- Joined
- Jan 29, 2022
Sure, whatever you say.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, whatever you say.
No, whatever YOU say, stalker.Sure, whatever you say.
Except that's not when it's completely finished. Brain development obviously isn't finished, but things like full adult height, pelvis width, and body fat content arent completely finished developing til around mid-20s. It's a common myth that female puberty ends at menarche though, so I'm not surprised it made it to Wikipedia.That's not what I said and you know that. That was disingenuous and a false equivalency, and you know it.
You wanted the age puberty ends. I gave it to you.
What does milimeters of height and pelvis width and slight changes in fat distribution have to do with sex?things like full adult height, pelvis width, and body fat content are completely finished developing til around mid-20s.
I must have missed the part where only faggots are allowed to post here. My apologies for interrupting your utterly asinine, dumbfuck, moronic, dipshit, fuckheaded attempts to formulate coherent sentences.No, whatever YOU say, stalker.
A lot when it comes to something as dangerous as pregnancy and giving birth. Brain development has everything to do with ability to consent to sex. A 15 year old cannot consent to sex with an adult.What does milimeters of height and pelvis width and slight changes in fat distribution have to do with sex?
What Hitler says about how the jews will argue and argue with you while never ever admitting fault and always finding a way to act two faced and try to come out on top is pretty much spot on for how you are behaving right now. You ignore everything inconvenient to the partisan and tainted position that you arrived at because you're too low IQ to understand the finer points of argumentation and you were "abused" so this gives you permission and authority to act like a retard. Meanwhile Hitler formed his worldview by actually interacting with jews and much of what he says about the "internationale clique" still applies today because his argumentation is grounded in reality and extremely persuasive. There actually are gigantic global banking cabals that want to control everything. Example A: Joshua Conner Moon is not allowed to have a bank account because Visa and Mastercard control digital transactions. The banks they interact with are deputized by the federal government, and the government is lobbied to by gigantic organizations that are funded by the likes of Soros.Shit, Mein Kampf has value as probably the most infamous criminal manifesto in history. It's impossible to study Hitler and try to learn about his psychology without Mein Kampf. The views exposed are abhorrent, but it's incredibly important from a historical and psychological standpoint.
I can only fucking pray that you actually read and internalized the rest of my post instead of responding to the only part of it you comprehended.If he had CP, why was that not enough to convict him? CP has been illegal since the early 80s at the latest. Seems like the real shit alone would be more than enough to put you away for a while (as it should be)
according to this 60,000 marriages in the US since 2000 have involved an age difference that would otherwise be a sex crime and the youngest bride the advocate interviewed has seen was 10.
Another issue with legal child marriage is that it's a loophole that makes statutory rape legal in many states. The article also discusses other legal issues, like the difficulty children have divorcing or even getting into domestic violence shelters in some cases.
They should be focusing on the last two sets of states/people, and the specifics of the laws in the 23 states with a 16 floor. They advocate 0 marriage under 18. Can respect, but makes it less compelling, even though it bumps up the numbers.According to Unchained data, 10 states have a minimum marrying age of 17; 23 states have a minimum age of 16; two states have a minimum age of 15; and five states don’t have a minimum age specified at all.
So worldwide, daily, there are 2/3 the number of all "child marriages" in the US in 18 years (using the 60k stat).Between 2011 and 2020, more than 140 million girls will become child brides, according to United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
If current levels of child marriages hold, 14.2 million girls annually or 39,000 daily will marry too young.
Furthermore, of the 140 million girls who will marry before the age of 18, 50 million will be under the age of 15.
Yes. You have more rights, legal agency, at 18, regardless of your personal immaturity or lack. That means you have more power to take care of yourself. Important especially if in a bad situation.“We’re not arguing that you wake up on your 18th birthday with a newfound wisdom and maturity and the ability to choose a life partner,” Reiss said. “It’s about legal capacity: you wake up on your 18th birthday with legal rights of adulthood.”
You really think gay men are marrying minors? Take a look at the states with low/no age restrictions and highest rates of minor marriages. They don't strike me as particularly gay-friendly. Your challenge about assumptions is a fair question in the abstract, but on the very specific point of full adults marrying much younger minors (and if you read the above you'll see I challenge raptors articles stats/position and brought info about actual ages involved and at what rates - and it's mostly 17 yo minors and mostly 18-20 yo adults, though stats show maybe 30 marriages a year 2000-2015 of men 40+ marrying a minor, and 65-70 marriages/year to minors under 15, so it does happen), it should be easy enough to acknowledge that it's not mainstream activity , and that practitioners - again, check states - are more likely to be conservative religioussect folks than flaming LGBT. No doubt that's happened, too, but come on.Maybe, just maybe, there's not actually a big problem with predatory conservatives and it's actually liberals, especially LGBT men, and that whenever you hear about gang raped toddlers there's a good reason straight white Christian men don't come to mind for most people.
