Do "Femcels" count
View attachment 2118256
you know what maybe these women should lower their standards and maybe they'll find someone. Just a thought. All screenshots are from /r9k/ and they took them from r/Fds
I love how she talks about being "BLOCKED, IGNORED, GHOSTED, AND DELETED" as if that's some horrible punishment, like being sent to the rack. Being away from this insufferable bitch is a
privilege, and I feel sorry for the poor saps who meet all of her criteria.
my face is very ugly i have fat lips, recessed maxilla, recessed jaw, overall just recessed. Chad isn't recessed his jawline is prominent. mind you this is before you factor in Race pill being ethnic is 2 strikes and any other imperfection and you're out.
"You're out" - out
to whom? To your friends on incel forums? Do you not realize how
fucking delusional you sound, how
gay this "lookism" shit is - listing the "ideal" ratios of facial features like some nineteenth-century phrenologist, rating each others' mugs, maintaining tier lists of which male models "mog" the others? Yet here you are, an ostensibly grown man, obsessing over your every facial blemish and imperfection like a 16-year-old girl on prom night.
Most people - even literal models - look kind of dumpy when they're not properly dressed and groomed. A big part of proper grooming and self-care is covering up the facial deformities you've mentioned. You grow out your beard to cover a weak jawline. You choose a hairstyle that synergizes with the shape of your head. Have you given these things
any consideration? Have you made the
slightest effort to achieve your genetic potential, instead of wasting away on your fart cushion, lamenting the fact that you'll never be a Jersey Shore frat boy?
And have you considered joining a less miserable subculture? If you're preoccupied with looking good, why not go full metrosexual? Stop reading incel forums, pick up
GQ and
Men's Vogue instead. Even if your outcomes don't improve, your mindset will.
I have wasted many years of my life searching the Internet in pursuit of wisdom, with very little to show for it. I now realize that there is almost nothing of value on these god-forsaken tubes that you cannot get more easily from low-bandwidth media. One exception to the rule, a genuine gold nugget of web-exclusive wisdom, is
this post on Hackernews that I think about almost every day. As our social circles become more a matter of choice than an accident of birth, this will only be more relevant:
Patrick McKenzie said:
There are few things in life more important than choosing one's peer group well. The Internet gives you many more options than we had available prior to the existence of it. Choose wisely and re-evaluate that choice periodically to see whether your peer group continues to represent your goals and values.
Why? Your peer group literally gets arbitrary code execution on your brain. (It's a flaw in MonkeyBrainOS 1.01 which we haven't patched yet.) You'll tend to find yourself valuing what they value. You will tend to find yourself achieving outcomes strikingly similar to their outcomes.
Given this, picking a peer group whose values are not your values and whose outcomes are terrible is a poor choice.
There is some cognizable peer group of "the most misanthropic 10% of commenters on Internet threads about programming languages." The majority are not professional programmers. Most are not very happy people. You can generally tell a lot about what a person values by what they spend their time doing; someone who professes to value the great intellectual challenge that is Real Programming but actually ships comments which make other people feel bad probably, to a first approximation, values making other people feel bad.
If you do not also want to grow into a values system where making other people feel bad is the highlight of your day, consider choosing a better peer group, where e.g. feeding one's family through honest labor is valued and having very loud opinions about NodeJS not so much.
(If you have the chance: look up this guy's name and portfolio. He is a walking refutation of every incel theory. Guy looks like McLovin' and the Crypt Keeper had a mutant anal baby; still managed to marry a hot Asian broad and start a string of successful businesses. It's all about that low inhib.)
The original post was about tech communities that shamed people for using certain programming languages; but if you can't see how it applies to you, your own life situation, and the toxic communities you're mired in, then you are truly hopeless, doomed to forever rot in an equilibrium between the McDonald's pay window and the twin bed in your mildewy studio apartment.
It's funny because these same statistics they cite as an excuse to not better themselves should make them very optimistic. If women consider most men ugly then what does it matter if you're not that attractive, clearly women don't care as much as they think or else nobody would get laid.
If a woman
is willing to fuck an ugly dude, it's a "betabuxx" "cope", and she's only doing it because she couldn't get someone better. The former point is dubious; the latter so obvious as to almost be a tautology. This is the purported "blackpill wisdom" that, like some excerpt from the
Necronomicon, dooms those who know it to a life of impotent whinging.
Incels think that everything a woman does is part of her master plan to fuck the hottest man possible. That's it. There is literally nothing else driving any facet of female behavior. If women had their way, unfettered by laws and social norms, they would all be stepping on each other's necks for a chance to fuck the same three Calvin Klein underwear models.
It's like a bizarre variant of Freudian psychoanalysis, or the medieval Christian conception of humans as inherently sinful and flawed. At least Freud, St. Augustine, and co. applied their theories to all people equally. Incels have to vomit a bunch of evopsych mumbo jumbo to explain why men aren't just as bad.
![LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV]](http://uploads.kiwifarms.st/data/avatars/l/61/61177.jpg?1699571951){kind=avatar}
