The practical utility is that it makes retards seethe just by the mere exist existence of it. And that alone is worth a million bucks.
AI Art Seething General
- Thread starter The Thinking Abacus
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2022
Unironically, this might be an amazing tool to help artists get a rough understanding of how the process of certain artstyles would be drawn if no styleguides for it exist.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
Somehow, I feel tha those who whine about how these fake timelapses make AI preps pretend tha their work is real also support anything that makes trannies pretend tha their 'chosen' gender is real, including fake periods and surrogacy.
Diesel Boogaloo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
Nah, while it looks nice, it's actually not that accurate.
Would be nice if there was a program to separate an image by layers tho
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2020
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2022
Later in the video, he claims to not care, if games are programmed by AI - as it's only the artist part of the team, that matters to the art of the final product.
This is a perfect contrast to the backend developer I met at a bar a month ago, who claimed that it doesn't matter if the textures and sprites were drawn by an artist or AI, as long as there's a human, overseeing the code, so it doesn't run like shit.
Everyone always just assumes their part is the irreplaceable one and the other teams are just there doing stuff a computer could easily do as well, or better
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2021
Can someone archive this? I'm not giving an Arloid video any engagement.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Software copyrights in general have always been imo bordering on bogus, because copyright is not supposed to protect ideas, but a specific expression of those ideas. In software (like Rust for instance) there is very often only one way to do something correctly. So there's no creativity in it, it's at best a discovery of the one way to do something.
If a deterministic process can generate the right way to do something, then how is it creative? Any other similar process will generate something substantially identical. In a more typically legal context, while theoretically a legal filing is copyrightable, in reality, anyone else trying to do the same thing will use the same rote language, or language that is substantially identical. You can't just prohibit other people from making the same legal argument you did, if it's the one that is correct.
I don't see how you can prohibit someone from creating the same software. Where's the creativity? What's identical and has market impact? The font? The names of variables?
I've always had a beef with software copyrights and, for that matter, even patents.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
I wish you time-stamped that because 90% of that video is unwatchable.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
Since I cannot edit day-old posts, I shall say to anyone reading these posts to skip to 5:54.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
He sounds severely retarded
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2024
The only noteworthy take from all of his ai webtroon videos is A.I. could be beneficial to artists, especially to these Korean artists considering they shit out chapters weekly with little to no break.
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2020
Anti-ai people really are something else
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2022
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2021
Appealing to utility is vain since you'd have to demonstrate how YOU have any utility to anyone too. Which is something we've seen artists struggle at.
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2022