2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
A lot of this is them reacting to and having their own 'cope' that "Demographics as Destiny" is finally hitting its end.
Uh..no. You don't keep a civilization great by letting in the easily manipulated barbarian hordes that have no concept of what it took to build it in the first place.

To that end:
The one takeway from this election, fraud aside, is for Republicans to never, ever try to appease the nigger-vote ever again. The enlavement to the plantation is too strong to overcome.
Trump bent over backwards to appease blacks (handing out a silly amount of gibbs in doing so, which isn't terribly conservative of him) just to receive hardly a blip on the radar in terms of their votes. That's also considering his opponent went out of his demented way to shit on a few select minority groups that likely further tipped some more votes Trump's way.

Now, I know the "but white people voted in lesser numbers for Trump this time" shit is the common rebuttal to that. I'd only say that (again) I would be fucking shocked if almost all of the phony votes weren't from white people, because (fucking surprise) the country was a white super-majority until quite recently.

There aren't enough rainbows for the optimism required to think demographics don't matter even in the face of a handful of "le based <minority>" voters.
 
Now, I know the "but white people voted in lesser numbers for Trump this time" shit is the common rebuttal to that. I'd only say that (again) I would be fucking shocked if almost all of the phony votes weren't from white people, because (fucking surprise) the country was a white super-majority until quite recently.
Yeah, I find it weird when people bring up that talking point with complete sincerity, especially when those same people believe that massive fraud took place, or at least can't deny it. As for the minority vote, didn't Trump get the highest percentage of non-white votes for a Republican presidential candidate since 1960? So I don't know if it's fair to call it just a blip on the radar, though I do agree that demographics are destiny isn't just a meme and should be addressed, even if it's exaggerated sometimes.
 
The desperation among Democrats and RINOs and Hollywood and the niggers from the sportsball world who want Trump gone is super high for a giant conspiracy fix to be true. If the fix was in, they would let Trump challenge all this shit in the courts as they probably made a deal with SCOTUS judges to toss it out and Trump would lose all power in DC after that. He never had much power in DC to begin with.

Well if you look at the media most people on both sides are obviously not in on it. I'd say the heads of the state legislatures and governors in the disputed states are but probably most state-level Republicans saw a rigged election and are baffled as to why their leadership is certifying the results.

All the Hollywood/sportsball types think they're saving the world from evil dictator Cheeto Benito. AOC was probably very surprised when she got told by one of Pelosi's helper goblins "What up ho? P R I MA R I E D !"
 
The behavior of state-level Republicans raises an interesting possibility. Up to now, I assumed the Democrats rigged it unilaterally and Republican state legislators would go ballistic because they'd know they'd be next if this level of rigging was allowed to stand.

However, consider the following. A bunch of high-level Republicans and Democrats have a deal. The high-level Republicans don't like Trump. The Democrats probably know that AntiFa and BLM riots need to be suppressed because even normies know something is wrong if their city gets burned down. We know they fucking hate people like AOC talking about socialism and defunding the police. What they all want is a neoliberal regime. Woke capitalism basically. Sweatshops in China, and with illegal immigrants in the US but a rainbow flag during pride month and bans for anyone dumb enough to not see that there are some things you don't question.

So the elections were not rigged down-ballot because the down-ballot Republicans are in on the deal. The heads of the state legislatures will certify because they're in on it too. What will happen in Georgia? Maybe the Republicans get that in return for giving up the White House? The midterms will produce a carefully balanced house - literally 50:50. So the Republicans have some way to enforce the deal because they get to keep the Senate and the house is split. Republicans would probably know how many Democrat legislators would back things like the Green New Deal or court-packing and they'd know those have no chance of passing. And they've got the Senate in case something terrible happens.

