Approved 2024-07-25 - Stebbins: DMCA via Gimp Slave

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Do we intervene?

  • WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!

    Votes: 819 37.3%
  • nah

    Votes: 1,377 62.7%

  • Total voters
    2,196
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
He would just file spurious litigation.
He can do that anyway. Fulfill the site's obligations under the not-DMCA and wash your hands of it.
Do people not remember that none of the DMCA shit from Greer was valid? Same with Melinda...
Check the join date. I only registered because the shoe0nhead n00dz leak (RIP) required it at the time.
I do not pay very much attention to this place, as the drama for which it is most notorious sounds painfully uninteresting to me. I literally stopped coming here for over a year because during the period where the farms were taken down I realized that I wasn't missing not knowing the latest drama on the couple of attention whores I do find... less painfully uninteresting... and didn't bother seeing if it ever came back up.
Funnily enough, the thing that brought me back was seeing it mentioned in a DMCA and figuring the URL was probably good.
 
Last edited:
The title was not the sole source of his commentary. Akilah's video was over 10 minutes and he edited that down to under 2. Sargon prevailed because of the title + editing + his video wasn't a replacement for Akilah's. No one wanting to watch Akilah and her content would go to Sargon's channel and find that video an acceptable substitute for hers.

The post in question on the farms appears to have copied the entirety of a livestream in the typical archive everything approach. This is the extent of the commentary, so you'd have to argue that the thread itself is doing the heavy lifting in regards to fair use. Did the poster really need to copy the entirely of the livestream, almost 70 minutes worth of material to comment on the cuts on his face?

This livestream is available on Acerthorn's channel as members only content that people have to pay to watch. The market for that video is non existant, Acerthorn reported he makes less than $50 per month from YouTube, but the copy on the farms acts as a replacement.

Even if you had a bunch of money to burn and wanted to test the limits of fair use, I don't know if you pick a fight over this.
Yeah, you're probably right. The post was definitely less transformative than Sargon's video. I'm pretty sure Hardin would raise the exact same defense if things proceeded to a defensive litigation because Josh treated the post with as much reverence as the queen keffal's fart throne video. That and any litigation where KF is involved is always an uphill battle.

If anything, my take-away is we need to make sure to add as much critical commentary to any copyrighted lolcow work posted here. I think, at the end of the day, we agree that Josh should only fight the legal battles that are absolutely necessary. I'll just defer to Josh/Hardin on whether or not the juice of this particular legal battle is worth the squeeze.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TooManyKittens
As much as I would love to see Stabbin's shivved to death in the streets by a pack of melinated individuals... as others have said, you're already involved in multiple cases, and in a sense it rewards cow tipping.

But I also reaaaaaaalllly want to see this fucking cunt suffer. Vexacious Litigant status should just get you executed. Its figuratively speaking, a label saying outright "I get off on finacially ruining lives".
 
To let you know he doesn’t care
That bit was about why I do not remember the sites past/current legal issues.
I do miss the old school E/N forums, so I do like this place and wouldn't want to see it taken down again.

But I don't care enough to go digging through the site's old legal drama for my own entertainment because most of it seems to be mentally-ill-men-adjacent and I'm usually suffering from enough troon exhaustion from everywhere else on the internet.

edit: I'm going to cease shitting up the thread with this slap fight. I urge y'all to do the same.
 
THATS NOT WAHT J SAYEEEEED!!!!!
IMG_4933.jpeg
 
$150,000 in legal terms is the equivalent of an african american gentleman getting a free pack of newports, a 40, and 3 scratchers, huge to him but its gone before you know it if your not carefull. Perhaps later down the road when you start nice posting you will acquire funds from shadow investors and be able to take future ludicrous lawsuits involving indentured manservants
 
The legal fund should be narrow in scope in my opinion (as a donator but it’s no longer my money). The easiest and biggest wins against those who are silencing the farms. Becoming the better version of the EFF or other litigation funds just opens up misuse and distraction. Dude made his bed, I don’t see why we should bail him out of it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pee Cola
I voted yes. There is someone grossly abusing the court system in a very transparent way. They cannot keep getting away with this and it seems Josh and KF have been having a lot of good fortune with defending legal rights where the forum is concerned.

We cannot take on all the injustices we see in our lives, but the ones that we can, I believe that we should.
 
Last edited:
and not getting stuck in a forever case like Greer's.
It's a retarded case full are retarded people, are you prepared for the possibility that it could become just as retarded as Greer's?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back