- Joined
- Feb 16, 2021
I didnt say they will mod the UI to be mobile-like but that the OS itself will be more locked-down like phones areDon't they know at this point not to fuck with this kind of thing if it's going to brick plenty of legacy business side apps? I wouldn't put it past them to continue attempting to make Windows mobile centric in layout, but to the point of functionality in general being completely screwed I doubt it.
There will probably be a windows enterprise edition without those limitations but it will be only sold to companies and enterprise-grade OEMs, the home edition will be crippled af
Win10 isnt free, the upgrade from 8 and 7 was free only for a year but thats it, you still have to pay for itI don't see the benefit to them making it paid at this point when it's been practically free for so long. It would scare off a lot of people who could then either go to Mac or even pick up Linux. You can't slam the lid back on Pandora's box especially with gibs on the line.
They already realized they can get tons of telemetry and datamining even off an OS people paid for, why make it free? why cut down their profits? the last big threat to microsoft was steamOS luring gamers and thus devs away from windows and that and steamboxes were a total failure. Desktop linux is stagnated, and I say this as a linux user. And with apple going with ARM the hackintosh scene is going to be dead the moment x86 macs are out of support. Its clear that google has no intention of releasing an android version for desktop, the android x86 scene is pitiful, and chromeOS is a glorified linux distro locked to hardware and meant to lure normalfags to google's web apps, little more than a terminal
The fact is windows has never had so little competition in the past 15-20 years as it does now, microsoft has no incentive to improve their OS, we're back to the late 90s