US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Huh, fascinating. Your name doesn't bring up any of the posts that you did as Hymen Hive, but going back says it is you. Well then, apologies for the undeserved hostility, I thought you were another sock puppet. Hence my continued snark towards you since I am several bottles in and don't go back to work till Thursday.

Well, as a bit of a mea culpa, to give a bit more of a serious response rather than the sheer snark.

There is no benefit to losing the seat, leaving aside the sheer wound it would be, right now there is nothing at all that they'd gain from it. Losing a position in the U.S. system holds no benefit. Since we don't have coalition parties, there's no leverage. You just outright lose any power you had. While it is possible to make life difficult, it's through things like the filibuster. California long since got rid of that. While they could theoretically make life difficult, they'd be doing it against anything he intends to pass... and in turn make themselves look like obstructionists. Making themselves -more- disliked hardly helps them. And it doesn't let them really gain anything. "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" only holds if everyone hates the new guy more, and short of pulling a Biden, Elder won't do that.
Did Hyman get banned?
 
If cali is a dem a stronghold, what would that mean for any bill/law/etc that a repub tries to pass? Will it be blocked just because it's the other side?

On the flip-side, will the repubs use Elder as a 'token' black guy. "You can't be against this guy, he's black!"
If Elder won, it would be a visual victory at best. He has to deal with a Democratic Supermajority in both chambers, so legislation would be off the table.

It would be more about manuevering the governorship to try and uproot some of California's problems, like the Environmental groups making housing prices soar and prioritizing the homeless problem and so on.
 
Correction, I'm lazy and illiterate.
No harm no foul. I was going to string it on a bit longer, seems as it's a quiet period but who needs to fight against another sock?

If cali is a dem a stronghold, what would that mean for any bill/law/etc that a repub tries to pass? Will it be blocked just because it's the other side?
It will probably mean a legislative deadlock that will require him to function by executive order. he'll be able to launch investigations and push interesting appointments, but nothing will really change
On the flip-side, will the repubs use Elder as a 'token' black guy. "You can't be against this guy, he's black!" Will cries of racism work against the dem elite/voters?
Dem voters are retarded enough to think Larry Elder is the black face of white supremacy, so no.

Just look at how they react towards Ben Carson or Herman Cain, for reference
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
No harm no foul. I was going to string it on a bit longer, seems as it's a quiet period but who needs to fight against another sock?

If cali is a dem a stronghold, what would that mean for any bill/law/etc that a repub tries to pass? Will it be blocked just because it's the other side?

On the flip-side, will the repubs use Elder as a 'token' black guy. "You can't be against this guy, he's black!" Will cries of racism work against the dem elite/voters?
Depends on how much he's willing to compromise, and how much he's willing to play hardball. He can -really- damage them if he wants, in ways they'd find... unfortunate. If he's stupid, he'll use that to bludgeon his way forward, if he's smart he'll make some back room deals, grease some palms, and agree to not do that in return for some legislation.
 
This could work, this is an actual decent plan, except those farms are going to be the first thing they go for. That's why I was talking about the Special Forces, they are experienced in this exact field. They specifically, during the Troubles, killed off farmers who were friendly to the IRA and buried them in their own fields, or harassed them into selling up and giving their shit over to state-friendly owners. As far as I know, the USA doesn't have a specific military group who engage in outright illegal activities against their own civilians, whereas the UK does. On-the-ground espionage against their own citizens to arrest or kill potential rebels.
🤔"Hey Steve, you know how the Anderson Dairy farms been run by the Andersons since the town was incorporated?"
🤨 "Yeah, what about it, Bill?"
🤔 "They didn't come by church, and Chuck ain't seen them at the feed store all week. Do you think it has anything to do with the strangers with funny accents that we, as small town folk, immediately pegged as interlopers?"
🤨 "The ones that showed up after the civil war went hot?"
🤔 "Yeah, thos 'uns. You don't reckon they did something unseemly, did you?"
-A Short Time Later-
👩‍🦰 "You strangers need some more coffee?"
🤡 "Yes, we're thirsty from uh, managing the old Anderson place, which we bought without anyone knowing about it!"
👩‍🦰 "Oh, darlin', looks like you boys are just exhausted to boot, passing out right in the diner."
👩‍🦰 "Must be all the poison I put in your coffee!"

I'm just kidding, I'm sure that the Coastal governments will be able to control the 900+ million acres of farmland in the US and turn every last inch of it into an impregnable fortress with zero problem whatsoever.

You are 100% correct, the USA needs these rural areas entirely, that's why they will do everything they can to make sure those farms are protected and nobody can interfere with their power structure. They will set up checkpoints near to the dairy farms, and at best you could snipe some cows from a distance.

