Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

if FTMs had been intelligently designed, the autoandrophile troons would be the tiny ones who could lean into the boy aesthetic which would probably be a big hit on the sodomite hookup scene.

How about no. Gay men are attracted to male sexual characteristics and masculinity, often regardless of whether they're masculine themselves. The uwu softboi FTMs who have tried to break into the gay male hookup scene have encountered monumental failure and little else.
 
Has anyone checked out Dr Will Powers, the God-King of crazy troon quacks? Apparently he's "innovated" such things as using estrogen cream on the face, butt-chugging progesterone, and he recently had a Reddit meltdown.
Yeah, no. Women have done that long before troons. Estrogen to the face is a bad idea.
 
View attachment 1757213
Can't believe this bigot fucked up not once but twice. Not only did they erroneously conflate vulva-possessing units with women but they also engaged in an act of unbelievable cultural erasure genociding the traditions of thousands of indigenous nations who have been trading their portable vulva-possessing units for commodities or other units with similar mileage for over 50,000 years!

View attachment 1757234
"anyone [have] tips for how to not look like a 12 y/o" :story:
She didn't get really any tips.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TransyTalk/comments/k2und5/fashion_tips_for_short_trans_guys/ (x)
Nobody thinks Danny Devito is a woman. Likewise, being 5’2” does not make Chelsea Manning pass.

FTMs look like that because they want to exercise control over their bodies. I’ve seen FTMs say that about tattoos. It’s basically the same as being anorexic.
 
Yet another annoying ftm in terrible makeup talks about xenogenders:
This is far from the worst content I've seen, and she comes across as fairly intelligent. But her whole argument boils down to "Accept people's identities without question or you're a transphobic dick." While she herself doesn't have a xenogender, she has a rather pretentious way of describing her own relation to gender. Anyway, from what I've been observing, the lines between "true transsexuals" and "trenders" are blurring. How many people these days are both transitioning physically AND adopting weird microlabels?

(The comments and the like-to-dislike ratio are also rather disheartening and make me worry for this already fucked up generation.)

I tried watching this but was too distracted with how feminine her body language and manner of speech are. It often seems like FTM are more girly than most normal girls despite the retarded clothes and hair cuts.
 
When I was in highschool my girlfriends and I were of the distinct belief that menfolk always bragged and exaggerated their sexual encounters to each other.

I have no idea if this is true or not, having never infiltrated a male locker room.

I think of that when I see people of any sort speaking about their bedroom activities so freely.
Those rumors are true. Most guys outgrow that braggadocious attitude over time. Those who don't are typically insecure with their sexuality and feel the need to convince others of their sexual competence while failing to realize that no one gives a shit.
 
Someone needs to inform Jimmy's doctor about him mixing a dangerous amount of Copium with his progesterone:
View attachment 1757836
https://twitter.com/Emmy_Zje/status/1333190848150982656 (Archive)

Jimmy's argument can best be described as "Not everyone looks the same!!!", "BIRTH DEFECTS SAY TRANS RIGHTS!!".
Jimmy needs to read (or re-read) my post from a week ago.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/tranny-sideshows-on-social-media.33028/page-1699#post-7792918

Choice quotes:
The other interesting observation from this framing is that there are multiple possible (and reasonable) definitions of 'sex' in this second sense since you have some freedom in choosing your classifier (i.e. what is considered relevant in determining sex) so long as you preserve the two gamete clusters*. In practice, people do actually do this to a very limited extent for those ambiguous few. For example, is someone with CAIS a woman? Is Caster Semenya a man? IMO, it seems obvious that it depends on the context since the ultimate goal of the exercise of labeling is to efficiently convey known information and the information that is relevant is always going to be context dependent.

*Can be noted that failure to respect this constraint is the explicit reason why the Jimmy Zje et. al.'s argument that he is 'female' since he has female estrogen levels is rubbish.

A point that these retards really need to drum into their heads though is that whether sex is binary or whether Jimmy is a 'woman' is not a question of science per se but one of descriptive linguistics.

Shit like this is just so retarded:
1606754197750.png

And even Jimmy probably knows it's retarded despite retweeting it.

As is this:
1606755225548.png

Like c'mon Jimmy, sex is a social construct, it doesn't just exist in your head; it's articulated collectively.
 
The people who live in Alaska and the people who live in Eastern Siberia are basically the same. Some of them even speak different dialects of the same language. But to the US government, they’re not the same race — ‘Native Alaskan’ vs ‘Asian’. This is a social construct. What isn’t a social construct is that they have evolved to live in a cold environment but one with lots of seal blubber to eat.

Likewise, gender roles are often socially constructed. ‘Pink for women’ is arbitrary. ‘Men can’t wear skirts’ is arbitrary. What isn’t arbitrary is that men and women are biologically distinct. That’s not a construct of society. It would continue to be true without society.
 
Yet another annoying ftm in terrible makeup talks about xenogenders:
This is far from the worst content I've seen, and she comes across as fairly intelligent. But her whole argument boils down to "Accept people's identities without question or you're a transphobic dick." While she herself doesn't have a xenogender, she has a rather pretentious way of describing her own relation to gender. Anyway, from what I've been observing, the lines between "true transsexuals" and "trenders" are blurring. How many people these days are both transitioning physically AND adopting weird microlabels?

(The comments and the like-to-dislike ratio are also rather disheartening and make me worry for this already fucked up generation.)
I must be a boomer now, I can't keep up with the amount of new genders being released. It's like the fucking marvel movies at this point, each one has 5 sequels.
 
