/r/wsb autists taking on a wallstreet hedgefund. Elon musk involved as always / wallstreetbets / gamestop - Gamergate 2: financial boogaloo

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Edit: I’ve also vowed to spend a significant portion of whatever I make (if anything) at GameStop. It’s only right.
Reggie thanks you for your contributions, but perhaps you should also spend a lot of it on spaghetti, as is tradition.

But yeah, if I had more slushy money to throw I'd have probably gotten a few to have a laugh alongside others with. But I'm still finishing up the next egg while paying down some debt; I'm the boring investor sort by and large. Don't go to college if you're from a poor family, folks.
 
I bought like 10 shares at $300 yesterday on the grounds that maybe I’ll double my money, but if I don’t, lol, it’s certainly not the first stock I’ve gotten ass fucked by.

Edit: I’ve also vowed to spend a significant portion of whatever I make (if anything) at GameStop. It’s only right. Also my kid wants a Switch.
For real. The point isn't to make cash. At least, not for me. The point is to hurt sociopaths and make them cry and scream and meltdown.

Take the stock down to zero, whatever. Just as long as they feel like losers.
 
"I will make it legal"

Something being illegal doesn't really matter if no court on the planet will actually take your case. What if the rot is so deep that even doing something hilariously illegal in broad daylight has no consequences for these people because no one in their right mind will prosecute?
Not entirely true. Billionaires get prosecuted if other people at the top have something to gain from it. Idk where this idea that all these billionaires live in perfect harmony came from, but idk if I completely believe it. I guarantee you there are other 10-figure hedge funds that are feeding on the corpse of the $2b hedge that tried to short GME as we speak.

2008 housing bubble was different because the bankers benefit everyone at the top. The government has nothing to gain from prosecuting useful idiots, so they give them a slap on the wrist.

The people at the top don’t believe in equal justice, only justice when it suits them.
 
But yeah, if I had more slushy money to throw I'd have probably gotten a few to have a laugh alongside others with. But I'm still finishing up the next egg while paying down some debt; I'm the boring investor sort by and large.
I have like $10k of “fucking around” money from ESPP sales (originally 14k lol). I would never dump any real money into this.
 
1611949806145.png

lmaoing at all these desperate suits trying to blame the racists, this guy has a more Spanish first name than me :sighduck:
 
"Poor people shouldn't learn basic personal finance fundamentals because everything is a lie"

???????

Like I agree that the short selling stuff is messed up and all, but those are two totally separate problems.
It's pity-party, post-facto excuse making for Black "excellence."

Which is stupid because it's like seeing Bobby Fischer beat Donald Byrne at chess and then proclaiming that it exposed that the reason you always lose is because the game is rigged.
 
You’re right, it’s not illegal if friends and/or family tell you “I think this stock is going up, you should buy it”. It is for someone who owes a duty to you as a customer.

It’s also illegal when it’s in service of a larger scheme at hand, which is what I believe they’re going to run with if they ever decide to take WSB to court.

They’ll label this a “Pump and Dump” and will try and argue the WSB mods were facilitating the rollout of this scheme by telling everyone they can to buy this stock. They will consider this “manipulation of a stock” in order to “pump” a symbol.

I’m not taking sides, but if WSB were taken to court, this is how they would proceed. It would be an uphill battle for the prosecutor and an easy win for the defendant, but it’s what would happen.
May I remind you that bankers, lawyers, and judges have something important in common and the courts have almost always sided against the common people on any issue which matters.
 
This is the book in question:
A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind

Literally found it in 2 seconds free to read:
And our friend is looking for an audiobook. The book was posted at least twice as an attachment already.
 
Man, I wish half the things said by people about Jews in this thread were true. Then (((I))) wouldn't be so anxious over trying to get into law school right now (since I'm not a black tranny who majored in film studies to get a 4.0), make money, earn a living, save up for car payments, etc. If I had access to some Rothschild gold bullion or a secret network of elites that let me in wherever I wanted just by reciting the right phrase from the Protocols, my life would be a lot simpler.

Remember in the New Testament there were Jews and then there were specifically the Pharisees? The Pharisees and scribes are the ones you should be pointing at, not Shlomo at the Chabad or David who works in sports medicine.
But wouldn't the Jews of today be the ones who sided with the Pharisees (or the Synagogue of Satan as Jesus called it)? Those who sided with Jesus would be, well, Christians, by that logic.
 

Socialism is an economic system, which contrasts with capitalism. Under socialism, the means of production are owned collectively rather than by individuals. Historical examples of socialist countries include Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Contemporary examples of socialism include Venezuela, Cuba, and China. Socialism is different from capitalism, in which individual property rights determine ownership. Under capitalism, each person is entitled to the wealth they create from their land, labor, equipment, and entrepreneurship. Socialism is related to Communism, but predates Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto by a few decades.
 
Back