AI development and Industry General - OpenAI, Bing, Character.ai, and more!

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I've been toying with the idea of starting a thread for this guy, who makes a new edgy Sonic bot every day. That being said, he's got a good enough grasp on opsec not to link his chub account to anything else, or (according to my cursory search) reuse his username. I feel like there's an amazing well of milk just out of reach, I don't suppose any of you guys can find an easy lead that I missed?


1711013778207.png
1711013848631.png
1711013880575.png
 
I've been toying with the idea of starting a thread for this guy, who makes a new edgy Sonic bot every day. That being said, he's got a good enough grasp on opsec not to link his chub account to anything else, or (according to my cursory search) reuse his username. I feel like there's an amazing well of milk just out of reach, I don't suppose any of you guys can find an easy lead that I missed?


View attachment 5836028
I believe he has an account on poe that goes under a different set of names. I didn't see them being used anywhere else at a casual glance, but I'm not an expert on this stuff. Honestly, for a lot of the people on Chub, it's either them outright linking everything together with shit like carrd, hanging out on a Discord, or being surprisingly cognizant enough to make a wholly original persona with no connections elsewhere. The community's funny like that. I guess you could try joining up on one of the Discords floating around and see if anybody might have details on the guy.
 
I've been toying with the idea of starting a thread for this guy, who makes a new edgy Sonic bot every day. That being said, he's got a good enough grasp on opsec not to link his chub account to anything else, or (according to my cursory search) reuse his username. I feel like there's an amazing well of milk just out of reach, I don't suppose any of you guys can find an easy lead that I missed?


View attachment 5836028
What an unsettling thing you've discovered. Have you interacted with any of these cards?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst
What an unsettling thing you've discovered. Have you interacted with any of these cards?
Haven't built up the nerve, I just keep seeing them. I'll try it if I can find a doxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Ether Being
I've been toying with the idea of starting a thread for this guy, who makes a new edgy Sonic bot every day. That being said, he's got a good enough grasp on opsec not to link his chub account to anything else, or (according to my cursory search) reuse his username. I feel like there's an amazing well of milk just out of reach, I don't suppose any of you guys can find an easy lead that I missed?


View attachment 5836028
He goes by BludHavenClaude on JanitorAI. He seems to be good at not reusing usernames, but he does reuse pictures a lot so reverse image searching is probably the trick to tracking him across sites.

edit- I think we've got a bingo. Searching for the Rawk Hawk bot brings us to CrushOnAi where it's under an account called Mada Dardeb, but the account itself has been purged. This name leads back to a Youtube channel, Pinterest (the Google+ account in the bio can be found on Wayback Machine but isn't worth linking, there's nothing on it), TikTok (with another username), Furaffinity post, and Amino Apps page. The TikTok username plus info on the Amino page IDs this as his Furaffinity account, which matches the earlier picture, and links to his Twitter.

Archive isn't cooperating right now.
 
Last edited:
I've been toying with the idea of starting a thread for this guy, who makes a new edgy Sonic bot every day. That being said, he's got a good enough grasp on opsec not to link his chub account to anything else, or (according to my cursory search) reuse his username. I feel like there's an amazing well of milk just out of reach, I don't suppose any of you guys can find an easy lead that I missed?

-
That is probably one of the most normal users you can find on that website. Keeps to himself, pushes out autistic cards at an autistic rate. I find the botmakers related to /aicg/, the statuo group and the discord-dwellers who have Patreons and Ko-Fi's to commission them (hand-rigged animations? What?) a lot more lulzworthy. I regularly go on chub to read random joke cards, profiles and comments, it's easy entertainment (the comments on malebots are unhinged).

There's also this guy. Projection levels off the charts.
 
I got to say, the people who mald most about generative AI being used for image creation and creative writing are artists/authors who I wouldn't want to view/read in the first place, much less pay for the privilege to do so. While generative AI has some serious issues -- low perplexity, limited context windows, annoying content moderation policies on the commercial ones -- there's very obviously a lot of potential to this stuff.
 
