Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Curse of ten yahoos upon you, fellow k-farmers. This is truly legal battle for the ages. The following narc injury will be great to witness, especially when reflecting upon her almost manic blissposting. Granted, she will try to twist and force meanings to fit in her worldview, conveniently skip over everything that doesn't support her viewpoints and continue the flinging of her favourite accusations in the meanwhile. So just wait for a while fellow kiwis, this might actually be interesting.
The best part of her her madness is that she actually considers FILING anything a victory, regardless of the inevitable failure of every filing. It's as if she believes being included in the process is some sort of vindication of her abilities or the righteousness of her cause. Sad.
 
I love Smelli Melli’s bragging about how these legal setbacks are actually “wins” for her and allow her to file total crap like her latest filing. She thinks she’s playing 4-D chess, when she’s actually playing Hungry Hungry Hippos.
 
The best part of her her madness is that she actually considers FILING anything a victory, regardless of the inevitable failure of every filing. It's as if she believes being included in the process is some sort of vindication of her abilities or the righteousness of her cause. Sad.
In her list of "victories" that she included, she specifically mentioned that they were cases that she'd won or received any ruling in her favor. That could be, for example, the order granting her motion for breastfeeding, which according to her logic is a win and "proves" that she's not filing frivolous cases even if the overall case ultimately is dismissed as frivolous.

I wish we had some of those documents because I'm sure they're chock-full of stupidity; unfortunately I'm not sure if the state court records can be searched online. I tried searching one of the case numbers and didn't find anything at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
I love Smelli Melli’s bragging about how these legal setbacks are actually “wins” for her and allow her to file total crap like her latest filing. She thinks she’s playing 4-D chess, when she’s actually playing Hungry Hungry Hippos.
You need friends to play Hungry Hungry Hippos. She has none.
unfortunately I'm not sure if the state court records can be searched online. I tried searching one of the case numbers and didn't find anything at all.
Oftentimes they can. Send me the numbers and I will try to get any documents you request for it
 
And you claim that there's no proof that KiwiFarms user "@TamarYaelBatYah" is actually Melinda Scott.

How do you know that I'm not a Private Investigator?


Isn't it improper to communicate directly to a party when you know that they're represented by

I filed my Motion to Compel before they served me the Notice of Appearance.

She has two older sisters and her mother seemed to have been well liked by everyone. To me, it just looks like the youngest child didn't get enough attention when normally they should. Probably was always told why can't you be like Christine or Melissa. Given her temper tantrums as an adult, it's safe to assume she had them even worse as a child.
Holding someone accountable for their actions is not a "temper tantrum". And that is exactly why my mother and I did not get along. I hold people accountable for their actions. That was too offensive for my mother.

My biological sister Christine did not grow up in the same household as myself. There was no need to "compete" for attention. She was raised by other relatives.

My ex-biological-sister Melissa and I didn't have to compete for attention. Melissa got along with my mom better than I did. I was closer to my dad then Melissa was. My mother didn't like me as much because I wouldn't condemn my father and take her side over his. My mom would put me in the middle of her and my father all the time. Melissa would take my mom's side so she gained my mother's favor by doing that.

My mother was wronged by my father in many ways, but I cannot overlook that is was my father that rescued me out of the drug addicted hell hole of a home my mother created. How can I condemn a man who rescued me?

Also, I never understood why my mom needed me to condemn him. Even if her relationship with him was a disaster, she still got 3 daughters out of the whole thing. Daughters.

On a side note, I secretly always believed my 2 biological sisters have different biological fathers than I do. I don't think my 2 older sisters look anything like Thomas Renner, my biological father. So this might also be why my mom didn't like me. I take after my father's looks (in a feminine way). I remind her of him, so she didn't like seeing a reminder of him through me

Also, my father was the one that called me, took me out to lunch, checked in on me when I went off to college. My mom didn't care. I felt loved by my dad, no so much with her.
@TamarYaelBatYah why are you so afraid of "sexual repression" as you call it. You think if you don't rub one out your tits will explode or something?

