US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Senate panel will probe Supreme Court's Texas abortion ruling, 'shadow docket'
A Senate panel has set its sights on the Supreme Court’s increasingly common practice of deciding weighty cases on an emergency basis, a procedure the justices used this week to greenlight Texas’s severe curtailment of abortion access.

Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.), the Senate Judiciary Committee’s top Democrat, announced Friday that the committee would hold a hearing on the court’s so-called shadow docket, which often produces consequential rulings without the justices having received a comprehensive set of paper briefs or hearing oral arguments.

The court recently used the truncated process to rule on significant disputes over immigration policy and federal eviction protections, and to leave intact a new Texas law that bans most abortions in the country’s second-most populous state.

“The Supreme Court must operate with the highest regard for judicial integrity in order to earn the public’s trust,” Durbin said in a statement. “This anti-choice law is a devastating blow to Americans' constitutional rights — and the Court allowed it to see the light of day without public deliberation or transparency.”

“At a time when public confidence in government institutions has greatly eroded, we must examine not just the constitutional impact of allowing the Texas law to take effect," he continued, "but also the conservative Court’s abuse of the shadow docket.”

Although the shadow docket itself is not new, the Supreme Court had previously used the truncated process only sparingly to render decisions of major consequence. The practice, however, became more commonplace during the Trump administration.

Just before midnight on Wednesday, the Supreme Court used the procedure to issue a 5-4 ruling that denied an emergency request from abortion providers who sought to block the Texas law. The statute, which is now the country's most restrictive abortion law, prohibits the procedure after the presence of a fetal heartbeat is detected, usually around six weeks into pregnancy.

An estimated 85 to 90 percent of women who get an abortion in Texas are at least six weeks into their pregnancy, and the burden is expected to fall most heavily on teens, people of color and women living in rural areas, experts said. The law only makes exceptions for medical emergencies, with no exemptions for pregnancy resulting from incest or rape.

The Texas law gives enforcement authority to private citizens, allowing them to sue those who perform or aid the procedure in violation of the measure, and provides for $10,000 for a successful lawsuit.

In a brief unsigned order on Wednesday, the court’s five-member majority pointed to the procedural complexities arising from this unique legislative design to explain their refusal to block the Texas law, despite noting “serious questions” about its constitutionality.

The constitutional right to abortion, first recognized in the court’s landmark 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, prohibits states from banning abortion before a fetus is viable, typically around 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court's three liberal justices in dissent, with each of the four writing their own opinions. Justice Elena Kagan in her dissent called the law “patently unconstitutional” and criticized the majority for using the court’s shadow docket to reach its ruling.

“Today’s ruling illustrates just how far the Court’s ‘shadow-docket’ decisions may depart from the usual principles of appellate process,” Kagan wrote, noting that the majority had issued a ruling of “great consequence” without guidance from a federal appeals court that is reviewing the Texas law and only after “the most cursory” court briefs from the parties.

“In all these ways, the majority’s decision is emblematic of too much of this Court’s shadow-docket decisionmaking — which every day becomes more unreasoned, inconsistent, and impossible to defend,” she added.

Kagan’s criticism echoed that of fellow liberal Justice Stephen Breyer, who last week expressed misgivings about the practice.

Breyer, in a dissent that was joined by the court’s two other liberals, criticized the majority for using the shadow docket to effectively end the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) eviction moratorium, even as the U.S. contends with the highly contagious delta variant of COVID-19 and despite unanswered questions over the legal dispute.

House to vote on bill guaranteeing abortion access in response to...
What the Texas abortion law means for Roe v. Wade
“These questions call for considered decisionmaking, informed by full briefing and argument,” Breyer wrote in an eight-page dissent. “Their answers impact the health of millions. We should not set aside the CDC’s eviction moratorium in this summary proceeding. The criteria for granting the emergency application are not met.”

Earlier last week the Supreme Court used its shadow docket to deny a Biden administration request to halt a lower court order that reinstated a controversial Trump-era immigration policy.

The court's three liberals indicated they would have stepped in to temporarily block the policy, which requires asylum-seekers at the southern border to remain in Mexico while their applications are processed.
just uniparty mad about special session in texas.

won't won't be suprised if we get a abortion ammendment by 2022.
 
:story: oh this is going to get fun when things inevitably start getting worse for old Joe. Note how Rasmussen is the only pollster using a likely voter model - i.e. the model you want to use because it best measures those who actually vote. Everyone else is sucking the registered voting model hard - except for ABC and Reuters rocking the ADULT model which you don't use because it only checks if you're 18+.

These pollsters are quite literally scraping the bottom of the barrel in an effort to boost Biden's ratings and keep their contract funding going, and even then can barely nudge his ratings above the mid 40s.
 
Good luck getting 3/4 of the states on board needed for a constitutional amendment.

The Moloch apologists should have thought of that before they decided legialating from the bench was the way to go.
Once again, the Democrats are completely surprised to once again meet up with their old opponent: The consequences of their own actions.
 
So Baris today is going on about how these polls are a joke.

The US is D+2 to D+4 nationally.
The polls are showing D+10 to D+17 to keep Biden's head floating above 40%.

Essentially, the polls are making the hypothetical situation that Trump started a 3rd party and broke the Republican party in half, or if 1/3 of Republicans just stopped existing.

He also floated about making a competitor to 538 to break the narratives spun by it.
 
