Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
We laugh more at his trashy junk-food diet, which contradicts his self-image as a cultural sophisticate, than the brute fact that he is fat.

Not to mention his "Southern cuisine" disasters.
For a New Englander, he seems deadset on making stuff I'd see in a trailer park in Mississippi or Tennessee. He also seems to be like a fly given his love of letting his meats stew and rot in acids or sauces for a few days.
 
Thinking is also nothing to brag about; everyone who is not a vegetable thinks. Someone is thinking when he analogizes a real life situation to an MCU film, and reasons that because the situation in the film is only resolved by destroying the villain, hence we should destroy that villain's counterpart in real life. This is thinking, but is this good thinking? The notion of good (vs. bad) thinking reminds me the difference between intelligence and rationality. Intelligence is a problem-solving skill and is neither reflective nor evaluative (as long as the problem is solved, all solution is as good as another); rationality requires more. At the very least rationality requires you to 1) articulate the basis of your strategies, beliefs and attitudes and 2) evaluate the basis; ask questions such as "is it good or is it bad?"

Say when someone claims "We must destroy all MAGA ghouls", if that someone is rational, he will follow it with "Why do I have such an idea?". Let's imagine how such a Socratic soliloquy might occur in Bobby's mind:

"...because they voted Trump and not Hillary Clinton."
"Is it a good reason to destroy people for not voting her?."
"Yes."
"Why is it a good reason? What is the basis of that?"
"Because without Hillary we don't have culture, we don't have science, we don't have a global economy, space technology and cybernetics. They deprive me of a robotic body and a sojourn in Mars!"
"Are you sure? What is the basis of that in turn?"
"..."

The problem with Bobby isn't just that he is an irrational thinker; he surrounds himself with other irrational thinkers, notably Luke Lockhart, who claims "The willingness to cheat for something means one wants that thing more, and thus deserves it more". But I guess irrational thinkers find comfort in each other, because reflections and interrogations are painful.
This is one area of Bob's twisted mindset where I wish he couldn't block out people who put him on blast. He just has a one step thought and clearly doesn't follow it any further. That's where you get things like him saying "destroy the mayghouls" yet decrying others as fascist and genocidal.

He lives in a world of total double standards and doesn't even have the self-awareness to examine how he would wind up a victim of his own logic no matter how many circles he runs. He just has a Bachelor's degree from what I understand, so wouldn't that make others with a Master's or a Phd more viable than him? He only studied film or some such shit, so wouldn't someone like Ben Shapiro with a law degree be a step above him? The answer is, somehow, no. Why? He's MovieBob. What makes that distinction special? He's MovieBob. On and on and on it goes. He thinks that he's the great exemption in this system because he's the worst irrational thinker of them all. For a man who detests those who have faith in something beyond them, he sure does have plenty of misguided belief in the idea that he wouldn't face the wall.
 
He thought Lindsay Ellis was actually friends with him. He thought it was a good idea to accuse her of gaslighting him before getting laughed at even harder. He thinks it's a good idea continuing to advertise his genocidal hatred of poor people despite it costing him two jobs at the escapist and turning him into a public laughing stock.
Maybe give believing another try, bobo.
 
This is what Bobby thinks is the meaning of life:
74.png
"Don't worry about the ultimate matters. GvK is in the cinemas, go watch it. It's AWESOME!!"

Question that we cannot answer, or rather ones that Science cannot answer, doesn't mean it is irrelevant to us as human beings. And even if Science says it cannot answer our existential questions -- What are we here for? How to live our life correctly? How should we face death? -- it hardly stops people asking it anew. The eschatology of Science is dismal: as the telomers of our chromosomes get shorter, cells lose their ability to replicate, organs fail, then we die, and the molecules that used to sustain our lives break down and be recycled. Eventually the planet Earth is cooked by and then swallowed by the Sun. Then the Sun goes dark. The relentless accelerated expansion of the universe will isolate our Galaxy from everything else, our Galactic neighborhood a vast, unbridgeable darkness.

If you are content with such a picture, more power to you. But you must understand the fact that you are satisfied does not entail everyone must be satisfied.

809.png
I repeat it is the ultra liberals who think Science is an arbitrary narrative, or a system of discourse that practitioners "buy into", or else a conspiracy of the Patriarchy, Colonialism, White Supremacy, or whatever bugbear du jour.

