Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's definitely not new or unique to comics. It's just very, very badly done in the modern woke stuff, to the point where a lot of them only exist to serve as a pulpit for the writer; they may as well use an AI bot to grab tweets from anyone with #BlackLivesMatter and pronouns in their bio to make the scripts.

Conversely, take something like Watchmen where, even if you knew absolutely nothing about Alan Moore's politics or the real-world events that inspired it, you'd still have a really interesting take on the superhero genre filled with memorable characters.

Meanwhile, if you removed the copy-paste SocJus soliloquies from woke comics there'd be literally nothing else left; they are pure propaganda and nothing else.

I still love watchman which is a testament to Allens craft.

But his thesis in Watchman is completely wrong, MAD stopped WW3 and Reagan was right had the USSR been allowed to it would have went the same path as China and morphed into a fascist state.

Also its funny that people including the blob stick to one world ideas in the face of the CCP making corporations bend the knee. I really wonder how they respond to the point that their theory is falling apart as a fascist state makes their UN , WHO and international companies dance to their tune.
 
Sad thing is that Ayn rand is a "strong independent woman who didn't need no man" yet all these wokistanis hate her. All the woman insinuated is that man's purpose in life is his owns happiness, and no one has a right to interfere with that as long as he is not interfering with theirs. It's like saying the golden rule is the path to self-advancement, and thus happiness. The problem is the people who don't follow that code, thus "Atlas Shrugged" where everyone smart says fuck this and leaves.
Rand's view of sex is a lot more complicated. A more exact term is that Rand was a sex freak and wrote strong independent women who don't need men but that they only SAY that, because deep down they want their ubermensch dream hunk to just take them sexually as is their right, consent be damned

Which leads to rapey undertones and unfortunate implications: see The Fountainhead, where Dominique basically bullies Howard Roark until he just snaps and rapes her, an act that Rand explicitly described as "rape by invitation". Which is a fucked up way of saying "she was asking for it (IE rape), and intended it (being rape) to happen with how she carried on".

Adding to this is her screwed up idea of courtship; Dominique spends most of the Fountainhead refusing to marry Howard and marrying other people simply to avoid marrying Howard, due to a masochistic notion of "suffering builds character". On the flipside however, Dagny in Atlas Shrugged famously fucks multiple men and even sacrifices her own reputation, admitting that she fucked Hank Reardon (who is stuck in a loveless marriage to a gold digger villainess who married Hank for his wealth and takes joy in tormenting him over how she doesn't love him and her manipulation of his feelings for her) to ensure that the affair can't be used to hurt Hank. And that's not even touching "Ideal" and THAT clusterfuck of "courtship".
 
Rand's view of sex is a lot more complicated. A more exact term is that Rand was a sex freak and wrote strong independent women who don't need men but that they only SAY that, because deep down they want their ubermensch dream hunk to just take them sexually as is their right, consent be damned
This, you know what you're talking about. The "strong independent" thing is total delusional, solipsistic egotism.
Which leads to rapey undertones and unfortunate implications: see The Fountainhead, where Dominique basically bullies Howard Roark until he just snaps and rapes her, an act that Rand explicitly described as "rape by invitation". Which is a fucked up way of saying "she was asking for it (IE rape), and intended it (being rape) to happen with how she carried on".
She was in love with Nathaniel Branden who left her for Barbara Weidman, so this makes sense to me.
Adding to this is her screwed up idea of courtship; Dominique spends most of the Fountainhead refusing to marry Howard and marrying other people simply to avoid marrying Howard, due to a masochistic notion of "suffering builds character". On the flipside however, Dagny in Atlas Shrugged famously fucks multiple men and even sacrifices her own reputation, admitting that she fucked Hank Reardon (who is stuck in a loveless marriage to a gold digger villainess who married Hank for his wealth and takes joy in tormenting him over how she doesn't love him and her manipulation of his feelings for her) to ensure that the affair can't be used to hurt Hank. And that's not even touching "Ideal" and THAT clusterfuck of "courtship".
Absolutely indicative of her romances.
 
