Vinesauce

  • Thread starter Thread starter YI 457
  • Start date Start date
View attachment 2054874

grown man sleeps with grown woman, third party makes a google doc about it, mental state: ANNIHILATED

Grow up please.

Also this was the dude vin got pissed at because he actually uploaded something a bit too spicyily out of context, I believe about little boys, pretty sure it's in the thread way back, but he said whatever you do, if you clip this one leave SOME context. (I started following because he actually had some balls and said nope out of context means out of context)

"can you fucking not, not now!" *slams phone or keyboard*

Got my desired salt!

An understandable request considering it was a pedo joke he made stripped of all context, but funny not a "joke" like in a shane dawson way. Still in todays climate i would nawt risk my pecker like that.

And some salt back from the uploader:

View attachment 1437158

https://twitter.com/NoContextVinny/status/1281124216150962177

View attachment 1437160

Found and here is the PROPERLY archived url: https://archive.md/VkC2p
 
Might have been brought up already, but I think it's interesting that GreatSphynx (admin on the vs discord server, and who vets some of the random turd packs/etc that Vinny plays) liked Charon's tweet.
 

Attachments

  • sphynx.png
    sphynx.png
    594.2 KB · Views: 219
Same with the Dan Avidan thread. If none of those hoes were children and were consenting to have sex with the eceleb then FUCK THEM.
 
That's very naïve thinking if you think casual sex is a relatively new thing.
Casual sex was a rarity until the invention of reliable contraception, due to several factors:
1. It was much easier to get pregnant, the obvious one.
2. A woman's reputation was much, much more important than today.
3. Raising someone else's children, barring very specific circumstances, made a man a laughing stock, and once again - honor mattered.
4. Communities were, barring some exceptions, much smaller and more tight-knit, so sexual promiscuity was more difficult due to simple logistics. Very few women like to be known as "the town whore".
5. Due to a lack of DNA testing men were much more paranoid about raising children born out of adultery, so marrying a virgin was crucial.

I'm not even going to go into discussions about whether societies past simply had better morals, at least in certain parts of life. So yes, my observant friend, casual sex is a relatively recent invention.
 
If we don’t apply this logic to young men we shouldn’t apply it to young woman. Also if you’re too agentless to choose who to have sex with how can you be trusted to vote
I do apply that logic to young men, and sex is more complicated than voting for a myriad of reasons. I honestly don't think teens should be voting unsupervised, either, though. We only barely let guys do it and that's because they have the draft, and young women got the free in because egalitarianism is cool. Some people are young enough or not well informed enough to understand that and take it as hyperbole, but that's literally what happened. Politics has (unsurprisingly) become increasingly juvenile over time.
 
You know what? I'll be the special faggot of this thread and say that, while I do not believe that Vinny is guilty of anything, I can totally see him doing the whole boobie creeperino shtick when trying to pick groupies. This is the kind of language he built his career on so why wouldn't he use it on women who obviously love him as a performer for that exact kind of thing?

I couldn't tolerate much of gamegrumps after Jon left but Dan was definitely going for the very same persona he uses on the show in that jacuzzi video.

What I mean is, if I was a young and impressionable whore then I would be pretty disappointed if he DIDN'T scream BOOOTI while filling my loose meathole with a foamy cocktail of love juices, cum and STDs. Otherwise, why even bother?
Dear friend, I know you are excited to be on the forum, but could you please keep the erotic descriptions to a minimum? The fine people here may otherwise start thinking that you yourself draw some strange sexual gratification from describing such acts.
 
Casual sex was a rarity until the invention of reliable contraception, due to several factors:
1. It was much easier to get pregnant, the obvious one.
2. A woman's reputation was much, much more important than today.
3. Raising someone else's children, barring very specific circumstances, made a man a laughing stock, and once again - honor mattered.
4. Communities were, barring some exceptions, much smaller and more tight-knit, so sexual promiscuity was more difficult due to simple logistics. Very few women like to be known as "the town whore".
5. Due to a lack of DNA testing men were much more paranoid about raising children born out of adultery, so marrying a virgin was crucial.

I'm not even going to go into discussions about whether societies past simply had better morals, at least in certain parts of life. So yes, my observant friend, casual sex is a relatively recent invention.

IDK if you're being serious or not - this reads like a reddit post.

While I have no concrete evidence (based on not existing at the times), I do know human nature, and I can virtually guarantee that those are all not good enough reasons for our ancestors to not have casual sex.

You actually contradict yourself by admitting there was a lack of DNA testing, so there would have been no way to know whether or not your son's ginger hair just 'skipped a generation'.

I hate the fact i can reference this, but the Scarlet letter disproves you completely. A story written in the 1800s about casual sex in the 1600s. Shakespere's work also explores the topic. Even cultures dating back to the ancient greeks outline 'sexual deviancy'.

But yes, the internet and 'new' culture is bad, and makes everyone a sex perv.
 
Last edited:
Moving away a bit from the nonstory:

On the topic of bullshit Star Trek memes, anyone else find Vinny's one week obsessions kind of annoying?

Where he would watch something, and not shut up about it for a week. Like the time he watched Flight Of The Concords this time last year and wouldn't shut the fuck up about it.

I also remember a period where he had to randomly mention to chat "hey guys I watched the movie Eyes Wide Shut when I was a kid" several times.


This is of course, different than him talking about a movie that RLM immediately reviewed the day prior, or his REM kick he goes on 3 times a year.
I absolutely agree on how annoying it gets. But I can sort of get it. Aside from the obsession, the dude streams so much that I'm surprised he still gets things to talk about anymore
 
IDK if you're being serious or not - this reads like a reddit post.

While I have no concrete evidence (based on not existing at the times), I do know human nature, and I can virtually guarantee that those are all not good enough reasons for our ancestors to not have casual sex.

You actually contradict yourself by admitting there was a lack of DNA testing, so there would have been know way to know whether or not your son's ginger hair just 'skipped a generation'.

I hate the fact i can reference this, but the Scarlet letter disproves you completely. A story written in the 1800s about casual sex in the 1600s. Shakespere's work also explores the topic. Even cultures dating back to the ancient greeks outline 'sexual deviancy'.

But yes, the internet and 'new' culture is bad, and makes everyone a sex perv.
Are you really citing books and plays intentionally including overly dramatic events - for entertainment purposes - as proof of how everyday life looked? Going by that logic, in a hundred years people will cite "The Hulk" or "Spiderman" as proof that 20th century Americans tried radiation poisoning as a means of achieving supernatural powers.
 
Might have been brought up already, but I think it's interesting that GreatSphynx (admin on the vs discord server, and who vets some of the random turd packs/etc that Vinny plays) liked Charon's tweet.
he was streaming and being hosted when vinny normally would have been live last night playing doom. someone asked about vinny and he said he'd rather not talk about twitter bullshit, and that people had already made up their minds regardless of the evidence.

 
Are you really citing books and plays intentionally including overly dramatic events - for entertainment purposes - as proof of how everyday life looked? Going by that logic, in a hundred years people will cite "Hulk" as proof that 20th century Americans tried radiation poisoning as means to achieving supernatural powers.
That's a stretch an a half. By your logic, you would imagine that we all think Zeus existed. We're talking about sex, something that not only all (or most) living organisms are capable of, but something that literally contributed to the fact we can even have this conversation right now. So you know, a biological function as opposed to a comic character.

You also said that casual sex is a new thing (objectively wrong), so regardless of the context, it's not. And if you honestly believe that older generations didn't partake in such acts... well, I got a bridge to sell you.

Nice strawman though, I'm gonna start telling kids the Hulk is real.
 
Last edited:
Back