2020 Oscars Discussion - complain about how Uncut Gems nor the Lighthouse weren't nominated here

What a load of bullshit, it's insane that someone would really believe that.

Is this someone you know personally? Tell them that they are no different from a brainwashed Scientologist or FLDS member and they need to pop their head out of their ass.

This is a family member, so all I could really do is ask them why, if that was true, the left had to make completely false claims about the contents of the film. No response.

My thirstiness aside, she really is a very talented actress, I actually loved the movie Ladybird.

I'm resistant to seeing it because I'm apparently supposed to love it because muh female directors. But I've heard it's good .
 
I'm resistant to seeing it because I'm apparently supposed to love it because muh female directors. But I've heard it's good .

I watched it because I wanted to see how it depicted 2002 and 2003, the novelty of an early 2000s period piece was really intriguing to me.

And I was actually very impressed with how it captured the time period, like really impressed, it didn't do what a lesser movie does when depicting a certain time, the soundtrack wasn't hit songs of the era, people weren't using whatever cutting edge tech was available at the time and the fashions weren't simply taken from commercials (think Adam Sandler's The Wedding Singer as the worst example of that sort of thing)

Instead Ladybird and her mom are listening to an audiobook on cassette tapes, nobody has an ipod, nobody I knew in 2002 had one, she doesn't have a 2002 era imac but some shitty old computer because her family is poor, your average people didn't have Apple stuff in 2002 like they do today.

And Ladybird doesn't dress like a stereotypical teen of the era, the walls of her room aren't littered with posters of popular bands at the time, it all feels more real, like you're really looking back at the early 2000s, not a commercial idea of it.

And I was VERY impressed with how the movie handled the fact that it was the post 9/11 era and the start of the Iraq war, none of that has anything directly to do with the story of the movie, but it would feel dishonest to make a movie about that time period and not in some way address what was going on, to just ignore it, but Ladybird does it in a very clever and subtle way, at the start of the movie you see her class commemorating the 1 year anniversary of 9/11 and there's a couple of scenes where she's watching news about the Iraq war on TV, before turning it off and going about her teenage life.

And that right there was really kind of mind blowing because that's how it was for me, you'd see stuff about it on TV, but quickly just kinda shrug it off and focus on your life, those scenes really capture what life was like back then.

But beyond the period setting it was simply a good movie, I don't care that it was a woman who directed it, it was a good movie.
 
Saoirse Ronan is such an odd case for me because when it comes to women I like them to have a little more going in the chest department, you know? So she has a pretty meh body, but her face! If I was banging her I could definitely get off just by staring into her hypnotic eyes.

My thirstiness aside, she really is a very talented actress, I actually loved the movie Ladybird.

I think you can judge how good an actor is by the way they save a potentially terrible movie. Hanna is a ridiculous film about a teenage girl trained as an assassin but Ronan gave her this genuinely creepy intense vibe that made the film work.

Better than Ladybird is Brooklyn, about a young Irish girl immigrating to 50's New York, that's the antithesis of the picture woke activists try to paint of women in that time and place.

Yet feminists will alway try to pretend that actresses like Emma Watson are somehow the ideal. Despite the fact she's never turned in a noteworthy performance in any film.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: frozenrunner
I think you can judge how good an actor is by the way they save a potentially terrible movie. Hanna is a ridiculous film about a teenage girl trained as an assassin but Ronan gave her this genuinely creepy intense vibe that made the film work.

Better than Ladybird is Brooklyn, about a young Irish girl immigrating to 50's New York, that's the antithesis of the picture woke activists try to paint of women in that time and place.

Yet feminists will alway try to pretend that actresses like Emma Watson are somehow the ideal. Despite the fact she's never turned in a noteworthy performance in any film.

Another movie she elevated and this might have been the first thing I saw her in, was The Lovely Bones, which some might say was too schmaltzy, but it's one of the few movies to make me cry in the theater.

I was being smart alecky, the truth is she is a stunningly beautiful woman and a very talented actress.
 