If this were the case I'd expect the new regime to be a carefully bipartisan technocratic one that doesn't really achieve anything. Woke scraps will be thrown to the left but capitalism will continue to shaft normal people. Immigration and free trade will be pushed. Bipartisan groups will work out careful chess moves to play against China - carrier battlegroups will prowl the seas and US allies will be bolstered. In Europe, NATO will announce that the US is back, baby, with more commitment to oppose Russian expansionism. One interesting thing about this is that you'd see the more strident members of each party decommissioned, a bit like the US and USSR decommissioned their intermediate-range nukes towards the end of the cold war. So when AOC said she 'might leave politics' she wasn't kidding. Her next primary will end with her losing to stuffed ballots to some DNC apparatchik and she knows it. Similarly, all the Republicans who cast doubt on the 2020 'election' will get primaried and will lose, with varying degrees of legitimacy. So the reason the entire Republican party seems to be hedging its bets is that they all sense that the fix is in for this election and if you cast any doubt on the legitimacy of the process you're gone next primary or next election. Conversely, if you hedge your bets a bit you might benefit from the new, post-democratic order.

So what you've got is a compromise. It's just it's the Compromise of 2020 arranged pre-election, not a compromise of 2021 arranged after it.

Would it work? I'm not convinced. Suppose the Democrats break the deal and win control of the Senate? At that point, the Republicans know they've been screwed. Or if the Democrats rig the midterms. The regime requires that two parties that absolutely hate each other have a core of people who are willing to work together.

Incidentally, Newsmax has a parade of Republicans saying 'fight it out in court but if you lose move on'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39WrSskl3XE
So who's gonna be the first foreign leader removed?
It doesn't help that if this was planned by a grand level of conspiracy Biden would've been called as President much earlier than when he had actually been called.
Honestly, that was more just waiting for a time when they could push Biden across the finish line without being seen.
Ok, suppose my theory posted above is correct. In that case, Powell will crash and burn in court. You'll see Republicans come out and say 'Well it looks like we tried our best and failed. Time to move on'. All the other more credible accusations of ballot stuffing will fail in court. The SCOTUS won't take up the cases. On the upside, the Republicans will win the runoffs in Georgia. So we'll have a Democrat White House, a Republican Senate, and a razor-thin majority in the House. The Democrats will get rid of people like AOC. The Republicans will get rid of anyone who casts doubt on the glorious show of democracy that is the 2020 election.

The only problem is, it's all bullshit. Both parties have done a backroom deal to get rid of the most obnoxious members of their party and to tolerate massive chicanery to do it. You won't see any non neoliberal/neocon politicians under the new regime. No Bernies, no Trumps, No AOC. Just endless technocratic non-entities with zero support who nevertheless seem to win.

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a corporation that makes all its stuff in sweatshops in China having a rainbow logo for Pride month forever.
I think Kamala is part of the progressive sector. And I doubt the progressive sector will go quietly. And ANtifa's thing will be that they want their anarchist paradise, and the only difference will be how long the leash is.
People without any experience in lawsuits or not been involved in a number of them don't realize how crazy the politics involved can get. A good friend of mine is owed about $300,000 from Universal music for a couple of years. He can't get a single lawyer to take the case. The problem is that half the lawyers here in NYC are on retainer for Universal and can't take it, the other half looked at my friend's case and said it's airtight - he'll win easily and that's the problem. There's not a single lawyer here who wants to actually win against Universal. One of them told my friend outright, "I can win this case for you but I'll never work again. Universal will have me blacklisted like you wouldn't believe once I beat them".

Not really suggesting the SCOTUS case can be like that, but just that I've learned the hard way, after being involved in a lot of lawsuits as a musician, that there's always a lot of politics at play even when it's not actual politics, and that you can't just assume anything. You have to be ready to counter from any direction.
SO what I'm hearing is that petty shit can totally torpedo's Trump's chances. And SCOTUS could find themselves in the mix of lists, Trump Accountability Project, and Trust and Reconciliation Commission funsies. This whole thing starts to look bleaker for Trump with each passing day.
 
Like I'm almost certain I'm very late on this, but it's funny how all the bernie bros freaking out about the DNC rigging the nomination are now insisting there was absolutely no foul play in the presidential election.
There are two types of Bernie Bros. The non idpol types and the idpol types. The non idpol types fucked off from Bernie in 2016 leaving behind the retard idpol types. Those retards who accept anything Bernie would tell them like accept Biden and to accept forever wars I guess.

