- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
Didn't read.For at least 1025 pages now, yes. Goddamn. Log off. Go home. Live your life. Do something else. Start a profitable home business. You supposedly know outdoors things. Use natural plants and beeswax to make poison ivy remedies and sunburn creams and sell that shit online, get business loans for single moms from the government to do it, you could make a killing. Being a witch, as you frequently point out, and a horticuralist by trade, I'd be willing to give you hints as to plants that are natural remedies for toxins found in nature, and how to use them, as well as how to find and ID them.
Or you can keep doing the same thing. Being the fly bashing itself against the glass window over and over when there is an open door 3 feet away and a person with a broom trying to shoo you towards it. But by all means, keep bashing yourself against the glass. Keep going with your "hashtag evidence" foolishness. None of your lawsuits have ever gotten you any money. The biggest success in your life has been when Uncle Joe granted a refundable tax credit for 5 months that you've already spent.
The first line that I saw some TACKY UNSOLICITED ADVICE I scrolled on.
Why do you people express your bossy opinion on what I should do with my life thinking I give a shit what you think?
Least of all the opinion of a cursed witch with a barren womb. You're a fool and a moron and everything out of your mouth is foolish garbage.
I suspect that the blonde baby girl is not Marshalls, that Marshall is not her biological father. You likely fucked some other man while you were sexually active with Marshall -- he works so you have ample opportunity to do this -- and told him that she is his.
Marshall shouldn't take his paternity as a given. Your sexual morality doesn't even exclude your cousins so it is probable that it was not one of Marshall's retarded sproglets that fertilized your ovum.
Marshall is miserable living (even part-time) with you because the baby (which might not even be his) has been born. By this stage, he is supposed to be long gone, with no contact between you and his (purported) daughter. Playing father, playing husband, spending his money on anyone other than himself was never part of the plan. It certainly was never part of the plan with the other women with which he managed to achieve his reproductive free-ride. The free-riding male doesn't form a bond with either his child or his spouse. He doesn't want any sort of relationship: monetary or emotional. The primary goal is gene propagation with minimal parental investment.
This is the sixth -- 1,2,3,4,5,6 --time you have been used for a reproductive free ride and you remain unable to see the pattern. All of your partners have lied to you -- which you admitted -- because they were seeking a free ride, they told you what you needed to hear so you spread your legs and let them impregnate you. They never had any intention to raise their progeny or be with you. Minimal parental investment is their aim. They need only hang around until the baby is born and then leave, seeking another woman like you, viz. gullible, to repeat the cycle.
When these men have burned bridges with you they have done so deliberately. They want to get you to the point where you want to have nothing to do with them. They don't want you calling them asking for money or engaging them in the sentimental talk about their son or daughter. They want to move on to repeat their hustle. This was Marshall's plan.
I would bet money that Marshall and all the fathers of your children have other children that they have no contact with. This is how reproductive free-riders operate. If they aren't going to be involved in the rearing of their children there is some risk in that child reaching maturity and being able to have children of their own and further spread the absent father's genes. To manage this risk it is necessary to produce as many children as possible (with the lowest possible parental investment).
Marshall wants to make you history, to move on and forget you and the daughter that is supposed to be his. He would be feeling trapped, stifled, stuck, and bored. He is having difficulty leaving -- not because of sex and food -- but because
(a) the pool of women pretending to be Jews is small;
(b) his age; and
(c) the saleability of his bullshit hopes and aspirations to women given his age.
There are only two socioeconomic stations below Marshall, in order:
N-2 Unskilled Labor <---- Marshall is here
N-1 Unemployment
N Homelessness <---- Very bottom



This is an abuse tactic called a "narcissistic narrative" aimed at putting the Victim on the defensive.
So for one, we've established now that you are an ABUSER.
Damn, the thread diverged to a sex game and out of nowhere you came out of left field in a narcissistic rage because you just can't handle a woman expressing her sexuality outside of your sexist world view. Classic!
The fact that you just spent that much effort vomiting a narcissistic narrative out of your soul shows just how mentally unwell you are. Healthy, well adjusted people don't write narcissistic narratives like that.
Your false narrative is nothing more than the bleatings of sexist man who suffers from a narcissistic injury any time he witnesses female autonomy.
You re-invent the story and make up details in order to soothe your narcissistic injury against your partirchal world order.
You're so desperate to protect your patriarchal world order that you will go on the internet anonymously as a Troll attempting to verbally and socially abuse a random stranger in order to Scapegoat a woman who defies Patriarchal norms. Pathetic.
No amount of education in the world can fix a stupid neanderthal like you. You will be gathered up on the Day of Judgment and cast into darkness where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. I will meet you there face to face where I will stand there to condemn you before my Father in Heaven at his Throne.
they told you what you needed to hear so you spread your legs and let them impregnate you.



