- Joined
- Feb 24, 2016
Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big
- Thread starter JosephStalin
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
Vaccines may curb new virus mutations; teens use soft drinks to fake positive COVID-19 tests
The following is a roundup of some of the latest scientific studies on the novel coronavirus and efforts to find treatments and vaccines for COVID-19, the illness caused by the virus. Along with preventing illness and deaths, COVID-19 vaccines may also be curbing the "rampant evolution" of the...
Ok, so is it just too early in the morning and I'm falling for actual fake news, or is clown world this bad?
So apparently you can get literal soft drinks to get fake positives on take home COVID tests.
Teenagers have figured out how to use soft drinks to fake a positive COVID-19 test, and the authors of a new study warn schools and other groups to be aware. As of July 1, videos uploaded to social media under the search term #fakecovidtest, featuring young people applying various liquids to rapid antigen COVID-19 tests, had been viewed millions of times, according to the British news website inews.co.uk. That report https://bit.ly/3hLMoWT, and others, prompted University of Liverpool researchers to study the effects of applying soft drinks and artificial sweeteners to the test swabs. All four sweeteners tested produced negative results on rapid COVID-19 tests, as did spring water. But 10 of 14 soft drinks produced positive or weakly positive results, with no apparent link between the test results and the soft drinks' ingredients, the researchers reported on Monday on medRxiv ahead of peer review. Since March, UK schools have asked pupils without symptoms to test twice weekly, the authors note. A positive test can result in an entire class having to isolate at home. Based on their findings, they advise, testing "should be performed first thing in the morning, prior to the consumption of any food or drinks, and supervised where feasible."
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
They've been wanting to spike our drinking water for ages now.
Opinion | Should We All Take a Bit of Lithium? (Published 2014)
Suicide seems to be less common where the lithium is more plentiful in drinking water.
Just saw on the news that they're vaxxing the zoo animals now in my city.
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
At this rate, I wonder the professionals who do the covid-19 tests, might also finds a way to get a false positive just for the pleasure of those who still want lockdowns?
Vaccines may curb new virus mutations; teens use soft drinks to fake positive COVID-19 tests
The following is a roundup of some of the latest scientific studies on the novel coronavirus and efforts to find treatments and vaccines for COVID-19, the illness caused by the virus. Along with preventing illness and deaths, COVID-19 vaccines may also be curbing the "rampant evolution" of the...www.yahoo.com
Ok, so is it just too early in the morning and I'm falling for actual fake news, or is clown world this bad?
So apparently you can get literal soft drinks to get fake positives on take home COVID tests.
Teenagers have figured out how to use soft drinks to fake a positive COVID-19 test, and the authors of a new study warn schools and other groups to be aware. As of July 1, videos uploaded to social media under the search term #fakecovidtest, featuring young people applying various liquids to rapid antigen COVID-19 tests, had been viewed millions of times, according to the British news website inews.co.uk. That report https://bit.ly/3hLMoWT, and others, prompted University of Liverpool researchers to study the effects of applying soft drinks and artificial sweeteners to the test swabs. All four sweeteners tested produced negative results on rapid COVID-19 tests, as did spring water. But 10 of 14 soft drinks produced positive or weakly positive results, with no apparent link between the test results and the soft drinks' ingredients, the researchers reported on Monday on medRxiv ahead of peer review. Since March, UK schools have asked pupils without symptoms to test twice weekly, the authors note. A positive test can result in an entire class having to isolate at home. Based on their findings, they advise, testing "should be performed first thing in the morning, prior to the consumption of any food or drinks, and supervised where feasible."
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
Graphene is only now used because it has only been synthesized and studied for 15 years or so. It had been theoretically known since the 19th century or at least early 20th century or so, but has only been synthesized properly in 2004. And it took a while longer to find a method to synthesize it in more reasonable quantities, so studying it outside condensed matter physics labs (where you can do a lot of stuff on a single micron sized flake of graphene that you exfoliated in a cleanroom on a chip) only very recently became a viable thing.As much as I'm skeptical and wary all at the same time, I've started looking into graphene, and no not at sites like truth11 (it's the same as considering bloody naturalnews a source), I still stand by what I said though. It is worrying when graphene is only now, literally in the last few years, being used in things like vaccines due to what it is able to do.