Oh! Those pesky Christians are throwing tantrums about their sky daddy again! Pay them no mind and let natural selection sort them out!
89.png

Jelly about Elon Musk:
8.png
Yup and people only knew Hillary Rodham even exists because she married the 42nd president of the United States.

While Peter Coffin gives Bobby eschatological thoughts:
Untitled.png

+ + + +
Greenwald and Matt Gaetz. The evil Greenwald does not Believe Women.
Untitled.png
"Are you Devin Faraci? At MovieBob Productions we will help you hush up your women accusers!"

Bobby's orbiter approves kangaroo courts:
78.png

As the market decide to Do The Right Thing, the GOP becomes obsolete:
8.png

The roads you drive on are built on racism!
79.png

Gimme gimme for niggers.
0-[0-=.png

78.png
I agree Greg Kelly is a good-looking man, but what's your point?

+ + + +
0.png
Bobby probably has a point. Even cheap, shoddy Chink-made products have a market, and if people want them who is to say no to that?

=.png

Prince Philip. I need expert help deciphering this mess, but he seems to suggest that his own opinion represents all Irish-Americans, and maybe that jorts are fashion of Superior Future?
9.png

Suez Canal clearance. Bobby's only point of reference is....
Untitled.png

BTW Bobby cares about Middle-Eastern historical artefacts. Also US GIs dumb -- hey they are dudebros so what do you expect?
9.png

+ + + +
Consoom:
1.png
This Izzi Rae (Sapphic Trans Woman (She/her)) might be another Angel in training. We'll see.

Consoom wokeness:
0.png
Huge amount of capeshit sperging ensued.

9.png

Continuing yesterday's convo on Falcon. You should read my highlights at least.
8.png

-12o.png

I think the subject has shifted to Captain Whatever:
=-34.png

Kissing his Gunn:
94.png

623.png
Not creepy at all.

Wrestling:
8.png

Bobby is scared by arty photographs, and he implies he has an "office":
Untitled.png
I presume he is out of salt, or "sorts", because of his high sodium diet?
 
Last edited:
I hope at least one person will get what I mean when I say this: Bob wears his jeans like a retard.
Parasite. I almost sense there is a point somewhere:
View attachment 2078210
Except that's absolutely not the case Bob, you thick-headed fucktard. Just because you scrape by earning a crust making shitty videos in your basement and never need to leave your house doesn't mean there aren't way more people who've been put out of work and/or completely ruined by the draconian pandemic measures you think are so great; including your precious cinema staff, what happened to them?

They're the dude driving the car, Bob, you thumb-faced tit.
 
Last edited:
At the very least rationality requires you to 1) articulate the basis of your strategies, beliefs and attitudes and 2) evaluate the basis; ask questions such as "is it good or is it bad?"
I think a core problem here is that people don't know what "rational" means, although they have a vague feeling it is good.

I remember a discussion along these lines. Had two people insist an opinion was "rational" even though neither one could give a "reason" for it.

It wasn't a dumb opinion, by the way; I don't even necessarily disagree with it. But you know... if there's no reasoning behind it, it's not rational. And that's okay. Everyone has irrational opinions, since postulates are a thing.
 
There's plenty of reason to make fun of Bob for being fat.

The hypocrisy of him telling gamers to lose weight.

The hypocrisy of him constantly going after other people for their looks

Him pretentions of being a high class connoisseur when he's just a consumer.

And most importantly of all because it clearly bugs him, as he almost always responds to those comments and he regularly posts bragging about his weight loss. Despite no one being able to see any difference.
 
Try the guy who is asking patrons to support to his fifteen podcasts and his "special needs" daughter who desperately needs medicine. You know, the one who ordered the expensive microbrew.

Let me rephrase: if I didn't recognize him as MovieBob, I would be looking for a wrangler, based on that t-shirt and the utterly gormless expression on his fat face.
 