I always laugh at this Captain America argument to have the gotcha "Comics has ALWAYS been political", when the simple answer is "yeah, no shit, we know" but these posers only know Captain America for that Hitler punching cover, when a better case for comics being political is pretty much the whole Marvel output from the 70's onward.

Look, if liberal takes were a deal breaker for comic readers, then no one would have read Marvel and a lot of DC stuff for decades, and that because the vast majority of comic writers and artists were very much the self-satisfied libs caricature we have of them now. And a lot, and I mean A LOT liberal causes made into comics, and I'm not talking about some throw away issue of fucking power pack, nah, I'm talking about Clarimont's X-men and other heavy hitters.

But there was a decisive difference between back then and now, and that is editorial. When guys like Jim Shooter, legendary Marvel editor in chief and all around bastard, were running the show, there was just one law, sell comics.

Shooter wasn't particularly political engaged, at least not publicly, and from his run on Marvel, seems like he didn't mind the writers letting everybody know their liberal policies (they were a bunch of hippies after all), but he reigned in a lot of more "progressive" ideas in favor of "we make stories about people in silly costumes fighting other people in silly costumes, and we need to sell these to 12 year olds".

Not that we didn't get more "mature" stories from the Jim Shooter times (I mean, as far as capeshit goes), but back then capeshit comics never lost the tone of, well, being capeshit comics, never devolving into nonsensical, unaware self-parody bullshit.

Yeah, comics were stories about silly people in stupid costumes, but at least there was a professional varnish over it, it was a job done by pros.

But now the mask is off, and we can see what comics is like when the children, or adults that act like children, take over the wheels.

And it's funny how manga is taking over the market, because if we go what mangakas have describe what is like working for Shueisha and kodansha (the marvel and DC of Japan if you will), their editorial process is one of the heaviest and more intrusive they have worked with, either you follow thier line, or you get the fuck out.

Also, they don't give a singular fuck if you are famous or not. The guy who created Naruto, Masashi Kishimoto, Shonen Jump's best seller that ain't Dragon Ball, tried a new series about Space Samurais with some cool organic armor designs, and the story was a pretty standart shonen afair. Kishimoto was planning for at least 10 volumes.

it didn't catch on, people found it to be a poor man's Naruto, Shueisha canceled the series 5 volumes in. Kishimoto went back to be one of the writers in the Naruto's kid spin off, after saying he has done with Naruto (he spend over 15 years with that title and pretty much gave up his life for that)

Fuck, talk about being brutal... but maybe if Marvel had some of that spine, more people would be reading their comics, who knows.
It doesn't really seem like there's much incentive for Western comics to improve, sadly. Disney and WarnerMedia don't really give any shits about Marvel and DC respectively, only using them as an IP farm for their movie and TV projects. Comics are a blip on their yearly revenue streams, where they barely make any money but barely cost any money either. It doesn't even matter if these comics don't turn a profit, or even if they sell at all, they're so insignificant that the megacorps can just operate them at a loss forever.

Now, if Marvel and DC were fully independent publishers again? Whole other story. There would be a need to make books that sell, and thus a need for a competent editor to find the best talent and keep them producing quality material (or at least material that's good enough to make money). Political topics can certainly come up, but any editor worth their salt would know that characters launching into diatribes every issue doesn't make for a bestseller. But because they're tiny subsidiaries of megacorps, too small to notice, the tards are allowed to run the asylum.

Without continuing to go too far off topic, I see three other big reasons why manga is eating the West's lunch. First reason is ease of entry. If you want to get into a manga series, you just go to the store, find volume 1, and start reading. No clusterfuck of multiple #1 issues or dozens of series starring (in theory) the same character, alternate timelines, or crossover events that you have to try and untangle. Second reason is variety. For Western comics, if you don't want to read capeshit, your options are minimal at best. Manga has something for everyone, whether they're old or young, male or female, in any genre you could think of (and some you probably didn't). Third reason is price. Comics are gonna run you easily $4 an issue for something like 16 pages of content, while a single manga volume is usually between $10 and $15 for 100 pages or more. Yes, manga is usually black and white, but it's still a way better bang for your buck.
I don't detract this guy often, is he more vile than usual or this is normal Bob?
Y'know, I think it's pretty sweet that there are still people who don't realize that this is Bob, every day. To have that innocence again!