Equating 15 year olds, 17 year olds, and at this point 20 year olds again.A lot when it comes to something as dangerous as pregnancy and giving birth. Brain development has everything to do with ability to consent to sex. A 15 year old cannot consent to sex with an adult.
Maternal mortality is still one of the leading killers worldwide of 15-19 year old girls for a reason.
The 60,000 figure is specifically child marriages with an age gap that would otherwise be criminal (since statuatory rape is legal in many states if the child is married to the person raping them). So even if it's minor-minor, it's a big enough gap to go beyond what would be legal under Romeo and Juliet laws.So I dug a little deeper to the source info, and it's about 14% minor-minor marriage. http://apps.frontline.org/child-marriage-by-the-numbers/
So 60000 becomes 51600, over 18 years.
Do you think 15 year-olds can consent to sex with adults?Equating 15 year olds, 17 year olds, and at this point 20 year olds again.
Adding "middle schoolers don't ever die in childbirth" to the list of shit I never said.
You are a disingenuous cunt.
You cite vague, stretched information and allege I said things I didn't.The 60,000 figure is specifically child marriages with an age gap that would otherwise be criminal. So even if it's minor-minor, it's a big enough gap to go beyond what would be legal under Romeo and Juliet laws.
Personally I think one child marriage is one too many.
Do you think 15 year-olds can consent to sex with adults?
You call this "debating"? You are without a doubt the stupidest retard sped in the history of stupid retard speds. Put down the fucking crack pipe and go back to middle school you diseased afterbirth.You are a disingenuous cunt.
So you won't say directly whether or not you think a 15 year old can consent to sex with an adult, got it.You cite vague, stretched information and allege I said things I didn't.
I'm not even going to respond to that. A 15 year old is not a 17 year old, and neither are 20.
I'm not the one defending child porn. I'm also not arguing the developmental difference between a 15 year old and 20 year old is insignificant.So you won't say directly whether or not you think a 15 year old can consent to sex with an adult, got it.
Totally not suspicious whatsoever.
No, you are, stalker.You call this "debating"? You are without a doubt the stupidest retard sped in the history of stupid retard speds. Put down the fucking crack pipe and go back to middle school you diseased afterbirth.
Good think I never said any of that either!I'm not the one defending child porn. I'm also not arguing the developmental difference between a 15 year old and 20 year old is insignificant.
Good think I never said that either!
I can only assume your position on child rape is that your cool with it.
TLDR you think banning cartoon child porn is the same as arresting me for saying nigger.Books like Lolita that aren't meant for any sexual gratification (the polar opposite, in fact) have been challenged since its publication and banning lolicon could open the door to banning works like Lolita that deal with CSA in any capacity. It's pretty much the same issue as banning hate speech.
If it's a cartoon, it's not child porn. Doesn't mean it's not still nasty AF or that I want it anywhere near me, but you cannot compare horrific abuse of real children to gross cartoons and its an insult to victims of CP to do so.TLDR you think banning cartoon child porn is the same as arresting me for saying nigger.
New Tonight: Braindead Dyke Cannot ReadIf it's a cartoon, it's not child porn. Doesn't mean it's not still nasty AF or that I want it anywhere near me, but you cannot compare horrific abuse of real children to gross cartoons and its an insult to victims of CP to do so.
I also said I think it's comparable to banning a novel that's been linked to the murders of 200+ people and has already been banned in several countries. Not you saying no-no words.
Not you saying no-no words.
It's pretty much the same issue as banning hate speech.
Then go tell victims of CSA you think the horrific abuse that will haunt them for the rest of their lives is the exact same thing as someone drawing gross cartoonsYour additional (bad) comparisons don't negate my point.
By the way cartoon pornography depicting children is cartoon child porn. It's kind of implied.
Your complete inability to formulate a coherent debate position at even a 6th grade level without resorting to ad hominems is absolute proof that you're a useless fucktard.Your additional (bad) comparisons don't negate my point.