You'd think if they genuinely felt like a man trapped in a womans body they would try to be something other than the most obnoxious, feminine, childish type of "man" possible.
I tried watching this but was too distracted with how feminine her body language and manner of speech are. It often seems like FTM are more girly than most normal girls despite the retarded clothes and hair cuts.

It's because (to no one surprise) she's autistic, this is why she has a very hyper-feminine body language, when you struggle to understand how women behave but then you suddenly feel like a "xenogender trans demi-boy" shit, it's kinda hard to switch to a more manly behavior.
edit: You should watch her video titled "do i think the same as other gay men?" and see her REEEing to gay men who prefer masculine men.
 
The people who live in Alaska and the people who live in Eastern Siberia are basically the same. Some of them even speak different dialects of the same language. But to the US government, they’re not the same race — ‘Native Alaskan’ vs ‘Asian’. This is a social construct. What isn’t a social construct is that they have evolved to live in a cold environment but one with lots of seal blubber to eat.

Likewise, gender roles are often socially constructed. ‘Pink for women’ is arbitrary. ‘Men can’t wear skirts’ is arbitrary. What isn’t arbitrary is that men and women are biologically distinct. That’s not a construct of society. It would continue to be true without society.
I think you misunderstand the point of something being socially constructed. It isn't so much a comment on the nature of the thing but rather on how it is framed and interpreted; it's a question of mental processes, inter-subjectivity and language as opposed to the underlying objective facts.

The key feature of your examples is not social constructedness but rather historical contingency and present arbitrarity. In general, social constructs are not arbitrary but rather positively useful in allowing us to understand an otherwise incomprehensibly complex reality.

The fundamental particles that together form what we call Jimmy's chromosomes are plenty real but our shared interpretation of them as being 'male' and of Jimmy being a 'man' arises through the social construction of them as such. Sex being socially constructed is why Jimmy can't meaningfully say "I think I am a woman [he actually doesn't but w/e] and therefore I am one". It's also why breathlessly gibbering about "muh intersex folx" won't make sex any less binary in practice.

In fact whether something is socially constructed is almost always irrelevant and the first question you should always ask when someone says X is socially constructed is "So?" since it forces them to lay out what they actually think. Now, in my experience TRA-types most often haven't thought anything at all but rather just heard the phrase and decided that this was a Correct Answer which legitimated whatever it is that they want to believe.
 
Sometimes I would really love to be in the mind of someone like that for an hour, just to see what it's like. I guess I honestly cannot imagine how someone must think to feel that things like xenogenders and 'microlabels' make sense and are totally natural or that you can call youself a trans demiboy or whatever and expect people to not think that you're just a cringy teenager.
I like the term “microlabels” because it reminded me of what bothers me about this sort of thinking.


Taxonomy (no really, bear with me)

There’s two ways to approach taxonomy when you’re doing biology.

The “essentialism” way which is “a place for everything and everything in its place.” Have a species with some slight morphological variation? MAKE A NEW CATEGORY. Oh this bird sings a bit differently? OMG NEW SPECIES. I kid, but it’s actually the way humans tend to think. We loves a good pattern and we loves categorizing to find it.

the second way is the “population” way which is annoyingly laissez faire because it just admits “fuck it, species have variation, let’s not go nuts here”. Scientists try for this sort of thinking because suprise suprise nature doesn’t give a crap about your boundaries.

translated into SJW speak? You’ve got your “essentialism”, aka microlabels, and your “population”, aka things are a spectrum. Trouble is they’re trying to have the cake and eat it to. To accept a spectrum of anything (gender, sexuality, neurotypicality, whatevs) you have to accept that the categories you use are diagnostic only, and will never really capture any one individual. Best to define the main boundaries and just roll with it if you’re in the middle somewhere. But some folks want a million labels on things and that way lies madness, nature doesn’t want to fit into those so there will be ever increasing fracturing until no one is like anyone else.

So yeah. Weirdly enough I’m arguing for the spectrum model here. Because once people aren’t forced to think “I have to be this or that” they can just relax and be themselves. Maybe sometimes that’s trans but I bet a lot of times it’s not gonna be.
 
Last edited:
FtM Jessica "Riley" Behrens has mini-stroke from covid, goes viral. Surely her hormone cocktail played no role.

Screenshot_20201130-181219.jpg


https://twitter.com/RileyBehrens/status/1333230792206553089

1606773082663.png


Arrested in October:

Screenshot_20201130-175958.jpg


EkpyjI8UYAATSSt.jpeg

https://twitter.com/mrandyngo/status/1317993996703002624

Suing Maricopa jail for discrimination following a July arrest (for throwing rocks at cops) because they kept her in a women's holding cell.

"I would have rather been kept in isolation than with anybody else," Behrens said. "It was the most shameful, frustrating, hurtful and humiliating experience I've had since coming out."

https://www.azcentral.com/story/new...ty-discrimination-mcso-jail-staff/3324206001/

Manlet:

20201130_175601.jpg
 
"I would have rather been kept in isolation than with anybody else," Behrens said. "It was the most shameful, frustrating, hurtful and humiliating experience I've had since coming out."
Oh boo hoo hoo first world Ivy Leaguer has to be housed with women at the county lock up. That’s what she finds humiliating— not being caught throwing rocks at cops.

Guess what sweetheart— you’re in jail. You don’t get to choose. Be thankful the COs has enough sense not to toss you in with the men; though fuck knows at this point some of these militant and insane FTMs could use a good reality dose.
 
Back