- Joined
- Sep 27, 2014
Isn't the leader of Venice the Doge? Imagine being led by a shitty meme like that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's why they invented window blinds: to fuck children in secret.Venice is a pedophile.
Fun fact, one of the first American diplomatic letters ever sent was to Venice, as a greeting from the worlds newest republic to the world’s oldest.Isn't the leader of Venice the Doge? Imagine being led by a shitty meme like that
Why the fuck is Q messing around with the DEMONRATS when he should be going for the real monsters; those spaghetti-eating child-fucking Venetians?!That's why they invented window blinds: to fuck children in secret.
A riddle for the ages.Why the fuck is Q messing around with the DEMONRATS when he should be going for the real monsters; those spaghetti-eating child-fucking Venetians?!
Yes, I just kind of ignore what he does at this point since he comes off as annoying and desperate so can't tell you exactly what he screeched about.Begging your pardon, folks, but did any of you hear Trump put out a 45-minute long rant about the election was stolen?
Funny how he keeps talking about how it was stolen and it's so obvious yet his lawyers have yet to even try to prove it in a court of law.Begging your pardon, folks, but did any of you hear Trump put out a 45-minute long rant about the election was stolen?
I'm here. Your tax dollars at work!I wouldn't be surprised if some FBI agent is watching KiwiFarms, or atleast that election thread.
His supporters think he's saving all the evidence for the Supreme Court, because wasting tons and tons of time and money in the lower courts to intentionally lose repeatedly is 64th Dimensional chess or something.Funny how he keeps talking about how it was stolen and it's so obvious yet his lawyers have yet to even try to prove it in a court of law.
Law and Order/CSI/Matlock was a mistakeHis supporters think he's saving all the evidence for the Supreme Court, because wasting tons and tons of time and money in the lower courts to intentionally lose repeatedly is 64th Dimensional chess or something.
Nope. Nobody is paying any attention to that weirdo any more. Nobody cares.Begging your pardon, folks, but did any of you hear Trump put out a 45-minute long rant about the election was stolen?
That’s probably the part that grinds his gears the most.Nope. Nobody is paying any attention to that weirdo any more. Nobody cares.
Plenty of Trump simps are. He could tell them the sky is purple and they'd believe itNope. Nobody is paying any attention to that weirdo any more. Nobody cares.
Literally not allowed. The Supreme Court doesn't give a flying fuck about evidence in 99% of cases, and they will tell you to fuck off if you try to introduce any.His supporters think he's saving all the evidence for the Supreme Court, because wasting tons and tons of time and money in the lower courts to intentionally lose repeatedly is 64th Dimensional chess or something.
You have Minneapolis and Portland to thank for that overgeneralization.I still find it utterly hilarious that Trumpies genuinely think arguably one of the most conservative Democrats right now is a far-left authoritarian communist. Even progressives like Bernie and AOC are considered center-left in the grand schemes of world politics. The Overton clock is so shifted to the right in America that it’s insane.
My biggest mistake on this website was posting about the Bialystok pride parade in A&H. Had so many people LARPing as historical figures try to justify reports of gangs of grown men beating the everloving shit out of and throwing rocks and glass bottles at teenagers.
SCOTUS can frequently decide a case based on public opinion or how its viewed to be shifting.Its close to impossible to imagine SCOTUS in 1980 deciding that a ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional even if you brought the same arguments brought in 2015.For all this talk about the Constitution the truth is SCOTUS can often decide based on how things have shifted among the public.Which is why frequently certain decisions are reversed decades later.Literally not allowed. The Supreme Court doesn't give a flying fuck about evidence in 99% of cases, and they will tell you to fuck off if you try to introduce any.
While the Supreme Court often opines on stare decisis and similar common law principles, they are actually only bound by the Constitution itself. They can quite easily simply declare they were wrong in previous opinions and that the actual text of the Constitution is what binds them. This is likely how they will rule in a number of cases that will shock and horrify liberals. Just saying.SCOTUS can frequently decide a case based on public opinion or how its viewed to be shifting.Its close to impossible to imagine SCOTUS in 1980 deciding that a ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional even if you brought the same arguments brought in 2015.For all this talk about the Constitution the truth is SCOTUS can often decide based on how things have shifted among the public.Which is why frequently certain decisions are reversed decades later.