@Android Raptor Hate Thread

exact same thing
Wordplay, false equivalency, etc. Nobody said "exact same thing", but what do you call a cartoon of children being molested?

Grasp at straws, cry when wrong. I await your fated "mental illness" or "parental abuse" cop out.

Your complete inability to formulate a coherent debate position at even a 6th grade level without resorting to ad hominems is absolute proof that you're a useless fucktard.
Seething, malding even.
 
Wordplay, false equivalency, etc. Nobody said "exact same thing", but what do you call a cartoon of children being molested?
Disgusting, but not the same thing as actual child abuse.

CP= abuse of real children. Using the term for other things takes away from the severity of CSA and CSAM.
 

child pornography​


noun
  1. pornography using a child or children as the subject.

We're at the stage of looking stuff up in the dictionary.


Get a job.
A child. Not a cartoon. An actual child.

CP/CSAM doesn't need to get abused and watered down the same way as terms like groomer. We can talk about lolicon being disgusting without using terms meant to describe real child abuse.

Especially since there are dumb kids on twitter/etc calling teens writing/drawing terrible smut of teen characters from the Macadamia anime CP/CSAM.
 
Clearly absent from this definition is the term "cartoon child" or "drawing of children," you stupid, stupid fuck.

But hey - I agree with you the Loli should be banned. Now what, cocksucker?
A child. Not a cartoon. An actual child.
Child as subject.

Pornography of any kind that sexually depicts children in it does not meet the standards of literary value to exempt it from ban.

It is considered a form of child pornography.

I never said it was CSA, I said it was a form of child pornography.

You are coping.

You are seething.
 
Child as subject.

Pornography of any kind that sexually depicts children in it does not meet the standards of literary value to exempt it from ban.

It is considered a form of child pornography.

I never said it was CSA, I said it was a form of child pornography.

You are coping.

You are seething.
I am going to repeat myself, because it bears repeating:
I agree with you that Loli should be banned.
Now what, cocksucker?
 
Child porn=CSA. Not some 15 year-olds terrible fanfic about Deku giving Bakugo the buttsex or w/e.
15 year olds generally don't sell highly detailed illustrations of toddlers being molested.

Bitch really flips the fuck out because of her daddy issues.

Oh, OK then. Go fuck yourself with a tire iron.
We're at 10.
 
15 year olds generally don't sell highly detailed illustrations of toddlers being molested.
You must not have spent much time on tumblr.

Drawings of toddlers being molested are appalling, but they aren't abuse of real children. Again, don't water down terms meant specifically to describe actual child abuse any more than they already are. It's bad enough the terms like grooming and gaslighting basically mean nothing at this point.
 
You must not have spent much time on time.

Drawings of toddlers being molested are appalling, but they aren't abuse of real children. Again, don't water down terms meant specifically to describe actual child abuse any more than they already are. It's bad enough the terms like grooming and gaslighting basically mean nothing at this point.
For the last page you've stooped to tricking me into debating definitions. If nothing else you're good at deflection.

On the previous few pages, you asked when puberty stopped, I gave the science on it. Then you grabbed the lowest number and ran with it.

You cited no statistics on maternal mortality specifically of post-pubescent 15 year olds, and then accused me of supporting child rape.
You think a 15 year old girl is the same as an adult woman?
Do you think 15 year-olds can consent to sex with adults?
So you won't say directly whether or not you think a 15 year old can consent to sex with an adult, got it.

Totally not suspicious whatsoever.

You're still an asshole and you suck at actual debating.
Learn when I'm trolling you.
 
For the last page you've stooped to tricking me into debating definitions. If nothing else you're good at deflection.

On the previous few pages, you asked when puberty stopped, I gave the science on it. Then you grabbed the lowest number and ran with it.

You cited no statistics on maternal mortality specifically of post-pubescent 15 year olds, and indirectly accused me of supporting making 15 the age of consent.
here you go!

If 15 year-olds are post-pubescent, are they adults?
 
Back