I'm reading this as "if you're sick or old then that's just tough luck if you die". Every doctor in the country, or even just any person with a relative or friend fitting those criteria, would have a very different opinion.
Like the author of the Substack article I originally responded to, you sound bitter that the argument moved on in light of new data - that's generally what happens in science since it's an evolving process. It's funny watching the people who claimed to be the true and honest arbiters of how the scientific method really works now squirming when witnessing that very method working before their eyes.
Yes, there were idiots promising all sorts of crazy things like how the vax makes you immune to catching the virus or how it can stop transmission (it does reduce it, but in the words of Wings "does not fucking stop it"). Uninformed / unrealistically optimistic libs from 2021 are living in your head rent free and all I can recommend is to get over it.
They get weaker and less deadly yes, but the data still shows that the vaccines confer some protection for the milder strains too (albeit reduced protection compared to the older strains). Another booster is needed to bring the protection more in line with previous strains.
But oh, I forgot - boosters bad and their necessity proves that the vaccine didn't work! In regards to needing a booster, I don't know why it's so difficult for people to accept that 1) antibodies wane over time and 2) viruses mutating also allows them to evade previous immunity, and so to address both problems you will need some sort of top up. Apparently acknowledging this lack of permanence and proposing a solution means you are "moving the goalposts".
It's really not unlike the flu booster old people get every year. Somehow those old people were sensible enough to realize that the strain that season was different and so the previous year's booster would no longer cut it.
"Gender retardation has infiltrated its way into some journals for a handful of unrelated topics, better abandon the entire peer review process"
1. Read it however you want to, but "reducing' symptoms for a tiny minority of the population is not justification for forcing a significantly larger population to undergo gene therapy shots which we haven't even had time to study the full extent of side effects yet. And because of so many retards shouting "but tHe ScIeNcE!" any studies that do point out the flaws in Jabfest such as the Israeli studies showing boosters actually
reducing immunity in some cases after the fourth shot, quickly get shouted down and buried. Call it natural selection, call it cruelty, but I'm not willing to take an ineffective shot with no examination of risk just because some other dumb fucks 92 year old fatass chain smoking mammy can go on gumming her apples another day.
2. No, the scientific process does not involve "welp this is it, only our word goes, no challenging." Nor does it involve "well everything we said so far was wrong but you stupid plebs should just trust us that we are still right when we update what we said that was wrong" when they
don't provide any actual correction. The rates for the jab haven't went up significantly at all in quite some time and yet covid is becoming less and less prevalent, less and less a threat, and fewer people are dying from it. That doesn't exactly shout "the jab caused covid to go away" when the vax rates in many places have remained fairly consistent independent of varying waves of coof hitting. Some places which went gigavaxxed are still getting hit, some which have large unvaxxed pops haven't been hit much at all.
3. Refer to earlier argument. The shitlibs and vax shills aren't doing "the scientific method" they're throwing shit at a bar room dartboard and then when they miss they're blaming the guy 20 feet away not even playing darts and throwing another dart hoping for a hit. Science must produce
results and to produce results
things must be studied repeatedly. Get back to me in a few years when the actual data is out which isn't just a collection of snippets from a Pfizer brochure that got disseminated word for word through a variety of journo articles.
4. The rest of your post can be addressed more or less with this - stop putting your faith in people who consistently show you that they don't deserve it. Its peak retardation to actually believe that the same people who shill castration drugs and genital mutilation to children as "science" wouldn't also tell you and the other impressionable niggercattle to line up to take a shot of limited efficacy or you're un-personed and undeserving of basic rights.
You wanna call me bitter? Lol have a wakeup call nigger, I am bitter but my anger is directed toward the people who know better who are pushing this shit. Meanwhile the jab crowd openly wishes death and suffering on everyone unvaxxed on plebbit and twatter even though, as even you have acknowledged, the jab doesn't do much at all to reduce transmission. That's like sperging out because someone cheated in a game of solitaire. A bunch of perpetually MATI retards out there would see people like me hauled into concentration camps because I'm unwilling to inject myself with something I distrust, and I'm bitter for sperging at the people who advocate it and brainwashed the mobs into such an attitude
, correct?