2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
You could actually respond to what I say without just negrating it. It's nice there's no stickers now, so you have to respond to what I say instead of seething with pointless internet images.
This article has the claims made by USPS workers. I'm looking for the video of the press conference today. While the 288,000 ballots weren't delivered election night, going from New York to PA and then just having his trailer of ballots just disappear is totally legitimate, very secure.
Why look into voter fraud? What are you, some kind of bigot?
 
It's just dissident fantasy. Unrealistic, especially in the totalitarian panopticon we live in nowadays, but not much different than the numerous Jewish revenge fantasies pumped out by Hollywood. It's pretty tame stuff overall. The love story parts are lame, but I suppose the couple who slays together, stays together.
Among American apocolyptic fiction- 'Turner Diaries' is shit that a smart man cranked out in small installments over 30 minutes a month to pad out his newsletter. 'Hunter' is Pierce's less bad book.

'Unintended Consequences' is a better book for you libertarian/conservative retards who think that you'd rise up against imaginary 'election fraud', the politics will be more amenable to you and it's less badly written. It's still a more ridiculous fantasy than Nazis flying nuclear bombs into DC on cropdusters.
Interesting conversation. This woman is saying that 71% of the precincts haven't balanced for ages. She's an inner city black Republican and she thinks its an absolute scandal. A forensic audit is needed. The white guy on the panel is a Democrat who tried to blame the Republicans.

She's awesome, he's an absolute cockroach.
Lol noone cares what tokens think
What was Trump's "moderate rebels" scandal?
Trump is best friends with the Saudis, who ran 9/11 (while the Mossad set up general logistics and monitored the attack).
Jesus christ. This is awful. A guy testified that he saw ballots being delivered after polls closed and got blocked by a cop. And that things like this were occurring regularly. Except, he didn't have names, plate numbers or even phone numbers. Its ridiculous.
hahah weird. Do you think this highly credible witness might also be reluctant to testify to these claims in court under penalty of perjury?
The fuck you talking about? They took Mexican land and then proceeded to treat the Mexicans living in said land like shit. Polk was a Democrat remember.
Are you saying that DEMONRATS are the REAL RACISTS?
It could be a recording of joe biden literally claiming to have the biggest, best vote fraud team ever
Joe Biden is literally senile and he still beat your guy lol
 
Highlights and stickers broke, I'll see you fuckers later when I can read the thread proper again.

Otherwise looks like some progress was made in Michigan. :)
Are you saying that DEMONRATS are the REAL RACISTS?
Homie I'm a democrat and I know we're fucking racist. They don't even believe black people can succeed on merit and have to have school standards lowered for them to pass.
 
270towin has examples of the actual certificates

https://www.270towin.com/maps/2020-election-certification-status

Each state compiles its certified results on a Certificate of Ascertainment (example). These name the electors to be sent to the electoral college and also include the vote earned by each candidate and/or party and their corresponding slate of electors.

Electoral college delegations meet to cast their vote in each state on December 14. The result is recorded on a Certificate of Vote (example). These are then counted in Congress on January 6.

Note they're signed by the governor and secretary of state in this case even though Article 2 Clause 2 actually makes this the legislature's job. Normally the legislature delegates that power to the governor and secretary of state. As Mastriano pointed out, that makes sense if the election is fair. If not, and the governor and/or secretary of state aren't willing to look into it, you've got a problem.

Interesting, but what I was actually looking for is what is the process by which Congress can challenge the electors present and kick it to a contingent election. Apparently Rep Gaetz has hinted he might do this.
 

Attachments

  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Georgia has set 2 hearings for Thursday and Guliani has been un-uninvited to a Michigan hearing or presentation or whatever tomorrow.

More places are holding hearings. It is an interesting development considering the bipartisan rush to elect Biden.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Georgia has set 2 hearings for Thursday and Guliani has been un-uninvited to a Michigan hearing or presentation or whatever tomorrow.

