Debate user "Sage In All Fields" on if men should want to fuck 14-year-olds

[Lidl Drip]

Young girls are at a bigger health risk during pregnancies https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24641534/

We all know that the human body, including female hips, is not done developing after puberty. Female hips reach their full width between 25-30 years even. This also coincides with the best birthing years, somehow!

Even in the 13th century normal marriage age was at 22 years for women, so it's not like it was the standard for people back to go around marrying and impregnating children. Appeal to history doesn't apply here...
Source:
Hallam, H. E. “Age at First Marriage and Age at Death in the Lincolnshire Fenland, 1252- 1478.” Population Studies, vol. 39, no. 1, 1985, pp. 55–69. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2174029. Accessed 20 Dec. 2022.

Girls as young as 5 are on record of giving birth, doesn't mean we should do it lmao.

Anyway not coming back to this thread afterwards because it's a silly discussion, exercise your literacy all you want.

Thank you! Pedos always bring up this cope of teenage girls being the most fertile, when they have much higher risks of serious pregnancy complications than a woman in her twenties. Also the only people who married kids in ye olden days were nobles and they only did it to secure alliances, not because they thought 12 year olds were so sexy and fertile. The average age for marriage was always 20s.

 

[Blewberry Nausea]

Oh jesus can we vote out pedo men from the male gender already I really do not wish to have to be associated with these incels.

 

[draggs]

Oh jesus can we vote out pedo men from the male gender already I really do not wish to have to be associated with these incels.

Is there a rule somewhere that once a month, some absolute retard has to get all whipped up about how banging 14 year olds should be okay, and get a thread made for them to retard in?

 

[Pee Cola]

Is there a rule somewhere that once a month, some absolute retard has to get all whipped up about how banging 14 year olds should be okay, and get a thread made for them to retard in?

There is. It's called Norbert's Law.

 

[Netizennameless]

I'm just dropping in to say pedos deserve the rope. A short drop.

Edit: also, i sincerely the people making these arguments are high schoolers, but i know that's overly optimistic.

 

[Sage In All Fields]

Edit: also, i sincerely the people making these arguments are high schoolers, but i know that's overly optimistic.

I made similar arguments when I was in high school, it's just that I kept going after. One of my classmates used to get really mad about it, we used to argue about it very loudly in the common area.

 

[Gay Mouth]

Why the fuck am I attached or linked to this in any way at all? I’m not watching or tagged or following this or replied to this. What the fuck?

 

[soryu2electricboogaloo]

I don't dispute that women by and large have a preference for older men.

A preference based on...? Fantasy or experience or what?
Sure, women might find they prefer older men because they've gotten into seriously bad relationships with men their age, but I assure there's a point where it's because they  believe an older man would be a better choice. There's a point where a woman realizes there's a very good reason why some men in their 30's and older are single and it's certainly not because he's meant to date a young girl.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

If you're so concerned with fertility and "Securing your genetic legacy", go to an African country and sleep around. You'll leave with some STDs and women birthing your kids that'll secure your legacy

Don't give him ideas. I don't think it's a legacy worthy of preserving.

 

[draggs]

These threads where incels whine they weren't born in a tribal jungle, desert, or mountain shithole where adult men fucking 14 year olds is okay...

It's a really weird whine

 

[Blewberry Nausea]

It is really simple. If you are old and your love of your life is 12 it is probably because you are fucked up. Hell if you are a young adult say 22 and your love of your life is 15 well if she is so great you can wait a few years while her brain matures before coitus. If you can’t that says you just want to fuck a 15 year old and you have issues.

 

[IKOL]

Oh, yes, another specimen to get a taste of molten .50 cal in the mouth.

 

[TayandYou]

@Sage In All Fields Why are you writing a collage essay with graphs like this is Childfucking Justification 201: Advanced Arguments? Why are you deep diving into kiddy diddler lore and pouring over the ancient chomo scrolls? What the fuck is wrong with you?

When it comes to minor attracted persons, I actually have more respect for the people that outright admit they want to fuck kids over those that make up esoteric arguments in an attempt to justify their degeneracy. The first group are just regular sick freaks, the latter are mega sick freaks who are heavily invested in being sick freaks.

There is. It's called Norbert's Law.

Named after a certain Big Cat?

These threads where incels whine they weren't born in a tribal jungle, desert, or mountain shithole where adult men fucking 14 year olds is okay...

It's a really weird whine

I don't understand how pedos can see Kiwifarms, look at how hostile we are towards pedos, chomos, groomers and MAPs and think that this is a place where they belong. They can't even hide their powerlevel, they just have to argue about why they think fucking kids should be legal.

I think we have enough minor attracted persons for a hall of shame type thread in the vein of The Easy to Track Username Hall of Shame to keep track of all of these age of consent debaters. There's Boxershorts, Norbert and now this guy, probably a few more that I can't remember, it feels like there's a new one every few months.

