Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because I know how policy works in this country. I couldn't care less about providing a moron like you with sources for anything. If you wish to not believe me I strongly encourage you to do so.

Besides, on which grounds would I seek disability in any country? Some depression? You exceptional individual.
Holden, you don't know how ANYTHING is done in your country. We were the ones that had to inform you how your basic slander/libel/privacy laws worked. Jesus. If you don't even know something that basic, you don't know shit.
Hahahahaahahahahahahaha

Tell ya what, I'm gonna remove you from Skype for this.
OH NO!!! PLEASE MR. HOLDEN! NOT THAT!! ANYTHING BUT THAT!!!

Just kidding. We've talked once.... most of the time it's you saying "you're a nigger cow" or "cow nigger".
Not really a big loss, to be honest.
 
1) In that case I can't really remember. Maybe some tiny argument on some info. If anybody can find some, please show it.
2) strawman. The point was that her reason wasn't that of most Western women - that I'm not a seducer or a killer. Most modern Western women vomit at the idea that a man who isn't a monster is a father. That's why they usually kill the babies the father would like to take care of.
1) No, you find it. You said you've never lost an argument on here, it's your job to show us.

2) Irrelevant, it wasn't an argument in the first place.
 
No, I didn't.

Another strawman. A sane forum would put one for your avatar.

My claim, so far as expressed there, was about values of an institution and emotions of straight people. It said nothing about survival of societies.

Sorry there, buddy, you actually said nothing about values and emotions in that post. Here,'s the actual quote.

And if you need me to explain why an institution that had been going on for millenia and served the most vital purpose in society should not be expanded, then you are behind hope.

Not one thing about either emotions or values. You do say it served the most 'vital' purpose, though. Something that is, in your own words, "the most vital," would likely be needed for survival of the civilization, no?

, not strawmen.

I'm starting to become convinced that your response to being beaten in an argument is to just cry that, in somewhere, that person utilized a strawman in their argument. It allows you to deflect from the fact you regularly have you ass handed to you in the thread.

Also, awww, @Saint rated me dumb.:c
 
We were the ones that had to inform you how your basic slander/libel/privacy laws worked.
No, you just translated them, thinking you can do that cause you're arrogant morons. You did so badly and incorrectly, as expected, plus you saw the text in US context.

Now tell me why would you want your son in jail for not raping?

1) No, you find it. You said you've never lost an argument on here, it's your job to show us.

2) Irrelevant, it wasn't an argument in the first place.
1) I said I can't remember
2) Then what was it?
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: cromit and 4Macie
Awwww, he thinks I'm pretty! Thanks @Holden you finally learned to give compliments instead of just say douchey things.

You're also a @Holden confirmed super seducer. A Holden confirmed, pretty boy super seducer at that.

Meanwhile, the nicest thing Holden will say about me is that I'm as intelligent as multiple rocks.:heart-empty:

Edit: Maybe if I compliment Holden, he'll say something nice about me. Here goes...

Uh, well. You have better teeth that most meth addicts I've met!
 
Sorry there, buddy, you actually said nothing about values and emotions in that post. Here,'s the actual quote.
I see. I can understand why you'd misunderstand. I wasn't clear enough.

My point was about emotions and values. Check the posts I wrote Otaku earlier. Society can survive with gay marriage, my post simply explained why this institution has an immense emotional and traditional value to straight people due to its functions.

I hope this is clear.
 
Didn't Supreme Court do that? In any case, gay marriage is the least of societal worries in the West one way or another. The fact that a woman will kill a baby if the father wants to take care of it should be somewhat higher on the list.
Do you feel that way because that schizo you supposedly impregnated didn't get an abortion?
 
No, you just translated them, thinking you can do that cause you're arrogant morons. You did so badly and incorrectly, as expected, plus you saw the text in US context.

Now tell me why would you want your son in jail for not raping?
So are you saying your country is so retarded they can't translate their own laws? Because that's where we got them....we didn't need to translate, your country already provides 8 translated texts of their laws and codes.... that's what we used.

You said what the kiwi does would violate laws in your country under slander/libel/privacy laws. We proved you wrong with YOUR OWN LAWS.

Damn, you're all kinds of special.

And seriously.... what does "text in US context" even mean? Are you seriously saying that Croatian laws are written differently for US citizens?
 
Also, awww, @Saint rated me dumb.:c

Sorry, I hit the wrong button somehow. I fixed it. I don't think anything you say is dumb. You are my hope for the future remember?


You're also a @Holden confirmed super seducer. A Holden confirmed, pretty boy super seducer at that.

Meanwhile, the nicest thing Holden will say about me is that I'm as intelligent as multiple rocks.:heart-empty:

OMG you are right! I'm a Pretty Super Seducer!
 
Do you feel that way because that schizo you supposedly impregnated didn't get an abortion?
I repeatedly said she's an exceptional case due to being sick in a different way than modern Western women. She wouldn't kill it even if I wanted to take care of it. Other modern Western women usually would kill it, cause it would show me for a reproductive failure - a responsible man.

So are you saying your country is so retarded they can't translate their own laws?
No, that you are. And that foreigners in general shouldn't do so, especially when they are coming from a completely different legal culture and are arrogant and dumb as fuck.
 
Edit: Maybe if I compliment Holden, he'll say something nice about me. Here goes...

Uh, well. You have better teeth that most meth addicts I've met!

