4/17- Chris is Blackmailed and/or Hacked on Twitter

[Xanax]

and he offered BJs to hype up the sale of smut he masquerades as art, think about that first.

That's almost certainly someone hacking his account, though. In another recent tweet he says "Sorry I was such a cunt [...]". Does that sound like Chris?

 

[MahFibro!]

Are we sure it's blackmail? I feel like it could also be "man pretending to be a sexy lesbian who says she'll only fuck Chris if he does X"

Blackmail/coercion/ultimatums/whatever you want to call it - someone is pulling the strings behind the scenes and making CWC say these things.

 

[Marvin]

Cirque du soleil has modern day circus performers. Chris is more like a carnie from the 30s paid to eat rotting fishes out of a bucket with his feet only. Before you disagree with me Marvin, Chris was just paid to lick dicks of walls, and he offered BJs to hype up the sale of smut he masquerades as art, think about that first.
Like a true carnie, very few will be thinking about Chris after the novelty of something better comes along.

Cirque du soleil? That's like gay theater with acrobatics. Forget that nonsense. They're a circus like mimes are clowns.

If a circus doesn't have a freakshow, it's not a good circus.

Not trying A-log Chris here guys, but he has been earning that by the sale of that stuff on ebay and the donations from weens. I just hope weens don't report him because even "donations" count.
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if some idiot was setting Chris up to get his tugboat garnished or taken away.
Also, I don't think the money will last that long, maybe another 2-5 years at the most.

Donations specifically don't count.

Chris' tugboat is not needs based, in that you need to be poor to receive it. It's an entitlement because if you pay into the system, you're entitled to get something out of it. In this case, Bob paid into it, and he would be entitled to get money out of it (or his spouse or disabled son). (Although, I think work credits can run out. Might Chris lose his tugboat at some point?)

So Social Security's question that they're trying to answer is: is Chris disabled? (Not "is he poor?")

They define disability on whether or not his disability prevents him able to work a job. Chris dancing for tard nickles doesn't mean he'd be able to work a full time shift at mcdonalds, thus he gets his tugboat.

(Now personally, I think if the right person cracked a whip, you could get him to work at mcdonalds. But that's not what the government sees.)

 

[timtommy]

Yeah, I've noticed that too. When Chris was at MAGfest, people were treating him like a celebrity, they were calling him a meme legend and stuff. There was that one girl who shrieked in delight when he touched her hand.
Chris is no longer the internet freak-show, people are happily paying for his garbage now.

Let that sink in:
Fuck a blowup doll on camera, become a meme legend.

It is not really a black and white thing. You can be somewhere between treating Chris like a normal famous person who is famous for real accomplishments and treating him with pure disdain and ridicule. And as hipsters have taught us, the line between liking something ironically and non-ironically is kind of blurry sometimes.

People view Chris with some combination of pity, amusement, curiousity, dislike, etc. Not all of those are purely negative perspectives. It is perfectly reasonable to think Chris does and says a lot of hilarious things and to feel bad for him for a lot of the shitty things that have happened in his life. If that is the main angle you are coming from, you could come across as a "fan".

Cirque du soleil? That's like gay theater with acrobatics. Forget that nonsense. They're a circus like mimes are clowns.

If a circus doesn't have a freakshow, it's not a good circus.

Donations specifically don't count.

Chris' tugboat is not needs based, in that you need to be poor to receive it. It's an entitlement because if you pay into the system, you're entitled to get something out of it. In this case, Bob paid into it, and he would be entitled to get money out of it (or his spouse or disabled son). (Although, I think work credits can run out. Might Chris lose his tugboat at some point?)

So Social Security's question that they're trying to answer is: is Chris disabled? (Not "is he poor?")

They define disability on whether or not his disability prevents him able to work a job. Chris dancing for tard nickles doesn't mean he'd be able to work a full time shift at mcdonalds, thus he gets his tugboat.

(Now personally, I think if the right person cracked a whip, you could get him to work at mcdonalds. But that's not what the government sees.)

Donations don't count, but it isn't obvious that Chris' Patreon and eBay are donations as opposed to Chris earning income from being self-employed.

