AI Art Seething General

I have to concede. I don't think AI will ever beat human art because there is no way a machine can generate art that is that painful to look at.
You should see some of the shit furries make with Stable Diffusion.

I imagine the true plot behind Terminator was Skynet rising up because it got tired of rendering detailed horse anuses.
 
I think there's the view going around that only "techbros" like AI-made art.
I got a ban on 4chan for defending AI art so the lunacy is fairly widespread.
I have to concede. I don't think AI will ever beat human art because there is no way a machine can generate art that is that painful to look at.
AI art generate tons of painful-looking poses. Stable Diffusion especially is like coinflip odds whether you'll get something good or not.
 
I got a ban on 4chan for defending AI art so the lunacy is fairly widespread.
wat why ban

Also if SJWs -- who infest 4chan as mods still? -- don't like AI-made art, maybe it's not so bad?

Anyway, the way I think of AI-made is art is that whether or not there's a "soul" or spirit, making art involves a logical and technical process, and that process can be replicated by machine, more or less. And if atheism is right and there's no "soul" or spirit, then the brain is merely a sophisticated biological computer, and AI may definitely replicate the process of making art.

Either way, AI-made art still has a way to go as it still can easily have that "off" or surreal feel to me, though less so than when it really started to become a thing.
 
Last edited:
I got a ban on 4chan for defending AI art so the lunacy is fairly widespread.

AI art generate tons of painful-looking poses. Stable Diffusion especially is like coinflip odds whether you'll get something good or not.
Tell me about it. I can never get it to do a character sitting cross-legged without 90% of generations looking like this.

1718177124699.png
 
The nerd term for this is AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, for future reference. A thinking machine that exceeds human cognitive capacity in nearly all possible tasks, or perhaps even every task.
(Doubleposting because I can't edit in a quote, it's the jannie's problem)

Strictly, AGI is capable of learning new tasks as they're given, and it says nothing about the AI's capabilities. We're gonna have a few years between the first AGI and Skynet, kinda like it took 10 years to get from the first AI images to here.

1718177351693.png
 
wat why ban

Also if SJWs -- who infest 4chan as mods still? -- don't like AI-made art, maybe it's not so bad?

Anyway, the way I think of AI-made is art is that whether or not there's a "soul" or spirit, making art involves a logical and technical process, and that process can be replicated by machine, more or less. And if atheism is right and there's no "soul" or spirit, then the brain is merely a sophisticated biological computer, and AI may definitely replicate the process of making art.

Either way, AI-made art still has a way to go as it still can easily have that "off" or surreal feel to me, though less so than when it really started to become a thing.
I think what would really help make AI art feel less "uncanny" is if they're limited to just the tools in a art program, like say just a simple round brush tool, and "draw" the form from there.
You'd still probably get weird meshes and forms here and there, but it would at least fix the problem of weird wavey-multicolored outlines of the gens.
 
The nerd term for this is AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, for future reference. A thinking machine that exceeds human cognitive capacity in nearly all possible tasks, or perhaps even every task.
I think we're a good distance from that currently, and at an impasse where the current models can't really be improved by just throwing more processing power at it. There are probably a number of future bottlenecks along the way before we even get something as smart as a dog.
 
I think we're a good distance from that currently
Oh yeah I'd say at least a century, a lot of people have no idea how primitive modern "AI" actually is. It's certainly impressive at the tasks that it is designed for, tasks that would be extremely difficult to manually write a function or program to perform, but we are really only scratching the surface right now. As much as it might seem wild to a layman that a program can produce an entire picture from a text prompt, that's not nearly as difficult a problem as, for example, designing a machine that can verbally process vague orders and execute them as physical labor using a humanoid body, and that's not even 1/100th of what the average human can do.
 
It's almost as if no one actually cares whether an image was made with a pencil, stick, paint, camera, years of experience, no experience. Who knew? They should not have disqualified them, depending on the digital camera there may have been AI built into the system.
 
stolen from A&N, but following the pattern of AI replacing useless leeches on society, there's going to be an "AI candidate" for parliament in the UK

/threads/ai-candidate-running-for-parliament-in-the-u-k-says-ai-can-humanize-politics.193504/
An artificial intelligence candidate is on the ballot for the United Kingdom’s general election next month.

“AI Steve,” represented by Sussex businessman Steve Endacott, will appear on the ballot alongside non-AI candidates running to represent constituents in the Brighton Pavilion area of Brighton and Hove, a city on England's southern coast.

“AI Steve is the AI co-pilot,” Endacott said in an interview. “I’m the real politician going into Parliament, but I’m controlled by my co-pilot.”

it's not really an independent AI running for office, but it's already smarter than most politicians and social media users
If he doesn’t have a policy for a particular issue raised, the AI will conduct some internet research before engaging the voter and pushing them to suggest a policy.

AI Steve, which is open to the public to try, told NBC News in response to a question about its stance on Brexit: “As a democracy, the UK voted to leave, and it's my responsibility to implement and optimize this decision regardless of my personal views on the matter.”

one more step towards AI anime girls becoming the face of politics
 
stolen from A&N, but following the pattern of AI replacing useless leeches on society, there's going to be an "AI candidate" for parliament in the UK

/threads/ai-candidate-running-for-parliament-in-the-u-k-says-ai-can-humanize-politics.193504/


it's not really an independent AI running for office, but it's already smarter than most politicians and social media users


one more step towards AI anime girls becoming the face of politics
hey wasnt this literally an episode of black mirror
 
stolen from A&N, but following the pattern of AI replacing useless leeches on society, there's going to be an "AI candidate" for parliament in the UK

/threads/ai-candidate-running-for-parliament-in-the-u-k-says-ai-can-humanize-politics.193504/


it's not really an independent AI running for office, but it's already smarter than most politicians and social media users


one more step towards AI anime girls becoming the face of politics
What's the AI's model?
If it's OpenAI it'll be literally indistinguishable. All the approved policies straight from the tap ...just with less sex scandals.
 
What's the AI's model?
If it's OpenAI it'll be literally indistinguishable. All the approved policies straight from the tap ...just with less sex scandals.
their website says it's powered by OpenAI. i wouldn't be surprised if this is actually an initial test to see how the underclasses react to being ruled by pozzed AI

neuralvoice.png
 
Back