Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[AmazingEagle]

View attachment 2323238
here is the cunt’s profile pic she is insane

View attachment 2323243

Borzah Yankey lookin ass.

 

[AnOminous]

Critical race theory is explicitly Marxist, it just substitutes class struggle for racial strife. The end goal is the same.

That's like saying you can be a Christian but not actually believe in Jesus. It's a complete contradiction in terms.

 

[Josterman]

Borzah Yankey lookin ass.

View attachment 2323336

God that’s even more unhinged

 

[NoReturn]

Listen! There's the smoke detector noise again!

 

[AmazingEagle]

View attachment 2323490
Listen! There's the smoke detector noise again!

I can't tell if this is a guy or a girl.

 

[Derka Derka]

I can't tell if this is a guy or a girl.

Gender is a social construct

 

[Local Fed]

I can't tell if this is a guy or a girl.

It's as if Dave Chappelle trooned out.

 

[existencialdispointment]

I don’t know a lot about D&D but don’t you just make up whatever you want when playing? Why does it matter if the son of the guy who came up with is a transphobic monster? Just play it how you want

they look for reasons to harrass the people in a hobby out of the hobby

 

[Alessonincrippliningdepre]

This video

 

[Derka Derka]

This video

This is what bath salts does to your brain

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

the left-wing version of the Hitler Youth.

Isn't that just the Hitler Youth?

View attachment 2322946

So, you want to talk about crimes against humanity committed with religion as a motive? Let's talk. Specifically, let's talk about:
• the French revolutionaries' genocide in the Vendée,
• the French revolutionaries' massacre of Catholics at Lyons,
• the French revolutionaries' (are you noticing a theme here?) desecrations of churches and murders of priests,
• the murders of Catholics by the Paris communards,
• the socialist Mexican government's persecution of Catholics,
• the attacks against lay Catholics and priests by Republicans in the Spanish Civil War
• the persecution of Russian Orthodoxy and Uniate Catholics by Soviet Russia
• the ongoing persecution of Christians in China.

 

[Trianon]

Oh hey, remember this cunt from a few dozen pages back?

View attachment 2321378

She's the "journalist" behind the Marxist 1619 project, designed to rewrite history so that DEY WUZ KANGS and the US WUZ WAYCIST AND SHEET. She was having a sad because some college wasn't giving her Tenure despite her being VASTLY unqualified for her job.

Well, they gave her Tenure at the express objections of the staff after she had a fit on Twitter and got a mob of dindus and white liberals to bitch about it.

And she declined it and called the college racist and quit in a huff.

View attachment 2321375
View attachment 2321376

Nikole Hannah-Jones declines UNC tenure, accuses college of racism: 'Just not something I want anymore'

Left-wing journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones announced Tuesday that she has turned down the offer of tenure at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and suggested racism played in a role in UNC's dragging its feet on her future at the school.

www.foxnews.com

Another group of people get to learn the mantra: Around Blacks, Never Relax.

Anyone with a brain could see UNC was walking into a trap. The fact that she got THEM to APOLOGIZE for being RACIST ........... I can't. Cucks.

I was reading a lot of Twitter arguments about CRT today and getting so depressed. I can't believe how many people aren't aware of the insidious influence it has had on the culture over the past few decades. If you were in academia or woke Tumblr, you could see it creeping in and burning everything you loved, and now people are gaslighting me about it and saying that was something else and/or all of that is good, actually.

I do like how they say "critical race theory" is just a scary-sounding label Chris Rufo gave to all the woke shit. But it's not the term that's scary, it's the ideas. I never needed anyone to stir me up about it, it's scared me for years watching friends succumb to a mind virus where they wouldn't listen to anyone who disagreed with them, where you were afraid to say you had some anodyne conservative view because you would be called racist and lose friends. They all started chanting "intersectionality" at the same time, which is one of the first CRT concepts written about in the '70s and '80s.