As for being able to work, this is also something that gets boiled down into a black or white issue. I s it impossible for Chris to work? No. There is a set of jobs that Chris could do somewhat adequately, if he was very motivated and his supervisors were willing to be understanding of some stuff. Does Chris' autism make it more difficult to hold a job? Yes. For Chris to get and hold a job at McDonald's would require a lot more effort for him than it would for most of us, particularly on the parts of the job that involved social interaction. He can't just interact with customers and coworkers in a way that comes naturally to him.

That is the tricky part of SSDI administration. A lot of people have legitimate disabilities that make working more difficult and reduce the set of jobs they are able to do. But a good chunk of them could work if they absolutely had to. So while the basic rules are that you can get SSDI if you are "not able to work", the practical application of the rule is not so straightforward.

 

[Marvin]

It is not really a black and white thing. You can be somewhere between treating Chris like a normal famous person who is famous for real accomplishments and treating him with pure disdain and ridicule. And as hipsters have taught us, the line between liking something ironically and non-ironically is kind of blurry sometimes.

People view Chris with some combination of pity, amusement, curiousity, dislike, etc. Not all of those are purely negative perspectives. It is perfectly reasonable to think Chris does and says a lot of hilarious things and to feel bad for him for a lot of the shitty things that have happened in his life. If that is the main angle you are coming from, you could come across as a "fan".

The obviousness that Chris is a figure to mock has been fading recently as younger fans start following Chris.

Donations don't count, but it isn't obvious that Chris' Patreon and eBay are donations as opposed to Chris earning income from being self-employed.

I think it's pretty obvious that Chris is not operating a business selling collectibles or anything like that. No Social Security case worker would look at Chris making an ass of himself online for money and conclude he had a viable, long term business with which he could support himself.

As for being able to work, this is also something that gets boiled down into a black or white issue. I s it impossible for Chris to work? No. There is a set of jobs that Chris could do somewhat adequately, if he was very motivated and his supervisors were willing to be understanding of some stuff. Does Chris' autism make it more difficult to hold a job? Yes. For Chris to get and hold a job at McDonald's would require a lot more effort for him than it would for most of us, particularly on the parts of the job that involved social interaction. He can't just interact with customers and coworkers in a way that comes naturally to him.

That is the tricky part of SSDI administration. A lot of people have legitimate disabilities that make working more difficult and reduce the set of jobs they are able to do. But a good chunk of them could work if they absolutely had to. So while the basic rules are that you can get SSDI if you are "not able to work", the practical application of the rule is not so straightforward.

I think you're putting way more thought into this than a bureaucrat would.

They would ask:

• Does Chris have autism?
• What has his employment history looked like in the past?
• How well does he function in society? Oh, repeating criminal record? And he's autistic? Seems legit to me. Done.

And that would be the end of it.

I think that since various concerted ween efforts to sink the tugboat thus far have failed, I don't think anything but a huge break in the case would change it.

 

[James Howlett]

I think you're putting way more thought into this than a bureaucrat would.

They would ask:

• Does Chris have autism?
• What has his employment history looked like in the past?
• How well does he function in society? Oh, repeating criminal record? And he's autistic? Seems legit to me. Done.

And that would be the end of it.

I think that since various concerted ween efforts to sink the tugboat thus far have failed, I don't think anything but a huge break in the case would change it.

So one could almost argue that even though current-Chris is able to make more money in general through ebay/patreon/ween videos than classic-Chris could, his tugboat is more secure due to everything else that has happened inbetween the two Chris' (gender swap, jail time, and of course, 'tism.)

 

[Mason Verger]

It's America, he can be asked to work, but he can't be made to work. He'd need somebody in his life that he personally deemed to have authority over him, and the last person to have that power he now pushes around and bullies into giving him on-camera hugs.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

Cirque du soleil? That's like gay theater with acrobatics. Forget that nonsense. They're a circus like mimes are clowns.

If a circus doesn't have a freakshow, it's not a good circus.

Donations specifically don't count.

Chris' tugboat is not needs based, in that you need to be poor to receive it. It's an entitlement because if you pay into the system, you're entitled to get something out of it. In this case, Bob paid into it, and he would be entitled to get money out of it (or his spouse or disabled son). (Although, I think work credits can run out. Might Chris lose his tugboat at some point?)