Seriously though, you can go to pretty much any of the almost 4000 pages in this thread at random and find him spewing the same vile shit he does today. He did a little better job hiding it pre-Trump, but like many cows, the Bad Orange Man broke him mentally and made him remove his filter altogether. And because he's vomiting his word salads on Twitter every hour of every day, this thread is never for lack of new content. Probably best to take it in small doses, though, too much Bob is likely bad for your health.
 
It's so petty and spiteful.


Petty and spiteful is Bobert to a T. It's interesting how he has fully embraced the politics of spite, and claims that "anger is how you win", yet he is still a fat, stupid, basement-dwelling loser who has never won anything.

His entire political philosophy can be summed up as "WAAAAAAHHHHH!!!! Chad was mean to me in school and I never forgave him! He only pantsed me in front of the cheerleaders because he' s jealous of my superior intellect. It's HIS fault I'm a virgin at the age of 40! I HATE CHAD!!! WAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!"

His lack of self-awareness is impressive in a darkly humorous way.
 
Last edited:
"Stomp them into paste" is such a particularly violent choice of words.

Bob often displays a fondness for ridiculous tough guy talk, but he certainly seems to harbor violent fantasies. My favorite:

1619555965446.png
 
Soybibor.

Look at what the Academy nominated back in the day and what they nominate now. Can you honestly say you've seen any of the Best Picture winners from the past decade? There's your problem. The incessant political ramblings are not the major issue at play.

Any reasonable person could look at those facts, glance over at Bob's Twitter feed and then come to the logical conclusion to that question.

Now, I still have yet to figure out if Bob is delusional, stupid, or self-aware enough to know the answer, but he will never dignify it with a coherent response. He'll stubbornly insist that he matters and will always matter unlike half of America's population. There are great many things about him that are reprehensible, but this is an aspect about him that is just plain pathetic.

Part of the issue with the movies/awards disconnect is Harvey Weinstein; Weinstein famously created the modern formula of getting explicitly made Oscar bait that has super limited theatrical runs (often only in major cities in arthouse cinema chains) Oscar gold via calculated promotional campaigns targeting LA's elite who select the winners and staffing his films with big named stars who would in turn do the same with their own connections in the Academy.

LOTR Return of the King was the last real proper populist hit to win best picture. And that drew a good amount of controversy because a lot of people felt that they only gave it to third film as a mea culpa for not giving it to parts one and two of the trilogy. And you can make a case further, that Departed and No Country For Old Men were the last time that the Oscars picked a proper populist film given that both were super popular with normies.

Nowadays, if you make a populist film the best you can hope for it best actor/actress and maybe best director if it's a slow year. Especially the last one, since it's become an open secret that the Academy horse trades the best director award to get out of having to give certain films the best picture award.
 
Seriously though, you can go to pretty much any of the almost 4000 pages in this thread at random and find him spewing the same vile shit he does today. He did a little better job hiding it pre-Trump, but like many cows, the Bad Orange Man broke him mentally and made him remove his filter altogether. And because he's vomiting his word salads on Twitter every hour of every day, this thread is never for lack of new content. Probably best to take it in small doses, though, too much Bob is likely bad for your health.

I'm surprised he hasn't gotten a heart attack with this much rage, and resentment built in him by now. This much bottled up could harm anybody, Even kill them in one bad day. If anything, I don't think COVID should be the anvil that he must worry about. His own deteriorating health because of anger should be on the list, but that's like asking Bob to stop spouting words salads, and accept some battles are way above his check.
 
"Stomp them into paste" is such a particularly violent choice of words.