More places are holding hearings. It is an interesting development considering the bipartisan rush to elect Biden.
It's possible they're trying the old "pretend to do something" trick. Either way it's clear there's an order coming from someone.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
https://www.thenewcivilrightsmoveme...e-last-shot-at-overturning-his-election-loss/
https://archive.vn/wip/XkWza

The Electoral College officially votes for the president Dec. 14, but individual members of the House and Senate may legally challenge the results from the floor before Congress certifies the results a few weeks later — and several GOP lawmakers and aides say they’re considering that rarely used maneuver, reported Politico.

“Nothing is off the table,” said Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL).

Gaetz says Democrats tried the same maneuver in January 2017, when a handful of House members took that procedural step before their efforts collapsed during a joint session of Congress presided over by Biden, who was then the outgoing vice president.

Vice President Mike Pence will serve the same role in this proceeding next month, perhaps setting up an awkward scenario if Trump still refuses to deny his plainly obvious loss.

Voters picked 306 electors for Biden and 232 for Trump, and they will cast their formal votes in two weeks, and the Electoral Count Act passed in 1887 outlines the procedure for Congress to officially certify the election in a joint session at 1 p.m. on Jan. 6.

That same federal law also gives lawmakers the power to challenge the results, and one House member and one senator could band together to challenge entire slates of electors — although they must provide an explanation in writing.

Once that happens, the House and Senate meet in their own chambers to debate the outcome for up to two hours before voting, and this process could play out for multiple states, because each state’s electors are certified separately.

Some of the president’s allies are already urging congressional Republicans to take this action, and several incoming GOP lawmakers, such as Georgia’s Marjorie Taylor Greene, agree with Trump’s lies about election fraud.

Some GOP state legislators in Pennsylvania filed a resolution disputing their state’s election results, and Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA), who challenged the state’s mail-in voting system in court and lost, could take that fight to Congress.

Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) has signaled that he may challenge the election results, and a chief of staff to another GOP lawmaker said his boss may do so.

Politico also reported that Arizona Reps. Paul Gosar, Andy Biggs and David Schweikert may be open to challenging the president’s election loss.

Aides to House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy declined to comment, although the California Republican has previously backed Trump’s effort to overturn his loss.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has raised questions about the election’s legitimacy, based on Trump’s baseless conspiracy theories, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell seems unlikely to favor a potentially toxic vote on the challenge.

If all these long-shot scenarios break for Trump and the Senate upholds challenges to some slates of electors, that would put the GOP-majority Senate at odds with the Democratic-majority House.

Here's what happened in 2017

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...ess-certifies-donald-trump-s-election-n704026

Democrats objected 11 times, citing a variety of issues, including “Russian interference,” “massive voter suppression” and the “violation of the Voting Rights Act.”

Vice President Joe Biden, who sat in the chair and presided over the 41 minute-long process in the House chamber, attempted to speed through the objections. After the third objection and the third time Biden asked if a senator had signed on, Biden said, “it is over.”

But a handful of Democratic House members continued to object during specific states and tried to continue their speeches even after Biden gaveled them down and said debate is not allowed. After the states were counted, three citizens in the audience gallery stood up to demonstrate.

At one point, Rep. Maxine Watters, D-Calif., stood and asked for a senator to join them. Only four Democratic senators attended the ceremony.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said it was "embarrassing" for House Democrats that they couldn't get a senator to join the protest. But he added that Republicans were prepared in case an objection succeeded.

“Senator McConnell made clear that people needed to delay their trip home in order to be here in case there was a need to vote," Cornyn said. "That's why we were all in town."

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said she was not encouraging objections but that she would “support” them.

“I think people don’t want the day to pass without registering concerns,” she told reporters Friday. “In some cases, members are concerned about voter suppression, in some cases they are concerned about Russian influence on our election. There are a number of concerns. But it’s not going to have an impact at the end of the day.”

Every objection must be made in writing and signed by one member of the House and one senator.

In 2001, when Democrats objected after the contested election between George Bush and Vice President Al Gore, no senator joined an objection then either. During that process, Gore, as vice-president, presided over the process.

Now maybe I'm taking crazy pills but it looks like you only need one House member and one Senator to object and all hell breaks loose. That didn't happen in 2000. In 2016 Maxine Walters objected but no Democrat Senator joined her. Is it me or are the chances of one Republican House member and one Senator deciding to step up non-zero?
 