I mean as much as a mess the right wing is right now, imagine the left wing since they want really believe hard Biden is the winner before he could be officially declared one combined with some of them now realizing how Biden has no intentions of allowing any Bernie or AOC affiliated retards close to him. And Biden already proved that they are enslaved to him so they can either cope or grift. They have swallowed too much of the "Republicans are Evil" talking point to be even saved.

On a side note, the only commentators backing Trump even till now hard are based black men whereas we slowly seeing white commentators start to slowly back away. I expect some fatigue to set in and the only white commentator to be even more in favor of Trump is Styx lately.
 
Here's the thing: Trump didn't lose supporters in the last four years, he and the things he stood for brought in millions of additional people over to his side. Those gigantic rallies leading up to the election all across the country aren't indicative of a dying movement, they're indicators of a huge amount of anger at clownworld and a desire for a leader to reverse its malignant spread. Personally, while I admire him in many ways, I am overall disappointed with what Trump was actually able to do from a policy standpoint. He seemed to have been effectively hemmed in by his enemies in Washington from the moment he took office and he simply wasn't ruthless enough to do what had to be done as far as shitcanning saboteurs in the executive branch.

I don't think he'll be dead or thrown in jail, but I do think we're probably going to see a period of social and political reprisals against anyone who is not perceived as being onboard with the progressive cult. I mean shit, we already have been seeing that in the form of online censorship, employment fuckery, and race-based discrimination against whites in multiple contexts. With all that said, it's important to remember that Trump himself is not the embodiment of the sentiment that put him into office in 2016, he's merely the guy who harnessed it. There remains widespread and growing discontent with the social and economic direction that global society is heading in, and the voting numbers (if you believe them lol) reflect that. Wokeist crackdowns aren't going to make people happier with that agenda, they're going to make people despise it even more. Take heart in the fact that energy remains out there for another leader to tap into, one that is hopefully more adept at wielding power to effect lasting change.
It comes down to whether it's even possible to pull off a Bolshevik/Cultural Revolution-scale purge in a first-world country. I think it worked in Russia and China mainly because they were peasant societies before the revolution, so the vast majority of people were used to keeping their heads down and meekly accepting whatever the new boss said unless it directly threatened them (ironically the Bolsheviks fucked up the food badly enough to get a peasant revolt), in which case they'd have no allies. Plus they had the advantage of essentially importing modernity (albeit a commie knock-off version) so any holdouts would likely be using a horribly outdated power structure compared to the Bolsheviks.

The Dems think they have the second advantage judging by that "Jesusland" map and their Euro-worship, but I'm not so sure. The profs and the tech companies may vote overwhelmingly blue but that doesn't mean the left has a monopoly on knowing anything discovered after 1960 even if Moviebob pretends they do. If the relation between Blue America and Red America really was like 19th century Europe and her colonies, namely that technological and social advances are made solely by the former and radiate to the latter, they wouldn't need to run all these gay ops and the Pubs wouldn't have been in power more often than not over the past 50 years.
 
Last edited:
He tells the people at the G20 summit that he will be working with them in the future and using firm and confident language to convey that he has already won.
He straight up told world leaders to not count him out yet?

Forget Rudy, forgot Powell, forget Ellis, and the lolyer in Nevada. This guy Trump always has something. But for the sake of doom, he's rocking a poker face with a shit hand.
 
Well if you look at the media most people on both sides are obviously not in on it. I'd say the heads of the state legislatures and governors in the disputed states are but probably most state-level Republicans saw a rigged election and are baffled as to why their leadership is certifying the results.

All the Hollywood/sportsball types think they're saving the world from evil dictator Cheeto Benito. AOC was probably very surprised when she got told by one of Pelosi's helper goblins "What up ho? P R I MA R I E D !"
The only counter is the Governor of Arizona apparently refusing to certify. The governors of WI, MI and PA are all democrats so its no surprise there since they wanted Trump gone. Georgia is the one where they probably know some skeletons about Kemp and the Ratfuck dude. Georgia is the most mind boggling state of them all since Arizona is doing the opposite of Georgia.
 