You said it was bad because "patriarchy" but why would guys get any sort of win if you don't put out? How is it any benefit to this alleged big bad patriarchy that you don't keep on screwing "concubines" or whatever.

Or maybe something happen to you when you were young (aside from converting to your weird little cult) to make you decide you need to keep getting knocked up. You said you decided to do that, probably because Torah, but is there any other factor?

Look at your language: "put out". In your mind, sex is something that a woman gives a man, yet you are unable to recognize a woman's natural desire for sex too.

Sexual repression is not healthy. It can lead to mental health issues. Part of maintains a healthy mind and body is having frequent sex.


Melinda "No Read the Good" Scott strikes again!

You've managed to understand Matter 7: 1-3 exactly backwards, Mel. And I'm a genuine and authorized pope, so I can say that. Infallibly.

"Judge not, that ye be not judged.

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"

Or in less flowery, more direct language.

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"

Yeshy the Meshy isn't commanding you not to judge unless other people judge you first, he's saying don't judge people or you will be judged in the same way, because you are a huge fucking hypocrite and much more guilty.

It's like you're getting them all exactly backwards on purpose, just to find something, anything, to justify your hateful nature.



She represents herself and has a fool for a client.

You are the one reading Matthew 7 backwards.

The Torah says that YOU SHALL judge your neighbor (Lev. 19:15). Keyword there is "neighbor". Goyim are not my "near ones". Israelites are. So I do not judge Goyim UNLESS they judge me first.

The Messiah came to uphold The Torah (MW 5:17-20). He was a Jewish man who followed The Torah and taught other Israelites to follow it as well.

Go to the Greek. Greek says "Don't judge UNLESS you are judged". Christians completely make up their own translations of Matthew 7:1+ because they try to pretend that The Messiah didn't follow The Torah.


Screenshot_20201214-130538.png



"Don’t think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete. 18 Yes indeed! I tell you that until heaven and earth pass away, not so much as a yud or a stroke will pass from the Torah — not until everything that must happen has happened. 19 So whoever disobeys the least of these mitzvot and teaches others to do so will be called the least in the Kingdom of Heaven. But whoever obeys them and so teaches will be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven. 20 For I tell you that unless your righteousness is far greater than that of the Torah-teachers and P’rushim, you will certainly not enter the Kingdom of Heaven!" (MW 5:17-20)


You can't interpret The Messiah's words out of context of The Torah




I’m surprised that YHWH hasn’t told you that your case is going to be dismissed, Nostradumbass.

Secular courts have nothing to do with Elohim. Elohim gave humankind the ability to create their own institutions and rule over them. Secular courts are the dominion of humans. Heavenly courts are the dominion of Elohim





The sexual forwardness? That screams daddy issues too.

From where did you derive the idea that women aren't naturally sexually aggressive creations?
She's required to serve it on all parties, and her certificate of service says that she sent it to Josh instead of his lawyer.

View attachment 1787869
I filed my Motion to Compel before they served me the Notice of Appearance

Sorry, I type fast.

She hasn't, has she? This was sent to the court, and via it to his lawyer.

Things that Null either does not have or cannot be compelled to produce

Null's lawyer replied to her motion to compel by pointing out some of the things I did, and asking for more time

Seriously. More to reply too 🥴

Better get busy again!
 
I filed my Motion to Compel before they served me the Notice of Appearance.
I'm sure the court will be thrilled to see that you're playing silly games like this, particularly since you already filed a response to the motion to set aside default that Josh's lawyer filed at the same time as his the notice of appearance.

Your claim to not know that Josh was represented by council is a lie on its face. The motion that you tried to strike specifically said that it was filed by his lawyer, therefore you knew that he was represented by council, and yet you directed correspondence to Josh directly instead of through council as required.
 
*to

I'm sure the court will be thrilled to see that you're playing silly games like this, particularly since you already filed a response to the motion to set aside default that Josh's lawyer filed at the same time as his the notice of appearance.