I still hope parasite pulls an upset but it won't lbr

Academy has lots of weird choices:

Rami Malek, Casey Affleck, Gary Oldman, Colin Firth, and Matthew McConaughey winning Best Actor

Isabelle Huppert losing Best Actress to Emma Stone

Gwyneth Paltrow winning best actress over literally everyone else

Crash, Green Book, and Shakespeare in Love winning best picture

The Warren/Faye debacle

Kate Winslet winning for The Reader

Beatrice Straight winning for a 5 minute performance

Michelle Pfeiffer, Glenn Close, Isabelle Huppert, and Amy Adams having no Oscars at all
 
Last edited:
I watched The Irishman on Netflix and really liked it. Generally I don't like mob movies much but I figured I'd give it a whirl. I really loved Al Pacino as Jimmy Hoffa. You could devise a drinking game based on how many times he says "cocksucker". :lol:

I knew Hoffa was gonna get whacked. But I was sad to see him go. He was best character.

My only beef is that it's three and a half hours long. I had to break it up into two nights like a weakling. I think it could have used some editing here and there. But it was not nearly as bad as the desperately needed chop job A.I. could have used. What the hell were they thinking? :cringe:

Also, I have never heard of Jojo Rabbit. A lot of times stuff is nominated that I have never heard of. Are these big movies or just something the Academy really likes?
 
I still hope parasite pulls an upset but it won't lbr

Academy has lots of weird choices:

Rami Malek, Casey Affleck, Gary Oldman, Colin Firth, and Matthew McConaughey winning Best Actor

Isabelle Huppert losing Best Actress to Emma Stone

Gwyneth Paltrow winning best actress over literally everyone else

Crash, Green Book, and Shakespeare in Love winning best picture

The Warren/Faye debacle

Kate Winslet winning for The Reader

Beatrice Straight winning for a 5 minute performance

Michelle Pfeiffer, Glenn Close, Isabelle Huppert, and Amy Adams having no Oscars at all

The sad thing is that it's really, REALLY rare that a French actor or actress will win an Oscar (Simone Signoret, Jean Dujardin and Marion Cotillard being the exception, Claudette Colbert doesn't really count because her being French didn't really impact her star persona, and Juliette Binoche won for Supporting AND it was in an English-language film). Emmanuelle Riva should have won the year JLaw got her Oscar, Catherine Deneuve and Isabelle Adjani were nominated but never won while they're two of the greatest actresses to have ever lived, and you got big names like Yves Montand or Jeanne Moreau (who was called the greatest actress in the world by no other than Orson Welles) who were never even nominated.
 
Saw 1917 today. It blew my fucking mind. Another film from this year that I will be perfectly happy for if it wins Best Picture.

Agreed. I obviously would prefer Joker to win but I wouldn't feel too terrible if they gave it to 1917.
 
Knives Out was funny, had great acting, and some excellent twists, but the ham-fisted shoving of politics into it was annoying and I'm glad it's not up for Best Picture.

1917 was great, and deserves whatever awards it gets. The cinematography, the acting, the music, the emotion- I loved it, and I hope it does well. Or at least better than Little Women, since I'm at my last straw with self-righteous feminists throwing bitch-fits over the fact that no women (i.e. Greta Gerwig) didn't get nominated for Best Director.

For the same reason, I hope Joker comes away with some stuff too. Decent movie, and boy will those tears be sweet.
 
Knives Out was funny, had great acting, and some excellent twists, but the ham-fisted shoving of politics into it was annoying and I'm glad it's not up for Best Picture.

1917 was great, and deserves whatever awards it gets. The cinematography, the acting, the music, the emotion- I loved it, and I hope it does well. Or at least better than Little Women, since I'm at my last straw with self-righteous feminists throwing bitch-fits over the fact that no women (i.e. Greta Gerwig) didn't get nominated for Best Director.

For the same reason, I hope Joker comes away with some stuff too. Decent movie, and boy will those tears be sweet.

The irony is that while I loved Little Women, I don't really see why it'd get a Director nom apart from "IT'S A WHAMEN", because there wasn't anything particularly mind-blowing on a directorial level. If any female director deserves to be nominated this season, it should be Céline Sciamma, but France screwed her and Portrait of a Lady on Fire for Les Misérables, so...
 
I hope Brad Pitt wins because it would piss off so many viewers.
LOL, why is the actress for Harriet nominated? Was it that good?
 
Toy Story 4 won Best Animated Feature

Hair Love won Best Animated Short
 
Back