It IS Marxist. Oh, it's not material at all, or class-based, but Marx didn't have anything coherent to say about material either; he was a paranoid bitter man who shaped his envy into an entire worldview. CRT is very Marxist. Casting all aspects of society as power struggles between the oppressed and oppressor is textbook Marxism, and the scholars behind the theory were very deliberate about expanding Marx's dialectic toward other social divides. (See how they initially conceptualized "whiteness" as "property," an unspoken "knapsack" of privileges that white people carried around that no other race had.)

CRT was created BY Marxists. Their earliest conferences of Bell and Delgado and others were all self-professed Marxists talking in a room together. They were just trying to give those ideas a way to stick in the land of opportunity by pitching a lie that opportunities don't exist for non-whites. The theories are paranoid conspiracies dependent on a privileged outgroup who have a false consciousness that is the sole explanation for why they could possibly resist the glorious utopian vision of equity. The rural man is an enemy in both systems; he is too stupid to understand the grand theory, cannot be cajoled into it with guilt or passion. His poverty and his pride both stand athwart the entire scheme of Marxism or antiracism; he has nothing and yet has more self-worth than all the envious little busybodies put together.

It's not exactly a secret. Encyclopedia Britannica makes the connection clear:

Critical race theory (CRT) was officially organized in 1989, at the first annual Workshop on Critical Race Theory, though its intellectual origins go back much farther, to the 1960s and ’70s. Its immediate precursor was the critical legal studies (CLS) movement, which dedicated itself to examining how the law and legal institutions serve the interests of the wealthy and powerful at the expense of the poor and marginalized. (CLS, an offshoot of Marxist-oriented critical theory, may also be viewed as a radicalization of early 20th-century legal realism, a school of legal philosophy according to which judicial decision making, especially at the appellate level, is influenced as much by nonlegal—political or ideological—factors as by precedent and principles of legal reasoning.)

I didn't say anywhere if its good or should be taught. I just explained why it doesn't function the way Marxism does because it doesn't create a unification between non-whites and that prevents their ability to do shit about the so called power structures.

I in no way endorse CRT and I think its a really bad idea particularly the way its being taught.

EDIT: @Dynamic Right, the idea behind Marxism however is that the proletariat is able to unify on the basis they are all being oppressed. The problem with the way CRT goes about things is it posits that all minorities are oppressed, but blacks are the most oppressed so their's are the only issues that matter. You see them ignore other racial group problems or actively attack others such as the recent attacks on Asians. This precludes the unity needed to overthrow the power that exists because it doesn't create a place of unity for the oppressed.

(Again, as I said earlier I don't agree with this - I'm just explaining)

I think I see what you mean about CRT feeling like it's imposed by the powerful specifically to AVOID a cross-coalitional overthrow; keep the bottom feeders fighting each other instead of promoting class-based interests. There are socialists who oppose it on those grounds. But I see Marxism as doing the same thing CRT does, quite purposefully: creating tensions in an existing power structure that it can then exploit to impose a new system. It's not just that someday the lower classes overthrow their oppressors; it's that everyone not on board with the system has to be liquidated in order for it to work. When Mao's China got families to rat each other out, when Zimbabwe's Mugabe turned to Marx to describe whites as "blood-sucking exploiters" and used Marxian language to justify seizing their land and killing their families, then yes, it all turns out the same and has the same root. The Marxist goals of a cross-class coalition is a farce, has never come close to happening, and is as much of a pipe dream as CRT's promise of a fully just, antiracist society, which will never happen so long as humans have free will and basic disagreements (and using the ludicrous definition that all disparities/disagreements are caused by latent racial biases baked into a faceless system, which conveniently is operated by the white oppressor class - not that we're saying whites are evil! but draw your own conclusions!). Ultimately both are designed to destroy everything that unifies us for some small cadre of people's inexplicable ends, people who never expect to face the consequences of their mistakes.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

Isn't that just the Hitler Youth?

