Debate user "Sage In All Fields" on if men should want to fuck 14-year-olds

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Assuming you are a pedophile you would benefit from normalizing pedophilia.
It would make no difference to my personal life, so your assumption is faulty.

The number of women under the age of 18 that I've liked in my entire life are fewer than 10 (including celebrities), the vast majority were from before I turned 18, only 1 is from after I turned 18 and that was a 3 year age gap.

I addressed every sentence in that paragraph.
I'm not even sure you understood the paragraph.

My objection is to adult people having sex with 14 years old kids. I call it pedophilia and I find no justification for it.
Your opposition to it requires justification, since you are positing that we ought oppose it, all I'm saying is that you have no justification for that.

The fact that you can’t differentiate between a 14 year old and an 18 year old is far more revealing about you than you realize.
Not really, I've met plenty of 20 year olds who look like them. I get the impression you don't actually interact with alot of people.

“It’s Amuricun so it doesn’t count cause not enough niggers from other cultures approved it” isn’t an argument. If you’re going to argue against the field of neuroscience then be my guest; it doesn’t change the fact that you want to fuck kids.

What, do you want a citation which has all the diversity hires to cross cultural reference it, faggot?

Do you realize what website this is, you dumb nigger? We call out groomers of all cultural and sexual backgrounds; what made you think you’re immune to the same standards we hold them to?
The fact you don't even understand the point of cross-cultural work is extremely telling (edit: on second reading I'm actually not even sure if you know what it is, google is free dude). If you actually want to learn about neuroscience I'll happily recommend some books.
 
Last edited:
My "justification" is basic human decency of not fucking children.
Right so... 'muh feels'.

I'm not sure why you felt the need to complicate this. You could have just said this from the start instead of tying yourself in knots trying to justify something you don't have any rationale for.
 
Right so... 'muh feels'.
Muh feels are pretty much limited to being disgusted. It's more about their feels.

I'm not sure why you felt the need to complicate this. You could have just said this from the start instead of tying yourself in knots trying to justify something you don't have any rationale for.
I don't feel the need to justify opposing pedophilia. Only things that are wrong or questionable require justification.
 
The fact you don't even understand the point of cross-cultural work is extremely telling. If you actually want to learn about neuroscience I'll happily recommend some books.

You disgusting mongoloid. You absolute fucking Cro-magnon. Your defense of hinging on cultural relativism is itself fundamentally ignorant.

I'm guilty of being sympathetic toward Islam and failing to speak about the types of unspeakable horrors that go on in my part of the world because I generally like to focus on the positives. But fuck it man, you made me legitimately mad on the internet with your disgusting fetishism of children by using other cultures to shield yourself from degeneracy. I'm gonna assume you're using "cross-cultural" to refer to Islam, because Islam is the one religion I see paedophiles of all walks hide behind (much to my own horror).

Tie up the kafir, kids and gather the coal that Santa left us for being soldiers of Allah! It's time for the شيخ التوحد to issue a fatwa on why Sage in All Fields must be stoned!

It's an open secret that predominantly Islamic countries have a huge problem with grooming, pederasty, among other such things. However, what people fundamentally fail to understand is that no part of the fucking world likes paedophiles. Do you sincerely think that every Muslim majority country is filled to the brim with mouth-breathing apes who think any female who starts menstruating, regardless of age, is a woman worth lusting after? I know it's ludicrous to think to the contrary, but the reality is far more complex than meets the fucking eye.

a) Islam specifically operates under the premise that both men and women must dress modestly and lower their gaze. For obvious reasons, the obligation for men to lower their gaze has been loosely interpreted and generously stretched through the centuries. This does not, however, change the fact that modesty extending to both men and women is fundamentally written into the Qur'an itself.

“Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that will make for greater purity for them: And God is well acquainted with all that they do. And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty…” [Qur’an - Surah An Nur: 24:30-31]

b) The notion of "sexuality" or "kinks" or "fetishes" does not exist in Islam. This is a concept that I see most Western people (especially first generation Muslim immigrants) struggle to understand (excellent video by Al Muqaddimah on the subject). Homosexual behaviour exists and homosexual behaviour is condemned. However, Allah (read: YHVH) specifically created humanity with heterosexuality being the fundamental norm. Any type of sexual behaviour that doesn't involve a (read: adult) man and a (read: adult) woman is treated as a sin of excess and lust. This includes homosexual behaviour, pederasty, and most other paraphilias.

c) On the subject of the Prophet and his wife Aisha... this is the one that I personally struggle to talk about the most. Why? Because everyone who clings to the narrative that the Prophet was a child-fucking paedophile who married a 9-year-old girl is horrendously misinformed and nobody ever fucking listens to the other side. It's just "oh, Prophet's a paedophile and I have poorly translated Surahs posted by some random douchebag on the internet to validate my claims!"

Full writeup for those who care, but the key takeaways are as follows:

1672011673414.png

TLDR: Aisha wasn't 9 when she got married off, she was 14 and the marriage wasn't consummated until she was anywhere between 17-19. Mind you, the Prophet was still a middle-aged man who was married to a teenage girl and started having sex with her when she was at the tail end of her adolescence. This is a jarring image that does disturb a lot of Muslims abroad. When we read about incest and disturbing age gaps in marriages in the Bible (new or old testament), it's often easy to let that shit slide because the sins the past are several millennia removed from the present day. Stuff gets lost in translation, manuscripts get destroyed, people die out as they get supplanted, the list goes on.

