2020-12-07 - Scott v. Moon Mk VI(?)

[AprilRains]

I do not have a JD but I have skills to represent myself.

You should consider your results more carefully before you claim expertise.

 

[Kosher Salt]

You should consider your results more carefully before you claim expertise.

Her skills include lying on her back, lying in her filings, and shitting out retard crotch goblins.

 

[HarveySperg41]

I predict Mel’s next attempt to catch Null will include a rocket sled, a tunnel painted on a wall and more frivolous filings.

 

[Scarlett Johansson]

I never said I lived in a hotel. I said I pay hotel taxes. When I've traveled over the years I've paid hotel taxes when I stay places.



My car is safe. That's what safe, so you best drop your hopes of seizing my car. Va law exempts $5,000 of personal property from judgment. And an additional $500/for each dependent. That's an additional $3,000 for me.

My one car that I own is valued at $1,500. You can't touch it.



So I guess Moon has no one to blame but himself for his attorney fees.

If he thought I had no case he would have just not responded to the lawsuit and let it run its course.

If he was smart, and not a high school drop out dummy, he could have filed pro-se himself to overturn the Default and dismiss the case if he thought my suit was such gibberish. But he can barely read and write so obviously he had to hire someone with more education. He has no one to blame but himself for his educational deficiencies.
Instead of running a junkie site he could have invested his time and energy into getting an education and learn how to file his own court documents

Junkie site. Lmaoooo I love this description
We truly are the skid row of the interwebs.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You should consider your results more carefully before you claim expertise.

I never claimed to be an expert. But for a pro-se litigant, I've done extremely well. There's dozens of skills I've already demonstrated getting this far in federal court. In Federal Court I'm like at a B+(89%)/A- (90%). You have to be at a 97% or better to get a judgment in your favor.

In state court I have a 75% success rate. Not bad for a pro-se litigant.

Yet you fundamentally have more rights as a poor American than many in the world EVER will though.

That's not actually true. Other countries gave women the right to vote before the USA (Russia for example). Other countries have had women Presidents, unlike the USA. Other countries have secured the rights to recreational marijuana use, ND and home birth at a federal level than the USA. Holland pays for nurses through health insurance for postpartum mothes. Other countries have also banned GMO food and have a higher average household income rate than the USA (for example, Saudi Arabia whose average household income rate is twice the USA).

It's a myth that the USA grants more freedoms than anywhere else in the world.

And lets not forget, for perspective, because some people are new to your specific feud with the farms, that this all started because Null thought it might be worth it to inform you of the probably illegal actions of that idiot stalker, and you overreacted.

You're trying to invalidate and gaslight me. But you're also incorrect to say that that is why this all started.

ND

*NDs

mothes

*mothers

than the USA.

*while the USA has not

 

[Kosher Salt]

In Federal Court I'm like at a B+(89%)/A- (90%). You have to be at a 97% or better to get a judgment in your favor.

Needless to say that is not how it works. You need to be technically competent, and have a valid case... both.

 

[HarveySperg41]

@TamarYaelBatYah as a child did you repeatedly try to put metal objects in electrical outlets? What was the outcome after you did it?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

But for a pro-se litigant, I've done extremely well.

"This is Scott's eighth pro se case filed in this court within the last two years. All of them have been dismissed." - Judge Jones 2018
"This is not the plaintiff’s first suit against WCDSS. Most recently, in 2017, I dismissed the plaintiff’s action against WCDSS for failing to state a claim against it. " - Judge Jones 2020.

Also, you can watch Nick explain why your filings suck here:

 

[Hungerdunger]

That's not actually true. Other countries gave women the right to vote before the USA (Russia for example). Other countries have had women Presidents, unlike the USA. Other countries have secured the rights to recreational marijuana use, ND and home birth at a federal level than the USA. Holland pays for nurses through health insurance for postpartum mothes. Other countries have also banned GMO food and have a higher average household income rate than the USA (for example, Saudi Arabia whose average household income rate is twice the USA).

It's a myth that the USA grants more freedoms than anywhere else in the world.

The handful of points you make do not invalidate what I said. Russia is a poor example of rights, overall. And Saudi Arabia? Hardly a feminist utopia, and not big on religious freedoms. We can all cherry pick, but it doesn't change the tree.

And it IS a myth that the USA has more freedoms than anywhere else in the world, which is why I never claimed as much. Your world view seems limited. I wouldn't be surprised if, like many Americans, you've never even gone abroad.

 

[HarveySperg41]

The handful of points you make do not invalidate what I said. Russia is a poor example of rights, overall. And Saudi Arabia? Hardly a feminist utopia, and not big on religious freedoms. We can all cherry pick, but it doesn't change the tree.

