2020-12-07 - Scott v. Moon Mk VI(?)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
TamarYaelBatYah said:
You don't "bat" in a lawsuit, that's a moronic notion.

Obviously if my prior 2 cases were dismissed "without prejudice" I got somewhere.

I can completely mock Joshua Moon who is too illiterate to even file his own paperwork.
Click to expand...
Others have pointed out your utter stupidity in failing to grasp a simple figure of speech, so I'll stick with this: When every single thing you file in a lawsuit fails, it's time to consider you're making a mistake. But far be it from you to learn from experience.

Dismissal without prejudice just means they didn't bother to enjoin you from trying again. It doesn't mean you're making any headway at all. And what will be your excuse when your suit is dismissed with prejudice? Some "color of law" bullshit again?

Mock whoever you like, but it works better when you're actually winning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Shaka Brah and Useful_Mistake
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Judges do the same thing to the common public: they proceed under "color of law".
Click to expand...
Why do you assume maliciousness in all things?
TamarYaelBatYah said:
I've seen it multiple times in courtrooms because people are not informed of the law or their rights.
Click to expand...
That's why you hire a lawyer, who informs you of your rights and possible actions you can take.
TamarYaelBatYah said:
, sometimes they are intentionally gaslighting people, and sometimes they are being downright malicious to someone. I've seen it all the time sitting in the back row.
Click to expand...
While, yes, maliciousness does happen, but we've seen your definition of "gasslighting". Knowing that, I assume the judge was just speaking facts

TamarYaelBatYah said:
Sometimes the judge innocently doesn't actually know the law. Three times I've had to bring the law to the judge's attention in my case. Each time the judge pulled out a book or looked up the code because they didn't know. True story. This is not to take a dig at Judges who innocently have overlooked case law or code.
Click to expand...
Well, yes, a judge doesn't remember all law that exists. Unlike lawyers who focus on a certain field, judges make decisions on all topics. That's why both parties show relavant law in the documents. Naturally, the judge will double check all that.
TamarYaelBatYah said:
What is written on paper is the ideal. What actually happens in courtrooms is another matter.
Click to expand...
If a judge fails to uphold law, appeal. If you lost the appeal, you might start to realise that perhaps your work is simply bad. Not saying you can't get to the SCOTUS, or state supreme court, but the numbers aren't in your favor.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Anne Hyroe and AprilRains
Hungerdunger said:
And it IS a myth that the USA has more freedoms than anywhere else in the world, which is why I never claimed as much. Your world view seems limited. I wouldn't be surprised if, like many Americans, you've never even gone abroad.
Click to expand...
It depends on which specific rights you mean. Frankly, for the rights I care most about, we really are the best in the world, specifically the rights protected under the First and Second Amendments. There are countries where access specifically to guns is easier, but in many of these cases it's because they're shitholes with nonfunctioning governments so there just isn't anyone to stop you.

I'd rate us fairly poorly on economic disparities but the fix would involve some sacrifice in economic liberties specifically. I can certainly think of some policies in other countries I'd adopt here, but I can't think of a single country where I'd swap the entirety of their liberties for the entirety of ours.

Ironically, we are actually not the best on specifically freedom of the press, but to be honest I couldn't give a fuck less about the press at this point. I care about my own personal freedom of speech and that's in pretty good shape.

MuuMuu Bunnylips said:
Also she's a stupid-face!
Click to expand...
She is fat and her kids are ugly retards with head lice.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Troon Carey, Botchy Galoop, Slimy Time and 14 others
Useful_Mistake said:
New docs here (at the end of the post).

Tldr: Mr. Hardin filed an Opposition to the Motion to Recuse.
Click to expand...
Interesting that Null would even bother to oppose the motion, as it's a hundred percent guaranteed to be denied whether or not he opposed it.

I can only assume he sees it as another opportunity to remind the court that she's a vexatious litigant and needs to be sanctioned, and therefore a justifiable use of his money.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: artilleryfroth, Botchy Galoop, Useful_Mistake and 1 other person
Kosher Salt said:
Interesting that Null would even bother to oppose the motion, as it's a hundred percent guaranteed to be denied whether or not he opposed it.

I can only assume he sees it as another opportunity to remind the court that she's a vexatious litigant and needs to be sanctioned, and therefore a justifiable use of his money.
Click to expand...
She's really going out of her way to make sure the judge knows she is a vexatious, retarded lunatic who is wasting everyone's time, including the court's.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Lilly Philly Burnelli, Slimy Time, Kosher Salt and 2 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
I never claimed to be an expert. But for a pro-se litigant, I've done extremely well. There's dozens of skills I've already demonstrated getting this far in federal court. In Federal Court I'm like at a B+(89%)/A- (90%). You have to be at a 97% or better to get a judgment in your favor.

In state court I have a 75% success rate. Not bad for a pro-se litigant.


That's not actually true. Other countries gave women the right to vote before the USA (Russia for example). Other countries have had women Presidents, unlike the USA. Other countries have secured the rights to recreational marijuana use, ND and home birth at a federal level than the USA. Holland pays for nurses through health insurance for postpartum mothes. Other countries have also banned GMO food and have a higher average household income rate than the USA (for example, Saudi Arabia whose average household income rate is twice the USA).

It's a myth that the USA grants more freedoms than anywhere else in the world.





You're trying to invalidate and gaslight me. But you're also incorrect to say that that is why this all started.


*NDs

*mothers


*while the USA has not
Click to expand...
Hello, and greetings.

I see you listed a bunch of skills, or at least alluded to them. Have you learned the skill of just calling it a day and moving on with your life?
 
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: Ralph Barnhardt, Slimy Time, AprilRains and 3 others
Kosher Salt said:
Interesting that Null would even bother to oppose the motion, as it's a hundred percent guaranteed to be denied whether or not he opposed it.

I can only assume he sees it as another opportunity to remind the court that she's a vexatious litigant and needs to be sanctioned, and therefore a justifiable use of his money.
Click to expand...

She won't be able to resist filing another unhinged reply as a result of this motion, further demonstrating that she needs to be banned from filing further IFP actions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Kosher Salt said:
Interesting that Null would even bother to oppose the motion, as it's a hundred percent guaranteed to be denied whether or not he opposed it.

I can only assume he sees it as another opportunity to remind the court that she's a vexatious litigant and needs to be sanctioned, and therefore a justifiable use of his money.
Click to expand...
"I lu' you, Judge! Judge, I would never ask you to recu'e yoursel'. Cuz I ju' lu' you so much! 💋💋"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back