They are certainly better than those of the dread maw that belongs to @Cowlick


Straw Man: the author attacks an argument different from (and weaker than) the opposition's best argument

Irony: You use this in most of your posts yet claim you win the argument. Then you claim that everyone else is using this on you.
 
That's what birth control is for.
Birth control has very little to do with the idea that a woman will kill an already conceived child if she sees that the father isn't a moron. And this can happen in some cases.

Of course, it usually doesn't even get to that. Aside for their rape option, the best birth control for some woman would be to become surrounded by decent, intelligent men.

You use this
Let me make a prediction - you will never ever try to even prove that.
 
And if you need me to explain why an institution that had been going on for millenia and served the most vital purpose in society should not be expanded, then you are behind hope.

And you just explained the idiocy of this sort of opposition. It's not changing the institution, simply expanding it. By this logic, it was bad for Christianity and other major religions to expand to the Western Hemisphere. The religion itself did not change solely for this reason, any changes came about from offshoots of the religion or high ranking members of the faith reinterpreting parts of the texts, something that would happen regardless of the religions' geographic boundaries. This is exactly the same, perhaps even better in the fact that the marriage process itself doesn't have to change.

Also, vital purpose? This is quite the interesting claim. You would bar people from a vital purpose, yet at the same time this "vital purpose" seems immaterial since there are times when it was outlawed for everybody in certain societies, most of which survived.

Your evidence (which you finally dug up)

First of all, you are not one to point that finger. Second of all, we've discussing this specific post ever since I linked to it in the very first post of this discussion following the poem. You're not just a lazy lay, you're downright lazy in general.

doesn't say they should have the right. It's in favor of the act.

Because those are completely different?

(my actual belief is that they have the de facto right already btw, because said sluts don't know what consent is and would never understand it, just like their mothers didn't, which I also said before but you ignored or missed that)

I'm not ignoring it, I'm simply restricting what we discussed to the post you couldn't be bothered to read even though I linked to it before we began discussing it, the lone post you demanded I assess for your lazy ass. If you want me to drag everything into this, then it's still ultimately you supporting the right for men to rape 12 year olds.

So I was lying. Again. Thanks.

Fixed that for you.

@Holden
There's nothing wrong with being mentally ill. It is what it is. What is wrong is when someone who is as mentally ill isn't getting the help they need.

You need help. You are so out of tune with reality it's borderline terrifying. You are so paranoid that it's not even amusing to anyone. You are so depressed many of us think you'll kill yourself someday.

Just go get some meds. You're on disability for your welfare; it'll cover the cost of the meds I'm sure.

If all he does is get meds, he's probably still fucked. In general, psychiatric medication is only a symptom suppressant, patients still keep most of the toxic traits cultivated in this time. If Holden is diagnosed, he'd need therapy to correct these, and for his own sake it should be through inpatient.

That can be one of those last minute details they throw in, so years later they can revive the series should they want to milk it.

And, if they want to milk it in a different direction, Holden's nurse would be TJ Church.

Can someone else ask him how many arguments he's won, considering he's said he never lost any?

It's easy to never lose since he always runs away and restarts somewhere else.

But that's the issue, though - I am not.

You are somebody who's been laughed at my me hundreds of times for your delusional posts. Your posts make no sense, and I've been replying to you saying that over and over. If you tell me I'm not in tune with reality it's like somebody locked up in max security ward is telling me that.

Cause, you know, how come nobody irl is saying this? Here's what your reply will be - a lie that I don't communicate with anybody there, which is something you can't know and the only way to be consistent and deny it is to deny all I ever said, not the things you don't like.

That's what you are, Macie. A nut.

You'd want your own son jailed for not hurting women, ffs.

If you say it for the 101st time it suddenly becomes true.

Irony. Gigantic loads of irony.

My god, how can you possibly be this self-unaware?
 
Birth control has very little to do with the idea that a woman will kill an already conceived child if she sees that the father isn't a moron. And this can happen in some cases.

Of course, it usually doesn't even get to that. Aside for their rape option, the best birth control for some woman would be to become surrounded by decent, intelligent men.

Citation needed. Your opinion doesn't count.

Let me make a prediction - you will never ever try to even prove that.

I don't have to, you will prove it for me in your next few posts. you always do.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Toasty
I repeatedly said she's an exceptional case due to being sick in a different way than modern Western women. She wouldn't kill it even if I wanted to take care of it. Other modern Western women usually would kill it, cause it would show me for a reproductive failure - a responsible man.
Well if I was pregnant with your kid I'd probably self immolate on the spot.
 
And you just explained the idiocy of this sort of opposition. It's not changing the institution, simply expanding it. By this logic, it was bad for Christianity and other major religions to expand to the Western Hemisphere. The religion itself did not change solely for this reason, any changes came about from offshoots of the religion or high ranking members of the faith reinterpreting parts of the texts, something that would happen regardless of the religions' geographic boundaries. This is exactly the same, perhaps even better in the fact that the marriage process itself doesn't have to change.
No, not at all. Christianity didn't change by expanding, or at least didn't intend to originally. Messages, dogmas and ceremonies were, or at least should had been least in theory, initially the same.

By expanding marriage to include not just a man and a woman but two men or two women you are expanding the nature of institution by changing it. This is hurtful to straight people.

This is why you're an idiot, Otaku. Go away.

Oh, and you're the guy who said that about the girl and pics. Never forget that.

Well if I was pregnant with your kid I'd probably self immolate on the spot.
But you're not schizophrenic and you know I'm incel (aka not an immoral retard). That's a huge difference. I do believe you, but know the difference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back