Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Trigger warning: skulls
image.jpg

That is what he's trying to reshape with this technique.
image.jpg


Have you consulted a doctor on this?
 
Gold has intrinsic value, since it's rare and you have to dig it up.
That's inherent scarcity and cost, not value. It's still just a shiny rock. Ultimately, the 'intrinsic' value of gold depends on a social construction that this shiny rock has value precisely because it's hard to dig up and our ancestors waged war over it (and it's a metal that is scarce but not too scarce and doesn't corrode and looks pretty, but whatever)

It would take us a lot of effort and time to use elephant shit as currency too. That doesn't make it valuable.
 
Maxillary reshaping in adults is accomplished with either extremely daunting (and to all accounts painful) prosthetic devices (Google "maxillary spacer") or surgery. Snorting fingercots isn't going to change the shape of bones.

Amid, are you confusing your maxillary structure with your nasal cartilage or your turbinates? Or do you not know how physics works (hint: rubber is way softer than bone).
 
If ancient societies did something, that means it probably works. Very recently in history, there has been a massive upheaval of traditional ways, but those traditional ways worked in a stable manner for a very long time.

So...basically you want everything to revert back to being an intense patriarchal society of the mostly Western variety, where women are expected to marry, pop out a few kids, stay at home, and nothing more. Right? This isn't a sexist jab, I'm legitimately asking if that's what you want.

You heard it here, folks. Human sacrifice, witch burning, slavery, and the worship of our kings as gods are all good ideas.

Before you can burn witches, you have to weigh them against a duck.

84123-Monty-Python-burn-the-witch-gi-EzMU.gif
 
So...basically you want everything to revert back to being an intense patriarchal society of the mostly Western variety, where women are expected to marry, pop out a few kids, stay at home, and nothing more. Right? This isn't a sexist jab, I'm legitimately asking if that's what you want.

Oh, no, he's shown over and over that he hates it when women exercise their autonomy. He blames "sluts" for perpetuating a culture of debauchery or some shit. It's really not a stretch to conclude that he sees the sacrifice of women's rights as an acceptable means to his nobilid, neanderthal end.
 
Oh, no, he's shown over and over that he hates it when women exercise their autonomy. He blames "sluts" for perpetuating a culture of debauchery or some shit. It's really not a stretch to conclude that he sees the sacrifice of women's rights as an acceptable means to his nobilid, neanderthal end.

FACT: Any time someone invents a religion they're always the chosen ones who are going to be favored and any time someone invents a pseudoscientific system of classification based on racist notions whatever they are is always the best. His lack of ability to understand things from any perspective but that of what he wants and getting it as easily as possible should not be much of a surprise.
 
1. Never heard of it, but I can infer what it means from the context. I'm still trying to decide whether my difficulty with Asian faces stems from this, or whether they really do all look the same. It's an interesting question. At any rate, I have been able to make some determinations about Asians. For example, I've found that the Tibetans have the most Neanderthal influence among Asians. I've also noticed that some Asians, like Li Ka-Shing, follow the same basic Inbred Psychopathic Bankid pattern.

2. Don't worry, I'll have a new blog with all kinds of information up and running before too long. I'll even include some data and citations where I can.

3. I am not familiar. Thanks for informing me.




Yeah, maybe so. I guess Tesla didn't need sex to be productive, according to legend. However, I do think that the average man has a strong desire for sex.
I've done a lot of research on Neanderthals and have never come across anything indicating that they practiced bestiality. I can't imagine how anyone could make such a determination based on fossil evidence.



That's not what I was referring to. I was referring to the mathematical methods used to sort the data once it's been collected, to see what genetic clusters form.



Okay, so what's wrong with barter systems?



I'm no expert on economics. Like I said, I got a C in high school economics class. Maybe in my society, I could appoint an economist to figure all that stuff out. The truth is that it's beyond me.



Don't worry about it. I'm happy to answer questions. I just don't like being insulted or having biases projected onto me (racist, sexist, etc.). I am alrgely ignoring such posts.

1. Yes, that sounds like a good idea.
2. Yes, I think dowries are probably a good idea too. If ancient societies did something, that means it probably works. Very recently in history, there has been a massive upheaval of traditional ways, but those traditional ways worked in a stable manner for a very long time.
3. It's more what they shouldn't find attractive that they do. Women are attracted to psychopathy, criminality, and upper facial flatness. This is dysgenic.
4. Yes, I think they should be lowered. I don't think there's anything wrong with teenage marriages. People got married at a younger age for most of history. It's only in the past few years that feminists decided to raise the age of consent because "muh pedophilia". What a joke. I don't know why we think we know better than time-honored traditions of our forefathers.
5. I don't like the idea of incest and it's not something I would rather participate in, or have my friends participate in. However, like I said, I recognize that it may be necessary in cases where there are no other options




I do think that.