So, you want to talk about crimes against humanity committed with religion as a motive? Let's talk. Specifically, let's talk about:
• the French revolutionaries' genocide in the Vendée,
• the French revolutionaries' massacre of Catholics at Lyons,
• the French revolutionaries' (are you noticing a theme here?) desecrations of churches and murders of priests,
• the murders of Catholics by the Paris communards,
• the socialist Mexican government's persecution of Catholics,
• the attacks against lay Catholics and priests by Republicans in the Spanish Civil War
• the persecution of Russian Orthodoxy and Uniate Catholics by Soviet Russia
• the ongoing persecution of Christians in China.

Don't forget Muslim persecution of Christians through MENA and the Caucasus.

The theories are paranoid conspiracies dependent on a privileged outgroup who have a false consciousness that is the sole explanation for why they could possibly resist the glorious utopian vision of equity.

It's Patriarchy Theory, for race; Radical Feminism and CRT both replace "oppressor/oppressed", the former with "man/woman", and the latter with "whites/non-whites", except the latter has taken it further, claiming that "white" isn't a static demographic, and that other people can be "white-adjacent", and therefore oppressors, if they don't accept their position on the totem pole for the Oppression Olympics™.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Don't forget Muslim persecution of Christians through MENA and the Caucasus.

On that note, I've always wondered what'll happen when Islam and troonery come into conflict, and which side the #RefugeesWelcome leftists will pick.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

Don't forget Muslim persecution of Christians through MENA and the Caucasus.

It's Patriarchy Theory, for race; Radical Feminism and CRT both replace "oppressor/oppressed", the former with "man/woman", and the latter with "whites/non-whites", except the latter has taken it further, claiming that "white" isn't a static demographic, and that other people can be "white-adjacent", and therefore oppressors, if they don't accept their position on the totem pole for the Oppression Olympics™.

Why can’t people see this? The division between men and women was by design. Men were told women hate them, women were told men hate us, and so hate grew where there was none before, just because the sociological telephone game told them they were hated and it is natural to hate someone you are told definitely hates you.

When I say stop the hate, I’m not being fuzzy at all. I’m saying actually, let’s apply critical theory to critical theory. Critical theory is hate-generation-as-praxis. I’m saying stop hate like I say, do yard work, or touch grass. Break the spell, in other words.

Isn’t that really what Rufo is doing lol? Critical theory is named “theory” as praxis, because there is no theory, only praxis. It is praxis to hide behind the word “theory,” you see. The purpose of critical praxis is to destroy a system. What system, well, it’s irrelevant. Whether good or bad, this is a toolkit to destroy a system, render it nonfunctional in every way. By applying critical theory to ANYTHING no matter how good and pure...you’re queering it. “Queering” IS critical praxis. Because it says, hey what if this whole thing is degenerate and this degenerate thing wholesome?

So Rufo has introduced Critical Theory Theory, which is praxis - a toolkit - to allow Critical Theory to be interrogated with the assumption that it is definitely a system that should be destroyed.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

cafebeef: gender confirmist on Twitter

“if you start as an adult, you will probably not look like a woman, unless you already basically looked like one before you started. people may call you one, but they don't really mean it, they're mostly just being polite and acting out how they want the world to be.”

web.archive.org

Some sanity from one of the troons. Wonder how long till they're canceled and forced to delete it.

 

[Dynamic]

Why can’t people see this? The division between men and women was by design. Men were told women hate them, women were told men hate us, and so hate grew where there was none before, just because the sociological telephone game told them they were hated and it is natural to hate someone you are told definitely hates you.

When I say stop the hate, I’m not being fuzzy at all. I’m saying actually, let’s apply critical theory to critical theory. Critical theory is hate-generation-as-praxis. I’m saying stop hate like I say, do yard work, or touch grass. Break the spell, in other words.