 

[Dread First]

ITT: /b/ socials thread lurking coombrain outs himself on Kiwi Farms and is 2 or 3 posts away from getting halal'd.

 

[Amiga Shelley02]

Although certainly not the best arrangement, adult-teenager relationships used to be common back then. Nowadays, teenagers are even more interested in sex, due to its omnipresence in media, but these arrangements are stigmatized even in places where they are legal. I'll powerlevel a bit, but I remember being 18 and going on dates with people in their 30s, 40s and even 50s. Where I come from, most heterosexual people lose their virginity when they are 16, a lot of people do it when they are 15 and a significant amount of people do it when they are 13 (which is below the consent age where I live). It's practically unheard of for people to still be virgins at 19 years old and people in that condition are seen as failed shut-ins, autists, retards and nerds.

What I mean is that although large age gaps are problematic for romantic relationships, we can't deny that most teenagers would be fine having sex with someone older provided they were physically attractive. Kiwi farm's denial of this fact, extreme puritanism and romanticism and gatekeeping of sex stem from the fact that most users here were themselves these failed shut-ins, autists, retards and nerds when they were teenagers.

I don't agree though with what has been said in this thread about there being almost no difference between a 14 and an 18 year old woman. The differences are obvious. Visible, even.

 

[Wormy]

What I mean is that although large age gaps are problematic for romantic relationships, we can't deny that most teenagers would be fine having sex with someone older provided they were physically attractive. Kiwi farm's denial of this fact, extreme puritanism and romanticism and gatekeeping of sex stem from the fact that most users here were themselves these failed shut-ins, autists, retards and nerds when they were teenagers.

Flies to shit, pedos to pedos.

Eat shit and die, chester.

 

[draggs]

Although certainly not the best arrangement, adult-teenager relationships used to be common back then. Nowadays, teenagers are even more interested in sex, due to its omnipresence in media, but these arrangements are stigmatized even in places where they are legal. I'll powerlevel a bit, but I remember being 18 and going on dates with people in their 30s, 40s and even 50s. Where I come from, most heterosexual people lose their virginity when they are 16, a lot of people do it when they are 15 and a significant amount of people do it when they are 13 (which is below the consent age where I live). It's practically unheard of for people to still be virgins at 19 years old and people in that condition are seen as failed shut-ins, autists, retards and nerds.

What I mean is that although large age gaps are problematic for romantic relationships, we can't deny that most teenagers would be fine having sex with someone older provided they were physically attractive. Kiwi farm's denial of this fact, extreme puritanism and romanticism and gatekeeping of sex stem from the fact that most users here were themselves these failed shut-ins, autists, retards and nerds when they were teenagers.

I don't agree though with what has been said in this thread about there being almost no difference between a 14 and an 18 year old woman. The differences are obvious. Visible, even.

Other than most people having lost their virginity by 19, your depiction of your personal experience as typical and normal is ignorant and deviant. No, it was and is not normal for people at 18 to be dating people well more than half their age, or even almost three times older than they are. Where I came from, 21 year olds fresh on the bar scene getting fucked by 40-some year olds was looked down on as weird and more than a little bit gross. 'Most teenagers would be fine having sex with 42 year olds' is the contention of a failed retarded autist, you daddy-and-or-mommy-issues tramp

By the way the only people who care whether someone has lost their virginity or not by age [whatever] are shallow teenagers, strangely old virgins themselves, or weirdo coombrain sex perverts on the internet

 

[Owner of a Lonely Hole]

The argument in favor of this idiot getting to fuck 14 year olds boils down to the fact that adolescents are inexperienced and manipulable. End of story.
None of the arguments he has presented actually speak to the idea that adult/minor relationships are healthier or better. There has been nothing materially shown that proves that there is any benefit to fucking a 14 year old over someone more age appropriate.
If this moron is actually trying to argue that there is no difference between a 14 and 18 year old, then why can’t you just be okay with dating the 18 year old? He is quite literally betraying his fetish by focusing on the 14 year old here.
What are you doing here, dude? Trying to absolve your guilt for nutting to minors? Just because something can be done, doesn’t mean it should. Presenting attraction to minors as “natural” and therefore acceptable is about as logical as arguing that murder is natural, and so we shouldn’t really get so mad about it when it happens. Do you see yourself?

 

[Grub]

I don't understand how pedos can see Kiwifarms, look at how hostile we are towards pedos, chomos, groomers and MAPs and think that this is a place where they belong. They can't even hide their powerlevel, they just have to argue about why they think fucking kids should be legal.

pedos are like that wherever you go. They know they're fucked in the head and their brains are broken but they can't fucking help themselves. They have a fucked up compulsion to justify and normalize their fucked up desires.

 

[TayandYou]

I'll powerlevel a bit, but I remember being 18 and going on dates with people in their 30s, 40s and even 50s.

This is why you're now an autist on Kiwifarms instead of being a happy well adjusted normie. Please go to therapy.