Once again, the Democrats are completely surprised to once again meet up with their old opponent: The consequences of their own actions.
I know they tried with the Equal Rights Amendment, but didn't that get torpedoed by the bra-burners because it entailed "equality" such as women having to register for the draft?
 
Real talk, if this were to happen would it definitely result in a war? As much as Americans don't want to be involved in another war in the Middle East, the unprovoked slaughter of hundreds of innocents would definitely warrant reprisal. If it were my citizens, I honestly wouldn't be satisfied unless a proportionate amount of blood is shed.
The Taliban and ISIS have a week to round up as many Americans and collaborators as they can for their September 11th mass execution filmed in 4k with professional cinematography. At least thats what I think the glowies(ISIS) will try to do to get the American public on board with another romp in the sandbox.
Maybe this is why Biden intentionally fucked up the withdrawal.

Biden and his cabal don't want to leave Afghanistan and they lied to Trump and when that didn't work, Congress led by neocunts like Liz Cheney and shitlibs like Adam Schiff blocked him.

We all know what Taliban and ISIS are. Question is why did the military abdicate Bagram first and why are refugees prioritized over American citizens when it comes to withdrawal. Plus Biden broke the agreement to leave on time as well, leading to almost every Afghani outside Kabul just switching to team Taliban.

I doubt the Taliban will kill citizens of ours openly or Pakistan, Iran, Russia and China will throw them to the wolves. The Taliban are not rabid dogs like the ISIS and seems like they are more politically realpolitik than 20 years ago.

If folks want to die in the sandbox again because of what the glowies do, then America deserves to be ravaged by CRT and demographically replaced. But I doubt people will fall for what Biden has done. The blood is on Biden's hands and plus he has generated a shit ton of ill will from the main demographic that coincidentally voted for Trump hard and also joins the military at reliable rates. I look forward to troons, faggots and illegals and woke niggers dying there on our behalf lol.
 
So Baris today is going on about how these polls are a joke.

The US is D+2 to D+4 nationally.
The polls are showing D+10 to D+17 to keep Biden's head floating above 40%.

Essentially, the polls are making the hypothetical situation that Trump started a 3rd party and broke the Republican party in half, or if 1/3 of Republicans just stopped existing.

He also floated about making a competitor to 538 to break the narratives spun by it.
This my optimism & copeing :optimistic: :optimistic: :optimistic:

can the democrats using house & senate block trump from running for nomation for jan 6 minus any criminal charges or

OR
say the republican party banned from next election so, Democrats vs third party.
 
@Terrifik Senate panel will probe Supreme Court's Texas abortion ruling, 'shadow docket'

The Democrats seem hell bent on pissing off the Supremes as much as possible for no gain at all. They don't have the numbers to impeach or pack the court, so they have zero leverage for threatening them. It's boggling why they'd write threatening letters, do that dumb eviction moratorium shit after being told not to, and now they want to make a committee to publicly scold the court for not ruling in their favor on a motion they had no obligation to accept in the first place.

Nobody has a bigger legal or in general god complex than the lifetime appointees to the Supreme Court. Nobody holds grudges like they do, either, and not even Roberts can redirect the shitstorm that this will eventually produce.
 
Last edited:
havent-seen-the-democrats-this-mad-since-we-took-away-7112975.png

LOL the absolute seething.
 
Good luck getting 3/4 of the states on board needed for a constitutional amendment.

The Moloch apologists should have thought of that before they decided legialating from the bench was the way to go.
Nancy is now bringing an abortion access bill to the House floor for a vote. Good luck getting through not only the Senate filibuster, but also the dems from swing states that don’t want to be chained to the issue by taking a public stance. As was mentioned earlier, while more of the country is pro-choice than pro-birth, that support is soft, and begins to wane once the realities of late-term abortion (or the post-birth insanity from Gov. Northam) are considered.

In the meantime, I’ve been having an absolute blast trolling the leftists that I’m “friends” with on social media who are losing their sanity over this:

“No one is trying to TAKE your abortions. Think of it as common sense abortion control. You can still get them, they’re just putting in place some common sense #abortionsense laws to promote safety and responsibility.”

“Wait a second, who are you to tell me that men can’t enact abortion laws or have an opinion on the procedure? Sexist. According to y’all, men get pregnant too. So, by your standards, you’re either invalidating our very valid perspective, or you’re denying your own ideology that trans men are men by admitting that only real women are able to carry babies.”


These pathetic, self-loathing, self-flagellating leftists (white women in particular) REALLY hate having their arguments turned against them, and a few have unfriended me (good riddance). This goes to show the unsustainability of leftist beliefs, which crumble under even slight scrutiny. I’d say we’re witnessing the death throes of a highly autistic ideology that becomes increasingly incoherent before flatlining, but that’s way too :optimistic:.
 
So is Biden's new strategy just to call everything a success even when it clearly isn't?

Afghanistan exist? Rousing success. Over a gorillion air lifted.

The economy? Building back better! Pay no attention to slow job growth or how much ground beef costs.
Might backfire if someone memes "Biden success" meaning something similar to Hooverville.
 
Where would we be without helpful fact checks from DNC shills?

View attachment 2509308
So basically the DNC are trying to claim that rhe families are lairs. What abunch of faggots

Senate panel will probe Supreme Court's Texas abortion ruling, 'shadow docket'
https://thehill.com/regulation/5707...me-courts-texas-abortion-ruling-shadow-docket
https://archive.vn/uj8k7

They really are trying to piss off the Supreme Court. I wouldn't be shocked Roe vs Wade is finally overturn just to say fuck you to the dems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back