Just one example.
Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant - PubMed
Vaccine is one of the most effective strategies for preventing and controlling infectious diseases and some noninfectious diseases, especially cancers. Adjuvants and carriers have been appropriately added to the vaccine formulation to improve the immunogenicity of the antigen and induce...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The thing I don't like, all of the studies so far that I've come across and that are linked to the above, are all Chinese.
The other interesting thing is the link to allergic reactions.
It's just a single layer of graphite, aka carbon in a hexagonal lattice. I know it sounds scary and hightech and like it's gonna put antennas into your cells, but it really doesn't.
NoSpiceLife
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2019
It's not scary in the slightest when it's external. Nothing about 'high tech' scares me, well maybe AIs making decisions that involve emotions, it's more about it being another addition to the ever growing list of 'experimental' that these 'vaccines' come under, and that there is an illogical push for mandatory vaccination and mask wearing.
The psychs definitely won when it comes to mask wearing!
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2020
Goddamn, I sure hope so.
Conductive nanoparticles migrate into the bloodstream. Then, they bypass the blood-brain barrier. Finally, they take up residence inside brain cells, having been coated with cell-penetrating peptides like HIV TAT. Being conductive, these nanoparticles act like extremely tiny antennas and can be energized by induction through directed doses of RF, modulating activity in whatever cell they’ve taken residence in. 5G base stations are particularly good for this, because they have beamforming and output steerable beams of RF. Therefore, they are selective; different doses can be administered to different people in a crowd of low density.
I have just described a mind control system that is completely feasible with current technology. It works the same way a Wacom pen works, or an induction cooktop, energizing conductive particles (essentially micro-antennas) that have been surreptitiously implanted in the brain tissue by extravasation through the blood-brain barrier.
Robert Langer is one of the co-founders of Moderna. He was also an associate of Charles Lieber, who was arrested for his ties to the Wuhan University of Technology. Charles Lieber violated the terms of his government grants by accepting money from the CCP. Lieber’s research was funded by DARPA, NIH, ONR, AFOSR, and MITRE, so it would be accurate to say that Lieber had DOD/glowie funding and then double-dipped and took money from the PLA and the Thousand Talents program that the Chinese have been using to poach our scientists.
Robert Langer has authored papers on tagging and monitoring parts of the human brain:
Charles Lieber has authored papers on the use of SiNW-FETs as implanted BCIs:
Both silicon nanowires and graphene flakes are conductive and can harvest RF. RF harvesting is not a new idea by any means. In fact, it is often proposed as one of the primary means of powering smart dust that is too small to be outfitted with batteries.
Any way you slice it, there are very few degrees of separation between Moderna, the US and Chinese militaries and their think tanks, and people researching brain-computer interface nanotech, tissue engineering, synthetic biology, and other forms of human enhancement. This is incredibly suspicious.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2017
Even if the odds are incredibly slim, the fact that a tinfoil hat may actually be a legitimate defense against government mind control has convinced me that we're nearing peak clownworld.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2020
Tinfoil hats don’t actually work. In fact, they can act as antennas and expose you to more RF.
If, on the other hand, you fashioned a balaclava from RF-resistant fabric, that would probably do the trick.
Amazon.com: Faraday Fabric-EMI RFID Shielding-Block WiFi/RF Anti-Radiation Military Grade for Radiowave Microwave and Other Electromagnetic Fields 39"x43" inch
Shop Amradield at the Amazon Arts, Crafts & Sewing store. Free Shipping on eligible items. Save on everyday low prices.
www.amazon.com
There’s a company that makes an RF blocking hood, but it looks absolutely ridiculous.
Radia Smart EMF Hood Hat, 5G Anti-Radiation, RF Shielding, WiFi Radiation Protection, Brain Coat, Black: Amazon.com: Industrial & Scientific
Radia Smart EMF Hood Hat, 5G Anti-Radiation, RF Shielding, WiFi Radiation Protection, Brain Coat, Black: Amazon.com: Industrial & Scientific
www.amazon.com
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
Except 5G has a wavelength in the millimeter range, and minimal antenna sizes are still in the several hundred micrometer ranges. What is it, nanoparticles or antennas? For nanoantennas you'd need terahertz radiation, not merely 5G.
