Infected MGTOW - Men Going Their Own Way

Name them, and explain why you have to go to MGTOW instead of, say, some self-help book for it.
I didn't say you had to go to MGTOW for anything. That said if some people manage to improve their lives from the internet rantings of middle aged weirdos rather than self help books or whatever then power to them. You can level the same criticism against those same self help books. Why read book X if its basically the same shit as book Y which was published 100 years ago, which is the same as book Z etc etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fustrated
No. Being a perpetual bachelor is not a new thing altogether. New era, different name. I never said I wasn't interested in interacting with women. I have women who are my friends. However, I'm also a loner. I only interact with anyone as much as I'm forced to. I avoid marriage and relationships altogether because I believe it is unbalanced and doesn't give me anything that I want out of life.

I don't want crotch-fruit of my own or others' makings in my life. I'm barely responsible for my cats - you expect me to raise children? Fuck that.

MGTOW is moreso about avoiding women altogether and self-insulating from them - for fear of false rape allegations, child support out of nowhere, and so on. I don't self-insulate from them, I work with them, and have them as my friends. I'm not worried about false rape allegations because I don't really interact with anyone in private settings. If someone wants to hang out, I have to get drug out of my home to a public place. I never just hang out with a single person - not out of some self-preservation instinct, it's just a waste of time for me if it's not multiple friends.



It's really not. In some areas of the country, it's actually -very- dangerous to let your girlfriend live with you - as you can be considered de facto married or in a marititious (sc) relationship. And she can actually bring you to court. In some states, it's legal to anonymously report or accuse someone of rape, domestic abuse, etc. and even get their licenses suspended.

Some areas have disproportionate laws in regard to this. People from those areas would do well to know the rules, especially if it can cost them so much. Especially "yes means yes" law where a woman can decide the next day they didn't want to have sex and accuse you of rape (has happened).
I fully understand why MGTOW is a thing, the laws are shit and its only going to get worse because muh universal suffrage. My point was that I see it as nothing but an interchangeable term for eternal bachelor or the Japanese "herbivore men". The motivations for why men go their own way can be as simply as not being interested in committed relationships to viewing relationships as a game of Russian roulette in today's social and especially legal climate.

And with coping I mean everything from men impotently crying on the Internet, trying to make the best out of their situation to trying to figure out how to game and cheese the clown world system in their favour. Some men see MGTOW as a way to vent their anger, frustration and angst, while others see it was a survival guide.

Edit:
I agree to an extent, but like most primal urges it's meant to be challenged in order to make a better society. The known risks and problems brought on by hypergamy is enough, to me, that I think it's wrong. I don't want to tell people how to live though, but I see the upsides in "going your own way."
You can try to transcend the eternal monke in all of us, that is for example how we introduced and enforced monogamy through patriarchy. But if you are in complete and utter denial about human nature and go against it, you're doing so at your own peril. As I explained pages ago, there is a reason why post-wall stronk and independent womyn are crazy and bitter cunts, why middle-aged incels and MGTOWs are prone to being flailing spastics, why NEETs are for all intents and purposes zombies, why trannies have their 41% and so on.
 
Last edited:
It's actually alpha to never reproduce and die alone with a bunch of shitty blog posts as your legacy instead. Only betas have families, I mean come on what kind of cuck pays for a vapid FEMOID and her CROTCHSPAWN?

If men historically had the bitchmade, effeminate attitude of MGTOWs, we'd still be hunter-gatherers.
 
You can try to transcend the eternal monke in all of us, that is for example how we introduced and enforced monogamy through patriarchy. But if you are in complete and utter denial about human nature and go against it, you're doing so at your own peril. As I explained pages ago, there is a reason why post-wall stronk and independent womyn are crazy and bitter cunts, why middle-aged incels and MGTOWs are prone to being flailing spastics, why NEETs are for all intents and purposes zombies, why trannies have their 41% and so on.
Shitting inside a house, cooking food before eating it, asking for consent before fucking, and not ROFLstomping the infants of other males are all also against our biological instincts. Enforced exclusive monogamy through patriarchy is against our biological instincts. Just like pretending biological instincts don't exist at all is stupid, acting like biological instincts are the sole dictate of human behavior and acting against them lead to ruin is also stupid.
 
