Check out this Ovarit thread discussing SuperStraight:
Posted in o/GenderCritical by linsin
ovarit.com
They're annoyed that the TikTok kid got more attention than they did, because he's a male of course. But some of them are starting to get a clue:
A few of them are realizing that wit and humor work better than endless droning sermons.
Also, someone in that thread mentioned something even more interesting:
You think it's a coincidence that SuperStraight rhymes with GamerGate?
When the official talking heads are silent it's a bad sign for the status quo. When business is going on as usual, they're always quick to chime in and enforce the approved narrative. The fact that they're silent tells me that SuperStraight has caught them off guard and they're scared.
Why? My guess is that SS represents a perfect negative PR storm for them. It directly targets one of the weakest, least credible planks in their platform - that anyone refusing sex to a trans person is a bigot. Officially the trans institutions deny they believe this, but we know the trancels hold it near and dear to their hearts.
One of the reasons troons have taken so much institutional power over the last few years is that they've learned to fight ferociously for every bit of territory they can get and never, ever tolerate opposition. Anyone who opposes them must be crushed at all costs. And SS has just spit in their eye.
But the HRC and the other people pulling the strings know that this is a fight they must avoid. All their rabid footsoldiers are raring to go but they have to hold them back, because if they get into a public dispute where they're making a case that straight men owe it to trannies to suck their ladysticks, it's all over for their movement.
So will the Pritzkers and Clymers be able to keep their army of deranged incel diaper porn addicts under control or will they go into a vengeful frenzy and spark an online holy war bigger than GamerGate?