And while graphene does absorb pretty much all electromagnetic radiation in its pure form, but only like 8% per layer (I think? Something along those lines, enough to make it useful for distinguishing between single and multilayer graphene on certain SiO2 surfaces). Pretty lousy antenna.
Btw., graphene is actually not a conductor. Well, it is a conductor, but in a weird way. It's a semi-metal, NOT a metallic conductor. That means it has no bandgap, but also no density of states at the Fermi level. Graphene oxide is a conductor, but a pretty terrible one. It's basically an insulator unless you apply a bias voltage, which then turns it into a semiconductor.
There is very little functional difference between a tinfoil hat and a tinfoil balaclava. If you want to make a Faraday cage to protect your brain, you'd need a fully closed "cage". And your neck is in the way, so that doesn't quite work.
Your fancy anti-radiation hood gives you a bit more shielding than a pure tinfoil hat, but not much more. Ground your tinfoil hat and you can at least look like a proper lunatic, not like an absolute tosser who couldn't commit to the idiocy and bought a scam item on Amazon.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2021
Who is to say that any positive tests are needed? The numbers are reported by a government entity to the news, who dutifully repeats them in somber tones during the evening broadcast. You have no way of verifying any of it.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
so what you're saying is, the only place truly safe from the mind control beams is a man-sized cage of fine wire mesh?
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
Yes.
The only way to be safe.
And better put some wiremesh over the eyes, the holes are too big to keep out the 5G.
Jarolleon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
So the right is stupid, and the left is crazy, just like Ty Beard said?
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
I would consider that massively oversimplified, but as far as the edge cases, yes.
In COVID news, no spectators for any Olympic event in Tokyo due to Japan's state of emergency.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2020
Terahertz antennas are next:
Wireless Industry’s Newest Gambit: Terahertz Communication Bands
While communication system designers are preoccupied with readying millimeter wave (mmWave) for 5G, experiments are underway on terahertz bands for indoor wireless, localization studios, and gigabyte Wi-Fi networks
spectrum.ieee.org
If we’re talking about nanoantennas, the wavelength would indeed have to very short. This presents a problem for our hypothetical baddies and their mind control system, since millimeter-wave and terahertz radiation is absorbed by water molecules, limiting their skin penetration depth to fractions of a millimeter (this is how the Raytheon Active Denial System microwave crowd control device heats nerves in your skin without cooking your insides).
There are subwavelength nanoantennas being actively studied right now that are smaller than the wavelengths they interact with, but getting sub-GHz radiation that deeply penetrates tissue to interact with antennas of that size would appear to pose a virtually impossible engineering challenge.
Sub-wavelength Unidirectional Antenna Realized by Stacked Spoof Localized Surface Plasmon Resonators - Scientific Reports
The use of resonant structures to control scattering strength and directionality is of importance in various electromagnetic systems. Here we propose and demonstrate sub-wavelength unidirectional scattering by two nearby spoof localized surface plasmon resonators for microwave. The principle is...
Hmm, I see your point, and I agree. This is a harder problem than it at first appears. Even taking advantage of SPPs (surface plasmon polaritons), there are limits to what physics will allow.
That said, there are lots of proteins that bind metal ions, and future electronics may indeed have structures that are organized like biological structures, by doping them with organic material. That’s where things are going, it looks like; the merger of the fundamental characteristics of proteins and cellular biology with electronics. In a way, nature has already shown us how to make very powerful nanomachines. They’re everywhere and they’re naturally-occurring. They’re living cells. The whole paradigm of nanotech as a means of shrinking macro-scale machinery down to a teeny tiny size is bankrupt. Who needs motors, cranks, turbines, pumps, and other such things at the nanometer scale, when nature gets the job done with proteins and their ligands making complexes via chemical bonds? In a way, synthetic biology is the true nanotechnology.