Vicky is an idiot with no real knowledge of history if she believes that Wakanda is, "a vision of a place without white colonialism or white supremacy." Wakanda is a fictional country--emphasis on fictional--whose wealth and technology comes from an element that does not exist. It really broke my suspension of disbelief that such a place would choose to hide when the European powers carved up Africa when they had the technology to drive them off the continent and perhaps build their own empire. If she really wants a vision of a place without white colonialism, she can look at Ethiopia, which once repelled Italian attempts to conquer it. Or she could look at Japan, which rapidly industrialized during the Meiji period and became a great power in its own right (though they believed in their own supremacy over other Asian groups.)

I won't even address the sheer stupidity of her take on Captain America. Sweet merciful Frigg, the way the progressives are trying to appropriate superheroes is maddening. Superman may have started as allegory of progressive causes in the early months of his existence and superheroes may have directly addressed the cause du jour at times, but such stories where heavy-handed and often forgettable. The genre was always supposed to be about the escapism of flying people in colorful tights fighting alien invaders and mad scientists. If the author wanted to inject his/her politics into their work, it was through metaphors. However, progressives are terrible at it and are only capable of allegory that is as subtle as a sledgehammer to the cranium. For example, how Ta-Nesihi Coates tried to turn the Red Skull into a YouTuber/blogger to conflate the character with Jordan Petersen. Fans rightly mocked Coates for it because he's a shit writer who--like Bob-- uses a thesaurus to make his shallow writing sound deeper than it really is.

Is it any wonder why sales of titles like Captain America and Iron Man are in the gutter, while more escapist fare like Thor and Venom are at the top of the charts?
 
Is it any wonder why sales of titles like Captain America and Iron Man are in the gutter, while more escapist fare like Thor and Venom are at the top of the charts?

Personally, I think Captain America is everything cool about the Greatest Generation, while Iron Man is everything cool about the military-industrial complex that won the Cold War.
 
Vicky is an idiot with no real knowledge of history if she believes that Wakanda is, "a vision of a place without white colonialism or white supremacy." Wakanda is a fictional country--emphasis on fictional--whose wealth and technology comes from an element that does not exist. It really broke my suspension of disbelief that such a place would choose to hide when the European powers carved up Africa when they had the technology to drive them off the continent and perhaps build their own empire. If she really wants a vision of a place without white colonialism, she can look at Ethiopia, which once repelled Italian attempts to conquer it. Or she could look at Japan, which rapidly industrialized during the Meiji period and became a great power in its own right (though they believed in their own supremacy over other Asian groups.)

I won't even address the sheer stupidity of her take on Captain America. Sweet merciful Frigg, the way the progressives are trying to appropriate superheroes is maddening. Superman may have started as allegory of progressive causes in the early months of his existence and superheroes may have directly addressed the cause du jour at times, but such stories where heavy-handed and often forgettable. The genre was always supposed to be about the escapism of flying people in colorful tights fighting alien invaders and mad scientists. If the author wanted to inject his/her politics into their work, it was through metaphors. However, progressives are terrible at it and are only capable of allegory that is as subtle as a sledgehammer to the cranium. For example, how Ta-Nesihi Coates tried to turn the Red Skull into a YouTuber/blogger to conflate the character with Jordan Petersen. Fans rightly mocked Coates for it because he's a shit writer who--like Bob-- uses a thesaurus to make his shallow writing sound deeper than it really is.

Is it any wonder why sales of titles like Captain America and Iron Man are in the gutter, while more escapist fare like Thor and Venom are at the top of the charts?
The Superman thing isn't accurate either though it's common to hear people claim it, kinda like what everyone always says about the X-Men even if the allegory stuff didn't start until Claremont. He's mostly the product of Siegel and Shuster mashing together sci-fi/action series tropes they liked considering previous pitches for the character. The 2nd pitch where he was just some detective who loved fighting kinda morphed into Slam Bradley which I'd recommend googling any of his stories if you want to lose the impression his creators were hyper-progressive. People also like forgetting that they're 2nd generation (unless you count Shuster being from Canada and moving to America when he was like 10)

Hell, Krypton was kind of a non-thing in the golden age despite being in Action Comics #1. The character himself thought he was some hyper-evolved human until 1949 when Kryptonite was introduced and he discovered where it came from. Superman identifying as Kryptonian first is more of a silver age idea which didn't really survive into modern times since it doesn't make sense for him to have that kind of attachment to a place he'd only know from 2nd hand knowledge. "Clark Kent from Kansas" is characterization that has lasted the longest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back