Did it ever occur to you that women spread their legs because they actually desire the sex and pregnancy too?
No, no it didn't occur to you because you're a moron.
I can tell by this comment that you have been dumped by multiple women in your life because you are bad at sex. Any man who believes that sex is something where a woman is a passive participant is bad at sex.
You are completely ignorant about female sexuality.
The very fact that I can dissect the pathology of your words shows just how ignorant you are.
And how is that a problem? Why do you assume that a woman (or even a man) who is a single parent even wants another parent around?They never had any intention to raise their progeny or be with you. Minimal parental investment is their aim.
There's a reason sperm banks were invented. A reason why single men adopt children.
How far into the Dark Ages are you that you cannot conceive the idea of intentional single parenthood?.
Again, this is more of your brainwashed patriarchal world order psychobabble being vomited out of your ugly heart and soul.
When these men have burned bridges with you they have done so deliberately
Even if this were true, who cares?
How far in the Dark Ages are you that you cannot conceive the idea that someone's worth and happiness is not dependent on how others treat them?
This comment is actually surprising coming from you because it's usually the Christians who are the Codependents. You're a Talmud scholar. Where does this codependent view come from I wonder? I can only attribute it to your Patriarchal World Order view which tries to tell women they are only worth how men treat them. DUDE, the year is 2021, I'm too smart for that LIE.
Maybe that kind of garbage worked on women in another generation, but I'm not buying your lies. You're an idiot with a played out script.
Let me bring you into the mind of women in the 21st century: IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MANY PEOPLE YOU HAVE SEX WITH, AS LONG AS THE SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP IS NOT FORBIDDEN BY THE TORAH.
suspect that the blonde baby girl is not Marshalls, that Marshall is not her biological father. You likely fucked some other man while you were sexually active with Marshall -- he works so you have ample opportunity to do this -- and told him that she is his.
Marshall shouldn't take his paternity as a given. Your sexual morality doesn't even exclude your cousins so it is probable that it was not one of Marshall's retarded sproglets that fertilized your ovum.



There are only two socioeconomic stations below Marshall, in order:
N-2 Unskilled Labor <---- Marshall is here
N-1 Unemployment
N Homelessness <---- Very bottom
Marshall is a very low-status male -- not an alpha male as you have claimed -- with nothing to offer anyone. He works in unskilled labor, he has no trade skills, he has no education, he has no assets. Marshall isn't going anywhere. He isn't going to learn a trade or gain a diploma. Marshall peaked when he started working in unskilled labor. This is as good as it gets with Marshall.



There's no ladder with Elohim's people. Everyone of Elohim's people is equal in the eyes of Elohim with respect to their gender, race, occupation, and income.
Your arrogance over others due to their career path is telling that you are a Goyim. Goyim love to lord over others.
Your vain striving after money is folly, because even the rich die, while the poor are still happy.
"Let the brother in humble circumstances boast about his high position. But let the rich brother boast about his being humbled; since, like a wildflower, he will pass away." Yochanan 1:9-10
The abusive, Codependent, evil Christian trying to power level me on moralityBut didn't you hear Melinda telling us that as a string matriarchal woman she was the one breaking off the relationships with all her boy-toys? Men come chasing after her like ducklings, desperate for a drop of insane pussy, but no! Melinda is a strong independent woman who don't need no man. We know this is true, of course, because Melinda told us and she has never lied ever in her entire life.![]()
Be true to your colors Christian lady!
To a normal woman --
Being "normal" is supposed to be what? Praise?
That's laughable
A shift from Philosophy to Theology. Here we go.That is plainly false. Forgiveness does not require "power" to perform. Any human being that is of sound mind -- that understands the concept of forgiveness and can form intent -- can forgive anyone else of wrongdoing they feel they have been subjected to by the person that they intend to forgive.
In subjective terms, forgiveness is an attitudinal adjustment, a cessation of resentment, anger, and hostility towards the person you believe has somehow wronged you.
You are confusing (and conflating) transgressing against a person and transgressing against the rules of a deity. If you have transgressed against a deity's rule then yes, only that deity can normally forgive you for your infraction. But this doesn't exhaust the field of transgressing that humans engage in. Humans violate norms, mores, customs, agreements, and etiquette. These transgressions produce an aggrieved party and the grievance has no relevance to a deity's rules. In these cases, the aggrieved party can choose to forgive th
The only person confused here is you.
You're mixing secular humanism with teachings from The Torah. Not surprising, with you being a Talmud scholar, you're unable to divide between human teaching and The Law of Elohim. That's how Rabbis have brainwashed you, because you know, who cares the difference between the two, huh?
There is not one verse in the entire Torah which shows that humans have the power to forgive anyone's sins. Not one. High priests prepared offerings on Yom Kippur but only Elohim can forgive sin.
"Letting go" of emotions that come from conflict is not "forgiveness". I'm not going to dive into a 10 page essay on the multiple uses of the word "forgive" in the modern English language. The intent of my original comment was in the context of sin and it's black and white in The Torah: NO ONE CAN FORGIVE ANOTHER'S SIN EXCEPT ELOHIM. Nothing to argue with there and even you conceded to that point so why waste my time expanding it?
Offending someone's norms, customs, etc has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. You're adding extra topics that didn't appear in the first place.
Eye for an eye" is a principle for settling civil disputes in the context of some form of an adjudicatory process. It means that the (usually) financial restitution is to be proportionate to the injury suffered. It is not an invitation to take the law into your own hands. The restitution is decided upon by a court or tribunal after a sober assessment of the injury.
You like to use the figurative "Eye for an eye" to justify being a cunt to people. This is misuse. You don't have the necessary objectivity to accurately assess your (alleged) injury nor do you have the necessary impartiality to arrive at fair restitution. This is for a judge to decide whether he be secular or Jewish. If the issue does not rise to the level of requiring third-party involvement then just move on. Don't insist on being a cunt as if it's a religious duty.
More of your Talmudic nonsense. This kind of nonsense is why your Rabbis are being bombed day after day in Israel and can't drive the enemy out of the land even after 72 years. You're teaching lies.
Lev. 24:19-20 does not say it is confined to Judges. You lie.
Eye for eye is a moral obligation and no idiot like you is going to succeed in trying to bully me into silence.
So now I've shown you're an ignorant sexist and also wrong about theology.
Nice boxing round but I'm going to say it again: CHECKMATE!