- Joined
- Nov 26, 2018
As if female protagonists are any better. They're all black with short curly hair with the sides shaved.
Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging
- Thread starter José Mourinho
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
This article is the one that made me aware of it. He explains a lot better than I do.
Tl;dr: It's software. All social media, all news feeds, hell even your search results are designed to feed you stuff you'll agree with on some level. But on some unspoken level, they also feed you stuff that's easy to send to you. That's "safe." They're not going to give you stuff that sends you to a different bubble, or god forbid might create new bubbles. It's too expensive for the system to create new epistemic enclosures. You aren't given stuff weird enough to let you branch out your horizons, because that's expensive for the system to handle.
Consider music. Generally speaking I can't think of too many new musicians I've heard of in a very long time. Pandora or Spotify sure as shit aren't going to send me them. They send me stuff they think I'll like, which means bands I've already heard, songs I've already heard. Occasionally I see a meme video in my recommends on Youtube but again, it's "safe." It's something someone similar to me, in the same epistemic system, liked. It's not going to be connected to an entirely different epistemic system. Sometimes my friends will link me something weird like "Electro Swing" and I'll discover some entirely new thing that I didn't know that I'd enjoy.
And sometimes they link some weird shit like 5th wave European neo-dubstep and I get an entire new playlist on my Youtube Music list -- or, as I'd suggest, an entirely different epistemic system.
Even if you don't take personalized "mixed for you" shit, well hey look, it's not-personalized mixed-for-genre/era stuff instead.
Why do this? Because it makes money. Why risk shaking up the system? It works.
The same software algorithms are affecting content producers. Both literal software and people trained to make decisions like software. Music producers are going to push content that fits in the existing Pandora / Spotify algos. They have to, or it won't get any traction. The same thing with movies, TV shows, novels, et cetera. Hell, remember Elsagate? Of all those millions of randomly generated videos that started being played out by real actors? Same thing, only without any controls and on a VASTLY accelerated timescale.
I'm convinced a lot of the mental illness we're seeing online -- your "very online" twitter users, shit like the Reylos of the world, are a side effect of all this, but I don't know enough to explore that particular rabbit hole. Hopefully they perfect the machine before the complete fucking mental breakdowns start happening.
And what's safe? What does the system know how to sell you?
The 80s-00s. Look at all the content that's come out in the past 20 years. You could take the movies today, drop them in a time machine, and they wouldn't be shocking or confusing to someone from 2001. They'd actually be a bit bland -- as Nick Rekieta has pointed out on his movie nights, a lot of tropes in movies from the 80s and 90s are simply fucking GONE now. There's no dumb "Bikini Cafe Company" or "Action Star Shoots Fucking EVERYBODY" movies anymore -- and heaven forbid if you get a movie about rebelling against the state or discovering a corporation is evil. Things like John Wick are anomalies, and created their own systems -- look at Nobody. It's John Wick as a family man. There will be a dozen of them by the end of 2030.
Consider taking "Diary of a Mad Black Woman" (2005) and sending it back to 1985. It would be WEIRD. Consider taking "Weird Science" (1985) and sending it to the 1960s. Even weirder. Now realize they remade that exact same fucking Madea movie 12 times in the past 15 years and it's not weird at all, is it? Oh wait, yes it fucking is. It's weird as shit.
The only difference is wokeshit, but that's a cultural cancer and intentionally being pushed into the system by activists. Pronoun bullshit wouldn't make sense to someone in 2010, yet alone 2000, and a movie trying to take a tranny seriously would be weird. By today it's already becoming commonplace. By 2025-2030 the idea of it not being part of our culture will be unthinkable. That's the danger of this system -- intentional work can cause the system to shift. Elsagate got attention when pedophiles started intentionally shoving kink into that system, and /pol/ realized they could shove Hitler into it. The wokeshits are shoving pronouns and idpol in the greater system at large. Someone had better figure out how to start shoving Patriotism and Meritocracy into the system under the left's nose really fucking quick or we're screwed.
But in the end, the software isn't letting people create new culture. It's recycling existing culture as bite sized mix and match tropes with all the edges filed off. Some tropes are intentionally removed, and expect more of this to happen going forward -- when's the last time you had a major movie with "corporations are the villain" or "the government is bad" as a major plot point? How long until it's "weird" to see a same-race white couple in films, or for a film to not have a gay couple or a tranny in it? 2030 or so I'm guessing. I would wager you'll never see a homophobic or transphobic character ever again in a major film, because those "tropes" were expunged.