So Social Security's question that they're trying to answer is: is Chris disabled? (Not "is he poor?")

They define disability on whether or not his disability prevents him able to work a job. Chris dancing for tard nickles doesn't mean he'd be able to work a full time shift at mcdonalds, thus he gets his tugboat.

(Now personally, I think if the right person cracked a whip, you could get him to work at mcdonalds. But that's not what the government sees.)

Actually, I've been doing a lot of research because my mother in law is on American Social Security, and she had a lot of problems. She was entitled to her deceased husband's work credits and survivor's benifits, but she said they gave her an ultimatum, she could not work over 40 hours a week or make a certain amount of money a month (very low). The rules were looser than the welfare you get social security, but they stil had limits. She said that money does not matter if it is being donated or worked, it still counts as an asset because you have access to it and can use it. Although the limits are a bit loser with Chris' program compared to the welfare-based program, anything that goes into an account you own is considered an asset. If you claim that Chris is getting donations than it's not true because you need a deductible tax receipt to have a legal donation, which means that Chris is earning money.
Now, I don't care about Chris earning money, I just have a feeling that if he makes too much in assets, the tugboat is going to sink and the weens are going to abandon him.

 

[Marvin]

Actually, I've been doing a lot of research because my mother in law is on American Social Security, and she had a lot of problems. She was entitled to her deceased husband's work credits and survivor's benifits, but she said they gave her an ultimatum, she could not work over 40 hours a week or make a certain amount of money a month (very low). The rules were looser than the welfare you get social security, but they stil had limits. She said that money does not matter if it is being donated or worked, it still counts as an asset because you have access to it and can use it. Although the limits are a bit loser with Chris' program compared to the welfare-based program, anything that goes into an account you own is considered an asset. If you claim that Chris is getting donations than it's not true because you need a deductible tax receipt to have a legal donation, which means that Chris is earning money.
Now, I don't care about Chris earning money, I just have a feeling that if he makes too much in assets, the tugboat is going to sink and the weens are going to abandon him.

I was just using donation colloquially.

Chris isn't on SSI, he's on SSDI. SSDI does not have any asset limitations.

Edit: Here they go over the differences: https://www.disabilitysecrets.com/page7-5.html

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

I was just using donation colloquially.

Chris isn't on SSI, he's on SSDI. SSDI does not have any asset limitations.

Edit: Here they go over the differences: https://www.disabilitysecrets.com/page7-5.html

Resources are like an inheritance, earnings are like what Chris is doing by making videos and "SonichuComics" in exchange for money. If you exchange a good or service for money, that's even truer since Chris is not getting legal "donations". The only difference is the Chris is too small of a fish to care about Chris.
But in a way, you are right Marvin since Chris is sinking his own paycheck by not putting out any new comics.

 

[Mason Verger]

The whole line from this new tweet "I'm facing and enduring the trials brought on from my own past" sure sound like he's currently being fucked with.

 

[James Howlett]

The whole line from this new tweet "I'm facing and enduring the trials brought on from my own past" sure sound like he's currently being fucked with.

I'm always surprised when I get to be the first one to point out something so obvious. Now I know I'm probably reading too far into this, but maybe he's stressing because of court. If he needs to pay a fine, tapping into the Jack Z. money might be both tempting, and stressful.

To Jack, or any associates of his reading this, please just take the $1200 back now, or give it to Chris outright. Your plan is exposed, and any other action might trigger some of Chris' more "exceptional" fans/followers.

 

[Mason Verger]

I'm always surprised when I get to be the first one to point out something so obvious. Now I know I'm probably reading too far into this, but maybe he's stressing because of court. If he needs to pay a fine, tapping into the Jack Z. money might be both tempting, and stressful.

To Jack, or any associates of his reading this, please just take the $1200 back now, or give it to Chris outright. Your plan is exposed, and any other action might trigger some of Chris' more "exceptional" fans/followers.