Isn’t that really what Rufo is doing lol? Critical theory is named “theory” as praxis, because there is no theory, only praxis. It is praxis to hide behind the word “theory,” you see. The purpose of critical praxis is to destroy a system. What system, well, it’s irrelevant. Whether good or bad, this is a toolkit to destroy a system, render it nonfunctional in every way. By applying critical theory to ANYTHING no matter how good and pure...you’re queering it. “Queering” IS critical praxis. Because it says, hey what if this whole thing is degenerate and this degenerate thing wholesome?

So Rufo has introduced Critical Theory Theory, which is praxis - a toolkit - to allow Critical Theory to be interrogated with the assumption that it is definitely a system that should be destroyed.

There has always been a divide between men and women and there always will be. They approach the world from conflicting angles and process what happens to them differently. That's not a problem when women understand they need men and can't survive on their own without them and men can trust women to have their children and build the next generation. As civilization devalued men through government take over of local security, wild life being hunted down and caged and physical superiority being less important than machine usage we ended up with a generation of women not understanding the value of men. Society has done to men what super markets have done to food. They have made it abstract so many people don't understand where food comes from and think it appears on the shelves like anything else. That alienation is why you can call the police and have a 5 foot woman turn up as if she's going to help you when you're in danger. Abstraction made women think they can be men. You can't form healthy romantic relationships between 2 men and that's the foundation of society since the 1980s if not earlier. Everyone is now an economic unit and teaching the value of unique sexual functions and promoting following them gets in the way of that.

If you want a hot take here's one for the autistic responses. Critical theory (racial or other wise) isn't a theory, it's women being women. Women have a great ability to see problems and pick at them, badgering whoever they can about it despite never wanting to fix it themselves. Feminism and it's critical theory foundation was always just a way for women to badger society because that's what any husband knows women enjoy doing. The act of complaining is an accomplishment in and of it's self to women, it's why some women get upset when a man says "I'll fix it tomorrow" instead of "oh yea dear, that is a problem and it annoys me too". The complaining is an act of validation through shared emotion instead of an act of fixing. Mass communication and social media turned it up to 11 and along the way young men have realized how little value masculinity has so adopted female behavior patterns. Without masculine men willing to stand up to the grievance peddlers the immigrant populations are using the same badgering techniques women use as a power grab. The introduction of intersectionality unites women badgering and race badgering to form a united front of naggers seeing how much they can get from complaining. If men were still men and reigned in the women's natural instincts none of this would have happened, the path we took is as much women's fault as it is men's fault.

On that note, I've always wondered what'll happen when Islam and troonery come into conflict, and which side the #RefugeesWelcome leftists will pick.

Homosexuals lose to Muslims. When schools started to push that on kids, all the Muslim schools went ape shit and got it shut down in Muslim majority areas. The ring leader didn't even have any children and managed to circle the wagons enough to keep it out.

 

[AnOminous]

If you want a hot take here's one for the autistic responses. Critical theory (racial or other wise) isn't a theory, it's women being women.

It was almost exclusively invented by men. And mostly white men, well, for certain values of "white." Marcuse, Adorno, other fellow travelers like Foucault, Derrida, Lacan, all men.

 

[Dynamic]

It was almost exclusively invented by men. And mostly white men, well, for certain values of "white." Marcuse, Adorno, other fellow travelers like Foucault, Derrida, Lacan, all men.

You clearly don't understand my post. Man doesn't invent the river because he recognizes he can use it to make a wheel turn. He sees a natural current and subverts it to his needs.

And I dispute your use of the term white. They're Jewish and that's not difficult to find out.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

And I dispute your use of the term white. They're Jewish and that's not difficult to find out.

Yes, that's what "certain values of "white."" means.

Homosexuals lose to Muslims. When schools started to push that on kids, all the Muslim schools went ape shit and got it shut down in Muslim majority areas. The ring leader didn't even have any children and managed to circle the wagons enough to keep it out.

I remember that. It was hilarious. They had Jess "I wouldn't even rape her" Phillips, noted woke as fuck anti-male bigot, show up and explain to the Muslims that they were Musliming wrong and "real" Islam LOVES LGBTQ+. The looks the mothers gave her was just perfect.