Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I agree hypersexualization of women contributes to the trans phenomenom. I'm sorry you were raped. So why do you not blame porn, or predatory men, or misogynists who expect women to be bimbos, as any contributing factors? You go straight to blaming feminism and women as the cause. I've said on here before that one thing FTMs and MTFs have in common is that they hate women. Its kinda tiring
I definitely do think all of those things contribute. I center the discussion around feminism because feminism is supposed to be the solution that young women turn to feel empowered over misogyny and predation, and that makes it all the more important to course correct when it fails at being that.

In being mainstreamed and commercialized, feminism has been allowed to become appropriated by sexist and other counterproductive interests. I think the most detrimental aspects of these are the emphasis on hypersexuality and hyperfemininity, the wokescolding intellectual elitism that has infested many social movements with valuable causes at their core, and the fearmongering that is used to keep women afraid without actually making them feel like there are solutions to their problems.

I don't think these weakspots of third wave feminism are the only cause of teen girls falling down the trans rabbithole, but I do feel it's a really understated part of the phenomenon. I think it's being underestimated how much some of the current trends in feminism are alienating young girls and pushing them away from a movement that otherwise might benefit them.

What I saw repeatedly was scared and hurt young girls with very gendered issues looking to feminism for answers, not finding what they found or disliking what they found, and then turning to gender ideology, which conveniently had all the answers laid out for them.

I don't think this means feminism as a whole is to blame—I just think current issues in the feminist movement of the last decade or two are contributing to a weird feminism-to-troonism pipeline for a lot of girls.
 
Yet this only happens in the west. Virtually nowhere else
You think that because you only know of the West and virtually nowhere else.
First, think about "the East": Japan and Korea for exemple. No female hypersexualisation there?

Second, if you think about repressive third-world shitholes when a big chunk of the population lives in rural areas where even electricity isn't garanteed and the gender roles are super-rigid for everybody, don't be dumb, it's a very different kind of ballpark. But those are places when there absolutly are stuff like prostitution going on, it's just hidden under the rug.
 
May I ask where you are sticking those tampons?
1.png

(x)

That didn't happen, and if it did, you and your wife are nasty:
2.png

(x)

The blatant fetishization of it all:
3.png

(x)
 
This screen has been posted like 15 pages prior, i wonder if anybody has a link to the original post? Or is it from Discord, but where did you find it?

I think men perpetuate the sexualisation of their daughters even if they don't think they do and even if they don't push towards sexualized clothes and behavior. It's a lot more complicated than that. If they enforce the idea that as girls there's some things they can't do that boys can, girls will search for the things they can do that boys can't, and society will tell them what it is (ie: being an object). A lot of men perpetuate gender stereotypes even if they don't own up to it: you should find a husband, you should be this or that way, you are fragile, your opinion matter less, you should be quieter than boys and do more chores ..ect... too much gender essentialism in general will naturally prep the girl to adopt unhealthy behaviors.

Also the stuff they don't want their daughter to do/say or wear they will react more positivly when it comes from other women: still having porn at home that the kids will find, still watching shit tv, still reating negativly to women who don't perform feminity, or are older, still surrounding their daughter with sexualized female roles models and hardly anything else, just forbidding them from emulating them. It's a mixed message to say the least if you yourself are obsessed with thots and can't give positive non-sexualized female role models to your kid.

Another angle: being rigid and prude and not letting them experiment with gender, both girliness and the opposite, will make the girls want to rebel and go towards the forbidden.
Another angle: Not being positive and invested in their achievments enough, so the girl will look for validation in other places.
And so on.

For sure being feminine is considered a status-symbol in lower class more than it is in higher class. Higher class women can rely on money and education to get respect, status and security in a way lower class people can't.

But kids are not vase you fill with stuff, they can react in various ways to the daily mix of ideas they are gonna receive from their familly, peers, as well as medias and the education system. You can blame fathers or mothers depending on your biais but the truth is: it's complicated.
Apparently it's reposted and pretty old, it goes as early as 2018 Tumblr
 
...I have no idea if that fucking wall of spergery is pro terf or anti terf, that's how fucking lost the point is
I'm pretty sure it's a "being a girl is life on easy mode and when FTMs finally realize this they detransition and become terves". The first part of the story is being a girl and everyone being nice and wanting to help and the second part is being a boy and everyone laughing and not helping.
 
So, if i'm interpreting the ruling correctly, GC views such as "a man cannot become a woman" or "sex is immutable" is under protection now, meaning it's not about misgendering or transphobia, it's that people are allowed to believe in science and express that. The TRAs are reporting on it now, and the they are confused as to what the ruling means.

View attachment 2249477
View attachment 2249480
View attachment 2249478
View attachment 2249479
What dont they understand? This just proves it's not about transphobia, it's about power. They want to keep doxxing and make sure people lose their livelihoods. Sociopaths.
If they had "fought with love and acceptance in their hearts" to begin with, the movement wouldn't be as hated as it is. If they had acknowledged that sex-based spaces are important, that they cannot control how other people refer to them, and simply got on with making sure they had the same rights as everyone else to live as they wished, then we wouldn't be having this discussion. But only when they fail at forcing everyone to play along do they go back to "our movement is about LOVE and ACCEPTANCE and we will just have to win people over by being nice." AS ANYONE COULD HAVE TOLD YOU FROM THE BEGINNING.

