Debate user "Sage In All Fields" on if men should want to fuck 14-year-olds

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Ah I see where the disconnect is. My daughter won't be having any relationships with men outside of marriage, and she'll only marry men I find acceptable. This is the case whether she's 14 or 28 (necessarily subject to the laws of the country I'm in of course).


I'm not really the kind of person who gets his ass beat, this is a nice power fantasy though.


Oh no, I completely understand that, I just find the squirming entertaining and it gives me good prompts so I can finally write things up.
That's a lot of words to say "I'm a pedophilic rapist".
 
This retard got so mad he decided to make a thread about it. Jesus fucking christ, lmfao. Go touch some grass and go back to your french pedophilie philosophers who wanted to normalize the same shit you did, degenerate. Mald and seethe, faggot. If you have to go this far to defend yourself, maybe you should realize there's a reason why people bully you.
 
So I can respond to comments like these with 'refer to section 1.2'.


I'm not arguing that they're healthier or better, the only thing I'm arguing against is the intense opposition to it. If people were arguing that mesophilia, crurophilia or podophilia were wrong with the same intensity I would do the same thing, and I would have more of a personal incentive to do so.


The typical hypothesis is that it's based on a biological need for resources and competency etc


Yes, immense suffering during pregnancy and childbirth was quite normal for the era. As was your husband dying of plague or the flu.
Ok groomer.

I can’t wait for you to get Halal’d here, so we can see just how depraved you really are.

Putting pseudo-science and your vague understanding of history aside: the only men who want to date minors are men looking for partners they can control.

I haven’t met a single teen when I was in highschool dating an older man who wasn’t already abused by their parents or didn’t have some mental health issue. You’re just taking advantage of mentally ill kids.
 
Last edited:
Your appeals to past are overshadowed by the fact that you'd have been run out of town or murdered by angry peasants well before getting to the stage of writing chomo scripture.
I don’t know why these groomers think bringing up the past is even a good argument in the first place; in the past, people also didn’t bathe regularly. That wouldn’t justify letting yourself go weeks without bathing.

Neither does it justify taking advantage of minors with mental illnesses/parental issues.
 
The key problem here is your a priori assertion that the people we're talking about are 'kids'.


Well yeah but that's basically the nature of 90% of psychology. If you wanna reject the entirety of psychology you can go right ahead, I won't stop you, but then you can't also oppose anything I suggest on the basis of psychology.


Maybe I'm not 'trying to sound smart', maybe you're just kinda dumb. If I'm not overly concerned with making myself understood I just write in the way that's most enjoyable for me.


I care, therefore somebody cares. Also, by this logic you must think incest is acceptable as long as your daughter is over the age of 18 (although then again I've heard people make this case unironically, so maybe that's what you believe).
Nah you're trying to sound intelligent despite your inability to communicate intelligently.

Reading your prose out loud is amusing, the social incompetence really hits hard vocally.

And why do you all sound the same when you go for the :smug: posting defense mechanism? Identical vocabulary, tone, structure, and diction to every other pedo sperg. Such lack of creativity. Much banal. Many such cases. Not sad.
 
Last edited:
I don’t know why these groomers think bringing up the past is even a good argument in the first place; in the past, people also didn’t bathe regularly. That wouldn’t justify letting yourself go weeks without bathing.

Neither does it justify taking advantage of minors with mental illnesses/parental issues.
If my argument were 'people had sex with minors in the past, therefore they should do so now', then you would have a point. When it comes to attraction towards minors it does however make sense to speak about the past, in the same sense that we could also speak cross culturally, since that's a question of what is the 'normal desire' of humans. Alot of people are bringing this up though, so I should probably spend more time outlining this.

And why do you all sound the same when you go for the :smug: posting defense mechanism? Identical vocabulary, tone, structure, and diction to every other pedo sperg. Such lack of creativity. Much banal. Many such cases. Not sad.
This is very obviously just cope for your own illiteracy.

Your appeals to past are overshadowed by the fact that you'd have been run out of town or murdered by angry peasants well before getting to the stage of writing chomo scripture.
For agreeing with them?
 
If my argument were 'people had sex with minors in the past, therefore they should do so now', then you would have a point. When it comes to attraction towards minors it does however make sense to speak about the past, in the same sense that we could also speak cross culturally, since that's a question of what is the 'normal desire' of humans. Alot of people are bringing this up though, so I should probably spend more time outlining this.


This is very obviously just cope for your own illiteracy.


For agreeing with them?
The majority of your argument does use the justification of “people did it in the past”.

Just admit that you’re a groomer who wants a mentally ill kid to take advantage of, instead of trying to use pretentious pseudo-science to explain away your groomer tendencies.

Hopefully Josh hands your info over to authorities. I bet your hard drive is worth investigating
 
Hopefully Josh hands your info over to authorities. I bet your hard drive is worth investigating
He only does it when asked and there is no other option but to hand whatever data they're asking for. The forum is built on free expression and that means even a perverted retard can express himself as long as he's not breaking the law - then others can express what they think about his spergy manifestos.
But a pink triangle of deviancy would fit our friend well.
 
He only does it when asked and there is no other option but to hand whatever data they're asking for. The forum is built on free expression and that means even a perverted retard can express himself as long as he's not breaking the law - then others can express what they think about his spergy manifestos.
But a pink triangle of deviancy would fit our friend well.
I think we need something stronger than a pink triangle:

We need a pink triangle that says “PEDO” on it
 
If my argument were 'people had sex with minors in the past, therefore they should do so now', then you would have a point. When it comes to attraction towards minors it does however make sense to speak about the past, in the same sense that we could also speak cross culturally, since that's a question of what is the 'normal desire' of humans. Alot of people are bringing this up though, so I should probably spend more time outlining this.