Because in the end, why risk allowing the plebs to create new culture and allowing something subversive to enter the system? The current system makes money. Lots of money. It also lets certain people influence culture by simply dialing the knobs on the software. There's a reason Google spent billions running Youtube at a loss. Being able to turn those knobs -- and program the machine the knobs turned -- was worth more to them.
Except whoops, China's getting involved, so the culture has to shift slightly so they'll pay for Hollywood et all. Wonder if we'll put up with it?
Probably.
And that's why things ground to a halt. The kids of the 80s get pandered to by movies from the 00s and those movies have been remade forever since then, and will continue to do so until something collapses.
There are at least 5 Transformers movies coming out in the next few years and possibly a TV series. There's been 6 of them since 2007. One of them supposedly was literally the first movie again but this time with a random diversity chick instead of a fooookin' whyte maale.
We're trapped in a hell made out of software walls. But hey, at least the CGI's good.
Last edited:
AmazingEagle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
AmazingEagle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
Bruh, you can't free something that doesn't exist.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
Holy wall of text Batman.This article is the one that made me aware of it. He explains a lot better than I do.
Tl;dr: It's software. All social media, all news feeds, hell even your search results are designed to feed you stuff you'll agree with on some level. But on some unspoken level, they also feed you stuff that's easy to send to you. That's "safe." They're not going to give you stuff that sends you to a different bubble, or god forbid might create new bubbles. It's too expensive for the system to create new epistemic enclosures. You aren't given stuff weird enough to let you branch out your horizons, because that's expensive for the system to handle.
Consider music. Generally speaking I can't think of too many new musicians I've heard of in a very long time. Pandora or Spotify sure as shit aren't going to send me them. They send me stuff they think I'll like, which means bands I've already heard, songs I've already heard. Occasionally I see a meme video in my recommends on Youtube but again, it's "safe." It's something someone similar to me, in the same epistemic system, liked. It's not going to be connected to an entirely different epistemic system. Sometimes my friends will link me something weird like "Electro Swing" and I'll discover some entirely new thing that I didn't know that I'd enjoy.
And sometimes they link some weird shit like 5th wave European neo-dubstep and I get an entire new playlist on my Youtube Music list -- or, as I'd suggest, an entirely different epistemic system.
View attachment 2206731
Even if you don't take personalized "mixed for you" shit, well hey look, it's not-personalized mixed-for-genre/era stuff instead.
View attachment 2206762
Why do this? Because it makes money. Why risk shaking up the system? It works.
The same software algorithms are affecting content producers. Both literal software and people trained to make decisions like software. Music producers are going to push content that fits in the existing Pandora / Spotify algos. They have to, or it won't get any traction. The same thing with movies, TV shows, novels, et cetera. Hell, remember Elsagate? Of all those millions of randomly generated videos that started being played out by real actors? Same thing, only without any controls and on a VASTLY accelerated timescale.
I'm convinced a lot of the mental illness we're seeing online -- your "very online" twitter users, shit like the Reylos of the world, are a side effect of all this, but I don't know enough to explore that particular rabbit hole. Hopefully they perfect the machine before the complete fucking mental breakdowns start happening.
And what's safe? What does the system know how to sell you?
The 80s-00s. Look at all the content that's come out in the past 20 years. You could take the movies today, drop them in a time machine, and they wouldn't be shocking or confusing to someone from 2001. They'd actually be a bit bland -- as Nick Rekieta has pointed out on his movie nights, a lot of tropes in movies from the 80s and 90s are simply fucking GONE now. There's no dumb "Bikini Cafe Company" or "Action Star Shoots Fucking EVERYBODY" movies anymore -- and heaven forbid if you get a movie about rebelling against the state or discovering a corporation is evil. Things like John Wick are anomalies, and created their own systems -- look at Nobody. It's John Wick as a family man. There will be a dozen of them by the end of 2030.
Consider taking "Diary of a Mad Black Woman" (2005) and sending it back to 1985. It would be WEIRD. Consider taking "Weird Science" (1985) and sending it to the 1960s. Even weirder. Now realize they remade that exact same fucking Madea movie 12 times in the past 15 years and it's not weird at all, is it? Oh wait, yes it fucking is. It's weird as shit.
The only difference is wokeshit, but that's a cultural cancer and intentionally being pushed into the system by activists. Pronoun bullshit wouldn't make sense to someone in 2010, yet alone 2000, and a movie trying to take a tranny seriously would be weird. By today it's already becoming commonplace. By 2025-2030 the idea of it not being part of our culture will be unthinkable. That's the danger of this system -- intentional work can cause the system to shift. Elsagate got attention when pedophiles started intentionally shoving kink into that system, and /pol/ realized they could shove Hitler into it. The wokeshits are shoving pronouns and idpol in the greater system at large. Someone had better figure out how to start shoving Patriotism and Meritocracy into the system under the left's nose really fucking quick or we're screwed.
