Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[Useful_Mistake]

Nothing that Russ has rambled on in his supplemental brief is relevant to Russ's claim.

Don't get me wrong, I agree with you there. But Rule 15 is pretty much meant to be granted, so unless the Judge sees prejudice to Null (or Skordas responds claiming prejudice), I think this is likely to be granted.

What pleading is being supplemented here? Is it the Complaint?

Probably? Your guess is as good as mine.

I'm gonna lay a marker down on this Motion to Supplement/Amend being DENIED AS MOOT when the original case is dismissed

I hope you are right. That is the outcome I'd like as well


Edit: Link to Nick's livestream where he will talk about this filing:

 

[RodgerDodger]

Incredible. I can't even pick a favourite quote, he's almost parodying himself at this point.
I think we all knew that there must have been some sort of "verbal altercation" between Russ and his poor attorney but I'd love to know how that went down, leading to the greasy little fucker's visible seething in his court appearance.

I’ve read it three times now… is this actually real? I mean this isn’t one of you lot pulling off the most epic troll ever? This is an actual thing that Russel himself wrote and filed with a court? For real? This can’t be real! I didn’t think it was possible to concentrate this much autism into a single document.

So Russell claims he's filed an ethics complaint with the Utah State Bar against Skordas. Anyone here able to shed light on how that process usually goes, and the chances of us getting a copy of the complaint?

I still say that he will end up suing Skordas next.

Anyone care to speculate how Ratmouth ended up with a "6" a the bottom of every page?

The Utah State Bar or whatever their body of lawyer accountability may be will pass Russel’s complaint around for laughs, then tell him to fuck off in lawyer speak.

The big problem with this nonsense, is that he fails to show how this is relevant to the matter at hand, and he fails to cite any relevant caselaw or statute as to why this alleged new suicide should at all impact his request for an injunction on Kiwi Farms.

I’m not even sure what the matter at hand is? I don’t think he knows. It reads like his self loathing subconscious is actually seeking to rebel against the horrid meat sack it finds itself embedded in.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I mean this isn’t one of you lot pulling off the most epic troll ever? This is an actual thing that Russel himself wrote and filed with a court? For real? This can’t be real! I didn’t think it was possible to concentrate this much autism into a single document.

You can buy the document(1,2) and verify it yourself. I can assure you, though, it is real.

I’m not even sure what the matter at hand is?

Allegedly copyright, defamation, and harassment (even though he admited in court docs that the last two dont apply to us)

 

[talk talk talk]

Don't get me wrong, I agree with you there. But Rule 15 is pretty much meant to be granted, so unless the Judge sees prejudice to Null (or Skordas responds claiming prejudice), I think this is likely to be granted.

I don't think Null would win the prejudice argument, but because nothing in the supplemental whatever is relevant to Russ's claims, it would fail the futility test.

It is funny as hell, though. And, like every Russell endeavor, completely futile.

 

[RodgerDodger]

My analysis of Russell's motion for leave to file a supplemental pleading:

As much as I think that everything in that motion was retarded, 10th circuit has ruled that these motions should be generally granted ("Such authorization "should be liberally granted unless good reason exists for denying leave, such as prejudice to the defendants"", “Rule 15 was promulgated to provide the maximum opportunity for each claim to be decided on its merits rather than on procedural niceties.”, see Walker v. UPS, 240 F.3d 1268 (10th Cir. 2001), Predator International v. Gamo Outdoor, 14-1354 (10th Cir. 2015) ). However, the trial court still retains the power to dismiss such a motion on its own "sound discretion" ("Even so, such notions "are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court"", see Walker v. UPS, 240 F.3d 1268 (10th Cir. 2001))

Probably for the first time ever, I'm going to view his chances of the motion's success optimistically, even though I think it should be denied in a fair world. However, given that such motions are expected to be granted...well, it seems like he might win on this one.

Small Edit:

If it could be reasonably expected for Null to have to respond to this motion (and I don't think he needs to), that could be prejudice enough for the court to deny Russell's motion. See Jones v. Thompson, 996 F.2d 261, 264 (10th Cir. 1993)

He’s accusing the defendant of killing someone. A death, for which there is no actual reputable evidence that it ever occurred. That’s kind of prejudicial.

 

[talk talk talk]

Double posting to upload pdfs of Russell's latest masterpiece.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

I'm not sure I would consider it much of a legal victory for Russ to actually enter his document into consideration.

At best it's irrelevant. At worse, it's prejudicial to him and opens the doors to all sorts of issues he'd rather stay separate. In particular I would suggest that admitting to engaging in 'fake' lawsuits might be counterproductive.

 

[Pip Squeak]

Oh ffs! Of all the times to take an internet break.

He’s unravelling fast huh?

 

[kcbbq]

It wasn't a REAL guilty plea. After all, Russell never thought he was guilty and he wasn't even contacting the supposed "victim" that much really. Also, Kiwi Farms does way more harassment of Russell than he ever did of that mentally ill woman, so when you think about it Russell is actually not guilty.

He told the judge, to his face, that he was guilty. After the judge explained to him what that meant and he could only do it if he was guilty.

Yet somehow he has a magical letter that says he was convicted for outside reasons (despite pleading guilty) but doesn't produce it as an exhibit.

It's amazing what the goes on in his head (the same one that pled guilty).

 

[Cheesegirl78]

Rekieta is saying Null no longer owns Kiwi Farms? Is this true? When did this happen?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Rekieta is saying Null no longer owns Kiwi Farms? Is this true? When did this happen?

It's a constant joke he makes on every Null-related stream

Edit: nick finally talks about Russel.

