1/8/2019 - Tom wants the Age of Consent lowered to 12 - Yes. Lowered. To 12.

  • Thread starter Thread starter QT 219
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You know, it isn't nice to tell people to kill themselves.

I see the point that toots is trying to get at here, but its a dumb fucking solution. Adults should have good enough judgement to say no to a kid. End of story. I do think that there should be leeway for a defense where a guy doesn't know a chicks age. If some girl is 15 and says she's over the AoC to a guy, then the dude should be able to get off if he can prove it. There is some precedence in the law related to intercourse and the information people base their decisions on whether they will fuck or not. if a person has HIV/AIDS then several states have laws against lying about it. In this situation, its the other side of the coin where people should have a duty to ask, not to inform. If a guy bangs a chick without getting to know her age, then he has to live with the risks.

I feel that I have dragged hit off-topic, but I am just trying to temper the mood here, enough with the kys bullshit, it gets old.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: dark_lob1111, GethN7, DirkBloodStormKing and 8 others
Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg said:
I'm just being falsely branded a pedophile because of a single contact with an underage female 35 years ago...
Click to expand...

You keep saying that "but it was just one time!!" shit like it makes a difference.

"OMG, but I only raped the one child who had no capacity to consent!! Get over it!!" Lol no. That's not how it works, rctard.

"But I only robbed the one bank!!! And I prefer robbing other places, anyway!! Why does no-one mention the 364 days when I didn't rob any banks?!? So unfair you're calling me 'a bank robber' because of just one little bank robbery!!"
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Hanamura, UnclePhil, DirkBloodStormKing and 5 others
What is it with nonces and the "we must be protected from these evil sexy children" argument? This is like...the 5th time I've seen this shit, no little kids are taking a break from their LOL Surprise toys to conspire to hop on your ladydick Tommy boy.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: DukeOfNimonia, Mad Asshatter, Hanamura and 13 others
Lalala said:
What is it with nonces and the "we must be protected from these evil sexy children" argument? This is like...the 5th time I've seen this shit, no little kids are taking a break from their LOL Surprise toys to conspire to hop on your ladydick Tommy boy.
Click to expand...

The scary fact is that he doesn't see that. That is.... illuminating and frightening. Granted I'm new to Tommy, but it's still very odd.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: dark_lob1111, Mad Asshatter, Vaganabanana and 6 others
yawning sneasel said:
You know, it isn't nice to tell people to kill themselves.

I see the point that toots is trying to get at here, but its a dumb fucking solution. Adults should have good enough judgement to say no to a kid. End of story. I do think that there should be leeway for a defense where a guy doesn't know a chicks age. If some girl is 15 and says she's over the AoC to a guy, then the dude should be able to get off if he can prove it. There is some precedence in the law related to intercourse and the information people base their decisions on whether they will fuck or not. if a person has HIV/AIDS then several states have laws against lying about it. In this situation, its the other side of the coin where people should have a duty to ask, not to inform. If a guy bangs a chick without getting to know her age, then he has to live with the risks.

I feel that I have dragged hit off-topic, but I am just trying to temper the mood here, enough with the kys bullshit, it gets old.
Click to expand...

I can sort of see his point too, but current regulations (state based age of consent plus age gap specifications) are fine as is. Honestly if an adult takes someone who's underage to bed then they probably know there's a risk, which dulls my sympathy for them if either the underage person in question or their parents decide to pursue charges. Some states allow a wide berth so that early to mid 20s people can date people in their late teens, and that's fine enough for a consensual relationship.

The specific context of a deviant hippie in his 60s (who diddled a 15-16 year old girl in his 30s) wanting Federal to go down to 16 and to allow for "emancipation" for younger people is just gross, though.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: dark_lob1111, TheSpinyShell, Hanamura and 5 others
Tom, you are also being branded a pedophile for your habit of mastrubating to images or videos of little girls.

The general public believes that people who mastrubate while viewing images of children have sexual feelings toward children.

Most young guys who unknowingly fuck a girl a year or two under 18 don't want to have sex with children. But old men who mastrubate to images of children do so because they want to fuck children. These people are called pedophiles.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Asshatter, Hanamura, DirkBloodStormKing and 8 others
Marco Fucko said:
I can sort of see his point too, but current regulations (state based age of consent plus age gap specifications) are fine as is. Honestly if an adult takes someone who's underage to bed then they probably know there's a risk, which dulls my sympathy for them if either the underage person in question or their parents decide to pursue charges. Some states allow a wide berth so that early to mid 20s people can date people in their late teens, and that's fine enough for a consensual relationship.