But in the end, the software isn't letting people create new culture. It's recycling existing culture as bite sized mix and match tropes with all the edges filed off. Some tropes are intentionally removed, and expect more of this to happen going forward -- when's the last time you had a major movie with "corporations are the villain" or "the government is bad" as a major plot point? How long until it's "weird" to see a same-race white couple in films, or for a film to not have a gay couple or a tranny in it? 2030 or so I'm guessing. I would wager you'll never see a homophobic or transphobic character ever again in a major film, because those "tropes" were expunged.
Because in the end, why risk allowing the plebs to create new culture and allowing something subversive to enter the system? The current system makes money. Lots of money. It also lets certain people influence culture by simply dialing the knobs on the software. There's a reason Google spent billions running Youtube at a loss. Being able to turn those knobs -- and program the machine the knobs turned -- was worth more to them.
Except whoops, China's getting involved, so the culture has to shift slightly so they'll pay for Hollywood et all. Wonder if we'll put up with it?
Probably.
And that's why things ground to a halt. The kids of the 80s get pandered to by movies from the 00s and those movies have been remade forever since then, and will continue to do so until something collapses.
There are at least 5 Transformers movies coming out in the next few years and possibly a TV series. There's been 6 of them since 2007. One of them supposedly was literally the first movie again but this time with a random diversity chick instead of a fooookin' whyte maale.
We're trapped in a hell made out of software walls. But hey, at least the CGI's good.
I think you're exaggerating how new troons in film are. Boys Don't Cry was a deadly serious film about troons and that was 1999, over 20 years ago. Modern day progressive culture started around the 1990s, it was just way less prevalent back then. Look up Kurt Cobain's political views and you'll see a lot of what's out there today.
The 1980s was obviously a different time, but that was 40 years ago, not last week.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
Yup. Remember Hollywood has been used as social engineering for a very very very long time. Boys Don't Cry was prepping us to accept troons. Movies in previous eras prepped us to accept gays, and still earlier, interracial couples. It's one of the unspoken but key roles that Hollywood performs in the system. God only knows what weird "art" film in the next few years will be prepping us for a cultural shift in the next decade or tw...
Oh shit, it's "Cuties" isn't it?
Goddamnit.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 30, 2020
You ever seen shit that made you this disgusted?
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
Funny way of spelling ”hanged”.
> trans Jewish activist
”A woman shall not wear an article proper to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman's dress; for anyone who does such things is an abomination to the LORD, your God.” - Deuteronomy 22:5
At this point (and I'll take my Islamic ratings for saying this) the Rashidun caliphate, if it still existed, would be a better option than the wokists. Under the Rashidun I could pay the jizya and be a Christian in peace, and I wouldn't have to worry about my little sister or whoever being nonced by an
How have we reached the point where states that actually had shari'ah are more benevolent than what a sizable chunk of the West wants for the West?
- Joined
- May 30, 2020
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
Mentally ill anarchists want people to stop calling authority figures on them.
You know who else wants people not to contact authority figures?
8 year olds who are up to no good.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
My pronouns are nigger/faggot/tranny. Except if you're black, then they're yassa/massa.
- Joined
- May 7, 2018
How hard are these fucking faggots trying to push the idea that being postmodern on race (i.e. "not seeing race") is itself racist? How was anyone in the antebellum south anything like this when they had separate laws, quarters and facilities for blacks and nobody ignored race under pain of social ostracism (or worse)? Can these half-witted thenib cartoonists remember how to breathe oxygen and tie their shoes?
Last edited:
AmazingEagle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
"Don't do this!" "Don't do that!" bruh just act normal and shut the fuck up.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Joined
- May 19, 2021
When you put it like this, the gay-corporate alliance is weird as shit. On one hand, you have a collection of the biggest degenerates on God's green Earth using pride to engage in the awful activities that won't get them arrested and to fantasize together about the things that will get them arrested. On the corporate side, pride is just "the people in the Swiffer ads are gay now!" Seriously, what happened?
Apparently this was because of something that happened to the person themselves.
They are basically admitting to being mentally ill and of course they are trans. It's almost as if these two traits are just the same thing.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
They weren't. Those empires had the age of consent at puberty and widespread forced marriage. Modern concepts of banning child marriage only reached the Islamic world in the 20th century. At least if some creepy troon tried to diddle your sister you could have him arrested rather than hastily arranging a marriage to cover the sinful act. Europe wasn't much better then either.
You'd be a lunatic to want to live in the middle ages.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Reopen the asylums x6
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
Take the schizo dick, bigot.