If men historically had the bitchmade, effeminate attitude (...)
They'd be filtered out of the gene pool. When left on their own, problems like these are usually self-correcting.
(...) acting like (...) acting against them lead to ruin is also stupid.
Our biological programming isn't 100% absolute of course, but I'm 41% sure that acting against them does make you prone to mental ailments.
 
You can try to transcend the eternal monke in all of us, that is for example how we introduced and enforced monogamy through patriarchy. But if you are in complete and utter denial about human nature and go against it, you're doing so at your own peril. As I explained pages ago, there is a reason why post-wall stronk and independent womyn are crazy and bitter cunts, why middle-aged incels and MGTOWs are prone to being flailing spastics, why NEETs are for all intents and purposes zombies, why trannies have their 41% and so on.
Fighting the monke is also why we have laws and societies and not total anarchy where we fight and kill each other for dominance.
"enforced monogamy through patriarchy"
You think everyone would be polygamous without a "patriarchy"?
 
Fighting the monke is also why we have laws and societies and not total anarchy where we fight and kill each other for dominance.
"enforced monogamy through patriarchy"
You think everyone would be polygamous without a "patriarchy"?

right? I think a theoretical matriarchal society would gaurantee monogamy more.

On a similar note, I do wonder why we've gravitated so much towards monogamy in general. I'd like to think that it's because monogamy the healthiest form of romantic companionship, but that can't be all of it, right? it's gotta be evolutionarily beneficial in some sense, doesn't it? really makes me thunk.
 
Fighting the monke is also why we have laws and societies and not total anarchy where we fight and kill each other for dominance.
"enforced monogamy through patriarchy"
You think everyone would be polygamous without a "patriarchy"?
Restraint of raw animal impulse to constructive ends is the point of monogamy, the institution of marriage, and much of human civilization in general.
 
Name them

1614833302215.png


Sure, it's reddit, but it's not the only time I've seen a post like this clipped from reddit, nor is it the only time I've heard of this kind of shit happening. No fault divorce is ridiculously simple to get, and because married couples share assets, the person earning the lion's share of the income is functionally going to pay for both lawyers, until the asset split is signed off. That usually means the man is the one footing the bill for both lawyers. Tack on the bias in favour of mothers in child custody rulings, and shit like this (from 12 years ago), much of which is still permissible and/or legal, and they have a couple valid points, despite the raging idiocy and retardation that they also engage in.
 
View attachment 1967698

Sure, it's reddit, but it's not the only time I've seen a post like this clipped from reddit, nor is it the only time I've heard of this kind of shit happening. No fault divorce is ridiculously simple to get, and because married couples share assets, the person earning the lion's share of the income is functionally going to pay for both lawyers, until the asset split is signed off. That usually means the man is the one footing the bill for both lawyers. Tack on the bias in favour of mothers in child custody rulings, and shit like this (from 12 years ago), much of which is still permissible and/or legal, and they have a couple valid points, despite the raging idiocy and retardation that they also engage in.
Jumped the gun a bit fast here, huh? r/legaladvice is not an MGTOW forum, and some women being cunts and court bias does not justify 99% of MGTOW.
 
Jumped the gun a bit fast here, huh? r/legaladvice is not an MGTOW forum, and some women being cunts and court bias does not justify 99% of MGTOW.

No, you asked for a valid point, and that is an example of a point that a ridiculous number of MGTOW make. There's also a whole ass other link about how thoroughly a woman can screw over a guy, through entirely legally supported means, posted 12 years ago, which is well before "youtube MGTOWS" and "MGTOW forums" were a particularly notable phenomenon.

Do you not agree that family court bias is a valid complaint being raised by MGTOWs, despite being given 2 pretty strong examples of how that bias can completely fuck up the life of a guy?
 
I believe I've said it before in this thread, but I really do wish that the "men's rights" well wasn't so completely poisoned by online discourse. MGTOW has some pretty salient points - often unfair treatment in divorce court, less mental health support, the constant assumption that men in nuturing positions are somehow predators (stay at home dads, teachers, nannies, etc.), the weight of certain expectations regarding what a man is supposed to be. What I find most egregious, personally, is the complete lack of support/shelter for men suffering domestic abuse. Personally, I find the discussions and resources posted in communities like r/menslib to be a fair bit more constructive and substantial than anything posted in r/MGTOW, though.
 
