against the system as far-right extremists and neo-nazis. The election feels fake like it always does. The year 2021 is going to be an eventful one for sure. The Great Reset will reshape society and I don't trust it.

Tell me how a man who has zero charisma gets more votes from black people than Obama. How does Biden get this many votes? It seems shady.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: misterduckford
Feels over reals my man, don't forget to block and stay safe from any hurtful adulting reality uWu

edit ; sorry for assuming your gender that was pretty yikes of me, oof
Do you really let the media spoon feed you their manufactured consent? What happens if there aren't WMDs in Iraq?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Buster O'Keefe
College kids protesting in the United States didn't fight in the Spanish Civil War, dude. They're just average people who want to stand up and push back against the injustices they see, and I can't think of anything more important to a liberal society than that.
College kids are also idiots. Source: I was once a college kid and was an idiot, plus I still am an idiot.
 
I don't. Is that supposed to be an excuse? Auditing and election reform will help stop fraud from both sides.
This is the part that matters the most imo. Even if the election results don't change at all, this will hopefully expose people on a large scale of flaws in the United States' voting system and maybe in about 10 years we'll actually decide to do something about them if we aren't burned to the ground first.
 
I'm not fucking retarded.
PhelpsDoubts.png
 
No, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't confuse any college kids with time travelling WW1 soldiers, because I'm not fucking retarded.
But how do you know that time travel doesn't exist? Do you have a source for that? It better not be from Twitter, Some Blog (especially conservative affiliated!!), CNN, MSNBC, Huff Post, NYT, or any other source that I don't like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimjamflimflam
So, NJ-7, which was called D on election night, has been un-called by AP and there are only 7000 votes separating the candidates now with something like 40k left to be counted (breaking R in a reverse of the rest of the country due to the way New Jersey counts.) DKE thinks it will be straight down to the wire.
 
But how do you know that time travel doesn't exist? Do you have a source for that? It better not be from Twitter, Some Blog (especially conservative affiliated!!), CNN, MSNBC, Huff Post, NYT, or any other source that I don't like.

Source? Source? Source?
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
 
Source? Source? Source?
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Cope and seethe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back