But there is a comparison to a novel that features fags and all other minorities brutally murdered.
Your argument is that written fiction about killing fags is as bad as pornographic drawn imagery of children, which may also include explicit violence?
It's hard to even imagine, but there's a hentai genre called gore, and I'm sure some sick fuck out there has combined it with loli. You think that imagery is equal to some dry text about killing fags? Seriously? And that should be protected...?
Except that's not quite the case. I'm sure there are people chomping at the bit to ban Berserk. Works like that have been banned in the past.
If anyone wants to ban Berserk then it's probably over other factors, not his backstory of abuse. Anyway, I doubt an impartial judge would not see the difference.
Also, what works like that have been banned? None to my knowledge.
Yet people like you are still aware of who he is and what he did, and just how common people like him are in conservative religious communities.
Source? It's extremely uncommon amongst conservative Christians, but it's quite common among libtards, especially LGBT, like the 7 shitskin libtard fags who raped toddlers that you ignored.
There probably weren't even 7 such marriages to kids in the last year, yet fags did
much worse than marriage to kids
much younger, all in one day.
And you can say the exact same thing about the Turner Diaries, especially since it's just as connected to real world crime as lolicon is. Including some of the most infamous terror attacks of the past 40 years.
How is Turner Diaries connected to real world crimes, that's like saying Doom was connected to Colombine, which I said earlier but you ignored.
I'm OK with obscenity being banned, but the US judicial system tends to permit "freedom of expression" with a broad brush in rhe defence of First Amendment principles. I agree with you in principal. In practice, you have to look at countries that actually ban shit to see what a mess it makes and what it goes hand in hand with. Look at the UK, Dubai, Australia, the UAE
EDIT: and Canuckistan as AR pointed out^^, fuck that shithole.
I understand free speech principles are important, but there does need to be a limit. In certain times and places we restrict certain speech already, it's not absolute.
As one of many examples, swearing at a judge in a courtroom can result in contempt of court, your speech is literally limited. If you can't even tell a judge he's a retard then I don't see why loli can't be restricted. We should just bring back common sense.
Loli isn't actual CP, so banning it sets a very problematic precedent.
Of course, it's orders of magnitude less bad, I've never suggested otherwise, but as a society we still have an
obligation to ban and condemn it.
You really think gay men are marrying minors?
No, I think they're more predatory in general, not marrying specifically.
Do you think 15 year-olds can consent to sex with adults?
They can't even consent with other minors. There was some stat from the UK that minors there commit 18 rapes per day or something crazy like that, and they were certainly only counting minors forcing themselves upon others, otherwise those already high numbers would be much higher.
It's bad enough the terms like grooming and gaslighting basically mean nothing at this point.
Grooming still means exactly what it meant, you just don't like people calling out drag queens for grooming toddlers.
But if they're completely post-pubescent, why is pregnancy and giving birth riskier for them than women in their 20s?
I'm not a biologist, but I'd assume it's because growth continues, not puberty specifically, but I'm just assuming.