The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

[TLEN]

View attachment 2084730

did they not watch the jew yesterday

Which one? Mr. Hands?

 

[Sheryl Nome]

This is a good cross by the prosecution, I still think so far this is positive for the defense

 

[Coccxys]

View attachment 2084730

did they not watch the jew yesterday

Redditors are incapable of an objective world view. Everything has to be passed through the confirmation bias engine first.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Redditors are incapable of an objective world view. Everything has to be passed through the confirmation bias engine first.

I don't know why people think expert witnesses are anything but biased for their side, this guy is biased for the defense, obviously, he's doing a good job for them, but he's their guy.

 

[KiwiFuzz]

That antiauthority larp from the kinds of people who went crying to teachers in school when someone called them a faggot are hilarious though. Hell go call them a faggot on their comment and I guarantee they'll go crying to a janny. The anarchy they seem to want won't go the way they think it will.

I wonder how many white Antifa will be flamingly racist in 10 years.

"I thought we were there to get justice for George Floyd but they raped my dog and stole my iPhone."

 

[Special Agent Punchy]

View attachment 2084730

did they not watch the jew yesterday

This use of force witness is the only one that's answered yes or no questions with a "yes" or "no" all trial.

 

[Coccxys]

I wonder how many white Antifa will be flamingly racist in 10 years.

If they keep going they'll have gone up in flames at the crematorium within the next 10 years, no matter which side wins.

 

[WrenchWring]

The prosecution is getting a lot of "coulds" and "possibles" but the prosecution needs "beyond a reasonable doubt". This is like a defense's cross.

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

View attachment 2084730

did they not watch the jew yesterday

Ah yes, I love purchasing my favorite Kentucky Fried Chicken from my favorite Black plantation owner: Cornel Sanders.

 

[MoeChotto]

This is a good cross by the prosecution, I still think so far this is positive for the defense

I was thinking the same thing. Where were these guys during direct questioning?

I think it was a pretty bad idea for the witness to cave to the semantics, but Nelson will probably come back to that and correct the record.

 

[Pizza Munch]

This use of force witness is the only one that's answered yes or no questions with a "yes" or "no" all trial.

He's so matter of fact about the answers even if it's not exactly in line with the defense's ideals. It makes him a more credible witness IMO. He may say "yes", but as a juror I think I would be thinking "well yes but ...."

 

[Some JERK]

The prosecution is getting a lot of "coulds" and "possibles" but the prosecution needs "beyond a reasonable doubt". This is like a defense's cross.

I'm sure Reddit sees this as a crushing cross-examination but you're right, "could" doesn't mean "did" or even "probably".

 

[Feline Supremacist]

You know what really cinched the defense's argument was when Cochran had OJ to try on the gloves and they didn't fit (hence the "if it does not fit you must acquit" line). I wonder if Nelson demonstrated the restraint, complete with knee, for a sustained amount of time, showing it doesn't asphyxiate a normal person, if this would work in Chauvin's favor.

 

[KiwiFuzz]

I got your Gross Misdemeanor RIGHT HERE.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

The prosecution is getting a lot of "coulds" and "possibles" but the prosecution needs "beyond a reasonable doubt". This is like a defense's cross.

the 'coulds' and 'possibles' are actually what he's trying to get. He's not trying to get to 'beyond a reasonable doubt' from this guy, he knows he won't.

What the prosecution is attempting to do is to make the jury distrust the testimony of this guy. So that the jury just throws his testimony out as 'he was talking bullshit'. Which the jury can do.

 

[DiabeticSP]

Can you autistic idiots with free time at least occasionally say what the actual fuck is going on instead of memeing because as a wage slave I have no idea what's going on today.

 

[WeDon'tNeedToWhisper]

youre thinking of a wig, weaves dont work like that.

could be the short time limit? theyre going to start deliberating friday.

The jury won't start deliberating on Friday since closing arguments are expected to take place next Monday.

 

[Meat Target]

Every time something good happens, I'm busy...

 

[Pizza Munch]

Can you autistic idiots with free time at least occasionally say what the actual fuck is going on instead of memeing because as a wage slave I have no idea what's going on today.

lol I've been thinking this is thread is an awful way to know anything that's going on. This is a pretty good live update on the facts tho if u can't watch:

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/04/live-chauvin-trial-day-12-meet-the-jury-instructions-bring-on-the-defense-case/

eta this is in the view of a defense lawyer, he gives a good word for word update on testimony (unbiased), but his opinion are skewed toward the defense. There are good questions in the comments that he answers knowing the law far better than normal people. I've already posted this site before but it is a great resource

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

They're still equivocating the degree of force used for the crime committed to the degree of force used when handling uncooperative suspects.

Yes, if an armed murderer is being apprehended, they're taking every precaution not to be harmed and wouldn't use that same force against someone committing tax fraud. What the use of force that's actually being argued is the use of force when dealing with any uncooperative suspects.

It's a wholey different perspective on the use of force that they're continually trying to make the same thing.