The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Derek Chauvin'
s body language and tone really make him seem like he doesn't give a shit about Georgie boy dying which while baste isnt gonna score him points with a jury

The old coot can't fathrom what great and wonderful trandsference has taken place. Respect the new flesh, grandpa.
 
So far from what I've seen, they've all been eye witnesses. Just imagine the type of person who would be hanging outside the local bodega in a shithole neighborhood and it makes sense.
"Next surprise witness! This creepy nigga who was wearing a dress and jacking off in a dumpster across the street. Sir, what did you see?"

"I...I saw a man... get murdered. He done get his neck squashed with that mans foot. I was scared. He looked like a supple, sexy 12 year old naked boy with a bunch of men piling on top of his body with big dick energy. When will this nightmare of racism ever end?!"
 
Break break break. All these motherfuckers do is break. They go on break before lunch. They go on break after lunch. They get a guy in and he starts crying. 10 minute recess. He comes back and confirms that he is the guy in the video.

Great timing, says the judge. Let's have a 10 minute break so we can talk about streamlining this. Then he waddles his judge ass up and waddles his judge ass away and prepares another 400 hours of asking random people on the street if the man was in fact on the ground.

Boys I think Chauvin already lost. Win or Loss, he'll be long dead by the time these breaks come to a halt. Fuck.
From my, admittedly, limited experiences with the judicial system, I would say this is a constant around the civilised world. Judges, due to the way most democracies are constructed, are basically untouchable, hence they often display a "matter of fact" kind of arrogance, one so bred into them it becomes unconscious behaviour. Late arrivals; constant breaks; displays of open favouritism; allowing their own mood to clearly influence their attitude towards a given person/case - I've seen those, and more, time and time again. My absolute favourite example is a female judge who was more than an hour late to a hearing, and entered the courtroom with bags full of groceries discreetly carried away by a clerk.
 
idk if im very late on this but that obese fat bitch cuaght taking photos yesterday just confirmed she was there and the twitter account is real


Archive

fat kamala.png



i know some people were doubting if that twitter account was the same as the woman from yesterday becuase she called herself "Rachel Jackson" instead of kelly but this dumb bitch just confirmed it was her
 
And yet he was probably feeling short of breath due to his fentanyl overdose. Respiratory distress is consistent with a fentanyl overdose, and I can certainly believe that Floyd was panicking due to the effects.
To add on this, its not just Fent, it's all opiates and it comes in two major forms IIRC

The first is respiratory depression. Which is a gradual shift where you don't breath deeply and quickly enough, and your brain doesn't read that, so you gradually lose consciousness and die.

The second is respiratory distress from fluid in the lungs. Basically, your body's lipoproteins (lung wd40) are normally meant to keep things nice and slippery, but the opiates cause it to overproduce and flood the lungs with fluid. This is basically choking on your own lungs.

To be fair, you can be experiencing this and not die. Nor do you have to be "overdosing" to suffer from minor version of it. Think of a milk carton thats 20% full with all the milk on the bottom. Now tip it on its side. How much milk is now covering the jug? nearly 40%.

TBH if I was the prosecutor I'd go with this. Argue that basically anyone with fluid in the lungs would have the exact same issue. Find a position meant for people suffering respiratory distress.

Fortunantly, last I heard there was totally, 0 evidence of Floyd taking drugs. What? Toxicology? Drugs on him? Bro that's the police bro you can't trust that info bro.
 
idk if im very late on this but that obese fat bitch cuaght taking photos yesterday just confirmed she was there and the twitter account is real


Archive

View attachment 2046350


i know some people were doubting if that twitter account was the same as the woman from yesterday becuase she called herself "Rachel Jackson" instead of kelly but this dumb bitch just confirmed it was her
I hope she didn't take that on the 18th floor. She might get microaggressed right into a contempt hearing
 
So the plaintiffs have thusfar brought to the table: 1. A nine year old girl in an extremely tasteless and hamhanded attempt to tug on heartstrings, 2) a seething "nurse" who loooks lik a loaf of bread with legs, and had to literally be told off by the judge 3. A store clerk who doesn't know his asshole from his armpit and...?
 
So the plaintiffs have thusfar brought to the table: 1. A nine year old girl in an extremely tasteless and hamhanded attempt to tug on heartstrings, 2) a seething "nurse" who loooks lik a loaf of bread with legs, and had to literally be told off by the judge 3. A store clerk who doesn't know his asshole from his armpit and...?
A genuinely nice old man with no brain smarts but street smarts who just wanted to tell Floyd to calm the fuck down.

Each and everyone of these hurt putting away The cop in all honestly. Its kinda hilarious
 
To add on this, its not just Fent, it's all opiates and it comes in two major forms IIRC

The first is respiratory depression. Which is a gradual shift where you don't breath deeply and quickly enough, and your brain doesn't read that, so you gradually lose consciousness and die.

The second is respiratory distress from fluid in the lungs. Basically, your body's lipoproteins (lung wd40) are normally meant to keep things nice and slippery, but the opiates cause it to overproduce and flood the lungs with fluid. This is basically choking on your own lungs.

To be fair, you can be experiencing this and not die. Nor do you have to be "overdosing" to suffer from minor version of it. Think of a milk carton thats 20% full with all the milk on the bottom. Now tip it on its side. How much milk is now covering the jug? nearly 40%.

TBH if I was the prosecutor I'd go with this. Argue that basically anyone with fluid in the lungs would have the exact same issue. Find a position meant for people suffering respiratory distress.

Fortunantly, last I heard there was totally, 0 evidence of Floyd taking drugs. What? Toxicology? Drugs on him? Bro that's the police bro you can't trust that info bro.
I'm not familiar with how the United States justice system operates, so I'll ask something basic - can a judge/jury choose to completely ignore a medical expertise if it doesn't fit their bias towards a given case?
 
I'm not familiar with how the United States justice system operates, so I'll ask something basic - can a judge/jury choose to completely ignore a medical expertise if it doesn't fit their bias towards a given case?
The judge can't really just throw out evidence that's been properly submitted willy-nilly (I mean they can, but it'll just come back in appeals), and the jury is expected to take the testimony into account, but they're supposed to make their own decisions based on the evidence presented
 
idk if im very late on this but that obese fat bitch cuaght taking photos yesterday just confirmed she was there and the twitter account is real


Archive

View attachment 2046350


i know some people were doubting if that twitter account was the same as the woman from yesterday becuase she called herself "Rachel Jackson" instead of kelly but this dumb bitch just confirmed it was her
lol this dumb bitch told the judge she's a PR agent trying to keep the press away from her client, a young girl who was a witness. Yet she uses her full name in a hashtag.
 
I'm not familiar with how the United States justice system operates, so I'll ask something basic - can a judge/jury choose to completely ignore a medical expertise if it doesn't fit their bias towards a given case?
If they did it would probably be really easy for the defendant to appeal the ruling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back