Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Status
Not open for further replies.
syac_sexistshitb_by_tompreston-d6m2m44.jpg

*Vomits everywhere*
It's sexist because that tiny top does not cover hugely inflated boobs. ;)
 
bummed-out.jpg


He also can't spell tequila.

What was his thought process for designing these characters?

aw fuck yeah im gonna only outline movement lines in black along with eyes and one girls mouth and everything's gonna be dull colors except for the pale gay chicks mohawk and lips whichll put the emphasis in all the wrong right places and then ill save it as jpg a few times so if anyone calls me out on why it looks like shit ill blame the image compression or something

damn you andy youre one smart motherfucker
 
What was his thought process for designing these characters?

aw fuck yeah im gonna only outline movement lines in black along with eyes and one girls mouth and everything's gonna be dull colors except for the pale gay chicks mohawk and lips whichll put the emphasis in all the wrong right places and then ill save it as jpg a few times so if anyone calls me out on why it looks like shit ill blame the image compression or something

damn you andy youre one smart motherfucker
It looks like he tried to do textures but really fucked it up
 
I'm not sure who's worse. Blue bear or depressed lesbian chick that has no real purpose in the comic and is basically blue bear without the whole PARAGON OF FEMINISM crap.

EDIT: No, seriously. This was her introduction.
syac_giveup_by_tompreston-d7n71kg.jpg

No reason whatsoever. Just because.
 
I'm not sure who's worse. Blue bear or depressed lesbian chick that has no real purpose in the comic and is basically blue bear without the whole PARAGON OF FEMINISM crap.

EDIT: No, seriously. This was her introduction.
syac_giveup_by_tompreston-d7n71kg.jpg

No reason whatsoever. Just because.
God, that face in the third panel is just awful to look at. It's like he has no idea how to draw expressions that aren't forced and repulsive.

Edit: Dobson just messaged me back on DA over his completely wrong information on The Thief and The Cobbler.
 
I'm not sure who's worse. Blue bear or depressed lesbian chick that has no real purpose in the comic and is basically blue bear without the whole PARAGON OF FEMINISM crap.

EDIT: No, seriously. This was her introduction.
syac_giveup_by_tompreston-d7n71kg.jpg

No reason whatsoever. Just because.

Can't we just agree that they both suck like Preston's career?
 
I must confess. I thought the brown-haired chick was the school-aged daughter of the mohawk chick. And it really bugs me that he colors the all the character lineart except for the eyes and mouths. I can understand if you leave the top part of the eyes black in order to suggest eyelashes, but not the whole damn thing. And there is no excuse for the mouths. It looks awful.
 
God, that face in the third panel is just awful to look at. It's like he has no idea how to draw expressions that aren't forced and repulsive.

Edit: Dobson just messaged me back on DA over his completely wrong information on The Thief and The Cobbler.
What did Dobson say about his completely wrong information on The Thief and The Cobbler? Also, is it wrong if I said the expression in that third panel kinda looks like he made his fursona or whatever he calls it a bit older or something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96
What did Dobson say about his completely wrong information on The Thief and The Cobbler? Also, is it wrong if I said the expression in that third panel kinda looks like he made his fursona or whatever he calls it a bit older or something?
No not really, I kinda got that feeling too. Then again, it's probably just the shit art.
 
What did Dobson say about his completely wrong information on The Thief and The Cobbler? Also, is it wrong if I said the expression in that third panel kinda looks like he made his fursona or whatever he calls it a bit older or something?

He said that it was partially an Aladdin ripoff. Even though TTATC was made DECADES before Aladdin was even in pre-production. It only became an Aladdin ripoff after Miramax got their hands on it in the 90's. The Original workprint and the Recobbled Cut are in no way ripoffs.

After I corrected him on this......he just told me that it was still kinda a ripoff.

That was his explanation.

Yeah, I guess it's a minor thing, but it still wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randall Fragg
The funny part is how Dobson's PARAGON OF FEMINISM comics usually revolve around Dobbles saving a damsel in distress from EVIL RAPIST MEN.

I am firmly convinced that Dobson is two or three bad experiences with women away from becoming Michael O'Connell, because everything he does in his "Women's Issues" screeds absolutely reeks of "Nice Guy."

But I've never taken him seriously in that regard, given his... Past portrayals of women.

*cough* http://alexzepirate.com/art/dumb-men.jpg *cough*

Seriously, that comic pisses me off beyond anything else he's ever made. Two half-naked women beating up a guy with a stupid grin on his face? What's that I smell? Certainly not fetishization.

No sir.

The Champion of Women's Rights. We'd all best listen to him about how we need to "Stop doing sexist crap."

Oh, also, this new character. So we've moved from Andrew Dobson to Andrew Dobson as a bear, to Andrew Dobson as a lesbian woman.

I loved that bit about "The worst part" yeah, it's not more talented people's duty to care that you are upset that you are not as talented as them, Dobs. Get in touch with reality. Kaythanx.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back