Yes, I'm sure that they will also be able to protect the literally thousands of miles between the productive farms in the middle of the heartland and the major coastal cities. There won't be a single opportunity to disrupt the flow of milk and corn from the massive fortresses of Wisconsin to New York or LA. There aren't any infrastructure bottlenecks like bridges or mountain passes, or long lonely stretches of highway that pass through rough, difficult to patrol terrain. If there are any, they will be patrolled day and night by the millions upon millions of soldiers that will just....be there magically because in this special civil war the rural people must lose, facts be damned.
 
Last edited:
Correction, I'm lazy and illiterate.
And retarded :christine:
It will probably mean a legislative deadlock that will require him to function by executive order. he'll be able to launch investigations and push interesting appointments, but nothing will really change
An uphill battle to 2022 before he gets removed.
Dem voters are retarded enough to think Larry Elder is the black face of white supremacy, so no.

Just look at how they react towards Ben Carson or Herman Cain, for reference
Yeah good point. That blackface of white supremacy article was amazing. Here's to hoping he does a speech in white face with a Hitler tash.

Depends on how much he's willing to compromise, and how much he's willing to play hardball. He can -really- damage them if he wants, in ways they'd find... unfortunate. If he's stupid, he'll use that to bludgeon his way forward, if he's smart he'll make some back room deals, grease some palms, and agree to not do that in return for some legislation.

Who do the dems not like, or want to stop? Could Elder make deals with silicon valley to remove mutual opponents? If so, who would they be?
 
Willie Thrills said:
NYC being the home of the most influential backers of the state, it is the prime target for anybody who wants to force favourable negotiations - to put major firms into a position where they will say to politicians "We will back whoever makes this stop" - this is what pushed the IRA to the government of NI.
This just some juvenile fanfic view of the situation. No one gives a shit about NYC, everyone will simply want to be the first to blow it up before leaving to Florida. You assume just because we have potato niggers, all of us are like potato niggers. Also, the US potato nigger is not like the Irish one, its an American that gets drunk on St Patrick's and that's the extent of their Irishness.
They specifically, during the Troubles, killed off farmers who were friendly to the IRA and buried them in their own fields, or harassed them into selling up and giving their shit over to state-friendly owners.
I'm siding with the potato niggers on this. Tiocfaidh ar la, baby.
Some of them are racist, others are not?

Well, false-flag some anti-black attacks and blame the white nationalists.
I don't know what you all bongs smoke over there but you need to cut back if you think the US govt is going to pay a bunch of English yobs to come kill farmers or that we all hate niggers, you have no idea what we're like. Given just about everyone has a nigger in the family that's just not going to work here.

You know, funny thing about foreigners that come to America, they all seem to hate British too, especially the ones from Central-South America. You all did the same shit in Belize (formerly British Honduras), Guatemala and Argentina (and I'm not even referencing Las Malvinas). Don't think they'll want to team up in your scenario.
 
And retarded :christine:

An uphill battle to 2022 before he gets removed.

Yeah good point. That blackface of white supremacy article was amazing. Here's to hoping he does a speech in white face with a Hitler tash.



Who do the dems not like, or want to stop? Could Elder make deals with silicon valley to remove mutual opponents? If so, who would they be?
A ton of California's money is tied up in its agriculture. The most common, widely used, cheapest, and efficient method of cleaning political money is through them. The governor has to sign off on those big bills the California congress makes to do so. Now, here's the fun part. You see, while the Democrats have a supermajority in both houses, that supermajority is made up of lot of progressives. A lot of progressives who the Establishment Dems in California have made sure don't get any kickbacks.
 
I don't know what you all bongs smoke over there but you need to cut back if you think the US govt is going to pay a bunch of English yobs to come kill farmers or that we all hate niggers, you have no idea what we're like. Given just about everyone has a nigger in the family that's just not going to work here.
Not to jump back in to this, but...Nobody in the UK will come to America. Not to help, not to hinder. It won't happen. You're on your own and any talk otherwise is simply mental.
You know, funny thing about foreigners that come to America, they all seem to hate British too, especially the ones from Central-South America. You all did the same shit in Belize (formerly British Honduras), Guatemala and Argentina (and I'm not even referencing Las Malvinas). Don't think they'll want to team up in your scenario.
Everyone hates the Brits. And in Britain, everyone (Scots, Welsh, NI) hates the English. We're used to it.