This is very obviously just cope for your own illiteracy.


For agreeing with them?

I see you're still active. I can have my doctor assist you in filling out your MAID application so you can kys
 
The majority of your argument does use the justification of “people did it in the past”.
Nope, it's just that a lot of the arguments against hebephilia hinge on whether it's 'biologically normal'. We can use history to determine what is biologically normal attraction-wise, as we do for many other things. I'm not sure which part of this you find fallacious.

Hopefully Josh hands your info over to authorities. I bet your hard drive is worth investigating
I'm outside the jurisdiction of western authorities, the age of consent here is less than 18, everything I own is encrypted, and I'm against pornography of any kind. Your ineffectual frustration is comical.

I know theres another 5 pages of replies but if you think a 14 year old is capable of being an adult you have never been around kids my nigger
Quite the opposite actually, when I was younger I was extremely frustrated by the lack of autonomy I had on account of not being above the magical '18', and by the amount of irresponsible behaviour that was excused on account of people who were perfectly capable of behaving otherwise being regarded as 'teenagers'. I regarded myself as being an adult and I held myself to that standard, and as a result I found people were repeatedly shocked by my age and I was able to do extremely well for myself as a result. It's quite obvious to me that this distinction is entirely in people's heads and serves to severely stunt people's growth.
 
Last edited:
Nope, it's just that a lot of the arguments against hebephilia hinge on whether it's 'biologically normal'. We can use history to determine what is biologically normal attraction-wise, as we do for many other things. I'm not sure which part of this you find fallacious.


I'm outside the jurisdiction of western authorities, the age of consent here is less than 18, everything I own is encrypted, and I'm against pornography of any kind. Your ineffectual frustration is comical.


Quite the opposite actually, when I was younger I was extremely frustrated by the lack of autonomy I had on account of not being above the magical '18', and by the amount of irresponsible behaviour that was excused on account of people who were perfectly capable of behaving otherwise being regarded as 'teenagers'. I regarded myself as being an adult and I held myself to that standard, and as a result I found people were repeatedly shocked by my age and I was able to do extremely well for myself as a result. It's quite obvious to me that this distinction is entirely in people's heads and serves to severely stunt people's growth.
That’s a lot of words for “I want you all to not only excuse my predatory behaviour, but to also accept it”.

There’s a reason why you’re “attracted” to minors, and it really spills through how to talk to people.

You’re a manipulative individual who wants a partner that’s easy to control. As evidenced by your Redditor tendency to talk down to people; just judging by your essays I can tell that you’re the type of person who thinks they’re the smartest individual in any room. All while lacking self awareness that everyone else sees you as nothing more than a creep.

Everyone knows that a minor lacks life experience and the wisdom to catch on to when they’re being used; especially by a predator like yourself.

Again; no amount of pseudo-science, “muh history” or “stop being emotional” changes the fact that you felt compelled to confess to a bunch of autists that you’re attracted to children.

As Milsurp-Cyclopes suggested: Go Seek Canadian Healthcare.
 
Nope, it's just that a lot of the arguments against hebephilia hinge on whether it's 'biologically normal'.
Only pedophiles use the word "hebephilia" unironically.

Quite the opposite actually, when I was younger I was extremely frustrated by the lack of autonomy I had on account of not being above the magical '18', and by the amount of irresponsible behaviour that was excused on account of people who were perfectly capable of behaving otherwise being regarded as 'teenagers'.
If you can't see the difference between yourself as a teenager and yourself now leads me to believe that you are either still very young or your development stopped in your teens.

You’re a manipulative individual who wants a partner that’s easy to control. As evidenced by your Redditor tendency to talk down to people; just judging by your essays I can tell that you’re the type of person who thinks they’re the smartest individual in any room. All while lacking self awareness that everyone else sees you as nothing more than a creep.
He pretty much said it himself:
There are reasons to prefer a younger person that are not purely hedonistic. Such as fertility, and the need for them to learn.
Translating from pedophile to English:
"I think grooming children almost as great as raping and impregnating them later".
 
just judging by your essays I can tell that you’re the type of person who thinks they’re the smartest individual in any room.
This is an excuse people use to justify their own inadequacy.

You think that because I make you feel a certain way this must be true of my attitude towards every other person. The truth is that when I find people who are smarter than me I ask questions and I listen, and with those less intelligent than me as long as they're nice to me I go out of my way to adjust to their level and avoid patronizing them. Just because someone is less intelligent that doesn't mean they're not worthwhile, good or competent people. I'm not the kind of person whose 'too proud' to associate with those less intelligent than me.

However, when it comes to people like those in this thread who would sooner see me hanged for opposing their nonsensical opinions, I see very little reason to show any respect, but I digress.

Everyone knows that a minor lacks life experience and the wisdom to catch on to when they’re being used; especially by a predator like yourself.
Maybe they would have more life experience if they weren't treated like children by people like you.

If you can't see the difference between yourself as a teenager and yourself now leads me to believe that you are either still very young or your development stopped in your teens.
There's a difference, it's just not significant enough to justify depriving the 14 year old me of his autonomy.
 
Last edited:
Back