- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
Slack-jawed yokel who impressed Mark Serbu by getting kicked off YouTube for welding pipes together and calling them guns.This one of those 3D printing loons?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Slack-jawed yokel who impressed Mark Serbu by getting kicked off YouTube for welding pipes together and calling them guns.This one of those 3D printing loons?
Wouldn't expect anything less than willful ignorance from those tards.
I've seen people speculate that the load which busted the gun must have been in excess of 100,000 PSI, probably double of the normal operating pressure for .50BMG, the RN-50 itself is rated to hold up to as much as 85,000 PSI.
Maybe that's the answer? If the projectile got damaged while it was being fitted to the case. Handload + SABOT + Muzzle break + lighweight rifle = .....They were probably not reloads, as handloading something like SLAPs is apparently not easy to do.
Maybe that's the answer? If the projectile got damaged while it was being fitted to the case. Handload + SABOT + Muzzle break + lighweight rifle = .....
I'm no expert but sometimes when any piece of machinery goes catastrophically wrong, there's not just one cause.
First as already mentioned an AAR and autopsy needs to be done ASAP on the gun to be as best as legally possible to determine it was only the ammo and user for using iffy ammo is at fault. If something is found wrong however miniscule he is legally liable if anyone else get hurt using it.Someone asked me if it would be possible for him to 'save his skin' by offering people the option to trade in their RN-50 rifles in exchange for an equivalent value discount on a BFG-50. Some people might appreciate that gesture a lot, but I'm not sure that's economically feasible for him to do.
To his credit, he did a lot for people making homemade guns and those afraid of kabooms by firing 3 1/2" Goose loads out of a pipegun multiple times, and with bore obstructions.Not the brightest bulb, by far.
FW did make a good point about powder deterioration. There is a reason ammo has lot numbers and expiration dates. I could also see these being QC rejects that got “misplaced”.They were probably not reloads, as handloading something like SLAPs is apparently not easy to do. Most likely, these cartridges have just been going around, and this was the one which was the most fucked up and had degraded gunpowder.
This was a good post amongst lots of retarded bullshitting:
View attachment 2135575
I’m waiting on this to speak to causes. As to the threads I’ve mentioned what I would do to make it safer upthread. But without knowing the thread dimensions and the material used I have no idea as to the strength of them. If someone can DM me that I’ll do the calculations for thread strength.First as already mentioned an AAR and autopsy needs to be done ASAP on the gun to be as best as legally possible to determine it was only the ammo and user for using iffy ammo is at fault. If something is found wrong however miniscule he is legally liable if anyone else get hurt using it.
I get the feeling we may have a winner, although there's no way to know.I could also see these being QC rejects that got “misplaced”.
I’m waiting on this to speak to causes. As to the threads I’ve mentioned what I would do to make it safer upthread. But without knowing the thread dimensions and the material used I have no idea as to the strength of them. If someone can DM me that I’ll do the calculations for thread strength.
Backyard Ballistics gives his take on the situation. Here's the quick points:
Backyard Ballistics gives his take on the situation. Here's the quick points:
-Apparently Backyard Ballistics has the dayjob of investigating gun related crimes and accidents, which is why what he says in the video seems pretty insightful
-He places the fault on an overpressure cartridge rupturing, and causing gas to leak back past where the case is usually sealed, and exerted it's pressure against a much larger surface area of the cap.
-He says that the force stripping off the front threads (but not the back threads) doesn't mean that increasing the number of threads would have prevented the accident, because metal deforms under load, and due to load distribution the front threads will always bear the brunt of the weight (i.e. it could have had 50 instead of 5, and you would still have seen just the front 4 shear off and it go flying). So extra threading length on the cap probably wouldn't have prevented the failure (in his opinion).
-While the failure is solely due to the overpressure ammo, he felt there are some simple improvements to the RN-50 that could be made that would decrease the risk of injury in such catastrophic situations. These include:
1. Add vent holes to the cap so that in the unlikely event of a gas leak, it doesn't increase pressure inside the cap itself.
2. Place a hard cover over the stock or frame, so that in the event of a catastrophic failure the cap and debris would be captured or at least deflected by the cover.
3. Double the weight of the cap. This isn't to increase the strength of the cap, but because the amount of time that the pressure would act on the cap in the event of failure is fixed, which means the amount of momentum is fixed. Because the momentum is fixed, a cap that's double the weight would only reach half the speed, which would mean the kinetic energy would be a 1/4th of what it was. Which would also have meant that the metal ears that snapped off and hit Kentucky in the neck/lungs would have been 0.25x the kinetic energy, which would have likely made his injury much less life threatening than it was.
I don't have much mechanical engineering knowledge, so I don't know how much of this video is broscience, but he seems like he knows what he's talking about (at least to me). The video is only 6 minutes long, so it's worth the watch.
It wouldn’t surprise me. Grade 8 bolts are rated at 150,000 PSI and they have the same thread form.I wonder if they'd equal out to Serbu's stated numbers, or if he publicly lowballed them to keep people from working loads up to that wall.
It wouldn’t surprise me. Grade 8 bolts are rated at 150,000 PSI and they have the same thread form.
The one surprising design choice is the lack of a vent hole. Early smokeless firearms designers figured out pretty quickly that you don’t want the gases from a case failure finding the path of least resistance on its own.I am a mechanical engineer and everything he said is true. While the cover does not seem viable, he is correct that many guns don’t have that. While he is right that increasing the mass will lower velocity it will not change the amount of kinetic energy (Force) imparted. It will change the velocity at which it flies backwards. Being in direct contact with the ears the same amount of force will be applied to the ears and they will still break off and fly at the same speeds. Extending the ears the full length of the receiver would give more metal to move an honestly me cause them deform instead of shear off. This would also help with the deflection issue.
It wouldn’t surprise me. Grade 8 bolts are rated at 150,000 PSI and they have the same thread form.
I'm not sure of the dynamics involved but if the threads are the weak link, I don't think they'll hold long enough to let the case carve its way out of the cap.Forgive my motorpool-level of knowledge, but that'd be the point where the bolt fails, right? And not the threads themselves?
I'm sure there's an equation for figuring that out, but I've wilfully forgotten most of that info.
I think by that point, it'd just turn receiver into a banana peel.I'm not sure of the dynamics involved but if the threads are the weak link, I don't think they'll hold long enough to let the case carve its way out of the cap.
Kind of. It’s the load per square in that the bolts can take. The total load a bolt can hold increases with the size of the bolt. On the bigger bolts it tends to be the threads that fail first on the smaller ones the bolt itself will fail first.Forgive my motorpool-level of knowledge, but that'd be the point where the bolt fails, right? And not the threads themselves?
I'm sure there's an equation for figuring that out, but I've wilfully forgotten most of that info.
The threads are a failure point. However in the case of a vent hole you are deliberately putting in a failure point that will occur before the threads stripping out. By designing in a known failure point you and can lessen the chances of the failure causing injury.I'm not sure of the dynamics involved but if the threads are the weak link, I don't think they'll hold long enough to let the case carve its way out of the cap.