You’re wrong because you assume that moral outrage in and if itself caused Nazis and the like to be put on trial for war crimes. Military and industrial might was what brought war criminals to justice, not the now often mentioned “rules based global order”. The UN is theater. US moral policy is dictated by the Chamber of Commerce. Nobody cares how many bodies are being buried, only how cheap they can make shit somewhere else.
I’ve been thinking a lot about this lately, and it can be summarized like this: the West is like Don Quixote, believing in this moral and social fabric that no longer exists. His ideal was chivalry, ours is human rights. And just like “muh honor” and “muh chastity”, eventually “muh minority” and “muh wammen” becomes an absurd parody of itself. What once moderated behavior for the greater good now is used as a cudgel against weak rivals to one’s own power - and at that point a new morality slowly emerges.
China’s preferred morality is that of blood and soil. Their race, their land; while the rest of the world bows and sits in squalor. If the West’s best response is “muh warcrime that we can’t prosecute”, then you’ve already lost. Might as well mumble about fair maidens and how many dragons you’ve jousted.