The Tenacious Unicorn Ranch / @TenaciousRanch / Steampunk Penny / Penellope Logue / Phillip Matthew Logue - Don't cry because it ended, laugh because it's still getting worse.

Who are the top three strongest characters in the Kevin Gibes Inflated Universe (KGIU) canon?

  • Gash Coyote

    Votes: 102 4.5%
  • Rioley

    Votes: 277 12.3%
  • Penis

    Votes: 408 18.1%
  • Loathsome Dung Eater Jen

    Votes: 291 12.9%
  • Boner

    Votes: 294 13.0%
  • Kevin Gibes

    Votes: 671 29.7%
  • The Elusive Earl

    Votes: 701 31.0%
  • Landon Hiscock

    Votes: 262 11.6%
  • The Korps LARP Brigade

    Votes: 200 8.9%
  • Kiwifarms Militia

    Votes: 1,122 49.7%
  • Kindness

    Votes: 650 28.8%
  • Trans Cucumber The Child Abandoner

    Votes: 306 13.6%

  • Total voters
    2,258
1619316274193.png
lmao he's using the magazine as a VFG :story:
 
Judging by pics, I'd say the "farmers" are doing worse healthwise opposed to the animals.
None of the alpacas have am holes, or shit-eating fetishes, or take synthetic cross-sex hormones, or eat loads of sausage and cheese, so I'd say you're right.
The virgin Trooner Coomer Troops vs the chad cishetero alpaca.
 
A pond of sufficient size, could they maintain it, would increase greatly the viability of their efforts at self-sufficiency. I know of a subsistence ranch on which two acres of a twelve-acre parcel were given over to an artificial pond stocked with trout. This attracts a lot of wild game, and along with a small garden plot (I think maybe a quarter of an acre) and some fruit trees, this produces substantially all the food needed to support four people. Their rabbits and chickens are supplemental, but not strictly necessary.

Of course, I don't know that this kind of pond is sustainable on the Tranch's plot. The ranch I'm thinking of is not in a very wet location, but it's not desertified sagebrush either. Taking advantage of the presence of wild game requires some marksmanship and the right tools for that job. And, of course, farming even a small plot is work.

If they had bought better land, taken better care of it, and learned anything about subsistence farming, they could be quite independent of GoFundMe grifting. But that would be effort. So much better to buy prepared foods at WalMart and whine online about all the toys you need.
Wouldn't a pond in a place like that just freeze solid in the winter?
I've got visions of them chipping frozen ducks out of it with an ice pick

Also: Oliver Coomwell
 
That's actually a doctrine for CQB and room clearing. It's dated but still was a thing. It's way more common with AKs.
These zoomers don't know about that handguard life. Though, this brings up the issue of having a $150+ rail and not buying a $20 foregrip for it. It's just another example of them doing everything halfassed and everyone with half a brain laughing at them for it. The weaponlight mounting is retarded too and it's obvious he's never even thought about it, let alone done any work with one. He just knows you're supposed to have a light on a defensive rifle and slapped one on there. Literally any other rail position makes more sense, but he'd also need to have his weak side hand in proper position too. It's everything I expect from a man who mounts his optic on his rail.

They're like a poorly made Chinese counterfeit. They can imitate what they see, but they don't understand it and are too lazy to make a decent attempt. This also applies to their tacticool failures, not just their failure at being women.
 
I've been thinking more about a pond and if they do decide they want a pond, here's a list of what could happen:
  • They talk about getting a pond but never actually do it. This is the most likely scenario.
  • They start digging a pond but give up partway through and leave a small, potentially dangerous hole somewhere on the property.
  • They dig a pond but it's too shallow and evaporates/freezes through constantly.
  • The pond's size further exacerbates the llama population density causing even more problems.
  • They dig a pond and attempt to stock it with fish but they don't put anything in there for the fish to eat and all the fish die.
  • They stock it with fish but it's the wrong type of fish for that pond and they all die.
  • The pond is contaminated with alpaca and/or human waste and all the fish die.
  • Fertilizer runoff from their garden turns the pond into the tranch's own Salton Sea.
  • Somehow they get an algae bloom and red tide and all the fish die.
  • Earl sneaks onto the tranch and poisons all the fish.
As you can see, this list proves a tranch pond would be an excellent idea and we can only hope Bonnie and Penny take our advice.
 
I've been thinking more about a pond and if they do decide they want a pond, here's a list of what could happen:
  • They talk about getting a pond but never actually do it. This is the most likely scenario.
  • They start digging a pond but give up partway through and leave a small, potentially dangerous hole somewhere on the property.
  • They dig a pond but it's too shallow and evaporates/freezes through constantly.
  • The pond's size further exacerbates the llama population density causing even more problems.
  • They dig a pond and attempt to stock it with fish but they don't put anything in there for the fish to eat and all the fish die.
  • They stock it with fish but it's the wrong type of fish for that pond and they all die.
  • The pond is contaminated with alpaca and/or human waste and all the fish die.
  • Fertilizer runoff from their garden turns the pond into the tranch's own Salton Sea.
  • Somehow they get an algae bloom and red tide and all the fish die.
  • Earl sneaks onto the tranch and poisons all the fish.
As you can see, this list proves a tranch pond would be an excellent idea and we can only hope Bonnie and Penny take our advice.

* They dig an undeep pond with still water that catches botulism and the whole farm population dies. The End.
 
These zoomers don't know about that handguard life. Though, this brings up the issue of having a $150+ rail and not buying a $20 foregrip for it. It's just another example of them doing everything halfassed and everyone with half a brain laughing at them for it. The weaponlight mounting is retarded too and it's obvious he's never even thought about it, let alone done any work with one. He just knows you're supposed to have a light on a defensive rifle and slapped one on there. Literally any other rail position makes more sense, but he'd also need to have his weak side hand in proper position too. It's everything I expect from a man who mounts his optic on his rail.

They're like a poorly made Chinese counterfeit. They can imitate what they see, but they don't understand it and are too lazy to make a decent attempt. This also applies to their tacticool failures, not just their failure at being women.
mounting a light on the bottom of the rail is valid but not really pertinent unless you have a can on your rifle/large format pistol. She should have it on the side so she can hit the button on the back with her thumb, but if she had a pressure switch for it mounting it on the bottom and having the switch elsewhere would be fine.
 
mounting a light on the bottom of the rail is valid but not really pertinent unless you have a can on your rifle/large format pistol
It's valid if you're using a SMG or pistol. Remember, Surefire made specific handguards for a flashlight on the bottom of MP5s and they were EXTREMELY popular with SWAT for over a decade. I don't think I've ever seen anyone do that on an actual rifle.
 
It's valid if you're using a SMG or pistol. Remember, Surefire made specific handguards for a flashlight on the bottom of MP5s and they were EXTREMELY popular with SWAT for over a decade. I don't think I've ever seen anyone do that on an actual rifle.
They also had a foregrip with an integrated battery and light. A couple guys ran them because we weren't supposed to run tape switches and were way more convenient on full size rifle rails
 
Back