- Joined
- Jan 6, 2016
bra cup disconnectionI don't get what you're circling?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bra cup disconnectionI don't get what you're circling?
Wow, that's some sherlock detective shit right there.Anyone else notice her side of the Hyundai is tore up? This is the passenger side and looks to me like it's been hyperextended each time of her getting in and out. Which means she's pushing the door open wider than its meant to go.
The cow actually can't fit through the opening now.
View attachment 1017151
Edit: It just doesn't look like something crashed into it. I.e. scooty puff. It looks like the metal is being pushed in from the door being hyperextended and pushing against the side too much.
I wouldn't be surprised if AL got a shit ton of party platters from WalMart again. Hell, she may as well make stupid games and give out cash prizes again too. Just like Hallo's Eve. Oh! Maybe a turkey raffle?I'm interested so see what's going on with Thanksgiving this year.
At this point does it REALLY matter Amber? You were fat in June and you’re fat in November and you’ll be fat in January. We can all find a picture of you from June compared to now and find you look fatter. It’s called confirmation bias. Pronounced con-fur-may-shun bi-us. (Not comformaSHUN bee-ass, which is how I would imagine writerlynn would say it)
What the flying fuck does showing her face from June compared to now prove? Her legs are tree trunks. Her mons pubis looks like a gigantic sack of flour hanging down. She's so delusional. "Ummm actually, I'm maintaineen. I think I know my body situation better than anyone else."
Anyone want to make a wager that the bottle of pee-remover spray will be 'addressed' some time in the next vlog or so?
honestly can't keep up with the amount of times she's posted these "I'm done, people will believe whatever they want" posts. every time she tries to manipulate her viewers and it doesnt work she goes all pissbaby mode on social mediaView attachment 1018221
View attachment 1018222
Lol mmkay I’ll believe she’s losing weight when she posts a weigh in that says she’s down weight. And not like a measly 1.3lbs. Like a meaningful amount of weight. 30lbs or more.
View attachment 1018221
View attachment 1018222
Lol mmkay I’ll believe she’s losing weight when she posts a weigh in that says she’s down weight. And not like a measly 1.3lbs. Like a meaningful amount of weight. 30lbs or more.
They are after the channels that cater to children is how I understand it.I think I have found one thing that may threaten Amberlynn's channel.
COPPA.
That's right, COPPA. Not being bedbound, not bored viwers moving on, but fucking COPPA. A thing that has been going around within Youtube-dom for the past few days.
I might even make a thread on it.
She can't post an honest weigh in. She always has an excuse. I like to weigh myself with no pants on so I'll show you the ceiling. I don't want another weigh in unless she does it properly.Goddamn, Amber, it'd be a nice change of pace if you'd commit to something. Anything. This will last as long as optavia, leaving youtube, not discussing your weight in videos, vlogmas...the list could go on forever.
People don't believe things you say because you're a proven pathological liar. Want people off your back about your weight? Post a real weigh in showing that you're losing weight as you claim. It isn't rocket science, which is good, because you are surely not a rocket scientist.
She can't post an honest weigh in. She always has an excuse. I like to weigh myself with no pants on so I'll show you the ceiling. I don't want another weigh in unless she does it properly.
But that's the thing. Youtube will tag channels that show video game reviews, bright colors, certain words, animation, cooking, cartoon characters, toys, coloring, and a bunch more as 'for kids.' Creators can do this themselves of course, but if you don't, Youtube has bots and algorithms that will do this automatically. A creator can appeal this rating of course, but there is also what Youtube considers 'abuse' or 'violation' of this new criteria if you list you stuff as not for kids, but you still have stuff that looks 'appealing.' My sense of it is that a person could have XYZ, tag it as 'not for kids,' but because it has some cartoons or bright colors, could be considered as still appealing to kids and considered to be in violation and subject to review, loss of ads, or a fine by the FTC.They are after the channels that cater to children is how I understand it.