In the near future, they will have ways to simulate the interactions of proteins that don’t even exist in nature. The sky is the limit. If I were a complete psychopath, I could come up with a nucleotide sequence for a protein that binds metal ions in people’s bodies and builds large scaffolds out of them, and inject people with mRNA that codes for that; I could make their cells build custom organelles and vesicles wholly dedicated to the synthesis of immune-evading foreign proteins.
Scientists are gleefully opening Pandora’s Box right in front of us, and we’re just sitting here, blissfully unaware of how closely the near future will resemble an episode of Black Mirror.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2020
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
I saw this tweet where Senator Burr asked Fraudci how many of his employees was vaccinated to which Fraudci replied around 60%.
https://twitter.com/kerpen/status/1393022731373973504
One guy replied if the remaining 40% was anti-waxxers.
https://twitter.com/kerpen/status/1393022731373973504
One guy replied if the remaining 40% was anti-waxxers.
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2018
Cases were dropping worldwide before the first jab even happened
The reason was everyone in the world who was gonna get sick from the wild type and b117 kent version had already gotten sick.
The reason was everyone in the world who was gonna get sick from the wild type and b117 kent version had already gotten sick.
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
As I said, smallest antenna size for 5G is still in the 100 µm range, or lambda/8.Terahertz antennas are next:
Wireless Industry’s Newest Gambit: Terahertz Communication Bands
While communication system designers are preoccupied with readying millimeter wave (mmWave) for 5G, experiments are underway on terahertz bands for indoor wireless, localization studios, and gigabyte Wi-Fi networks
If we’re talking about nanoantennas, the wavelength would indeed have to very short. This presents a problem for our hypothetical baddies and their mind control system, since millimeter-wave and terahertz radiation is absorbed by water molecules, limiting their skin penetration depth to fractions of a millimeter (this is how the Raytheon Active Denial System microwave crowd control device heats nerves in your skin without cooking your insides).
There are subwavelength nanoantennas being actively studied right now that are smaller than the wavelengths they interact with, but getting sub-GHz radiation that deeply penetrates tissue to interact with antennas of that size would appear to pose a virtually impossible engineering challenge.
Sub-wavelength Unidirectional Antenna Realized by Stacked Spoof Localized Surface Plasmon Resonators - Scientific Reports
The use of resonant structures to control scattering strength and directionality is of importance in various electromagnetic systems. Here we propose and demonstrate sub-wavelength unidirectional scattering by two nearby spoof localized surface plasmon resonators for microwave. The principle is...www.nature.com
Hmm, I see your point, and I agree. This is a harder problem than it at first appears. Even taking advantage of SPPs (surface plasmon polaritons), there are limits to what physics will allow.
That said, there are lots of proteins that bind metal ions, and future electronics may indeed have structures that are organized like biological structures, by doping them with organic material. That’s where things are going, it looks like; the merger of the fundamental characteristics of proteins and cellular biology with electronics. In a way, nature has already shown us how to make very powerful nanomachines. They’re everywhere and they’re naturally-occurring. They’re living cells. The whole paradigm of nanotech as a means of shrinking macro-scale machinery down to a teeny tiny size is bankrupt. Who needs motors, cranks, turbines, pumps, and other such things at the nanometer scale, when nature gets the job done with proteins and their ligands making complexes via chemical bonds? In a way, synthetic biology is the true nanotechnology.
In the near future, they will have ways to simulate the interactions of proteins that don’t even exist in nature. The sky is the limit. If I were a complete psychopath, I could come up with a nucleotide sequence for a protein that binds metal ions in people’s bodies and builds large scaffolds out of them, and inject people with mRNA that codes for that; I could make their cells build custom organelles and vesicles wholly dedicated to the synthesis of immune-evading foreign proteins.
Scientists are gleefully opening Pandora’s Box right in front of us, and we’re just sitting here, blissfully unaware of how closely the near future will resemble an episode of Black Mirror.
Dude, you gotta lay off the physics, though. It's quite clear you're using words you don't quite understand the actual meaning of, and you're just digging yourself deeper into a rabbit hole that only exists in your head because you can't stop making random connections and don't have actual knowledge to understand where the limits are. You had this with biochemistry in the beginning of the pandemic, and you're doing it again now with scifi concepts of implanting nanoantennas and whatnot. This is not going to be healthy for you.
- Status