Islam, to the contrary, is fucking autistic with the depths by which people will go to document and preserve their own history. The Ahl Al-Bayt's line can be traced all the way to the modern day with the Hashemites, who in turn, trace their lineage back to Hashim ibn Abd Manaf, the great grandfather of the Prophet himself. When you have a cultural imperative to document everything regarding your own history, including unsavoury elements that later generations would've discarded in later centuries, gets preserved.

I cannot hold the past to the same standards as the present day, but I will say that the subject of the Prophet consummating a marriage with a teenage girl is an actual reason why Muslims become murtads (read: ex-Muslims).

***

TLDR - Even the goatfuckers that you hide behind have problems with their prophet you fucking mongoloid.
 
It's not white knighting to state my position on a subject you brought up. The push to raise the age of consent was a wholly feminist invention that has no basis in reality. Sectioning teenagers off from the rest of society by putting them in generational schooling and preventing them from marrying older people is extremely damaging to their socialisation, and this is massively to blame for how messed up things have gotten today.


I didn't realise men had a switch that turned off their sexual attraction depending on the laws of the country they're in. If desiring teenagers makes you a pedophile, then every man is a pedophile. Women don't walk around with labels on their heads indicating their age. People like you would have us believe every man just woke up in the 20th century and went 'hmm i think i will stop being attracted to teenagers now'.


View attachment 4066344
Isn't a big part of mental illness diagnoses, especially things like antisocial personality disorder and what have you, a lack of adherence to social norms within your culture/society? I don't think it's that farfetched that a person in good mental health may very well have some "switch" that causes them to not find someone attractive, because the law says so and/or society/the people in their culture find it abhorrent.
And I don't know why you would include that video to prove your point. Did you think these niggers wanting to fuck underaged girls would enlighten us?:lit:
 
Your defense of hinging on cultural relativism is itself fundamentally ignorant.
My defense doesn't hinge on cultural relativism and the rest of your comment has nothing to do with anything I've said. The fact that neural development is significantly impacted by culture & socialization is completely uncontroversial. If you do not understand what I am talking about just ask me to clarify instead of making yourself look woefully ill informed, I don't bite.

Isn't a big part of mental illness diagnoses, especially things like antisocial personality disorder and what have you, a lack of adherence to social norms within your culture/society?
You know for a while here I thought I'd be stuck batting off hysterical retards, so I'm glad you came along with something interesting. Psychiatry as a discipline is significantly impacted by the cultural context in which its found, it's not scientific in the sense that physics or neurology are.

Take for instance the fact that homosexuality was previously regarded as a mental illness, and is no longer regarded as such. There was never any change in the science, it was simply the fact that cultural attitudes changed, and what was previously regarded as mental illness was later regarded as a 'normal' part of human sexuality.

I don't think it's that farfetched that a person in good mental health may very well have some "switch" that causes them to not find someone attractive, because the law says so and/or society/the people in their culture find it abhorrent.
I would argue that this isn't possible, because physical attraction is necessarily the consequence of physical attributes and a huge number of people over the age of 18 are literally indistinguishable from those under the age of 18 who've reached spermarche/menarche. If this weren't the case then it wouldn't be possible for so many underaged people to simply lie about their age to get into clubs, or have sex, or otherwise get by with fake IDs. The fact is many people don't realize how many women they're swiping right on, or seeing in pornography, are underaged, it's absurd to condemn them for having this attraction since there is absolutely no way to make the distinction.

And I don't know why you would include that video to prove your point. Did you think these niggers wanting to fuck underaged girls would enlighten us?:lit:
Nah I just like the way he put it.
 
Last edited:
sorry i'm late had trouble getting online, OP add a handful of years and you're alright with me something like plus 4 or 6? yeah something legal , I hope your just fooling around i don't intend on reading any of the previous pages I just know you're scum :smug:
 
Human brain matures 21 year mark, to be blunt kids are stupid and impressionable.

Barely legals the 18 year olds are the same, anyone under 18 should be barred from wide internet to prevent porn consumption and cancerous social media

Simple as.
 
This is very obviously just cope for your own illiteracy.
Make a pedo seethe and you've done a good deed for the day
This is an excuse people use to justify their own inadequacy.

You think that because I make you feel a certain way this must be true of my attitude towards every other person. The truth is that when I find people who are smarter than me I ask questions and I listen, and with those less intelligent than me as long as they're nice to me I go out of my way to adjust to their level and avoid patronizing them. Just because someone is less intelligent that doesn't mean they're not worthwhile, good or competent people. I'm not the kind of person whose 'too proud' to associate with those less intelligent than me.

However, when it comes to people like those in this thread who would sooner see me hanged for opposing their nonsensical opinions, I see very little reason to show any respect, but I digress.
Smart people can write well. Your prose is turrble
 
I have now concluded my writing, save for some minor tweaks. I will be typesetting it and keeping it around for when this discussion comes up again. Thank you all for your contribution :)
 
It's normal for a 14yo boy to want to fuck 14yo girls. It isn't appropriate for a 21yo man to want to fuck 14yo girls.

When we get older, we understand more and more why people feel the way they feel, and society expects this understanding as a result. A grown man should know why it's improper and immoral to fuck teenage children.

If he doesn't, he needs to be thrown into a woodchipper.
 
I have now concluded my writing, save for some minor tweaks. I will be typesetting it and keeping it around for when this discussion comes up again. Thank you all for your contribution :)

"I got my ass handed to me, and it hurt my feelings. I'm going to seethe for days, but I'm too fucking retarded to be subtle."

Bro, stop. Do you want to be @BoxerShorts47? No diddling kids.
 
Back