I got to say, the people who mald most about generative AI being used for image creation and creative writing are artists/authors who I wouldn't want to view/read in the first place, much less pay for the privilege to do so. While generative AI has some serious issues -- low perplexity, limited context windows, annoying content moderation policies on the commercial ones -- there's very obviously a lot of potential to this stuff.

ChatGPT's "writing" is fucking awful. It's good as a way to interrogate the net sum of what people have written on the internet, since that's what it's trained on, so it's useful to get a rapid "what would typical people think of X" response, but is no replacement for a beta reader.

For ""art"" it's literal shit from a butt and it only intimidates very, very, very bad artists, just like you say.

Any writing it does is very very fucking dry and has that certain dryness? to it. It sucks.

GPT-4o is WORSE than GPT-4 for actual complicated technical stuff, too, but that's going into giga-🧩 shit.

It's still fine for helping people with beginner programming stuff and config stuff, because it's basically just stack overflow with less autism.
 
ChatGPT's "writing" is fucking awful. It's good as a way to interrogate the net sum of what people have written on the internet, since that's what it's trained on, so it's useful to get a rapid "what would typical people think of X" response, but is no replacement for a beta reader.

For ""art"" it's literal shit from a butt and it only intimidates very, very, very bad artists, just like you say.

Any writing it does is very very fucking dry and has that certain dryness? to it. It sucks.

GPT-4o is WORSE than GPT-4 for actual complicated technical stuff, too, but that's going into giga-🧩 shit.

It's still fine for helping people with beginner programming stuff and config stuff, because it's basically just stack overflow with less autism.
The GPT series of LLMs in general are bad for creative writing because they were trained and designed with HR/PR departments and answering factual queries in mind. They weren't designed with creative writing in mind. To an extent, you can bypass this issue with careful prompting, but it's very plain that the models don't write very good prose unless you're very careful and in an odd way rather skilled.

I know this because I write TTRPG stuff, that people pay for, and I use it to help me write the more formulaic parts of the text, like when you need to crank through 30+ skills, writing about 2/3 of a page for each. Even then, you still need to edit the content in order for it to be readable. We're open about our use of AI for these purposes, by the way.

But the thing is, we're starting to move away from it not due to an ideological opposition to generative AI, but because what it tends to write for us, well, kinda sucks. We're going to experiment with Claude3 some more soon. I think the future of generative AI in general will be locally-run models like Stable Diffusion and Mistral-esque LLMs, because you can fine-tune them to produce what you want, and make it high quality by your own standards of what quality entails.

But as others say, it will never actually automate away humans. It will only automate away low-level drudgery. But for what it will automate away, it's good that it will.
 
LLMs cannot be creative. The way they work only allows derivative output as a function of their data. At most, you could have it copy someone's style if you had a lot of their style to train it on.

If it's just spitting out "copy" for formulaic things, that's probably fine. If there exists a way to concisely tell it a style to take, that might be useful if we discover it, but I don't know if it would really save time spent writing that you would have to spend editing it, as you have already had to do.

LLMs have a place as an "automated librarian", and it's certainly more pleasant to deal with than the drive-by autism of stack overflow.
 
The GPT series of LLMs in general are bad for creative writing because they were trained and designed with HR/PR departments and answering factual queries in mind. They weren't designed with creative writing in mind.
GPT-4 really likes using cliched metaphors and cannot write beige prose for the life of it
i have been shilling google gemini for the past few months because it is ten times better at writing descriptions and dialog than anything closedai has released
novelai's kayra is really good for a 13b model and can copy your style quite well, though you need to give it good input
 
novelai's kayra is really good for a 13b model and can copy your style quite well, though you need to give it good input
Are you using it to write fiction?
 
i have been shilling google gemini for the past few months because it is ten times better at writing descriptions and dialog than anything closedai has released
Is it the only decent part of the whole Gemini namesake? Didn't they wrap their image generator and search assistant under the brand?
 
Back