Last edited:
Georgia has set 2 hearings for Thursday and Guliani has been un-uninvited to a Michigan hearing or presentation or whatever tomorrow.

More places are holding hearings. It is an interesting development considering the bipartisan rush to elect Biden.
interesting.
Do the hearings in question have any legal basis to them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria
Georgia has set 2 hearings for Thursday and Guliani has been un-uninvited to a Michigan hearing or presentation or whatever tomorrow.

More places are holding hearings. It is an interesting development considering the bipartisan rush to elect Biden.
Hopefully they get as good as the Michigan one did.
 
Georgia has set 2 hearings for Thursday and Guliani has been un-uninvited to a Michigan hearing or presentation or whatever tomorrow.

More places are holding hearings. It is an interesting development considering the bipartisan rush to elect Biden.

More theater to pretend they're doing something, as is tradition
 
The hearing started out as utter shit, but it got a lot better. The witness statements provided actual evidence and they shared the same stories and were truly diverse. Not like the faggot progtards. Immigrants, PoCs and whites all reporting the identical thing. It was worth it.
The stickers are the right way to respond to them, the real issue is all the people actually talking to them.
This.
Georgia has set 2 hearings for Thursday and Guliani has been un-uninvited to a Michigan hearing or presentation or whatever tomorrow.

More places are holding hearings. It is an interesting development considering the bipartisan rush to elect Biden.
I thought that was todays presentation? Because this was for direct evidence of fraud, which is why there were all the witnesses.
interesting.
Do the hearings in question have any legal basis to them?
Everyone in the MI hearing was under oath. It depends if the legislature wants to do anything. Probably not. But ignoring all those people and six hours of basically a massive amount of people with diverse backgrounds saying the exact same thing is criminal.
More theater to pretend they're doing something, as is tradition
Sadly, this. A lot more needs to be done. The problem is that its really fucking late. The shit that went on in MI was fucking criminal.
 
The hearing started out as utter shit, but it got a lot better. The witness statements provided actual evidence and they shared the same stories and were truly diverse. Not like the faggot progtards. Immigrants, PoCs and whites all reporting the identical thing. It was worth it.

This.

I thought that was todays presentation? Because this was for direct evidence of fraud, which is why there were all the witnesses.

Everyone in the MI hearing was under oath. It depends if the legislature wants to do anything. Probably not. But ignoring all those people and six hours of basically a massive amount of people with diverse backgrounds saying the exact same thing is criminal.

Sadly, this. A lot more needs to be done. The problem is that its really fucking late. The shit that went on in MI was fucking criminal.
The Stickers go away, China potentially directly rigged the election in Biden's favor and Secret Asshole gave a slight bit of hope towards all this this. This week is crazy and it's only just started.
 
Video posted by Neon Revolt.. posted on Twitter by 8chan admin/q admin Ron Watkins.

How could anyone doubt the veracity of this information? It'd be like saying the clips from zombie movies posted as 'COVID victims' back in March came from an unreliable source.
Ah, it turns out that the videos Neon Revolt posted were from 8chan /qresearch/ admin Ron Watkins. Amazing.

Lol, Sidney Powell echoing calls for military tribunals of DEMONRATS for winning the election
1606862720300.png
 
I mean, it wasn't in front of judges, so no. But it was to discuss and provide evidence to the legislature to discuss appropriate remedies. At the very least, it might, might provide some initiative to fix these problems before another election. But who knows.
The Stickers go away, China potentially directly rigged the election in Biden's favor and Secret Asshole gave a slight bit of hope towards all this this. This week is crazy and it's only just started.
Its still 2020 for the time being. Anything can happen.
Ah, it turns out that the videos Neon Revolt posted were from 8chan /qresearch/ admin Ron Watkins. Amazing.

Lol, Sidney Powell echoing calls for military tribunals of DEMONRATS for winning the election
View attachment 1760615
Oh Jesus fucking Christ. Thankfully Trump would never do this, its just insanity talking.
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: PepsiVanilla
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back