Your claim to not know that Josh was represented by council is a lie on its face. The motion that you tried to strike specifically said that it was filed by his lawyer, therefore you knew that he was represented by council, and yet you directed correspondence to Josh directly instead of through council as required.

I have Post Office receipts with time stamps that show that when I put it in the mail box.

Also you didn't do your homework very well. I filed on the 7th. I emailed him on the 8th.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How do you know that I'm not a Private Investigator?
One, this is not at all related to the comment or the comment the comment was replying to
Two, because Null verified you meaning you gave him proof of being Mel
Three, because you keep posting unique selfies on demand that no one else bar Mel could have
Four, because you keep mentioning things about your case that only Mel could know.
And more.
Sexual repression is not healthy. It can lead to mental health issues. Part of maintains a healthy mind and body is having frequent sex.
Assuming that is true, and you haven't provided sources, you can still have sex and not get pregnant.
Secular courts have nothing to do with Elohim. Elohim gave humankind the ability to create their own institutions and rule over them. Secular courts are the dominion of humans. Heavenly courts are the dominion of Elohim
Please read the comments you are replying to, Mel.
I filed my Motion to Compel before they served me the Notice of Appearance
Apperantly she filled it to the court a day before she filled it to Null. She mailed the court on the 6th, and Null on the 7th
Screenshot_20201214-202913_Drive.jpg

Seriously. More to reply too 🥴

Better get busy again!
Weird how you only announce you have work to do only when you read me pointing out your frivolousness.
Your claim to not know that Josh was represented by council is a lie on its face. The motion that you tried to strike specifically said that it was filed by his lawyer, therefore you knew that he was represented by council, and yet you directed correspondence to Josh directly instead of through council as required.
Motion to Strike came a day after she filled her motion to compel (to null)
I have Post Office receipts with time stamps that show that when I put it in the mail box.

Also you didn't do your homework very well. I filed on the 7th. I emailed him on the 8th.
You filled on the 6th, and mailed him on the 7th.
Screenshot_20201214-202913_Drive.jpg
Screenshot_20201214-202254_Drive.jpg

Unless you were talking about the motion to strike
Didn't you just say you have work to do? Why are you still here?
 
How do you know that I'm not a Private Investigator?
I was closer to my dad then Melissa was.


Sexual repression is not healthy. It can lead to mental health issues. Part of maintains a healthy mind and body is having frequent sex.
LMAO we KNOW you were "closer" to your dad. It's why he killed himself, out of guilt for that.
We know you are not a PI because you'd be on the State registry if you were. Also, your abject retardation makes it unlikely as hell.
Your mental health issues are so dire that sexual repression should actually benefit you.
Being a nymphomaniac coomer is not healthy. I don't care if you parrot some misread feminazi garbage to justify it. It isn't patriarchy that made you a disgusting deviant, it's mental illness.

We also know you are not a PI acting for Melinda because you discussed this thread in numerous emails with Farmers from the same address you listed on the court papers. Josh's lawyer knows it too. No judge would be dumb enough to accept your childish ruse. Keep digging, Piggie.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: super thug and Sock
How do you know that I'm not a Private Investigator?

Well, among other reasons...

I filed my Motion to Compel before they served me the Notice of Appearance.


Holding someone accountable for their actions is not a "temper tantrum". And that is exactly why my mother and I did not get along. I hold people accountable for their actions. That was too offensive for my mother.

My biological sister Christine did not grow up in the same household as myself. There was no need to "compete" for attention. She was raised by other relatives.

My ex-biological-sister Melissa and I didn't have to compete for attention. Melissa got along with my mom better than I did. I was closer to my dad then Melissa was. My mother didn't like me as much because I wouldn't condemn my father and take her side over his. My mom would put me in the middle of her and my father all the time. Melissa would take my mom's side so she gained my mother's favor by doing that.

My mother was wronged by my father in many ways, but I cannot overlook that is was my father that rescued me out of the drug addicted hell hole of a home my mother created. How can I condemn a man who rescued me?

Also, I never understood why my mom needed me to condemn him. Even if her relationship with him was a disaster, she still got 3 daughters out of the whole thing. Daughters.