 

[Cheesegirl78]

It's a constant joke he makes on every Null-related stream

Ohh...I was not aware of that.
Thanks for the information.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Nick finished reading the docs

"Now, the court might grant this motion because technically this was filed after the date of the pleading...maybe. Then again, this might have been filed too late. The judge may actually allow it just to eliminate an appeal point"

Paraphrase of Nick's conclusion. His actual conclusion was a bit longer, but I did my best to accurately portray his point

 

[DarkAlien]

Nick finished reading the docs

"Now, the court might grant this motion because technically this was filed after the date of the pleading...maybe. Then again, this might have been filed too late. The judge may actually allow it just to eliminate an appeal point"

Paraphrase of Nick's conclusion. His actual conclusion was a bit longer, but I did my best to accurately portray his point

He also made a good point about Skordas not being able to be the harrasser when Greer is the one bringing the action.

 

[The Dude]

Or he could just do what I do, and not play PUBG while having very little FPS experience. World of frustration spared there, but Russ must really love his frustration since he lays keeps poking the hornet nest.

I mostly enjoy FPS games, but haven't played one that's online multi-player in over a decade. They just lost any appeal for me, and I can't stand Battle Royale style FPS games like PUBG. I can't even spectate Battle Royales, like watching a let's play video about them. They just really irritate me. As I've gotten older I've really started to enjoy narrative-driven open world FPS games like Fallout, Cyberpunk 2077, Far Cry, etc. the most and haven't bought a Call of Duty since I can't remember when. The Borderlands games are pretty OK too, but I have to be in the right mood to play them. I do enjoy arcade-y simulator games as well, like Ace Combat, and the Metal Gear Solid series is my all-time favorite game series ever.

I guess I'm not surprised that Russhole would play such a cliché, meme-y game as PUBG. I think the only other game more clichéd and played by so many casual scrubs would be Fortnight. And he played it on his phone or a tablet, too. Just YUCK! So grody...

Oh, he said much more than that. This heinous little drool goblin wrote in his book, that the first time he had sex with a hooker was the first time he felt loved. That little tidbit shows really well how considerate he is of his family as well as his general attitude towards and understanding of both sex and prostitution.

I guess a family generously welcoming a physically deformed baby into their home of their own free will, feeding them, clothing them, protecting them, educating them, spending a literal fortune on surgeries and medical procedures to try to improve their quality of life, and generally loving and accepting the child as their own doesn't count as "real love" in Russhole's view. Good to know that Dildo Saggins is deeply grateful and appreciative for the Greers adopting him, welcoming him into their family, spending more on Shit-Lips' medical care than he will likely earn in his life, supporting him, paying for his education, bailing his ass out of his legal problems, and generally always being there for him whenever he needed them. We can only ever speculate on how the Greers parented and raised Russhole and how it affected his life growing up, but one thing is absolutely clear: they loved Russell as one of their own, and they did their level damnedest to give him a good life. It must be so disappointing, to a heartbreaking degree, to put the kind of love, time, effort, and money into a child like the Greers have with Russhole, only wanting the best for them in life, only to see that child squander everything you've done for them, then basically spit in your eye and tell you that it wasn't good enough and they never really felt loved.

 

[Rustled Jimmies]

Essentially, yes.

Well, Skordas will have to, at least, read it, which Null will have to pay for. So, it kinda does matter in a way. And if it's granted, Skordas will have to read and, likely, respond to more bullshit, which Null would have to pay for.

He doesn't have to, but he probably will, and claim that granting this motion would prejudice Null with undue attorney's fees

Skordas is a winner in all this, he gets paid to read Russell's comedy act.
I do it for free like a schmuck, discrimination!

I feel like Skordas and the judge will entertain this bullshit happily, it's not often their jobs afford them the luxury of reprimanding a mongel litigant like Russell. The Ariana Grande trial judge could have easily thrown out Russell's case on the basis he was late to his own trial, but he spent a good half hour telling him how ridiculous his claims were and how he didn't understand what he was suing for.

 

[theworstkindofeurofag]

Did Skordas ever even claim that Russell doesn't have a disability? Or is he just straight up lying in a court document? I mean, I know he does that frequently anyway.

 

[Captain Hair]

Did Skordas ever even claim that Russell doesn't have a disability? Or is he just straight up lying in a court document? I mean, I know he does that frequently anyway.

I remember during the Ariana trial, Skordas used the phrase "perceived disability" and maybe that's where Russell got that from.

 

[L. Ron Hubbard's Cat]

I remember during the Ariana trial, Skordas used the phrase "perceived disability" and maybe that's where Russell got that from.

Dang, you beat me to it. I had to read through the transcript to find the exact phrasing he used. You were right: Skordas said, "I’m sorry he has a perceived disability, and I’m sorry that he has suffered through that. I’m sure that that’s been difficult for him in life. But none of that has to do with our client."

It's more evidence of Russ ruminating over what are at the very worst minor slights until they become enormous, outrageous issues. He's really losing it.



ETA: Rereading that transcript is really funny in light of how Russ has reimagined the whole situation.

 

[Pip Squeak]

I don't even know what this document is. I went back to look for a particular thing and every other line is conjecture, false or outright hilarious. Now I can't remember for the life of me what I was looking for and why.

He's really got it out for the mentally ill in this filing though. I wish we knew what his assessment thingy came back with.
If there's one thing I know about a narcissist, anything thrown at them that rocks their opinion of themselves is projected onto others, but now they're mad about it.

I do love how in every document he has ever filed there is a word that simply doesn't belong in a court document. This episode is brought to you by the word, "trashy".
"Mr Moon has quite the trashy history himself..."
"Mr Moon and his users have quite the history of being trashy..."
"...that they have no right to be harassing others for perceived trashiness."