Bob often displays a fondness for ridiculous tough guy talk, but he certainly seems to harbor violent fantasies. My favorite:

View attachment 2123770
Does anyone else remember a tweet chain where Bob alluded to him being a tough, bar fighting kinda guy? I don't remember what started it but Bob said in his last tweet of the thread how cathartic it was to hear someone's head crash against the bar after kicking the stool out from underneath them. The guy he was trying to sound big and bad to called immeditely called him out on it by saying that that sounds like a pretty serious thing, possibly a crime, and if he had any proof of it. I know I've seen it, I might've actually thrown it up here, but for the life of me I cannot find it. I also cannot find it on his timeline no matter what keywords I try to put in the search. I don't know if it was lost in the great server crash of 2019 or what but it was before I started saving screen shots and before I archived everything :(

EDIT:
In my continual search for my white whale I found this telling tweet from 2015.
04-14-15 I am violent.PNG

Absolutely no idea what he's talking bout but we can see his desire to crush those he has a problem with, "in games or otherwise", was proudly being broadcasted 6 years ago in that awkward year between #GibberGabber and orange Voldemort ruining everything forever.

EDIT EDIT:
Found this other gem from 2017 which the top was captured by @Gordon Cole
05-25-17 Kill me some 'publicans.PNG

Bob wants catharsis from gunning down people who voted differently from him. He is the embodiment of every caricature of a Fox news viewer he has ever complained about.
Another find from 2017. It's so big and dumb the archive can't capture it all AND REASON IS NOT MORAL YOU RETARD!
04-18-17 bullshit pt1.PNG

04-18-17 bullshit pt2.PNG

04-18-17 bullshit pt3.PNG

04-18-17 bullshit pt4.PNG

And where did that get you Bob? It took you getting canned from The Escapist, again, for your support to come back and it immediately went into decline the next month and continues to this day.
 
Last edited:
You're right but the real irony of the "Gotcha Cap punched Hitler" argument they love to point to is that wasn't done for political reasons but marketing. Jack Kirby was a straight shooter and there are plenty of interviews where he states him and Joe Simon created a Patriot hero who punched Hitler on the cover of issue 1 because they thought it would sell.
I like to ask them where were the issues about the japanese internment? Or how they feel about Superman's cover declaring, "Slap a Jap!"

No clusterfuck of multiple #1 issues or dozens of series starring (in theory) the same character, alternate timelines, or crossover events that you have to try and untangle.
Well.... there are.

I mean I'd paste in here the Evangelion alt timelines but then the board might justifiably lynch me. But actually there are multiple series with characters. Like a favorite of mine, Goblin Slayer has... 4 "comic" lines right now? (depending on how you count - Main story, prequel story, "brand new day" story, and some new story)
I also cannot find it on his timeline no matter what keywords I try to put in the search. I don't know if it was lost in the great server crash of 2019 or what but it was before I started saving screen shots and before I archived everything :(
Yeah sorry, I tried to dig around myself - even checked his alt account - and couldn't find it. I think he deleted it.
 
I would agree with you there, but recently I don't think most of these people want to "get there" at all. I know it is a basic bitch argument to say that "actvists just want the fight to feel rightous and self-important", but have you seen the people that took over the spotlight for these racial/social grievances of late?

this is Travon Free, bi-sexual comedy writer for Samantha Bee and the Daily Show (you know, the funniest shit around), who made a short film about a black guy stuck in a time loop where he gets shot by a white cop no matter what he does. The short is a piece of shit racist flick, but what he wore to get his Oscar encapsulate this bizarre moment we are living, on his dolce gabbana suit and nike Tennis he had them inscribed with the name of black people who were killed by cops.

In short, he made dead people his fucking BRAND! In these days of fast media consumption, where everything needs to be a reconizable name to have any staying power, this guy made a fucking brand out dead people, grifting doesn't even start to describe this shit.

I mean, fuck common sense and any semblance of respect for the dead am I right, who needs those when we are living in crappy, rejected Black Mirror episode.
At the end of the (potentially first) American Civil War politicians would use dead soldiers to score political points in their campaigns. This became known as "waving the bloody shirt." Convince me that an act like this is any different.
Does anyone else remember a tweet chain where Bob alluded to him being a tough, bar fighting kinda guy? I don't remember what started it but Bob said in his last tweet of the thread how cathartic it was to hear someone's head crash against the bar after kicking the stool out from underneath them. The guy he was trying to sound big and bad to called immeditely called him out on it by saying that that sounds like a pretty serious thing, possibly a crime, and if he had any proof of it. I know I've seen it, I might've actually thrown it up here, but for the life of me I cannot find it. I also cannot find it on his timeline no matter what keywords I try to put in the search. I don't know if it was lost in the great server crash of 2019 or what but it was before I started saving screen shots and before I archived everything :(

EDIT:
In my continual search for my white whale I found this telling tweet from 2015.
View attachment 2124023
Absolutely no idea what he's talking bout but we can see his desire to crush those he has a problem with, "in games or otherwise", was proudly being broadcasted 6 years ago in that awkward year between #GibberGabber and orange Voldemort ruining everything forever.