On a side note, I secretly always believed my 2 biological sisters have different biological fathers than I do. I don't think my 2 older sisters look anything like Thomas Renner, my biological father. So this might also be why my mom didn't like me. I take after my father's looks (in a feminine way). I remind her of him, so she didn't like seeing a reminder of him through me

Also, my father was the one that called me, took me out to lunch, checked in on me when I went off to college. My mom didn't care. I felt loved by my dad, no so much with her.

All of this

I have Post Office receipts with time stamps that show that when I put it in the mail box.

Also you didn't do your homework very well. I filed on the 7th. I emailed him on the 8th.

And this.

You are the one reading Matthew 7 backwards.

The Torah says that YOU SHALL judge your neighbor (Lev. 19:15). Keyword there is "neighbor". Goyim are not my "near ones". Israelites are. So I do not judge Goyim UNLESS they judge me first.

The Messiah came to uphold The Torah (MW 5:17-20). He was a Jewish man who followed The Torah and taught other Israelites to follow it as well.

Go to the Greek. Greek says "Don't judge UNLESS you are judged". Christians completely make up their own translations of Matthew 7:1+ because they try to pretend that The Messiah didn't follow The Torah.


View attachment 1787990


"Don’t think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete. 18 Yes indeed! I tell you that until heaven and earth pass away, not so much as a yud or a stroke will pass from the Torah — not until everything that must happen has happened. 19 So whoever disobeys the least of these mitzvot and teaches others to do so will be called the least in the Kingdom of Heaven. But whoever obeys them and so teaches will be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven. 20 For I tell you that unless your righteousness is far greater than that of the Torah-teachers and P’rushim, you will certainly not enter the Kingdom of Heaven!" (MW 5:17-20)


You can't interpret The Messiah's words out of context of The Torah

Mel, you interpret the words out of context of themselves! And no, the greek does not say "unless you are judged" It says "you will be judged"

Melinda, you are a bad liar and a worse scholar.
 
Edit: Null's Lawyer is a God at fast responding. Normally it takes at least a day, but he responded within an hour(to the best of my knowledge) after it was posted on Pacer. It even has great arguments. However much Null is paying him, it's not enough
I can't imagine it would take long for Mike Tyson to win a fight against a wheelchair bound retard with brittle bones. This is basically the legal equivalent of that fight.

Edit: goddammit I missed the chance to make a Tonkasaw joke
 
How the fuck is she this fucking dumb? "Do not judge so that you are not judged" is a sufficiently complex sentence and statement that the trained professionals who study for years to be able to translate new editions of the bible would have gone over it a dozen times or more. If it meant "do not judge UNLESS you are judged" an actual Bible edition would have said so by now. There's literally nothing but cum and maliciousness in that big-ass skull of hers.
 
How the fuck is she this fucking dumb? "Do not judge so that you are not judged" is a sufficiently complex sentence and statement that the trained professionals who study for years to be able to translate new editions of the bible would have gone over it a dozen times or more. If it meant "do not judge UNLESS you are judged" an actual Bible edition would have said so by now. There's literally nothing but cum and maliciousness in that big-ass skull of hers.

There are, Madam Bimbo

Screenshot_20201214-155714.png



Well, among other reasons...



All of this



And this.



Mel, you interpret the words out of context of themselves! And no, the greek does not say "unless you are judged" It says "you will be judged"

Melinda, you are a bad liar and a worse scholar.

Screenshot_20201214-155714.png



The context is The Torah. Matthew 7:1 are the words of a Torah observant Jewish man who taught others to follow The Torah which says:
"With righteousness you *shall* judge your neighbor". (Lev. 19:15)

The OJB translation is accurate: don't judge unless you are judged first, then you get your judgment back in your face. "the measure you pour out will be poured back to you".


LMAO we KNOW you were "closer" to your dad. It's why he killed himself, out of guilt for that.
We know you are not a PI because you'd be on the State registry if you were. Also, your abject retardation makes it unlikely as hell.
Your mental health issues are so dire that sexual repression should actually benefit you.
Being a nymphomaniac coomer is not healthy. I don't care if you parrot some misread feminazi garbage to justify it. It isn't patriarchy that made you a disgusting deviant, it's mental illness.