I am not stretching out my nasal passages, nor am I attempting to enlarge my cranium. I am trying to untwist my maxilla for better functionality and facial aesthetics. My maxillary twisting is not caused by genetics, but by the environment, and thus it will have no effect on what I pass on to my kids.

God damn I wish I could rate this both dumb and autistic. You have trouble recognizing Asian faces, when one of your buddies tries to shield you, you contradict him and share an opinion that is extremely reprehensible and you sperg out even harder. @Holden at least you're entertaining here and there. This guy is just a fucking moron.
 
I am not stretching out my nasal passages, nor am I attempting to enlarge my cranium. I am trying to untwist my maxilla for better functionality and facial aesthetics. My maxillary twisting is not caused by genetics, but by the environment, and thus it will have no effect on what I pass on to my kids.
You're blowing finger cots up your nose to adjust the maxilla? What is this twisting you're talking about?
Please tell us more.
 
2. Yes, I think dowries are probably a good idea too. If ancient societies did something, that means it probably works. Very recently in history, there has been a massive upheaval of traditional ways, but those traditional ways worked in a stable manner for a very long time.
There wasn't a single line of descent of society though. Just many separate societies, each with their own traditional ways. And those societies went extinct, and were replaced by the next society to come along.

Every city is built on the ruins of a previous city.
 
Maxillary reshaping in adults is accomplished with either extremely daunting (and to all accounts painful) prosthetic devices (Google "maxillary spacer") or surgery. Snorting fingercots isn't going to change the shape of bones.

Amid, are you confusing your maxillary structure with your nasal cartilage or your turbinates? Or do you not know how physics works (hint: rubber is way softer than bone).
Considering he's already admitted to never really bothering to read anything...
2. I do not read a lot. Actually, I pretty much never read. I'd like to. Reading is one of those things that I know I should be doing, but never really get around to it.
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/amud-the-balloon-loon-loveshy-extraordinaire.8423/page-55#post-606519

Is it really surprising that he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about?

This is the reason why he's trying so damn hard to resist the urge to start outright calling women whores and anyone not white sub-human. He believes that if he can feign politeness people will be less willing to call him out on his bullshit.
 
That's inherent scarcity and cost, not value. It's still just a shiny rock. Ultimately, the 'intrinsic' value of gold depends on a social construction that this shiny rock has value precisely because it's hard to dig up and our ancestors waged war over it (and it's a metal that is scarce but not too scarce and doesn't corrode and looks pretty, but whatever)

It would take us a lot of effort and time to use elephant shit as currency too. That doesn't make it valuable.
Well, gold's useful for conducting electricity well and being malleable enough to shape easily, but it's not like that's why we use it for money.

Theoretically I do like the idea of something more solid being used to back the value of paper money, since paper is easier to print more of and has much less inherent worth in terms of actual materials and effort, but - paper money is valuable because people believe it is valuable, and gold is also valuable because people believe it is valuable.
 
The problem with backing your shit with something that has legitimate use -- such as, say, drinkable water -- is that it gets used up on a regular basis. Gold worked because people thought it was valuable but it also held no practical utility. If it can be used, it will be used so you constantly need to replenish reserves as they are consumed.
 
Well, gold's useful for conducting electricity well and being malleable enough to shape easily, but it's not like that's why we use it for money.

Theoretically I do like the idea of something more solid being used to back the value of paper money, since paper is easier to print more of and has much less inherent worth in terms of actual materials and effort, but - paper money is valuable because people believe it is valuable, and gold is also valuable because people believe it is valuable.

The major obstacle that people raging against fiat currency face is one in adapting it to the current economy. At current market value, there is not enough gold in the entire world to back even the American economy, let alone the combined product of the entire world. The whole economy would have to shrink back to 19th century levels of prosperity, which is an obviously undesirable outcome.

The other problem of currencies backed by gold or other metals is their inconvenience. Try going to a supermarket with a satchel of gold coins, let alone buying a car or a home. In this age of electronic banking, the entire world's supply of gold would merely sit in vaults for eternity while electronic exchanges of wealth would proceed more or less the way they do now... So what's the point?
 
For every society that traditionally had dowries, I can show you a society that traditionally had bride-prices (where the intended groom pays the intended bride's family). Societies have been both patrilocal and matrilocal, both patrilineal and matrilineal. There are societies where the two people most responsible for raising a child are its biological mother and her eldest brother, and the biological father isn't any more in the picture than uncles usually are in Europe. There are societies where the two people most responsible for raising a child are its putative biological father and his mother.

Humans will find different ways to do almost anything, and will believe that their way is the best and that the other ways are inferior.
 
What is it with cows who want the government help them get girlfriends? It's really common and a lot of them don't seem to like liberal policies either. I can't think of a bigger entitlement program than government sponsored prostitution/waifu rings.
Wouldn't you want your tax money to go towards getting some lonely, sexist man like Amud a girlfriend/wife?
 
Back