Approved 2024-07-25 - Stebbins: DMCA via Gimp Slave

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Do we intervene?

  • WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!

    Votes: 819 37.3%
  • nah

    Votes: 1,377 62.7%

  • Total voters
    2,196
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
We have the option to sue Stebbins. Kind of. We would be an intervener in the case and we would be raising similar arguments that this is a retarded settlement and it's now directly impacting us.
Don't do it.

Getting between two retards only ensures you are surrounded by retards.

Jones sent you a DMCA takedown request on behalf of faggot-thorn... so what? Maybe I don't understand . If it's a legit request, what do you care?

Also there's nothing in that settlement about indentured servitude (and although I agree with you), I doubt the judge will see it your way.

Especially if you go on the offensive.

You know that Stebbins will argue that he and Jones are just freely contracting together.

You have no guarantee that Jones will even take your side! Jones and Stebbins together might start opposing your motions! You are dealing with two idiots.

What is your win condition? What is Stebbins? Who has more to lose?

If it's not directly affecting you then stay out of it. lolcows have a way of sucking people into their gravity wells.

You've got enough to worry about besides this fat retard sending a few DMCAs-by-proxy for his shitty content that no one cares about.
 
Bro he literally asked for input. Are you retarded?
It’s really not that deep, read more carefully if you missed the point. That’s not about people donating. That’s not about people giving feedback on this particular question either. It’s about people who shit up every thread in which the donations to the legal fund are mentioned, acting like they have some sort of power or say over things they clearly don’t. They donated to a legal fund, the transaction is over. It doesn’t magically give them a say in how the site is run, or the other garbage they keep lording around all because they gave a donation to a fundraiser. I was tired last night & done with seeing some idiots yet again acting like they have bought some power & are owed obligation.
 
I am retarded and not in the loop, can someone spoonfeed me an explanation or point me in a direction so I can understand this? Please?
As an aside while I am ignorant of the true extent of this, if fighting this and winning means some crybully can stop harassing Dear Feeder I say go for it.
Clash of the retards!
 
Not an expert on any of this, but just looking at the situation: 3 lawsuits ongoing, and the fact that you're talking about voluntarily initiating yourself instead of entering litigation when its unavoidable and necessary... I don't think it would be wise to spread yourself so thin here and bring in another thing* to worry about and spend time and money on. If there were zero ongoing lawsuits then I'd change that to a maybe, but still lean towards no. Just seems like its going to add to your work, stress, and drain cash reserves for something that it could be saved up for at a more important time.
 
The litigation fund is a general purpose war chest, not purely for defense. If a competent lawyer thinks (a big if) this action has a chance of burdening the gobbler or otherwise deterring his nuisance lawfare within a reasonable cost, I say go for it.

Spreading yourself too thin is a concern, of course, but the money is there to be used in legal actions that benefit the Farms. And if my recollection is correct the current fund amount is capped only because the crowdfunding site didn't want to have more payout liability, not because there weren't more contributions ready to come in. I'd happily chip in another $50-100 if the current fund is depleted, and I doubt I'm alone.
 
I’m a neutral, independent, non-aligned, fence-sitter something or other. Idk people hate neutral niggas and they’re not wrong.

Morally, it’s only just that you assist a fellow autist stuck with indentured servitude at the hands of a vexatious litigant.

Practically, you run the risk of becoming Ethan Klein haemorrhaging the funds from FUPA (remember that?).

If you have an obligation to respond to the DMCA notice, I’d probably just respond in the most ethical means you can without kneecapping yourself.

As others said: we have three other lawsuits against the Farms. Your cons visually outweigh the pros as listed on the OP of this thread. Overextending yourself this soon will bite you in the ass
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pee Cola
I get it. Slapping this vexatious fat retard in the face with lawfare would be cathartic and righteous. However, you're already engaged in enough legal battles, adding another one would just be another drain of resources, which could leave you in a tight spot later down the line.

Sure you might be able to get another fundraiser going to replenish the account but it would be better to save that call to financial arms for a more pivotal moment.
 
Didn't one of the big companies against whom Acerthorn filed decide to act as an intervenor after he dropped them from his litigation?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: 306h4Ge5eJUJ
1722026299887.png
 
Jarrod is obligated to send DMCA takedown notices on Stebbins's behalf

I do not understand this at all. So a dude is court ordered to send legal notices on some other dude's behalf? That can't be an actual thing.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WonderWino
Jarrod is obligated to send DMCA takedown notices on Stebbins's behalf

I do not understand this at all. So a dude is court ordered to send legal notices on some other dude's behalf? That can't be an actual thing.
Only for this one post Jerrod himself made, I believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xev
Whether you folks like it or not Mr Stebbins aka the gobbler, the were-tureky, Mr Stabby, that annoying fat fuck, the retarded father stabber, Mr lolsuits, will not stop until he's stopped.

This ain't about Jones, Jones is a retard, but Null will have to crush Mr Stabby sooner or later as the fat fuck will not stop launching lolsuits at the Farms until he's declared vexatious yet again.

1. He's got nothing to do in life, no friends, no family, no job, no income. Just lolsuits for trillions of dollars.
2. It's his way of striking back at a world that despises him and won't recognize his genius.
3. It's his get rich quik scheme otherwise he's left eating raw hotdogs in a cockroach filled crack shack for the rest of his life.

Null will have to deal with David E Stebbins sooner or later so might as well get the ball rolling.

He's already prepping a defamation suit FYI for this very thread. Anyone voting no doesn't see the forest for the tree's. Time to let Hardin get to work on yet another pro se litigant determined to waste Null's time and money.
 
I think there are bigger fish to fry with that legal fund which may prove more useful in time.
Liz Fong-Jones, who is a degenerate and a rapist that keeps tabs on any post with his name in it, still hasn't had his eyes rot out completely and is thus still a threat. If he discovers some new way to attack the Farms and a legal response is required, I would feel happier and safer knowing that his retardation will not stop my sneeding even slightly.
 
I believe not being involved is off the table now, as Stebbins already requested a retraction of statements made in the OP.

Yup

Jersh has got yet another stupid, pointless, money sucking lolsuit on his hands

The system is fucking broken. Where useless pieces of shit like David A Stebbins can just file pointless suit after suit after suit each costing him nothing but costing Null money to fight off.

Unleash Hardin Null, see if you can't counter sue or something to crush this vexatious father stabber.

Stabby won't stop. I think in the end he will eat up more of the legal fund then any of the other suits just because this is what he does for fun and profit. He files frivolous lawsuit after frivolous suit after frivolous suit.

Your gonna have to deal with him Jersh, might as well start now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back