But for the sake of doom, he's rocking a poker face with a shit hand.
Isn't that just life in general?
It comes down to whether it's even possible to pull off a Bolshevik/Cultural Revolution-scale purge in a first-world country. I think it worked in Russia and China mainly because they were peasant societies before the revolution, so the vast majority of people were used to keeping their heads down and meekly accepting whatever the new boss said unless it directly threatened them, in which case they'd have no allies. Plus they had the advantage of essentially importing modernity (albeit a commie knock-off version) so any holdouts would likely be using a horribly outdated power structure compared to the Bolsheviks.

The Dems think they have the second advantage judging by that "Jesusland" map and their Euro-worship, but I'm not so sure. The profs and the tech companies may vote overwhelmingly blue but that doesn't mean the left has a monopoly on knowing anything discovered after 1960 even if Moviebob pretends they do.
Well, this summer looked to be a preview of that. A dress rehearsal, if you will. How do you think that turned out? What's you evaluation?
 
So who's gonna be the first foreign leader removed?

You mean will the Uniparty start a war? I don't think they'd do that unless they had to. Of course, the problem is that they're good at finding reasons why they have to.

Or if you mean will elections get rigged in other places on the same process? People have speculated the French election will be rigged to make Macron defeat Le Pen. It's also not out of the question the UK media will unite behind Starmer and Labour will rig the election so he beats Boris. The problem for Labour is that they're already down to the places they can rig. It will be hard to take over places the Conservatives currently hold because the UK has 650 parliamentary constituencies and a population of 68 million people. So the constituencies are much smaller than 50 states for a country with 330 million.
 
The only counter is the Governor of Arizona apparently refusing to certify. The governors of WI, MI and PA are all democrats so its no surprise there since they wanted Trump gone. Georgia is the one where they probably know some skeletons about Kemp and the Ratfuck dude. Georgia is the most mind boggling state of them all since Arizona is doing the opposite of Georgia.
The thing about Geaorgia is that the Democrats are hedging their bets to cement their power and influence, anything from cementing Atlanta as a stronghold that can control the state, or using the runoffs and whatever Abrams is doing to gain control of the Senate so they'll have the green light to pursue their pet projects. If AOC and her friends goes out, it'll be after the seeds are planted to achieve progressive utopia, and the road to it can be driven unopposed.
 
The thing about Geaorgia is that the Democrats are hedging their bets to cement their power and influence, anything from cementing Atlanta as a stronghold that can control the state, or using the runoffs and whatever Abrams is doing to gain control of the Senate so they'll have the green light to pursue their pet projects. If AOC and her friends goes out, it'll be after the seeds are planted to achieve progressive utopia, and the road to it can be driven unopposed.
The weird thing is Georgia is the most GOP strong out of all the states in contention. I am surprised how the GOP in Arizona has a razor thin lead though. But if the GOP in Georgia has any balls, its going to be through direct appointment. Kemp is a useless fuck and a fudd.






 
View attachment 1743362

Law firms may sleep on the weekends, but Autism. Autism never rests.

Apparently Georgia hid fake voters via registering at UPS Stores, FedEx Mail Receiving Locations, and Company Office Parks, using "Apt" instead of "Box" -- which shouldn't work, but I'm sure UPS / FedEx can figure it out and ship the shit through anyway.

if true, how does anyone certify the election? at this point, it's a clusterfuck.
 
You mean will the Uniparty start a war? I don't think they'd do that unless they had to. Of course, the problem is that they're good at finding reasons why they have to.

Or if you mean will elections get rigged in other places on the same process? People have speculated the French election will be rigged to make Macron defeat Le Pen. It's also not out of the question the UK media will unite behind Starmer and Labour will rig the election so he beats Boris. The problem for Labour is that they're already down to the places they can rig. It will be hard to take over places the Conservatives currently hold because the UK has 650 parliamentary constituencies and a population of 68 million people. So the constituencies are much smaller than 50 states for a country with 330 million.