We also know you are not a PI acting for Melinda because you discussed this thread in numerous emails with Farmers from the same address you listed on the court papers. Josh's lawyer knows it too. No judge would be dumb enough to accept your childish ruse. Keep digging, Piggie.

Every PI does not have to be listed in the state directory as long as they aren't actively following an individual around.

Don't assume a PI can't have access to someone's email, if consent is given in a contract


you can still have sex and not get pregnant.

And how is that?



@TamarYaelBatYah
Quick question, if only courts that matter are the proper jewish ones and secular courts don't matter, why you're suing people in 4th district court?

I never said secular courts don't matter. I said they are under the dominion of human beings, not ruled by Elohim.

Even if I live in a secular nation, the Constitution of the US and laws the USA are the social contract I live with with everyone else. We aren't in the Dark Ages anymore, everybody has to follow the rule of law.
 
There are, Madam Bimbo

View attachment 1788339




View attachment 1788344


The context is The Torah. Matthew 7:1 are the words of a Torah observant Jewish man who taught others to follow The Torah which says:
"With righteousness you *shall* judge your neighbor". (Lev. 19:15)

The OJB translation is accurate: don't judge unless you are judged first, then you get your judgment back in your face. "the measure you pour out will be poured back to you".




Every PI does not have to be listed in the state directory as long as they aren't actively following an individual around.

Don't assume a PI can't have access to someone's email, if consent is given in a contract




And how is that?





I never said secular courts don't matter. I said they are under the dominion of human beings, not ruled by Elohim.

Even if I live in a secular nation, the Constitution of the US and laws the USA are the social contract I live with with everyone else. We aren't in the Dark Ages anymore, everybody has to follow the rule of law.
"Lest" means "that you are not". Please learn how antiquated English works.
 
Dear Null's Laywer,

:semperfidelis: You're the real MVP. You haven't gone down the twisted Mel rabbit hole of narcissism alone. We're down here with you and we brought Everclear.

Nulls lawyer will be fine. Its pretty clear in the filings he is enjoying dunking on Melinda immensely. The best part for him is he is getting paid to do it. This case is a lawyers wet dream. Insane pro-se opposition, he gets to show off how much smarter he is, and he get money for it. Trifecta.
 
There are, Madam Bimbo

Chronic Criticism.

View attachment 1788339

View attachment 1788344

The context is The Torah. Matthew 7:1 are the words of a Torah observant Jewish man who taught others to follow The Torah which says:
"With righteousness you *shall* judge your neighbor". (Lev. 19:15)

The OJB translation is accurate: don't judge unless you are judged first, then you get your judgment back in your face. "the measure you pour out will be poured back to you".

Mel, "Lest" does not mean "unless," it means "for fear that" or slightly less formally "or else you will be"
I know you no read the good. You don't need to keep proving it all the time. I mean you will, because you no read the good, but maybe ease up on trying to convince us you read the good?
Also you're misunderstanding Lev 19:15 as well, but that's no surprise.

Every PI does not have to be listed in the state directory as long as they aren't actively following an individual around.

Don't assume a PI can't have access to someone's email, if consent is given in a contract

Even if that were the case, you're not a PI, Mel.

"Lest" means "that you are not". Please learn how antiquated English works.

To forestall Mel's whinging, this does not contradict the definitions I provided. I say this because I know you no read the good.
 
Last edited:
Chronic Criticism.



Mel, "Lest" does not mean "unless," it means "for fear that" or slightly less formally "or else you will be"
I know you no read the good. You don't need to keep proving it all the time. I mean you will, because you no read the good, but maybe ease up on trying to convince us you read the good?



Even if that were the case, you're not a PI, Mel.



To forestall Mel's whinging, this does not contradict the definitions I provided. I say this because I know you no read the good.
Correcting myself:
Screenshot_20201214-133259_Brave.jpg
 
Back