No, you asked for a valid point, and that is an example of a point that a ridiculous number of MGTOW make. There's also a whole ass other link about how thoroughly a woman can screw over a guy, through entirely legally supported means, posted 12 years ago, which is well before "youtube MGTOWS" and "MGTOW forums" were a particularly notable phenomenon.

Do you not agree that family court bias is a valid complaint being raised by MGTOWs, despite being given 2 pretty strong examples of how that bias can completely fuck up the life of a guy?
I didn't ask for a valid point- I was making the point that other groups make the same valid points as MGTOW without being mired in toxic sewage. That's it. Point over. Yes, MGTOW make a valid point about court bias (although the conclusions they draw are insane). Yakubians also make a valid point when they protest lynchings by the KKK.
 
You think everyone would be polygamous without a "patriarchy"?
Depends. In hindsight I should have used a better term since in extreme patriarchal settings (think of nature or warlords), polygamy tends to be even the norm. It was usually patriarchal institutions (state, religion, social norms etc.) that used to wrangle our monke impulses.
On a similar note, I do wonder why we've gravitated so much towards monogamy in general. I'd like to think that it's because monogamy the healthiest form of romantic companionship, but that can't be all of it, right? it's gotta be evolutionarily beneficial in some sense, doesn't it? really makes me thunk.
By being primates, we humans have a competitive based mating strategy where males compete and often kill each other over females with one alpha usually having a harem for himself and occasionally some betas temporarily teaming up to overthrow and kill said alpha before going at each others' throats again. That's just the way we evolved. Monogamy and marriage are - as much as this term makes me cringe - social constructs. We humans almost universally, at least when trying to evolve beyond a hunter-gatherer society, tend to ultimately drift towards these to turn violent male competition into male cooperation to have nice things such as an advanced civilisation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grumpy and Devyn
I didn't ask for a valid point- I was making the point that other groups make the same valid points as MGTOW without being mired in toxic sewage. That's it. Point over. Yes, MGTOW make a valid point about court bias (although the conclusions they draw are insane). Yakubians also make a valid point when they protest lynchings by the KKK.

And I presented a point that MGTOWs make - that some number of women use men as a disposable means of advancement. That's a point they constantly make, and that reddit clip is already being passed around by MTGOW, as proof of that point.

But go ahead and find me "other groups making those points", because I know I haven't seen any other group making those points, and I especially haven't seen any groups making that point that isn't tarred as howling retards, and a danger to women.
 
And I presented a point that MGTOWs make - that some number of women use men as a disposable means of advancement. That's a point they constantly make, and that reddit clip is already being passed around by MTGOW, as proof of that point.

But go ahead and find me "other groups making those points", because I know I haven't seen any other group making those points, and I especially haven't seen any groups making that point that isn't tarred as howling retards, and a danger to women.
And some men use women as a disposable means of pussy. Look how many men leave their wives when they get cancer, vs the opposite.

All MGTOW do is complain about women. So much for going their own way.
 
And I presented a point that MGTOWs make - that some number of women use men as a disposable means of advancement. That's a point they constantly make, and that reddit clip is already being passed around by MTGOW, as proof of that point.

But go ahead and find me "other groups making those points", because I know I haven't seen any other group making those points, and I especially haven't seen any groups making that point that isn't tarred as howling retards, and a danger to women.
Okay, here you go, three out of dozens of different sources talking about the thing you claim nobody but MGTOW talk about, ever. A legal firm specializing in divorce, a lifestyle magazine for fathers, and a subreddit devoted specifically to egalitarian discussion of men's issues (aka another thing you implicitly claimed doesn't exist).
You are not the universe, and if you didn't find these sources when I found them by googling "court bias against fathers" and looking at the first page, you clearly weren't looking very hard.
EDIT: Oh, and here's famed Leftist hub Wikipedia acknowledging the ghost of the Tender Years doctrine in the court system in a way far more neutral than you'd paint them.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: secret watcher
Back