The specific context of a deviant hippie in his 60s (who diddled a 15-16 year old girl in his 30s) wanting Federal to go down to 16 and to allow for "emancipation" for younger people is just gross, though.
Click to expand...
If the argument came from someone with no interest in the subject, it would merely be a dumb argument. As I see it, the problems are:

1. Tommy has molested a child. He has expressed no remorse, nor does he acknowledge that what he did was wrong. It’s not even clear that the girl wanted it - the whole thing appears to have been under her mother’s and Tommy’s control. Whatever he may claim to be into now, he clearly does not have a problem with child molestation, and he does have a vested interest.

2. His primary aim in suggesting this law is the protection of innocent pedophiles who were unwittingly seduced by sexy 12-year-olds, which never happens. That this process would require extensive, resource-heavy psychological evaluation is of no concern. That no responsible parent would allow their child to apply for such a license (and a parent would need to be present during evaluation) is of no concern. The potential stigma among teenagers of having or not having a piece of paper saying you’re mature is of no concern. The fact that a test with a specific desired end goal can be cheated is of no concern.

Girls, in this scenario of his, are just mindless sex objects floating around free of family, friends or aspirations, only existing to please men. There’s no concern for their feelings beyond “If they want to bang, they should be allowed to.”

Note that not once has he suggested a similar process for boys to protect innocent unwittingly seduced women. Because he doesn’t want to bang them. Nor has he mentioned any of the other implications of having documentation saying you’re adult-level mature, such as on voting and employment, because all he cares about is the sexual aspect.

TL;DR, this argument would carry more weight if it came from someone who seemed to actually care about women and didn’t seem to have the welfare of pedophiles as his primary concern.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Hanamura, DirkBloodStormKing, The Telomerase Truth and 7 others
MasterDisaster said:
Almost sixteen? Since when is 13 almost 16?

I wish Tom liked his women how he likes his food; past it's prime and in a dumpster.
Click to expand...

Go back and look at the confessions video and figure out when he "landed in Venice Beach", then figure out his age when he got there. I'd have to dig it up, but he claimed to have lusted after her since she was 12 or something. I think the exact quote was something along the line of everyone in the neighborhood had noticed her "globes" since she was 12 or something. Then remember that the incident happened when he was 28. Also, for those of you privvy to her dox, look at her current age. I think Tom said she was 13-14 originally, which lines up with the timeline better than his "almost 16" narrative shift that happened after AMB started calling him out for being a pedo.

This is the modified narrative, IIRC: https://prnt.sc/m5cali

Note he claims here to have been lusting after a 15 year old for "15 months", so since she was 13.

It's also completely possible that Tom's brain is so fried that he didn't know the difference between 12 and 16 and didn't actually know he age beyond that she was "a minor" as he frequently admits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vaganabanana, DirkBloodStormKing and The Telomerase Truth
Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg said:
I'm just being falsely branded a pedophile because of a single contact with an underage female 35 years ago by intellectually dishonest assholes who can't refute my religious and political assertions, so they resort to character assassination.
Click to expand...
Nobody cares about your religious or political opinions. How many times does someone have sexual contact with a minor before they are labeled a pedophile? Also, would you hop in bed with a fifteen-year-old again given the opportunity? Disregard the fact that you say you aren't a horny old man. Let's pretend that you are, so would you do it? I'm assuming you would.
Nice User said:
I've got a better idea, how about we ship all the pedophile trannys off to their own little island so that they can't interact with any normal people?
Click to expand...
Let's just send them to this island
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/sto...ome-to-uncontacted-peoples-1393013-2018-11-21
Sentinelese211118.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: dark_lob1111, DukeOfNimonia, DirkBloodStormKing and 3 others
12 year old girls have no interest in seducing old men. They don't even want to talk about music and YouTube makeup tips with old men, which is basically the only thing their undeveloped child-brains are focused on at that age. They barely have time for Nice Grampa, let alone Creepy Grampa.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: dark_lob1111, Mad Asshatter, DirkBloodStormKing and 4 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back