A ton of California's money is tied up in its agriculture. The most common, widely used, cheapest, and efficient method of cleaning political money is through them. The governor has to sign off on those big bills the California congress makes to do so. Now, here's the fun part. You see, while the Democrats have a supermajority in both houses, that supermajority is made up of lot of progressives. A lot of progressives who the Establishment Dems in California have made sure don't get any kickbacks.

If Elder wins, could it end up in a mexican stand-off of Dems, woke-mentalists and repubs? Can we chuck in RINO and Trumpers just to make it a battle-royale? Wouldn't it be great if silicon valley/hollywood/woke HQ were unable to keep exporting their shit because they were too bogged down with internal slap fights. A man can dream.
 
Lol. Right, let me highlight the important part here.

View attachment 2534838
The spin is blatant, and you can guess what they aren't saying.
Oh I see what you mean. They don't state if the poll found people blaming Biden for the chaos ot not. Just people are happy that the war is over and that's it. Those two don't necessarily go together.
Remember, Newsom's aunt, Rep. Pelosi, said that "Mother Earth is angry" in response to the forest fires in CA. So we aren't doing enough pagan sacrifices to the Earth Mother Gaia like that horror movie a few years back...
This is why I hate her saying she's catholic. She says mother Earth instead of God is angry.
I’m going to assume he means via airline because there is zero chance of this being enforced on all the roadways in America. The airlines have also been extremely hesitant to enact any mandates other than the masks. Any time this has been floated before, the airlines release statements about how this will not work and it would destroy their business. Fauci is just talking out his ass because he is losing relevance and he likes the attention he’s received over the past year and a half.
Fauci is not a policy maker. He doesn't realize how the stuff he is saying are impossible to do and can hurt businesses. Yet his cult eats it up and thank he's some genius.
 
If Elder wins, could it end up in a mexican stand-off of Dems, woke-mentalists and repubs? Can we chuck in RINO and Trumpers just to make it a battle-royale? Wouldn't it be great if silicon valley/hollywood/woke HQ were unable to keep exporting their shit because they were too bogged down with internal slap fights. A man can dream.
Could, yes. Will, probably not. Elder seems politically savvy, so all he needs to do is quietly threaten them with vetoing that funding. If he did, it would place the Establishment Dems in an unwinnable position. To pass it, they'd need to agree to give the Progs money who -will- use it against them, if they don't pass it they piss off all their 'interests'. The threat alone is sufficient to bring them to the table for compromise legislation. They won't like it, and it will fall short of what Elder would want in full, but would be a start.
 
Not to jump back in to this, but...Nobody in the UK will come to America. Not to help, not to hinder. It won't happen. You're on your own and any talk otherwise is simply mental.

Everyone hates the Brits. And in Britain, everyone (Scots, Welsh, NI) hates the English. We're used to it.



If Elder wins, could it end up in a mexican stand-off of Dems, woke-mentalists and repubs? Can we chuck in RINO and Trumpers just to make it a battle-royale? Wouldn't it be great if silicon valley/hollywood/woke HQ were unable to keep exporting their shit because they were too bogged down with internal slap fights. A man can dream.
I agree with this. Any talk of blue helmets or bongs or Frenchies coming over to help is ridiculous.

Putting aside the fact that the last time a proper war was fought on American soil was back in the mid 19th century, I cannot imagine any modern country who would gladly send their youngest and brightest just to interfere with another country's civil war, unless their name happened to be CCCP or USA. And one is dead while the other is tearing itself apart slowly. There's simply no casus belli you can sell to anyone to justify the expense and manpower.
 
I agree with this. Any talk of blue helmets or bongs or Frenchies coming over to help is ridiculous.

Putting aside the fact that the last time a proper war was fought on American soil was back in the mid 19th century, I cannot imagine any modern country who would gladly send their youngest and brightest just to interfere with another country's civil war, unless their name happened to be CCCP or USA. And one is dead while the other is tearing itself apart slowly. There's simply no casus belli you can sell to anyone to justify the expense and manpower.
Especially for -Biden- and especially while that civil war plays absolute hell with world economics.
 
I agree with this. Any talk of blue helmets or bongs or Frenchies coming over to help is ridiculous.

Putting aside the fact that the last time a proper war was fought on American soil was back in the mid 19th century, I cannot imagine any modern country who would gladly send their youngest and brightest just to interfere with another country's civil war, unless their name happened to be CCCP or USA. And one is dead while the other is tearing itself apart slowly. There's simply no casus belli you can sell to anyone to justify the expense and manpower.
I think those retards in Brussels will try to figure out some way, but I think generally you're correct. If a civil war were to happen, it would likely result in a Syria type situation, where opposing nations fund militias in a proxy conflict, supply weapons, funding, or equipment, or send "volunteer" batallions to assist their side.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back