EDIT EDIT:
Found this other gem from 2017 which the top was captured by @Gordon Cole
View attachment 2124085
Bob wants catharsis from gunning down people who voted differently from him. He is the embodiment of every caricature of a Fox news viewer he has ever complained about.
Another find from 2017. It's so big and dumb the archive can't capture it all AND REASON IS NOT MORAL YOU RETARD!
View attachment 2124128
View attachment 2124131
View attachment 2124132
View attachment 2124133
And where did that get you Bob? It took you getting canned from The Escapist, again, for your support to come back and it immediately went into decline the next month and continues to this day.
Bob's violent fantasies are due to him knowing he's an utter failure. He's the kind of person to get your blood boiling- until you remember not only is the fat fuck in no position to carry out his threats, he wouldn't be able to even if he was. He is the ultimate keyboard warrior. If he really was the macho, 300lb bench-pressing, gun-toting survivalist he claims he is, he'd be out there putting the fear of God into the hearts of wasteland ghouls everywhere. That he remains behind the screen instead of carrying out his threats evinces his impotence.

Or maybe he's just mad because he's so fat he can't beat his meat to Princess Peach anymore. Who knows?
 
It's common knowledge that he's permanently in the high school mindset, but for all his violent fantasies to opponents, has he ever successfully managed to intimidate someone? In school or otherwise?

And if not, has he tried? I'm not saying it would work, but it would definitely be funny to hear/read about. Imagine him trying to actually physically threaten someone and not look like, well, an aging obese retard.
 
It's common knowledge that he's permanently in the high school mindset, but for all his violent fantasies to opponents, has he ever successfully managed to intimidate someone? In school or otherwise?

And if not, has he tried? I'm not saying it would work, but it would definitely be funny to hear/read about. Imagine him trying to actually physically threaten someone and not look like, well, an aging obese retard.
Does anyone have that picture of teenage Bob? I feel like it needs to be reposted every now and then because he used to be even less intimidating than he is now. At least current Bob you might be afraid of him trying to molest you on public transit. Big creepy Uncle vibes.

Edit: I found the picture. Its astoundingly low quality, but imagine this bobbleheaded butterball wanting to fight you.

Bob teen.png
 
Last edited:
Bob going full fedora tipper and violent anti-mayo fantasy, yet again.

View attachment 2124409
Tick tock, Robert. Your time is running out and there will be no salvation coming from SCIENCEtm to save you from death.

You've created nothing of meaning, done no good works, bettered neither the world nor other lives. Death is coming, and you will be forgotten except by us - your own personal demons.
 
Did this picture answer you?
View attachment 2122307
This picture reminds me of something...
3caccbcb0dc4564e26dd91ef46501c5ae2-08-richard-friends.rsquare.w700.jpg

One common thread among these slacktivists is that they want to have won, not win. They don't want to put in the blood, sweat, and tears to win; they just want the accolades, fame, and glory that comes. They are a generation of participation trophy winners who've never known true hardship in their lives. They put up with the cops arresting them because they know daddy (or a Democrat fund) will bail them out, and they'll never see the inside of a Federal prison. They riot and loot because they know the age of Bull Connor and his dogs have passed, and that the MAGAs will not go to the effort of tracking them down and burning their homes down around them. If people put up the slightest resistance to them, they run screaming. They're unwilling to stand up to any organized enemy.
They also praise Socialism, but don't actually like performing physical labor.
Instead of stealing Tony's armor
She seriously stole his armor? And she's supposed to be the hero?
It's common knowledge that he's permanently in the high school mindset, but for all his violent fantasies to opponents, has he ever successfully managed to intimidate someone? In school or otherwise?
Maybe people would be scared of him because he smells really bad?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back