As much as I hate Boris for the stupid bullshit he keeps pulling, if Labor gets the UK now y'all motherfuckers are done. Just straight up. You'd be quartered worse than the krauts were in the 20th century with those idiots going full whiplash on the Brexit deals. Wouldn't surprise me if they even got Scotland to do another fucking referendum. And the Gibraltar situation would escalate, with very bad conclussions to the UK... Actually that shit might escalate anyway after Boris fucked it. (Seriously the Andalusian government backstabbed Sanchez to give y'all fuckers a hand. All that idiot had to do is sign, once that deal came through the statute of autonomy would have Sanchez's hands fully tied on the topic, they have the authority to do that. Our idiots in charge for once in their life were doing the right thing and actively sabotagging the EU diplomacy to help you because we also want to betray the EU (Despite Sanchez's best efforts to act otherwise) and we know damned well we're gonna need british support for that one. But no. That idiot stopped the deal, giving Vox a chance to realice we were thinking on allying with Gibraltar (only entity they hate more than the EU. Not without reason but imho the EU is worse... Just slightly though.) and gave Sanchez a chance to weaponize it diplomatically and tie the autonomy's hands, now we literally cannot even do the deal anymore due to decree saying negotiations with gibraltar are to be handled by central gov exclusively until new order. All he had to do is not get in the way! Negotiations were already done! Fucking... God why is he so fucking stupid?!)

(Also as for france I don't care either way. It's France it's gonna suck either way.)
 
What the fuck
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1330638034619035655

EndgPVgXIAcQZJe.jpeg
 
The thing that really kind of throws me off with what Powell was saying, is if she's suggesting that Hillary Clinton used Dominion to cheat Bernie out of his primary, why didn't she use it to cheat Trump out of the general election? They were clearly making use of it, if that's the case, and if Trump supposedly won this one in as much of a landslide as the last one, it wouldn't be a matter of having to sprint to close the gap. They would have just kept fabricating votes, wouldn't they?

They controlled virtually everything at the time; Trump had no appointees, the government was full of all the dipshits we've learned about since then who have been shoved into an early retirement, so what the fuck was stopping them from just doing the same, damn thing instead of having Hillary immediately concede the race? What was in the way preventing that from happening, if they held every space on the board at the time? What was different?

The whole thing has to hinge on that massive dump of mail-in ballots being sent out to everyone and their mothers and their maiden names, because there was nothing else that was different about the 2016 election, even if you want to make the argument that "they weren't ready for it" because Sidney's insinuating that they were already using Dominion to cheat it, and have been for a long time.

View attachment 1743082

When Barack Obama ran for Senate in 1994, the only reason that he won in the first place is because he challenged the veracity of his opponents' votes by demanding that the signatures be matched. The lowest number of invalid signatures was 48%. Signature matching is an absolutely vital part of the counting process, and it's swung the entire political spectrum one way or the other in the past. If Obama hadn't done this, he probably would have never become President in the first place.

With such a massive influx of mail-in voting this cycle, it should be more imperative than ever that all of these ballots are matched.

The fact that they're so adamant to avoid it and the fact that it's the only way to make sense of what Sidney is saying leads me to believe that's probably what's at the core of this. Granted, it's easier at this point to just say that Trump lost and Sidney's a crazy person, but that's not as fun as taking guesses. That's the only rationale I can see as to what the differences were between 2016 and 2020, because otherwise what Sidney is suggesting doesn't really make any sense, and that could be why they're bunkering down so hard to try and prevent anyone from signature matching.
Maybe Trump had blackmail material on them and he threatened to make it all public if Hillary didn't concede. Blackmail seems pretty popular in the halls of power. :optimistic:
 
The thing that gets me is... money for what?
Its LITERALLY costless.
"Hiring something like four thousand people is literally costless"
Ladies and gentlemen, the eternal MAGAtard
Lol, cutting ties from the stupid cunt who couldn't keep her mouth shut while they continue to pretend there was fraud (while not alleging any such thing in court on penalty of perjury).

Noone could have predicted this!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back