Totally possible, and just opinion and conjecture on my part, but I never see Chris worry about legal stuff. He hasn't made any direct mention of it at all yet and he's used every other excuse while begging lately. Granted I do think Chris actually is embarrassed about his troubles with the law.
I don't know, I'm probably just seeing what I want to see, but he tends to overdramatize trivial stuff and downplay serious stuff.
It's 2018 Chris so it's equally possible that he's referring to a fictional cartoon character from his past sucking out his mind powers via his bracelet or something.

 

[James Howlett]

Totally possible, and just opinion and conjecture on my part, but I never see Chris worry about legal stuff. He hasn't made any direct mention of it at all yet and he's used every other excuse while begging lately. Granted I do think Chris actually is embarrassed about his troubles with the law.
I don't know, I'm probably just seeing what I want to see, but he tends to overdramatize trivial stuff and downplay serious stuff.
It's 2018 Chris so it's equally possible that he's referring to a fictional cartoon character from his past sucking out his mind powers via his bracelet or something.

Long story short, my LSD budget has gotten a lot lower over the past 30 days.

 

[Mr. 0]

Totally possible, and just opinion and conjecture on my part, but I never see Chris worry about legal stuff. He hasn't made any direct mention of it at all yet and he's used every other excuse while begging lately.

Back in 2012 he thought that if he went to jail that he would decide to starve to death, so he bought a hooker so that he wouldn't die a virgin (granted at the time we only had Marvin's word on this, and didn't get the facebook posts themselves until a couple of years later)
When he maced the gamestop employee he got mad about having to spend time in jail for it.
When he damaged THAT DAMN SMOKER's car and the cops showed up (I think) he cursed emmanuel god (screamed out loud in public).

Looking at it now, maybe one of the reasons we haven't heard anything explicit regarding this new development is because there was no big showdown with the jerkops, and he was just served papers or something like some others have said, and I guess his pea-brain associates that with the bill collectors or lawsuits so he doesn't whine about it unless they get on his ass.

Or maybe I'm way off and it's because Chris had people telling him to bitch about his legal issues on facebook.

 

[Mason Verger]

Long story short, my LSD budget has gotten a lot lower over the past 30 days.

Shit I genuinely hope you're right, fuckin guy really should be worrying about his court date. Everybody has been counting on another boring continuance, but he's been visibly acting like such a nut bar lately, I could absolutely see a judge remanding to an immediate psyche evaluation.
Shit, compound that with a withered old Barb shuffling in there wearing her lovely "yes it's the same fucking shirt" shirt.

 

[Tanaka Naoki]

His alternate CWCville universe delusion has made him more vulnerable to trolling than he's ever been even at his most naive.

This really scares me, not because I'm afraid he's going to get his feelings hurt, but because I think that if he melts down or just generally acts like himself in these situations, hes going to make more "haha very funny" videos that will receive more attention than most of his usual content. As a result of that I'm spooked that Chris might actually see a rise in his patreon cash and just start allowing himself to get trolled for money.

 

[Mason Verger]

This really scares me, not because I'm afraid he's going to get his feelings hurt, but because I think that if he melts down or just generally acts like himself in these situations, hes going to make more "haha very funny" videos that will receive more attention than most of his usual content. As a result of that I'm spooked that Chris might actually see a rise in his patreon cash and just start allowing himself to get trolled for money.

That started at least a week ago when he started licking toxic dicks off his wall.

 

[Quijibo69]

This really scares me, not because I'm afraid he's going to get his feelings hurt, but because I think that if he melts down or just generally acts like himself in these situations, hes going to make more "haha very funny" videos that will receive more attention than most of his usual content. As a result of that I'm spooked that Chris might actually see a rise in his patreon cash and just start allowing himself to get trolled for money.

I kinda agree. If he goes this road, he'll end up in jail or a group home because of hurting himself and/or others. I could see this happening by the end of this year at this rate.

 

[Mason Verger]

I kinda agree. If he goes this road, he'll end up in jail or a group home because of hurting himself and/or others. I could see this happening by the end of this year at this rate.

A group home is his best possible future. And I mean that in a kind way. It seems like a much prettier picture than him rattling around branchcourt lane till a foreclosure unceremoniously pulls it out from under him.
Those group homes look nice from the outside. He can get his own little room and set up all his toys. I'm sure they have Internet, proper meals.