"gender non conforming women" is kinda meaningless these days because the modern day pop culture idea of feminine behavior with its focus on hyper sexualisation and hedonistic consumerism is so artificial and cancerous. it has gotten to the point where i think it's actually healthier for girls to reject most of it instead of conforming to it.

the problem then is that nobody is really presenting any sort of viable alternative to them, with tranny shit being the only 'alternative' that is supported and pushed, and it's even more cancerous and damaging than the regular stuff. shit's fucked all around.
Exactly. Am I "gender non-conforming" if I don't use contour? Or put on makeup at all? Or wear a bra? What if I wear sweatshirts? Or what about wearing vintage clothes? It's definitely not conforming to modern gender standards. The definition is just so meaningless it doesn't even need to be said.

I think commenters in here are right that the sexual liberation movement opened itself too wide and a lot of money is now invested in selling women the idea that sexualizing themselves is good. Whether it was hijacked by men or capitalist companies or women one-upping each other doesn't really matter; the point is that all these groups benefit from having a clear marker of their status (women) and easy access to sexually available women (men). That is the downside of loosening the cultural expectation so rapidly and severely. It creates a worse environment for women trying to maintain their self-respect in a world that's tugging them a certain way.
 
Do we have to ask why women, female people, are more active in feminist circles, really? Do we have to go galaxy brain on that? Is that the big unsolved mystery of our Time?

(both queer and terf circles define themselves as feminist spaces, and many terf explain how they used to hang in queer circles)

random delusion of grandeur from twitter :

View attachment 2249291
I'd like to see them try. Transhumanists are so fucking arrogant. Your body is not a machine that you can switch parts in and out at will, the more you meddle with and try and change your body to suit whatever crazy whims and delusion s of grandeur you have, the worse and more devastating the medical complications will be. We are not gods, at most modern medicine can barely repair damaged organs. Forget about creating functional new ones (Neovaginas anyone?) let alone cybernitically enhanced new ones.

I'll enjoy watching them try and modify themselves though, and suffering through the inevitable real-life body-horror consequences.
 
I'd like to see them try. Transhumanists are so fucking arrogant. Your body is not a machine that you can switch parts in and out at will, the more you meddle with and try and change your body to suit whatever crazy whims and delusion s of grandeur you have, the worse and more devastating the medical complications will be. We are not gods, at most modern medicine can barely repair damaged organs. Forget about creating functional new ones (Neovaginas anyone?) let alone cybernitically enhanced new ones.

I'll enjoy watching them try and modify themselves though, and suffering through the inevitable real-life body-horror consequences.
The transhumanists might have a point- 50 years down the road. For now, anyone self modifying their bodies with robot parts and shit is either obscenely, amazingly rich or dumb enough to act as beta testers for the crazy rich people. I think we know which one of those categories this guy fits into.
 
I'd like to see them try. Transhumanists are so fucking arrogant. Your body is not a machine that you can switch parts in and out at will, the more you meddle with and try and change your body to suit whatever crazy whims and delusion s of grandeur you have, the worse and more devastating the medical complications will be. We are not gods, at most modern medicine can barely repair damaged organs. Forget about creating functional new ones (Neovaginas anyone?) let alone cybernitically enhanced new ones.
It's coming. Clinical trials started recently for a surgically implanted prosthetic neovagina for women with vaginal agenesis.

Troons just let surgeons do fucking anything to them so I'm sure this will go weird places.

e: I've added something to my list of things neovaginas are made from. Scrotum (most common), sigmoid colon (more rare), fish skin (that one guy in Brazil) and now...mucosal tissue from the inside of your cheek.

1623366817146.png
 
A reminder that Colin’s selfies are heavily shopped. Colin and his receding hairline next to an actual female:

View attachment 2250969
Skull size never lies 💀
That's something that never struck me until recently (because I had never seen it until last week). The instant you get a tranny next to a real woman, anything they have that you might consider "passing" crumbles to dust. They can do a lot with a good angle, good lighting, 100 pictures in a row to choose one from, makeup, maybe some photoshop or filters, when they're taking selfies alone or with other trannies, but the second you put a pretender next to the real deal it's as obvious as it can be. It's already been posted here, but this perfectly illustrates the true sexual dimorphism of our species and how no matter hard a man tries, he cannot hide the fact that he is a man:
screenshot-2021-06-02-at-04-47-37-png.png

But gynecologists totally can't tell the difference, right?
 
That's something that never struck me until recently (because I had never seen it until last week). The instant you get a tranny next to a real woman, anything they have that you might consider "passing" crumbles to dust. They can do a lot with a good angle, good lighting, 100 pictures in a row to choose one from, makeup, maybe some photoshop or filters, when they're taking selfies alone or with other trannies, but the second you put a pretender next to the real deal it's as obvious as it can be. It's already been posted here, but this perfectly illustrates the true sexual dimorphism of our species and how no matter hard a man tries, he cannot hide the fact that he is a man:

---
everything about this image perfectly signifies justs how absurd this is, the gigantic shoulders, the dead eyes and gaping mouth, overdone makeup, the thick neck, the visibly male chest and arms; it's so hilarious how every picture of a troon just ends up looking like a charicature
 
I'd like to see them try. Transhumanists are so fucking arrogant. Your body is not a machine that you can switch parts in and out at will, the more you meddle with and try and change your body to suit whatever crazy whims and delusion s of grandeur you have, the worse and more devastating the medical complications will be. We are not gods, at most modern medicine can barely repair damaged organs. Forget about creating functional new ones (Neovaginas anyone?) let alone cybernitically enhanced new ones.

I'll enjoy watching them try and modify themselves though, and suffering through the inevitable real-life body-horror consequences.
I blame cyberpunk. It's supposed to be a critique of losing connection with your humanity as technology becomes more prolific, but people now read it and think "heckin' cool!" Ugh.
 
Back