And it IS a myth that the USA has more freedoms than anywhere else in the world, which is why I never claimed as much. Your world view seems limited. I wouldn't be surprised if, like many Americans, you've never even gone abroad.

If she has ever scuttled more than 100 miles from her shack I would be surprised.

 

[AprilRains]

I never claimed to be an expert. But for a pro-se litigant, I've done extremely well.

You are batting .000 in this case, but you keep stepping up to the plate and whiffing it again.

You are a stupid, vexatious, and unsuccessful litigant against Josh, and you have no standing at all to mock him for getting a lawyer to deal with your stupidity.

You are a laughingstock and a failure.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

"This is Scott's eighth pro se case filed in this court within the last two years. All of them have been dismissed." - Judge Jones 2018
"This is not the plaintiff’s first suit against WCDSS. Most recently, in 2017, I dismissed the plaintiff’s action against WCDSS for failing to state a claim against it. " - Judge Jones 2020.

Also, you can watch Nick explain why your filings suck here:

Rekeita has been wrong about many things in his show. He does what many lawyers do: "color of law" -- because the common public isn't informed enough to catch their errors. I see through a lot of what he says.

Rekeita's show has no inherent good value. It's just a way for him to garner narcissistic supply. I have better things to do with my time.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You are batting .000 in this case, but you keep stepping up to the plate and whiffing it again.

You are a stupid, vexatious, and unsuccessful litigant against Josh, and you have no standing at all to mock him for getting a lawyer to deal with your stupidity.

You are a laughingstock and a failure.

You don't "bat" in a lawsuit, that's a moronic notion.

Obviously if my prior 2 cases were dismissed "without prejudice" I got somewhere.

I can completely mock Joshua Moon who is too illiterate to even file his own paperwork.

 

[HarveySperg41]

You don't "bat" in a lawsuit, that's a moronic notion.

Obviously if my prior 2 cases were dismissed "without prejudice" I got somewhere.

I can completely mock Joshua Moon who is too illiterate to even file his own paperwork.

It’s a metaphor you stupid whole. Go you are so dumb. “I’ve done pretty good for myself” no you haven’t, you’ve failed at every step. You are a real life version of Willie Coyote. I look forward to your next mishap with the ACME catapult.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Rekeita has been wrong about many things in his show

Such as?

I see through a lot of what he says.

So your lawsuit won't be dismissed for the reasons he gave?

Also imagine thinking you know law better than a lawyer when the judge pretty much confirms that you are a constant loser(weirdly, you didn't address that part)

Obviously if my prior 2 cases were dismissed "without prejudice" I got somewhere.

You still lost. Prejudice or no, losing on the same day you file your suit is bad, no matter how you spin it.

I can completely mock

Yes, that is indeed your 1st amendment right.

Joshua Moon who is too illiterate to even file his own paperwork

Or he decided to hire a professional to do the work. Something even you said was a smart idea

 

[Spectre_06]

I never claimed to be an expert. But for a pro-se litigant, I've done extremely well. There's dozens of skills I've already demonstrated getting this far in federal court. In Federal Court I'm like at a B+(89%)/A- (90%). You have to be at a 97% or better to get a judgment in your favor.

if this is what you think is "doing extremely well" when literally everything you've filed of note has been put down like a girl born in China, I'd hate to see what you think bad is.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Also imagine thinking you know law better than a lawyer when the judge pretty much confirms that you are a constant loser(weirdly, you didn't address that part)

Judges do the same thing to the common public: they proceed under "color of law". I've seen it multiple times in courtrooms because people are not informed of the law or their rights.

Sometimes the judge innocently doesn't actually know the law, sometimes they are intentionally gaslighting people, and sometimes they are being downright malicious to someone. I've seen it all the time sitting in the back row.

Three times I've had to bring the law to the judge's attention in my case. Each time the judge pulled out a book or looked up the code because they didn't know. True story. This is not to take a dig at Judges who innocently have overlooked case law or code.

What is written on paper is the ideal. What actually happens in courtrooms is another matter.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

if this is what you think is "doing extremely well" when literally everything you've filed of note has been put down like a girl born in China, I'd hate to see what you think bad is.

Like I said, there's dozens of skills you have to know just to get this far! Shall I name them for you?

 

[teriyakiburns]

Like I said, there's dozens of skills you have to know just to get this far! Shall I name them for you?

lying on your back and mashing a typewriter with your fists aren't skills

 

[Spectre_06]

Like I said, there's dozens of skills you have to know just to get this far! Shall I name them for you?

Sure, name them. And then I'll name all of them that apply to you.